ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

Microsoft delivers 11 patches, 6 critical; Excel flaw left unpatched

By | February 12, 2008, 10:45am PST

Summary: Updated: Microsoft delivered 11 patches on Tuesday addressing 17 vulnerabilities. Six updates fix critical flaws and five address important vulnerabilities, but an already exploited Excel zero day was left unpatched. Microsoft’s advisory last week noted 12 patches fixing 7 critical vulnerabilities. One critical Windows vulnerability was cut due to quality issues. A Microsoft spokesman did confirm that [...]

Updated: Microsoft delivered 11 patches on Tuesday addressing 17 vulnerabilities. Six updates fix critical flaws and five address important vulnerabilities, but an already exploited Excel zero day was left unpatched.

Microsoft’s advisory last week noted 12 patches fixing 7 critical vulnerabilities. One critical Windows vulnerability was cut due to quality issues.

A Microsoft spokesman did confirm that this batch of patches didn’t address the Excel flaw that was reported last month. On Jan. 16, the Microsoft Security Response Center confirmed ongoing attacks against Excel. Microsoft at the time recommended that users either run files through a tool that strips out exploit code or block Office 2003 and earlier formats except for those from trusted locations.

Given that Excel resides in every enterprise leaving the flaw unpatched may raise some hackles. A Microsoft spokesman indicated that the Excel patch wasn’t ready for prime time. Here’s Microsoft’s statement sent to me:

Microsoft is always investigating potential and existing vulnerabilities in an effort to help protect our customers. Creating security updates that effectively fix vulnerabilities is an extensive process involving a series of sequential steps. There are many factors that impact the length of time between the discovery of a vulnerability and the release of a security update, and every vulnerability presents its own unique challenges. When a potential vulnerability is reported, designated product specific security experts investigate the scope and impact of a threat on the affected product. Once the MSRC knows the extent and the severity of the vulnerability, they work to develop an update for every supported version affected. Once the update is built, it must be tested with the different operating systems and applications it affects, then localized for many markets and languages across the globe. In some instances, multiple vendors are affected by the same or similar issue, which requires a coordinated release.

Among the more notable February patches for critical flaws:

MS08-008: Microsoft addressed a vulnerability in Vista’s OLE automation that could allow for a remote code execution. Microsoft said: This security update addresses the vulnerability by adding a check on memory requests within OLE Automation. Affected software includes Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Microsoft Office 2004 for the Mac and Visual Basic 6.

MS08-009
: This patch addressed a vulnerability in Word that could allow a remote code execution. Microsoft noted: “An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative user rights.” Affected software included Office 2000, Office 2003 and Office Word Viewer 2003.

MS08-007: Another XP and Vista patch. This patch fixes the WebDAV Mini-Redirector. In a nutshell, it’s another avenue to take control of a system, install programs and do other things.

MS08-010: This update fixes multiple flaws in IE that allow for remote code executions. Microsoft said: “The security update addresses these vulnerabilities by modifying the way that Internet Explorer handles HTML and validates data, as well as by setting the kill bit for an ActiveX control.” Stray thought: You could just kill ActiveX.

MS08-012
: This update resolves a remote code execution flaw in Microsoft Office Publisher. Affects Microsoft Office Publisher 2000; supported releases of Microsoft Office Publisher 2002; and supported editions of Microsoft Office Publisher 2003 Service Pack 2.

MS08-013: Microsoft’s update here covers a remote code execution vulnerability in Office 2000. It’s an important update for Microsoft Office XP, Microsoft Office 2003 and Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
62
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Microsoft drops 11 patches, 6 critical
lovedong 13th Sep
wow!!! beautiful!!! replica watches best
0 Votes
+ -
Conflicting Title
nucrash 12th Feb 2008
The headline had me worried that Microsoft wasn't going to release the patches.
0 Votes
+ -
me to
NoThomas 12th Feb 2008
nt
0 Votes
+ -
Staff
duly noted
Larry Dignan 12th Feb 2008
I meant drops as in "put in a dropbox" type way, but see your point. I changed to "delivers" when I updated that excel nugget
0 Votes
+ -
Thank you
nucrash 12th Feb 2008
I am sure many Linux Zealots mis reported this wrong in hopes that Microsoft messed up.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Thank you
richdave 12th Feb 2008
>>>I am sure many Linux Zealots mis reported this wrong in hopes that Microsoft messed up.

And you can always count on at least one idiot to try and start some s__t!
0 Votes
+ -
n/t
0 Votes
+ -
All we need. A flame war about a non story
0 Votes
+ -
Succinct
thx-1138_@... 13th Feb 2008
...and to the point. Nice post!

I applied all of the patches shown, via the links in the post - in less than 5 minutes.

Cheers L.D.

:^)
0 Votes
+ -
Agree
dbucciar 12th Feb 2008
You're right: Patches are "released", "posted", or "provided".

Software versions can be "dropped", but that usually implies an internal development baseline -- not for public use.

I had to read the headline twice to get the context of what they meant by "drops".
0 Votes
+ -
Wow!
dbucciar 12th Feb 2008
That was a quick response to the concerns about the title... thanks!
0 Votes
+ -
Title is still misleading....
MGP2 12th Feb 2008
Microsoft delivers 11 patches...

How is Microsoft delivering these patches? Snail mail? FedEx Ground? Air mail? (I hava wireless). Do I have to tip the delivery driver like when I order pizza? It would be so much easier if they would just drop them like they always do.
Just having some fun, folks. No need to throw rocks. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Picky Picky
nucrash 13th Feb 2008
Deliver means that it is available. Dropping could be interpreted as "Dropped the ball" or "Dropped work on them"

Deliver doesn't have to be a tangible item.
0 Votes
+ -
Did you miss something?
MGP2 13th Feb 2008
Either you failed to read the entire post or you chose to ignore the last line just so you could throw a rock. Once again, the last line, cut & pasted directly from my original stated:

Just having some fun, folks. No need to throw rocks. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Too busy to pay attention
nucrash 14th Feb 2008
Let ye who cast stones be without sin.

Or did I mess that up.
0 Votes
+ -
wow!!! beautiful!!! replica watches best
0 Votes
+ -
Did these make it to SP1? Prolly not?
techboy_z 12th Feb 2008
Do we install these before or after SP1? And...are there 11 or 17 vulnerabilities...6 + 5 = 11....
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft drops 11 patches, 6 critical
jenny.howard@... 12th Feb 2008
"Six updates fix critical flaws" is a world-class tongue twister!
0 Votes
+ -
Already Fixed in SP3?
Shazzalive 12th Feb 2008
I am running XP SP3 RC1 and according to Microsoft Update I only needed the Malicious Software Removal Tool (KB890830), Update for Outlook Junk Email Filter 2007 (KB944965), and Update for Windows Live Sign-in Assistant (KB947449). I run Office 2007 so a few wouldn't apply anyway seemingly; but I notice a couple of fixes pertaining to XP are missing. I take it they were included in SP3? If that were the case - I downloaded this Service Pack in December and installed it on my other computer to test it over Xmas before installing it on this one - Why have M$ been holding fixes back until now? Why didn't they release them on January's Patch Tuesday?
According to the details the code will be executed with the same privileges as the logged on user. Does this mean Protected Mode is bypassed by these vulnerabilities?
0 Votes
+ -
Staff
Good question
Larry Dignan 12th Feb 2008
I sent to Microsoft's PR guy. Will let you know what I hear. The patch was all encompassing for IE.
0 Votes
+ -
when you do this
Narr vi 12th Feb 2008
could you confirm that the Word fix now means we don't have to use the convert-to-XML-Word2007 on incoming Word files?

Or was it a less sweeping fix than this?

It would be good to know what's coming in the same sense, for the Excel fix bypassed for today.

Thank you, Larry, and regards.
0 Votes
+ -
Staff
I passed along
Larry Dignan 12th Feb 2008
It would make sense that the fix would take care of the conversion go round, but as you said it's unclear how sweeping the fix was. I'm not expecting a quick answer, but Microsoft is generally good about getting back with an answer.
0 Votes
+ -
thanks, Larry
Narr vi 13th Feb 2008
Looking forward...

C.
0 Votes
+ -
code runs with IE7 privileges = very vey low privileges because protected mode
0 Votes
+ -
...that an exploit will run with the logged on users credentials. Thus calling into question if Protected Mode is effective for the vulnerabilities in question.
0 Votes
+ -
user privileges are low privileges because UAC
So that your data is protected from malware. If Protected Mode is ineffective for these vulnerabilities I have to question the value of Protected Mode. While it might help in some cases the fact it could be bypassed doesn't give me confidence in it and I will have to strike it from my security advantage list.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft Security Bulletins contain a section called "Vulnerability Details".

Frequently, I'll read something like this in the bulletin -
"Mitigating Factors for ... Vulnerability: An attacker must have valid logon credentials and be able to log on locally to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability could not be exploited remotely or by anonymous users."

Does this mean that an attacker would have to have physical access to my computer? I don't understand why I would need to apply such updates since I can't see how an attacker could log on locally to my machine. Can you shed any light on this?
0 Votes
+ -
Vague, yes.
hauntingjoker 12th Feb 2008
My favorite is...
"...and do other things."

I suppose this is the part that allows someone the ability to drink all of your beer, eat all of your food, and get physical access to your computer.
0 Votes
+ -
More Patches To Open Up Holes In Vista
itanalyst 12th Feb 2008
Just wait and see...
They violate a number of the forums criteria. For example in Vista none of the vulnerabilities lead to remote code execution with administrator privileges. And the majority (haven't read them all thoroughly yet) appear to require user interaction. Those that don't, such as the IIS vulnerability, are not enabled by default.

In the end Vista has improved security drastically. So much so it's no longer a differentiating factor. After a year Vista has remained secure.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Microsoft drops 11 patches, 6 critical
johndavid_77@... 12th Feb 2008
Thanks for the news Larry and George.
0 Votes
+ -
All these critical or not patches that MS uses to drop every now and then, make me think that they just launch their products just for selling them and then they start to keep correcting them. Do they think we have to be their clients for long? Me i am completely fed up with this attitude
Do not want them anymore
0 Votes
+ -
How ,any holes are into MS products? They will never close!!
I am fed up with so many patches.It seems their products were nuts when they first were launched and mforced us to buy.By the next day of their release MS starts vorrecting them
Do they think we have to buy forever?
I think we have to get rid of them
0 Votes
+ -
How ,any holes are into MS products? They will never close!!
I am fed up with so many patches.

Stop your bellyaching! Any OS that doesn't release a steady stream of updates and bug fixes is lying to you. My beloved PCLinuxOS 2007 is currently downloading and installing 62 upgrades and two new packages. Call them what you will, vulnerabilities, bugs, etc., but whatever name you call them, you do want them fixed. I don't use Microsoft. Linux works better for me. But I don't have time to waste slamming Microsoft or Apple or ANYONE ELSE. I found what makes me happy, and you might be well advised to spend a little more time looking for what works for you and less time slamming what doesn't!!!
One of the "important" vulnerabilities is in a Works fil format converter (
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS08-011.mspx). The reason I say this is worth a mention, is because it only goes to show how more attention is going to be focused on attacking file format converters.

Microsoft did the right thing by disabling a whole swath of rarely-used, old converters as a part of Office 2003 SP3.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Easy choice - convert to Linux
zeffan 12th Feb 2008
Gaping security holes, monthly patching headaches, and forced upgrades. Don't ya just love Microsoft? I haven't run Windoze updates in over a year. Why? Because I converted my entire company to Novell Suse Linux Desktop with Open Office. We're running well, without any headaches and don't have any significant security concerns.

WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!! Think for yourselves! DUMP MICROSOFT!!
Linux has many security vulnerabilities and patches. One can expect to patch a Linux system several times a week.

As for forced upgrades I don't see Microsoft forcing anyone to upgrade. I'm still running Windows XP on my work laptop and so far no one from Microsoft has come and put a gun to my head, they have not taken my family hostage, my dog hasn't disappeared, nor is my house isn't being foreclosed on. Should something like this occur I'll let you know.
0 Votes
+ -
Ohh it has.....
Suicida| 12th Feb 2008
But the only updates I have seen in Linux that require a reboot are kernel upgrades, and the only time I do that on enterprise systems is when a critical flaw is found in the kernel which is about every 6 - 9 months on average.
0 Votes
+ -
Then he has no point.
ye 12th Feb 2008
He attempted to belittle Microsoft/Windows for something shared with his choice of
operating system. Makes him look like a fool wouldn't you say?
0 Votes
+ -
I'd say....
MGP2 12th Feb 2008
Because he didn't mention reboots at all in his anti-MS rant. Now, to be clear, I'm no MS cheerleader. In fact, I refer to them as Microsloth. But if you're gonna try to argue that Linux is virtually vulnerability-free, then it's time to don my Devil's Advocate hat.
0 Votes
+ -
Yep
Suicida| 12th Feb 2008
Linux has many situations where it is better than Windows, as does windows with Linux.

