ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

Mozilla delivers patches for Firefox; Plugs flat file vulnerability

By | February 7, 2008, 9:26pm PST

Mozilla on Friday delivered its Firefox 2.0.0.12 update including patches that fix a Web forgery flaw, browsing history and forward navigation stealing and the directory traversal via chrome, which has been the most visible vulnerability of late.

According to the Firefox security advisory, Mozilla filed the following fixes in its flagship browser:

The most notable of the bunch is MFSA 2008-05. This fix covered that vulnerability that allowed an attacker to run off with stored cookies and other data contained in flat files. The vulnerability was discovered by researcher Gerry Eisenhaur. On Jan. 29, Mozilla security chief Window Snyder upgraded the vulnerability and set plans for Firefox 2.0.0.12. On Jan. 22, Snyder confirmed a proof of concept vulnerability discovered by Eisenhaur on Jan. 19.

Regarding the flat file flaw Mozilla said:

URI scheme improperly allowed directory traversal that could be used to load JavaScript, images, and stylesheets from local files in known locations. This traversal was possible only when the browser had installed add-ons which used “flat” packaging rather than the more popular .jar packaging, and the attacker would need to target that specific add-on.

Mozilla researcher moz_bug_r_a4 reported that this vulnerability could be used to steal the contents of the browser’s sessionstore.js file, which contains session cookie data and information about currently open web pages.

mozilla.png

Another critical flaw (MFSA-2008-06) was one that allowed the stealing of Web browsing and forward navigation stealing. Mozilla noted:

Mozilla contributor David Bloom reported a vulnerability in the way images are treated by the browser when a user leaves a page which utilizes designMode frames. The reported issue can be used to steal a user’s navigation history, forward navigation information, and crash the user’s browser. The crash showed evidence of memory corruption and might be exploitable to run arbitrary code.

And a third critical vulnerability (MFSA-2008-03) covered a “privilege escalation, XSS Remote Code Execution.”

Mozilla said:

Mozilla contributors moz_bug_r_a4 and Boris Zbarsky submitted a series of vulnerabilities which allow scripts from page content to escape from its sandboxed context and/or run with chrome privileges. An additional vulnerability reported by moz_bug_r_a4 demonstrated that the XMLDocument.load() function can be used to inject script into another site, violating the browser’s same-origin policy.

And finally Firefox 2.0.0.12 addresses crashes due to memory corruption (MFSA-2008-01). Mozilla noted:

Mozilla developers identified and fixed several stability bugs in the browser engine used in Firefox 2.0.0.12 and other Mozilla-based products. Some of these crashes showed evidence of memory corruption under certain circumstances and we presume that with enough effort at least some of these could be exploited to run arbitrary code.

The remaining patches covered vulnerabilities that were deemed less critical. These vulnerabilities also affected Thunderbird and SeaMonkey.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
42
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Firefox update
roge 10th Feb 2008
I updated the latest Firefox and have a bad problem with it opening multiple sessions .When it does this,it says Entering YahooBuildToolbar.I removed all of Yahoo and removed and reinstalled Firefox and still have the same annoying problem.I di a search on YahooBuildToolbar and found many people with same problem.Haven't been able to fix it yet.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow, sure was easy.
OButterball 8th Feb 2008
Saw the notice on ZDNet, could have waited for it to automatically do it but decided to go ahead and hit Help, Check for Updates. Less than half a minute later I was back on the Internet road.

Wonder how many reboots this Tuesday's IE updates are going to take.
Wonder how many reboots this Tuesday's IE updates are going to take.

Of course, I'm only going based on past experience which I fully understand is much less valid than using present hatred of all things Microsoft as a guide. happy
0 Votes
+ -
... because most of my clients have key software which doesn't run on Vista, or doesn't run WELL on Vista, YET. Every single Update Tuesday, for as long as I can remember in 2007, required a reboot when IE was involved.

Of course, I'm only going based on past experience which I fully understand is much less valid than using present blind love and fanatical support of all things Microsoft as a guide. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Since IE is a part of the middleware that runs on top of the kernel, you can just kill the shell with the task manager or logout then login again which is the same thing. But Mozilla you don't have to do this and yes I have the updated Seamonkey. Logout and login works for registry changes too.
0 Votes
+ -
MS bashing for a Firefox problem?
transposeIT 9th Feb 2008
You people really are so pathetic. Can't accept the fact that all software are vulnerable and patches are a necessity. Can't help but drag MS into every Linux/Firefox problem. It's so hilarious how you turn a Linux/Firefox problem into a wonderful experience. Bwa-ha-ha-ha.
0 Votes
+ -
thanks; that is good information
Narr vi 8th Feb 2008
It was just a leetle hard to decode from their notices that the flat-packaged add-ons bug was fixed.

Would be helpful if Mozilla people spoke English once in a while....

Regards
If all the hype I have been hearing about how "safe" Mozilla Firefox is compared to Internet Explorer were true, then WHY are they patching so many vulnerabilities...
0 Votes
+ -
Why?
bart001fr 8th Feb 2008
Because at least, they are doing something about it, unlike the guys who are supposed to do something about IE and who stick to a schedule of their own, whether they have a fix or not, and if not they wait until the next scheduled release.

With Firefox, if they have a stable fix ready today, they release it today and no fanfare. (This one is an exception.) When you boot up Firefox, if you left the original installation parameters alone, the program will check with the Firefox main site and warn you that there is a new version or an upgrade and will proceed to install it on your say-so. Then if they have another fix tomorrow or next week, you get to upgrade all over again. All automatically and very painless, though a little time consuming. But I know for sure that the program is as up-to-date as possible and not a full month or more out of date. There is even a button to check for updates in the upper right corner below the red X as well as a menu choice in Help. When was the last time IE was upgraded, and can you upgrade as easily?

Vulnerabilities? Of course there are vulnerabilities. Go back to the original "Hello, world" program and a good hacker could probably find one or two vulnerabilities without breaking into too much of a sweat. Nothing is invulnerable. Especially in the computer world.
0 Votes
+ -
It's like this
ilovebacon 8th Feb 2008
If you don't know about a vulnerability, that doesn't mean it's not there, right? One of the biggest problems with IE is that you never know if Microsoft is patching all the vulnerabilities they're finding. Nor do you know about a lot of the vulnerabilities that could be being exploited right now. With Firefox, at least they keep their users informed and try to keep up with the problems without hiding them. Also, Microsoft has a specific schedule of patches that tends to have a pretty decently sized space large enough to be easily exploited before the vulnerabilities are fixed. Firefox may update frequently, but the patches are dealt with fairly quickly.
I think this will force me to use IE.
After updating, firefox will no longer connect. My Norton firewall has no user changeable settings.

I have now lost a great deal of browser personalization.

Thanks, but no thanks Mozilla
0 Votes
+ -
There's a bad flaw in this update
serv2meek@... 8th Feb 2008
I think this will force me to use IE.
After updating, firefox will no longer connect. My Norton firewall has no user changeable settings.

I have now lost a great deal of browser personalization.

Thanks, but no thanks Mozilla
0 Votes
+ -
Problem is Norton
dl@... 8th Feb 2008
Just being logical, but since everybody else is having no problems with the latest FireFox update, perhaps the difficulty rests with your Norton firewall. If I may write frankly, you would be best off making your computer Norton-free -- I dropped Norton products from all of our computers a few years ago after it became abundantly clear that they were slowing down the computers -- and live update just would not update key components. Norton's tech support's solution: Reinstall Norton Systemworks -- which, of course, made no difference. We've been very happy with Kaspersky Internet Security ever since. (And thee new FireFox is working just fine through Kasperksy's configurable firewall). You can try a fully-functional 30-day trial from Kaspersky's website. But be sure to fully uninstall Norton first. (And if you've been keeping current on that issue, completely uninstalling Norton is a challenge -- one of the many problems with Symantec applications.
0 Votes
+ -
RE:FireFox Update, Bad News
b3tonyc@... 8th Feb 2008
There are more people having this problem.
0 Votes
+ -
Well-known problem
Greenknight_z 9th Feb 2008
Comes up all the time on the Firefox help forums. For anyone having this problem with any firewall, see: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firewalls#Firewall_pitfalls
0 Votes
+ -
Browser's fault?
Joe.Smetona 8th Feb 2008
I guess it's a catch 22. These flaws all appear to be related to being plugged into MS. Perhaps Mozilla should have just provided FF for OSS, but then they would not be as popular.

I'm just wondering if it was worth it for them to enter the MS vortex and have to deal with trying to secure MS file management security by being an outside program.

I think anyone who builds accessories for MS are eventually going to run into these problems.

If the most serious threat is stealing cookies and History, (which are OS files), shouldn't the OS be in there somewhere protecting the files like OSS does?

Unfortunately people forget these flaws are "WindowsCentric".
0 Votes
+ -
These flaws all appear to be related to being plugged into MS.

directory traversal via chrome bug

The very first one I looked at shows that this is a vulnerability in ALL OSs. Can you please provide us with a rationale for you saying that all these flaws only affect Windows?

If the most serious threat is stealing cookies and History, (which are OS files), shouldn't the OS be in there somewhere protecting the files like OSS does?

Huh? When Firefox asks for a cookie file from the OS, you think it is the OS's job to ask: Are you sure you want this file?

How exactly do you propose that the OS decides when a program like Firefox is asking for a cookie file for "good" reasons or "bad" reasons? As long as the user ID that the Firefox process is running as has read permissions to that file, it is the OS's job to hand over that file. End of story.
0 Votes
+ -
Reply.
Joe.Smetona 8th Feb 2008
Here's the verification of the fix from the link you supplied. It just lists MS and MAC. If it affected Linux, it would be listed also.

***********

"Al Billings 2008-01-29 16:28:45 PST

I've verified this fix with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/2008012820 Firefox/2.0.0.12 and Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U;
Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/2008012822 Firefox/2.0.0.12.

With this testcase (attached to bug), we get "undefined" as a result now.

I've also tested and verified bug 413250."
0 Votes
+ -
FireFox Update, Bad News
b3tonyc@... 8th Feb 2008
I installed the new update as soon as i got the alert, the update crashed, so it retried, shortly after i am having problems accessing web sites, i called my isp, nothing wrong on their side. Now i completely un-installed firefox and i am still having problems. It took me about 5 refresh tried in order to get into the zdnet website. I do not know what the new update installed but it just messed up my connection settings. I did a google search and i see that i am not the only one with this problem. Now i do not know what to do, i need help, if anybody out there could help me, email me, b3tonyc(a)gmail.com.
0 Votes
+ -
Firefox update
roge 10th Feb 2008
I updated the latest Firefox and have a bad problem with it opening multiple sessions .When it does this,it says Entering YahooBuildToolbar.I removed all of Yahoo and removed and reinstalled Firefox and still have the same annoying problem.I di a search on YahooBuildToolbar and found many people with same problem.Haven't been able to fix it yet.
0 Votes
+ -
FireFox Update, Bad News
b3tonyc@... 8th Feb 2008
Other people are having problems with the update, check up the forum, http://kb.mozillazine.org/Error_loading_websites. So many people posted about the problem that the treat whats locked.
0 Votes
+ -
Possible Fix
Joe.Smetona 8th Feb 2008
The first thing that may help would be to clear you cache.

Go to: Tools, Properties, Privacy, Private Data, settings, then: check all 7 boxes including Cache and Cookies.

click: OK

Check: always clear my private...

Then click: "Clear Now"

You can also close Firefox and then reopen it to try the problem websites.

I hope this helps.
0 Votes
+ -
RE:FireFox Update, Bad News
b3tonyc@... 8th Feb 2008
I am still having the same issue, i checked my firewall and everything, i am now using netscape and still having the same problem, IE and Opera also suffering from this problem .
0 Votes
+ -
RE:FireFox Update, Bad News
b3tonyc@... 8th Feb 2008
I am out to just re-install windows. I don't need all this, my web surfing is suffering greatly.
0 Votes
+ -
Before Re-Installing.
Joe.Smetona 8th Feb 2008
You may want to try Panda ActiveScan (online scanning and free).

It's virus definitions ar updated once or twice a day. Here's the link:

http://www.pandasecurity.com/homeusers/solutions/activescan/
0 Votes
+ -
extension?
Pug466 8th Feb 2008
Maybe you have an extension or a new theme and it doesn't agree with the new update. I'm just guessing. I installed the updates with no problems.
0 Votes
+ -
So with all your multiple postings...
hasta la Vista, bah-bie 8th Feb 2008
We're not supposed to use Firefox anymore?

I mean, we get your point.

Btw, I've updated my three machines this morning. So far, no problems
0 Votes
+ -
how old is that article (NT)
kamahl928 8th Feb 2008
(NT)
0 Votes
+ -
Firefox Patch
bhelm@... 8th Feb 2008
I just updated and I am so far running just fine with XP Pro
0 Votes
+ -
Staff
It was painless for me too
Larry Dignan 8th Feb 2008
This am.
0 Votes
+ -
The Ubuntu update system is second to none.
0 Votes
+ -
Mozilla delivers patches for Firefox
hal9001@... 8th Feb 2008
upgraded to 2.0.0.12 in Ex Pee SP3 and Kubuntu with no problems.
Firefox 2.0.0.12 SSL Spoofing and Domain Guessing vulnerabilities:

http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2008-February/060036.html
I updated firefox at home and office. everything looks fine, nothing wrong at all
0 Votes
+ -
no Linux yet
LazLong 8th Feb 2008
Just trying to responed to a cnet
or a credit card info.....
0 Votes
+ -
Seven messages among the first 22,
mhenriday 9th Feb 2008
to this thread,all essentially identical and sent by one and the same signature, b3tonyc@ claim that FF 2.0.0.12 is a total disaster. Thereafter we see two essentially identical messages from the same signature, qmlscycrajg@ with links to a site which claims a new flaw in Firefox 2.0.0.12. When I click on the link in that site in FF 2.0.0.12, however, either a warning for the site in question comes up or the site (on both XP and Gutsy) is blocked. Thus, of the 34 first postings to this thread, nine, posted by only two signatures in toto, claim FF 2.0.0.12 problems which do not at all correspond to the experience of the other posters with the browser, nor to my own. What's going on here ? Who - or what - lies behind this bad-mouthing of Firefox ?...

Henri
0 Votes
+ -
Seems Bogus
Joe.Smetona 9th Feb 2008
I right clicked the links for the "qmlscycraig" entry to show the targets. The targets for the first one are the same page and the second one does not correspond to the URL shown on the web page. The Secunia value appears to be just a link added and not necessarily an identifier that the page is a valid part of that known security site. I didn't actually click on the links and would not recommend it.

I installed the latest FF update on a HT 3.46 Lenevo (XP SP2) and my 7.10 Ubuntu and the newly installed Hardy 8.04 Alpha Ubuntu with no problems.

I think the previous poster with problems has some machine issues. There does not seem to be global difficulty with the update.
0 Votes
+ -
Firefox 2.0.0.12 information leak pOc
qmlscycrajg 9th Feb 2008
<script>

/*
@name: Firefox ' + b + '
0 Votes
+ -
Mozilla Web info.
Joe.Smetona 9th Feb 2008
This appears to be the description for the problem on the Mozilla Web site for 2.0.0.12:

BasicAuth dialog realm value spoofing
4 January 2008

Issue

The realm value in a basic authentication dialog may be spoofed by a attacker to trick users into thinking the authentication request is coming from a different, trusted site.

Impact

When displaying the basic authentication dialog, Firefox displays the actual source of the request at the end of the dialog text. Some other browsers display the request source at the very beginning of the dialog text or as part of the pop-up window?s title bar, which may be less likely to be confused.

This may allow an attacker to craft basic authentication dialogs that are confusing to users and may result in users sending website credentials to phishing websites.

Status

Mozilla is currently investigating this issue and has assigned it an initial security severity rating of low. You can follow this issue here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244273

Credit

The issue was reported to the full-disclosure and bugtraq mailing lists by Aviv Raff.

http://aviv.raffon.net/2008/01/02/YetAnotherDialogSpoofingFirefoxBasicAuthentication.aspx

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix