Emergency IE update patches 10 critical security holes

Summary: The critical MS08-018 update patches security holes that could lead to code execution attacks on all versions of Microsoft's flagship browser, including the newest Internet Explorer 8.

Microsoft today shipped a cumulative Internet Explorer update with patches for 10 security holes, including a drive-by download vulnerability that's already being used in malware attacks.

The critical MS08-018 update patches security holes that could lead to code execution attacks on all versions of Microsoft's flagship browser, including the newest Internet Explorer 8.

From the bulletin:

The most severe vulnerabilities could allow remote code execution if a user views a specially crafted Web page using Internet Explorer. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights.

follow Ryan Naraine on twitter

The patch comes a full three weeks after the appearance of targeted drive-by download attacks that dropped a backdoor on a hijacked Windows computer.

The backdoor allowed an attacker to perform various functions on the compromised system, including uploading and downloading files, executing files, and terminating running processes.

[ SEE: New Microsoft IE zero-day flaw under attack ]

This chart from the MSRC blog provides a simplified view of the ten vulnerabilities and their aggregate severity on Internet Explorer 6, 7, and 8:

* CVE-2010-0806 vulnerability under active attack.

Topics: Security, Browser, Microsoft

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

71 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Wow

    14 MB on Win7. That was a pretty big update.
    Galactica Actual
    • That's right. The 'wow' begins now.

      nt
      Dietrich T. Schmitz, Linux Advocate
    • 9.6MB on Windows XP SP3. nt

      .
      ye
  • Are limited rights users effected?

    And if they are, does the vulnerability allow for privilege escalation?
    JoeMama_z
    • Limited rights users are affected.

      However the code executed would be limited to the rights they have. In addition Protected Mode would further limit what the exploit would be able to do.

      As for privilege escalation these vulnerabilities do not appear to permit that. However a blended attack using a vulnerability that does may open the door.
      ye
  • Am I imagining things or did 50 comments just disappear into thin air again

    [b] [/b]
    AzuMao
    • No

      The mods were here.
      The one and only, Cylon Centurion
      • And we thank you, oh gracious mods.

        Not having to wade through the minefield of 'OS wars' was like a breath of fresh spring air.
        rhuston@...
        • Really? Are they deleting non-relevant posts?

          So ZDNet is now trashing off-topic posts? Really truly? If so.... bravo!
          shawkins
      • Man, I was hoping to read all about

        M$ and Linux and Windoze and how one was the savior of the world, and the other, depending on your point of view, was a POS.

        Now I have to read discussion about the actual article...
        TranMan
    • Its the magic of Microsoft's gift to ZDNet

      Bless you child. The curse of open source cannot touch you, insulated as you are by the monopoly.
      Ole Man
  • I only use IE for windows update.

    Mainly because windows update doesn't support any other browser.
    monkeyman1140@...
    • Actually...

      ...on Vista and Win7, Windows Update requires no browser at all.
      mechBgon
      • True, but it still only updates Internet Explorer.

        The problems with Windows. Everything needs updated one at a time, separately.
        AzuMao
        • It updates other things as well

          I don't understand what you are trying to say...?
          The one and only, Cylon Centurion
          • Oh and Outlook. Whoopy.

            I prefer an OS where everything is kept up-to-date from a single location automatically, thanks.

            Having to browse from random website A to random website B updating stuff just isn't fun.
            AzuMao
          • I like...

            Secunia PSI and FileHippo update checker. I only have three places to go.

            However, which do you prefer RPM, or is there a more modern package manager?
            JCitizen
          • Secunia PSI won't update anything, it just lets you know when..

            ..security updates that they have (manually (read; it takes a while for the list to be updated)) deemed important exist, and only for certain products, and isn't officially supported by Microsoft.

            Same with FileHippo, minus the "only security updates part".

            Synaptic is a nice GUI for apt that's officially supported by most distros, and will keep [i]everything[/i] (even Linux itself) up-to-date, automatically.
            It also lets you install/uninstall everything from a nice, central location, with all packages cryptographically signed.
            AzuMao
          • That is pretty much...

            what I thought you were getting at this whole time.

            apt get ... I hear that is close to the appropriate prefix, though my punctuation is atrocious on any FOSS solution.
            JCitizen
        • That is not correct, AzuMao

          The stock Windows Update engine updates Windows and the components it came with, which includes IE and a lot of other stuff such as Windows Media Player, WordPad, Paint, etc.

          I suggest upgrading to the full Microsoft Update engine, however. On Vista and 7, there's a checkbox to do that. [u]Microsoft[/u] Update can update additional MS software such as Office, Silverlight, Network Monitor, etc.

          Going back to monkeyman1140's comment, I think he might've been implying that he doesn't need to keep IE updated since he personally uses it only for Windows Update. But it's best from a security standpoint to keep IE up-to-date whether [u]you[/u] use it or not, so that if something tries to exploit it, you've got the most exploit-resistant version, which is definitely IE8 thanks to its dedicated DEP, SmartScreen and ActiveX opt-in-only behavior.
          mechBgon