Anyone that doesn't use what works best is a fool.
0 Votes
+ -
Ye delusions reach a peak
whisperycat 13th Feb 2008
Ye, I think you ought to get some help. Your delusions are obviously peaking. "One can expect to patch a Linux system several times a week", is what you said. What utter, baseless tosh you talk. In Europe and beyond there are IN systems running on Linux which each support over 5 million subscribers. Downtime is not an option, and downtime does not happen. Do you comprehend that? Downtime is not an option. "Patching Linux several times a week"? You are a freaking joke. Stick with your toy Microsoft OS and your multiple reboots per month, Windows is not an option when real work needs to be done and quite obviously, you have no comprehension of the sort of reliability the real world demands. Patching Linux several times a week - oh lord, what a clown. MCSE, are you?
ye@gx620:~$ uname -a
Linux gx620 2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP Tue Dec 18 04:32:06 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
ye@gx620:~$ date
Wed Feb 13 09:30:50 MST 2008

This system is currently listing 17 security updates to be installed. I just updated it last week!

As a Linux, and UNIX, user I know exactly what I am talking about. And any objective Linux user will agree with me.
"Restart Required

In order to complete the update of your system it needs to be restarted.

Until you do so, security updates may not be fully applied, newly inserted or supported hardware may not function and new services may not be available.

Please make sure that you save all of your work before restarting."

Now to be clear I did not say reboots always happen. But to pretend they're not ever needed is foolish.
0 Votes
+ -
And your point is?
whisperycat 13th Feb 2008
Quite obviously the variant of Linux used to safely manage a platform with 5 million subscribers on it, with no reboots since installation, is not the one you are using. Executing uname -a on your home PC doesn't actually prove much at all, does it? So not only am I salt free, I also have no wounds.

How many million users on your platform, Ye? How many reboots since installation?
0 Votes
+ -
My Point Is: You Were Wrong
ye 13th Feb 2008
You attempted to claim:

1. I am unfamiliar with Linux.
2. That my claim of updating Linux multiple times a week was wrong.
3. That reboots are limited to Windows.

I demonstrated all of those claims you made to be wrong. No surprise there.

Can Linux be used 24/7 for a year without a reboot? You bet. But then it's missing important patches. I could do the same with Windows.

In the end you failed to prove anything I said wrong and ended up with egg on your face.

As for my home machines they're running: Vista, OS X, CentOS 5, and Solaris 10. This is not a home machine. As to executing uname it was not intended to "prove" anything other than to show you I am familiar with Linux.

Now go off and lick your wounds.
0 Votes
+ -
Updates, etc.
Joe.Smetona 7th Mar 2008
My recent experience with an XP computer was just too much to take.

At my previous job, I was using a Dell HT Optiplex 3.46b GHz machine with Xp SP2 and Symmantec Corp. AV. It was fully updated on automatic and the AV was scanning every day with DAT updates every day or two.

It seemed to be running somewhat sluggish so a ran some additional virus scans. It found two trojans and two key-loggers that were on computer for over 20 days! I removed them manually. Living with key-loggers is very disconcerting.

I was just working on Ubuntu alpha and Firefox beta at home.

Given my 27 years of computer experience, I'd put my money (and online banking) on a Linux box without reservation.

The updates occur when the computer is booted up. They are quick and everything is available for update, so it's just very convenient and you just go on with your work when done.
0 Votes
+ -
Linux patches? Pshaw...
MGP2 12th Feb 2008
You notice the writer said he hasn't run Windows Update. But if he hasn't run Linux update in the year since he's intalled, well he's vulnerable in more ways than one. At least as far as Novell goes. Don't believe me? See for yourself.

http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories.html

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix