ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

German ministers advised to dump BlackBerry for security reasons

By | August 10, 2010, 6:44am PDT

Summary: Citing the potential for “political IT attacks”, Germany’s Interior Minister is advising ministers to dump the BlackBerry, and replace it with BSI-certified SiMKo 2 smart phones.

Citing the potential for “political IT attacks”, following the ongoing bargaining between RIM and Middle East countries on improving lawful surveillance, Germany’s Interior Minister is advising ministers to dump the BlackBerry, and replace it with BSI-certified SiMKo 2 smart phones.

What’s so special about the SiMKo 2 device from a security perspective?

First introduced in 2009’s CeBIT, the smart phone is exclusively marketed to government agencies, and has been recommended by the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), for handling Classified – for official use only (VS-NfD security level) data. Following its release, the device was quickly adopted by German ministers, clearly not to extend as recommended for the country’s Interior Minister:

BlackBerry’s infrastructure is a company-owned closed system. But the access standard must be capable of being set by the government and not by a private company.

From data encryption, standard S/MIME, digital identities through certificates (microSD based hardware tokens), VPN tunneling, what’s particularly interesting about the device is that, T-Systems have labeled the camera, bluetooth, GPS and WLAN as potentially unsafe, and has consequently deactivated the interfaces. With all interfaces other than GSM, EDGE and UMTS disabled, and VPN tunneling enforced by default for EDGE and UMTS data transfers, the device clearly aims to offer secure end-to-end data transfers.

Go through related resources on BlackBerry’s security features:

In 2007, the French cabinet issued a similar ban citing a two-year confidential study into the security of BlackBerry devices. Earlier this year, the French cabinet found an alternative solution, and adopted the TEOREM phone. U.S President Barack Obama, also faced a similar situation when he wanted to keep his BlackBerry, but was given a Sectera Edge device.

What the three devices currently share, though, is a ubiquitous flaw which no OS-hardening process — unless it kills the core functionality of the device in the face of communication — can protect against - the end user.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dancho Danchev is an independent security consultant and cyber threats analyst, with extensive experience in open source intelligence gathering, malware and cybercrime incident response.

Disclosure

Dancho Danchev

More details on Dancho Danchev's current and past professional affiliations, can be found in his LinkedIn profile.

Biography

Dancho Danchev

Dancho Danchev is an independent security consultant and cyber threats analyst, with extensive experience in open source intelligence gathering, and cybercrime incident response. He's been an active security blogger since 2007, and maintains a popular security blog sharing real-time threats intelligence data with the rest of the community on a daily basis. More details on Dancho Danchev's current and past professional affiliations, can be found in his LinkedIn profile. You can also follow him on Twitter

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
14
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

implement approved devices
flodev305 11th Oct
@rsavage@... If the risk is to national security then why are Ministers and Civil servants using these devices for official business in the first place, surely only approved devices should be used Telpu uzkop??ana.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow
Economister 10th Aug 2010
All I have heard in the last while is that countries want to ban BlackBerry's because they are TOO secure. wink
Poor RIM. First BlackBerries are too secure, now they're not secure enough. What do people want from them?
0 Votes
+ -
@OmegaWolf747

nt
@OmegaWolf747
Business needs the communications to be secure so as to protect their IP. Government, on the other hand, need to spy on their people and their communications / data sharing... etc... There is no fine line for a manufacturer to walk - and Government knows it.
Think about it. Anything that the Arabian governments have access to, usually ends up in the hands of terrorists.

RIM should had just given up on business in the middle east instead of caving in and opening a Pandora's box.
The reason why Blackberries aren't secure enough is because if a government wants to devote the resources to do so, they can hack in. The problem that causes places like the UAE to ban them is because it's too hard for police or state security forces to monitor transmissions at will.

All this reveals one very disturbing infringement on personal freedoms; governments spy on their own people way more than people know, and way more than they are legally allowed.
0 Votes
+ -
Obama's Blackberry
rsavage@... 10th Aug 2010
Didn't Obama keep his Blackberry in the end?

Didn't Hillary Clinton just speak out in support of Blackberry security?
0 Votes
+ -
implement approved devices
flodev305 11th Oct
@rsavage@... If the risk is to national security then why are Ministers and Civil servants using these devices for official business in the first place, surely only approved devices should be used Telpu uzkop??ana.
I'm disappointed that BlackBerry caved in to the Saudis. After many years of using BlackBerry phones, this makes me rethink my loyalty to RIM. What in the world were you thinking?
@Micrahard They went were the money was!
@shusting@...
Blackberry giving in doesn't mean other phone OSes are secure..

Probably it also means that the government is already capable SPYING on your iPhones & Androids & Nokias..
Come let's be real, the answer is iPhone. With its VPN and Exchange support and capabilities, it's the only true alternative. Besides, as an American, I'm apt to promote an American solution and company. RIM has had their day in the sun and milked their paradigm for all it was worth. Now they are relagated as old school and a company that thought they could get by, by resting on their laurels. They were naive, presumptuous, non-innovative, and stupid. Now they will pay the price of their hubris. To RIM, all I have to say to you is: Bye-bye. Snooze you lose.
The German government isn't dropping it for lack of security... they are dropping it because it is too secure for them to monitor it at will. That makes it a "security risk" to the government. Not to the rest of us though.
0 Votes
+ -
I am taking a guess...
Roque Mocan 10th Aug 2010
I am taking a guess that the SiMko is made in Germany and the TEOREM in France?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix