Military contractor "cyber-defense" gold rush begins

Summary: Sensing a shift in upcoming defense priorities, Lockheed and Boeing are both launching information security product divisions.Bloomberg is reporting that both Lockheed Martin and Boeing are building security product groups to address the military's needs in defending cyberspace.

Sensing a shift in upcoming defense priorities, Lockheed and Boeing are both launching information security product divisions. Bloomberg is reporting that both Lockheed Martin and Boeing are building security product groups to address the military's needs in defending cyberspace. I doubt that the military requires technology to "defend cyberspace" that is fundamentally different technology than what is available on the commercial market right now. What I do think is interesting is what Lockheed and Boeing will be required to do to scale those operations quickly, and we need to think about what this means for the security industry as a whole.

Let's put our MBA hats on for a second. Both Lockheed and Boeing know that building a product group from scratch is a challenge, and they both are going to be going through the "Build versus Buy" equation as we speak. They will be looking at small time vendors that could make up the standard components of a security company, giving special consideration to any organization that generates a significant amount of revenue from the government and military already. If the two organizations begin making acquisitions, this would free up capital that has been allocated to a few of the late stage security startups that have been sitting in the market for some time.

If both of these contractors are serious about getting into the information security business, their entry in the market could clear out some of the mature security startups and make room for some new ideas and new technologies. This is good news for any of you who are cooking a security product on the back burner and are looking for startup capital in the coming year.

Topic: Security

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

9 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • what a load of BS!

    this is exactly what is wrong with the big business....creating crappy products and flooding the market with phony advertising in order to eliminate the smaller players that have a superior product.
    Isn't the software manufacturer in the best position to provide security for its own products.
    We will end up with expensive resource hogs that would cripple good products just to feel 'secure'.
    That's no different than 2001 selling of duct tape to 'protect against terrorists'.
    Linux Geek
  • RE: Military contractor

    I don't understand why the military is even concerned about software... their secure internet can only be breached physically, not by any drive by attempts, and they have zero connection to the internet as we know it. Only systems that do have internet access are the ones for Programmers, secrataries, first seargents, commanders, and other office personnel and all of those have plenty of market accessable sercurity software suits and those systems are to never have classified info on them in the first place. As long as the "wire" on the classified section is monitored, which it is,the only thing left to be concerned about is the human element and there only so much you can do there as any IT person well knows... Its a waste of time in my opinion, but then again we all know what opinions have in common with them...
    Cyrorm
    • Uhmm.. wrong

      Not sure where you get your info from, but the military is highly connected to the internet. And regardless, the military network is still a netwok and is subject to the same risks as any network. There are hundreds or thousands of scenarious that beg for top teir security protection.
      Argain
      • Re: Uhmm.. wrong

        I get the info from personal experience as a programmer in the Airforce. none of the classified data in the military is allowed on what the civilian world would call the "internet". There is a completely seperate and well guarded "internet" for classified information.
        Cyrorm
    • Sure but...

      While its true that the classified side is physically separate from the unclassified side, the Army and DoD generally has thousands of critical unclassified systems.
      mrowton
      • Sure but...

        And do you think that they are currently unsecure? They've been using physical protection as ell as commercial off the shelf software protection for years. Its not like they just now decided that they need to protect thir information and systems, classified or not.


        I think the term "cyber-defense" is the misleading part. It doesn't truely mean virus/hacking protection, likeit sonds like, it means the ability to have first and response cyber strike cabability. They call it cyber defense, because the military is supposed to be actively "defending" the US, and sometimes the best defense is a good offense.
        Cyrorm
  • RE: Military contractor

    Linux Geek,

    Small vendors are wonderful, but if STRATCOM buys 100,000 seats of something, is the startup going to be able to support them? Or do you think STRATCOM should buy twenty products five thousand at a time and eat the training and interoperability burden?

    Cyrorm, you're overlooking the need to protect unclassified data.
    ed.ahlsen-girard@...
    • RE: Military contractor

      Not at all, they protect unclassified data the same way any business would, with commercial off the shelf software, like they've been doing for years already.
      Cyrorm
  • RE: Military contractor

    Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
    <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">seslisohbet</a> <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">seslichat</a>
    birumut