Major Web browsers fail password protection tests
Summary: That nifty password management feature in your favorite Web browser could be helping identity thieves pilfer your personal data.That's the biggest takeaway from the results of this test which shows that all the major Web browsers -- including IE, Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome -- are vulnerable to a total of 20 vulnerabilities that could expose password-related information.
That nifty password management feature in your favorite Web browser could be helping identity thieves pilfer your personal data.
That's the biggest takeaway from the results of this test which shows that all the major Web browsers -- including IE, Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome -- are vulnerable to a total of 20 vulnerabilities that could expose password-related information. Among the problems are three in particular that, when combined, allow password thieves to take passwords without the user's knowledge. They are:
- The destination where passwords are sent is not checked.
- The location where passwords are requested is not checked.
- Invisible form elements can trigger password management.
Google's shiny new Chrome browser was among the worst offenders. According to the study, Chrome's password manager contains multiple unpatched issues that "form a toxic soup of potential vulnerabilities that can coalesce into broad insecurity."
Apple's Safari for Windows browser was also failed a majority of the tests (click image for full version):
Technical details of the test, which was conducted by Chapin Information Services, can be found here.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
What about KDE Wallet?
Probably about as safe as a real wallet.
Not if its my wallet.
Ok only a little bit...
OK, Neo...
laziness
I don't think it is about encryption
Looks like these issues are more to do with checks that password store does on a site etc. If you are xss'd will your password utility warn you, or will it still offer up your username and password? Will it submit your password to a site that slightly matches your sites. I guess there are a million and one checks that could be done with browsers these days being so customiseable.
How about how FF went with noscript and the password master on?
Look Blue... A Clue... A Clue!!!
?t-be-bothered-to-type-in-my-password software.
Morons, Morons, Morons? Common sense just made the endangered species list....
We need to stop messing with nature and return to survival of the fittest, most of you bozos would not last a week.
76 passwords and counting
The LEAST secure passwords . . .
So much for "high-security." Check for a sitcky-note on the screen, the wall, the rolodex or in the top drawer, if the browser doesn't fill it in automatically when you go to the page. It will be around somewhere.
("the chain is only as strong as the weakest link")
Wrong
It [b]is[/b] possible! But it requires careful use of passphrases. And this is in turn made more difficult, unfortunately, by misguides administrators who insist that passwords meet 'entropy' requirements, but don't tell users what those are, fearing a security breach!
Password Bank
I use a stand alone utility with a pretty high encryption level. If I'm not sure about the login for a site I'm going to visit I start that sucker up (it's got it's own password) then lookup the login info from my list of 80+ password/username combos. Then I CLOSE the app before firing up a browser.
Yeah - it takes a few seconds longer, but . . .
RE: Major Web browsers fail password protection tests
Wow, Safari is really bad!
NonZealot, again you proved to be an antagonist...
results in perspective none of the browsers did well. Some
better than others however, even the best failed 66%.
Go take a chill pill.
But Apple takes "suck" to a new level
By your reasoning so does Google.
Well, Google Chrome does suck securitywise
And in other ways
No you're thinking of Suckrosoft.
What dimension is frothing at the mouth currently in? What's Suckrosoft?