ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

Microsoft: 'Consistent exploit code likely' for IE vulnerabilities

By | February 10, 2009, 11:48am PST

Summary: Microsoft today shipped four bulletins with patches for at least 8 documented security vulnerabilities affecting Windows users and warned that “consistent exploit code could be easily crafted” to launch attacks via the Internet Explorer browser. The Patch Tuesday batch includes fixes for a pair of code execution holes in IE, two bugs in the Microsoft Exchange [...]

Microsoft today shipped four bulletins with patches for at least 8 documented security vulnerabilities affecting Windows users and warned that “consistent exploit code could be easily crafted” to launch attacks via the Internet Explorer browser.

The Patch Tuesday batch includes fixes for a pair of code execution holes in IE, two bugs in the Microsoft Exchange Server, a remote code execution issue in the Microsoft SQL Server, and three separate flaws haunting users of Microsoft Office Visio.

The Internet Explorer bulletin (MS09-002) should be treated with urgency because the flaws can be exploited to launch drive-by download attacks.

  • This security update is rated Critical for Internet Explorer 7 running on supported editions of Windows XP and Windows Vista. For Internet Explorer 7 running on supported editions of Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008, this security update is rated Moderate.

The Microsoft warning that consistent exploit code was likely suggests that it’s very easy for an attacker to host a specially crafted Web site and attack unpatched users who surfed to the rigged Web site.

  • The attacker could also take advantage of compromised Web sites and Web sites that accept or host user-provided content or advertisements. These Web sites could contain specially crafted content that could exploit this vulnerability.

Enterprise administrators will also want to pay special attention to the Microsoft Exchange update (MS09-003) which covers two different vulnerabilities that expose users to code execution or denial-of-service attacks.

Microsoft explains:

  • The first vulnerability could allow remote code execution if a specially crafted TNEF message is sent to a Microsoft Exchange Server. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of the affected system with Exchange Server service account privileges. The second vulnerability could allow denial of service if a specially crafted MAPI command is sent to a Microsoft Exchange Server. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could cause the Microsoft Exchange System Attendant service and other services that use the EMSMDB32 provider to stop responding.

The company says it expects to see “inconsistent exploit code” published for this bulletin.  However, nCircle director of security operations Andrew Storms says this is a very serious problem.

“This vulnerability means that any cybercriminal sending a well crafted email attachment to an enterprise could gain complete control over the server and gaining one of the keys to the kingdom,” Storms said.

“All kinds of highly confidential and proprietary information pass through an Exchange server every day.  Gaining control over it and its content would be a gold mine to any cyber criminal,” he added.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and social media enthusiast specializing in Internet and computer security issues.

Disclosure

Ryan Naraine

The most important disclosure is of my employment with Kaspersky Lab as a member of the global research and analysis team. Kaspersky Lab is a global company specializing in anti-malware and secure content management technologies. I do not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Ryan Naraine

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and social media enthusiast specializing in Internet and computer security issues. He is currently security evangelist at Kaspersky Lab, an anti-malware company with operations around the globe. He is taking a leadership role in developing the company's online community initiative around secure content management technologies.

Prior to joining Kaspersky Lab, Ryan was Editor-at-Large/Security at eWEEK, leading the magazine's and Web site's coverage of Internet and computer security issues and managing the popular SecurityWatch blog, covering the daily threats, vulnerabilities and IT security technologies. He also covered IT security, hacker attacks and secure content management topics for Jupiter Media's internetnetnews.com.

Ryan can be reached at naraine SHIFT 2 gmail.com. For daily updates on Ryan's activities, follow him on Twitter.

163
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft: �nsistent exploit code likely�or IE vulnerabilities
birumut Updated - 4th May 2011
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
seslisohbet seslichat
0 Votes
+ -
IE8 and Windows 7 aren't mentioned
NonZealot Updated - 10th Feb 2009
This security update is rated Critical for Internet Explorer 7 running on supported editions of Windows XP and Windows Vista.

I notice there is no mention anywhere of IE8 and Windows 7. Does that mean they aren't affected or does it mean that MS doesn't release vulnerability information for Beta products? This is kind of important to know considering I (and millions others) am using Windows 7 and IE8 every day.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree
MGP2 10th Feb 2009
Good questions. Not that I'm running IE8 or Win7 betas...I'm just in an agreeable mood today. wink
0 Votes
+ -
I disagree
AzuMao 11th Feb 2009
It isn't important. Just use Firefox, Opera, Safari, Chrome, or any other superior browser. Problem solved, whatever OS you run.


You might argue that there are a lot of uneducated people out there who will blindly use IE and be effected by its problems.. those people don't read the news though (or they wouldn't use IE), so it doesn't matter to them, either.

NonZealot was obviously employing sarcasm.
0 Votes
+ -
What was I being sarcastic about?
NonZealot 11th Feb 2009
I didn't mean to be, my question was 100% honest. Did you think it was my comment that there are millions of people using Win7? According to Microsoft, the number is in the low millions.

And while I primarily use Firefox because I like it, I have a feeling that IE with Protected Mode is actually the more secure browser. It is actually the #1 feature that I would really like to see added to Firefox.
0 Votes
+ -
Don't worry!
Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 Updated - 10th Feb 2009
You're not using OS X or Safari. That should be good enough for you shouldn't it? wink
0 Votes
+ -
I do use IE8 for some sites although 90%+ of my browsing is done with Firefox.
0 Votes
+ -
It's all good
Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 10th Feb 2009
I'm not sure how PWN2OWN is really relevant anymore, that happened how long ago now? Move on. I just thought I would poke a little fun at ya.

I don't really care one way or the other, though I will be trying out 7 as soon as I get my roomier drive in a couple a days...

How does Firefox run on 7?
0 Votes
+ -
It's very relevant.
ye 10th Feb 2009
I'm not sure how PWN2OWN is really relevant anymore, that happened how long ago now?

It proved there is nothing inherent in OS X which protects it from the very same types of attacks Windows faces.
0 Votes
+ -
Let it go...
Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 10th Feb 2009
It's patched. Who cares? You two are obviously obsessed. LOL!
As we continue to hear about things which are no longer issues and haven't been for years.

With that said it's not the specific vulnerability that is interesting. That in and of itself is boring. What's interesting is the point said vulnerability made. Which, I'll repeat again, showed there is nothing inherent in OS X that protects it from the exact same types of exploits that Windows faces. THAT is what's important.
0 Votes
+ -
Have fun beatin that dead horse!
Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 10th Feb 2009
LOL
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Patched
MissingMatter 10th Feb 2009
Many windows exploits are still exploited long after they've been patched.

For example, the conficker patch and removal was released in Oct 08, and in Jan 09 it was reported there were still many PCs infected.

In fact, one of the reasons virus propagation is dependent on population size is because of the ratio of patched to unpatched machines.
0 Votes
+ -
Not quite
frgough 10th Feb 2009
the PWN2OWN hack was not a drive-by exploit. It was a phishing attack
IIRC.

I cut MS slack on phishing exploits. There's no real way to protect against
those, but far too often IE and Windows have drive-by exploits, where
you are compromised just by clicking a link and doing nothing else. The
critical IE patch today is for just such a flaw.
The exploit involved getting an end user to click on a link, which opened up a port that he was then able to telnet into. Once connected, he was able to remotely run code of his choosing.

...exploit Windows. How does it differ from this:

but far too often IE and Windows have drive-by exploits, where you are compromised just by clicking a link and doing nothing else.

0 Votes
+ -
quite
rtk 10th Feb 2009
Nope, it wasn't a phishing attack, it was a vulnerability that allowed a code execution attack via a maliciously crafted Web page. Drive-by would have definitely been possible if anyone had cared to try to commercialize it.

No cutting Apple any slack on this. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Right
AzuMao 11th Feb 2009
When there are dozens of drive-by exploits for IE, anyone who points it out is an "evil ms hater", but when there is one single drive-by exploit for Safari (which is promptly fixed) it's all "ooooooooooooo apple got soooo owned go ms!!111".


Hilarious!
0 Votes
+ -
It wasn't relevant then.
kozmcrae 10th Feb 2009
And it's not relevant now. The exploit was independent of the OS. OS X was owned because the hacker was familiar with it.
OS X was owned because the hacker was familiar with it.

Yeah...because we all know the people who hack Windows have no familiarity with it at all. LOL!
0 Votes
+ -
So let me get this straight
rtk 10th Feb 2009
We need to excuse any vulnerability in an operating system if the hacker is familiar with that operating system?

That's great news for MS, no?

0 Votes
+ -
For Microsoft's OS you need full body armor and a small army of security software tenders. Not to mention money that could be better spent elsewhere. Take some advice ye, really. Don't ever bring up security when defending Microsoft and if others mention it, ignore them. You simply cannot win. If you do win, it's only in your mind.
...security. Never had a problem with malware. Not once. Windows' security is very strong...just as strong as Linux's and OS X. I don't need to "win" a discussion with fools who think otherwise. I have reality on my side. They have FUD.
0 Votes
+ -
"Never had a problem with malware."
kozmcrae 11th Feb 2009
That's a matter of opinion. Your computer came with the worst malware pre-installed.
0 Votes
+ -
.
0 Votes
+ -
Firefox...
Dave32265 11th Feb 2009
runs on Win 7 just fine. Have fun getting flash installed for it though.
0 Votes
+ -
Flash works fine on 32 bit Win7
NonZealot 11th Feb 2009
Did you have difficulties getting it to work on 64 bit Win 7?
0 Votes
+ -
works fine on 64bit as well.
rtk 11th Feb 2009
using 32bit browsers of course. Adobe is still pretending x64 doesn't exist.
0 Votes
+ -
64 bit...
Dave32265 11th Feb 2009
Haven't yet tried 32 bit
0 Votes
+ -
I take it you were unable to do so?

Make sure that you double click the flash installer, rather then just saving it to your desktop. Otherwise it won't work.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks....
Dave32265 11th Feb 2009
got it working
0 Votes
+ -
Flash???
GAXXIS 12th Feb 2009
Flash works GREAT no prob getting it in either. I didn't have ANY prob and I'm not an IT pro or a Power User either

IMHO GAXXIS
0 Votes
+ -
Yep. By cheating.
frgough 10th Feb 2009
The rules specifically stated it had to be an unpublished vulnerability.
The hackers used a known Perl exploit that Apple had not yet updated
the patch to on OS X.

The organizers acknowledged the cheat, but didn't have the b**** to
disqualify the hackers, because, well, it made such good press to go
around and say "we hacked OS X, take that all you Apple snobs."

Seriously. Look how much mileage they're getting out of it. People like
you still masticate to it to enjoy the ecstasy of artificial schadenfreude.
The rules specifically stated it had to be an unpublished vulnerability. The hackers used a known Perl exploit that Apple had not yet updated the patch to on OS X.

...the fact the system was compromised. Meanwhile the Vista system remained standing.
0 Votes
+ -
No cheating, but good try.
rtk 10th Feb 2009
The hackers used a known Perl exploit that Apple had not yet updated the patch to on OS X.

Nope! It was a heap buffer overflow in Webkit's handling of Javascript regular expressions.

They didn't cheat, it wasn't a phishing attack, it didn't require two people or someone to type in a password, or any of the other excuses the cult of Mac has tried to claim.

Unlike previous attempts to discredit security researchers that point of Apple's holes, it didn't work this time.
0 Votes
+ -
You still haven't hacked Linux yet, rtk...
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Feb 2009
And don't lie... wink
0 Votes
+ -
Please
rtk 11th Feb 2009
point out to me where I claimed to be trying to hack linux, b23423xxx.

0 Votes
+ -
C'mon, rtk...
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Feb 2009
Let's see ya get Linux hacked...

And getting the domain admin drunk and pwning his password doesn't count...

LOL... grin
0 Votes
+ -
What exactly
rtk 11th Feb 2009
are you trying to prove here. That Linux is perfectly secure? Good luck.
0 Votes
+ -
Compared to windows
AzuMao 11th Feb 2009
Everything is.
0 Votes
+ -
Azu, you'll never get the shills to admit that
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Feb 2009
That's why they fall back on the old obscurity by numbers game.

Only thing is, with 20 million Apple machines out there, and another 7 million or so Linux, there's lots of money to be made by script kiddies looking for a good challenge and a fast buck.
0 Votes
+ -
I didn't mean
AzuMao 11th Feb 2009
That there isn't incentive for people to break into them (especially since almost all of the most important servers in the world depend on them).


I meant that it is much easier to just break into windows/ie.
0 Votes
+ -
I realize that
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Feb 2009
But my point was that since they can't come up with any documentation of any massive pwning of Linux desktops, they fall back on the security by numbers game.

I believe the incentive is out there. They just can't come up with a way to do it due to the inherent design of Linux.

As the author of the earlier article said:

"...is that there are no easy ways to shove malware on users, install it without their knowing and in a way that is difficult to remove, and get it to automatically replicate and distribute itself."
0 Votes
+ -
re: I realize that
rtk 11th Feb 2009
But my point was that since they can't come up with any documentation of any massive pwning of Linux desktops

There's not enough linux desktops to have a massive pwnage. Malware, like spam, counts on a small fraction to fall for the trap.

Even an outbreak that affected 100% of the linux desktops ever in existence would still be a relatively insignificant event.

Back to roughlydrafted for more indoctrination for you.
0 Votes
+ -
Believe your lies
hasta la Vista, bah-bie Updated - 11th Feb 2009
You STILL can't come up with anything. The results at CanSecWest 2008 proved that.

You are useless.
0 Votes
+ -
Not my lies.
rtk Updated - 11th Feb 2009
As before, you'll have to take up your debate with the authors of the exploit, it was their claim that it'd work cross platform.

Since both flash and java were patched to fix the vulnerability, cross platform, we now have a successful security researcher and two major software publishers that disagree with your rants.


0 Votes
+ -
Stop embarrasing yourself
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 11th Feb 2009
You don't know what you're talking about. You have not provided any credible documentation to back up your idiotic retorts.

Go to bed...
0 Votes
+ -
lol
rtk 11th Feb 2009
Start here, and be sure to read the comments for the smackdowns mcfeters offered up.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=995

Good thing you were smart enough to stay out of that one, busting your fud and all.
0 Votes
+ -
Nonsense, and here's why...
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 12th Feb 2009
And that brings me to the Ubuntu laptop. Linux made it out of Pwn2Own unscathed. Does that mean that Ubuntu is unhackable? Not quite. It just means that hackers didn?t see the glory in taking down Ubuntu, which is a small sliver of the desktop OS market. Rest assured, if Pwn2Own ran another day Ubuntu would have stumbled too.

Didn't see the glory??

BWHAW HAW HAW HAW HAW.... grin

Translation: They weren't able to and their pride & ego prevented them from admitting as much, just as yours is now.

Hilarious... happy

Try again, shill...
0 Votes
+ -
Cluebat
rtk 12th Feb 2009
The quote, isn't mine.

Your debate, isn't with me. Not hard to see why you actively avoided the actual debate back then.

Your "translation" is pure fantasy, but nice try.
0 Votes
+ -
Evading the point
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 12th Feb 2009
As usual...

Maybe you shouldn't have used a weak article full of swiss cheese Windows holes, huh....

wink
0 Votes
+ -
Good point
Cayble 10th Feb 2009
Vulnerabilities or not. We make our choices for our own reasons.
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
seslisohbet seslichat

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix