Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
Summary: The company that owns the Nasdaq stock market today confirmed that servers in the U.S. were hijacked as part of a hacking attack but made it clear the breach was "unrelated to our trading systems."
The company that owns the Nasdaq stock market today confirmed that servers in the U.S. were hijacked as part of a hacking attack but made it clear the breach was "unrelated to our trading systems."
The company's admission follows a weekend Wall Street Journal report that hackers "repeatedly penetrated" the Nasdaq's computer network over the course of several months. The newspaper said investigators are are considering a range of possible motives, including unlawful financial gain, theft of trade secrets and a national-security threat designed to damage the exchange.
The mysterious hack -- details are being kept under wraps by Secret Service and FBI investigators -- included an attack against a Web facing application called Directors Desk. The application is billed as a "secure, online Board portal that provides corporate governance software, communication tools and Board management software that increase Board effectiveness."
Nasdaq said it spotted suspicious files during normal security monitoring systems and says there is no evidence that any Directors Desk customer information was accessed or acquired by hackers.
The company said it was asked by the U.S. Department of Justice to refrain from going public with the attack until February 14, 2011 but was forced to provide notification after Wall Street Journal ran its story.
Here's the statement from the Nasdaq OMX Group:
Through our normal security monitoring systems we detected suspicious files on the U.S. servers unrelated to our trading systems and determined that our web facing application Directors Desk was potentially affected. We immediately conducted an investigation, which included outside forensic firms and U.S. federal law enforcement. The files were immediately removed and at this point there is no evidence that any Directors Desk customer information was accessed or acquired by hackers. Our trading platform architecture operates independently from our web-facing services like Directors Desk and at no point was any of NASDAQ OMX’s operated or serviced trading platforms compromised.
Subsequently, the U.S. Department of Justice requested that we refrain from providing notice to our customers until, at the earliest, February 14, 2011, in order to facilitate the continuing investigation. NASDAQ OMX was honoring the U.S. Government’s request to delay notification, but when a story ran in the media on Saturday, February, 5, 2011, regarding a hacking incident at NASDAQ OMX, we immediately decided, in consultation with the authorities, that we must inform our customers.
We continue to evaluate and enhance our advanced security controls to respond to the ever increasing global cyber threat and continue to devote extensive resources to further secure our systems. Cyber attacks against corporations and government occur constantly. NASDAQ OMX remains vigilant against such attacks. We have been working in cooperation with the Government’s ongoing investigations and have received their technical advice for which we are appreciative.
* Image via bfishadow's Flickr photostream (CC 2.0).
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
so it was a third part piece of software!
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
Ah Sarcasm. Yeah... those fanbois would say something like that.
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
Wait, your title says "So it was a third part*y piece of software" and then you go on a pro Apple rant.
Wouldn't it be the fault of whoever wrote the "secure board portal"? The article doesn't say it exploited a bug in the operating system.
Where are all these people coming up with Win/Lin/App? It could be HPUX, Vax, or anything else. It doesn't matter how secure an OS is if the app is poorly written.
Duh.
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
Yeah, the NASDAQ is going to use Objective C to develop directors information on their servers... wake up!
All Windows' fault....
http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http://www.directorsdesk.com <br><br>People need to wake up and realize what a POS Windows is and how <b>WINDOWS HAS NO PLACE RUNNING WEB PRESENCES ANYWHERE</b>!<br><br>Join me and boycotting any website that used Windows. Start by anything with .asp or .aspx then look at Netcraft if you are unsure.
Without additional detail any such conclusion would be foolish.
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
You don't even have any proof that it wouldn't have happened to an OSX server or a Linux server.
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
Considering the majority of Web servers are not running IIS and Windows, I'd say it's less of an issue than putting Windows on the Internet.
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/category/web-server-survey/
Granted just because you don't run IIS doesn't mean you are not running Windows but I'd imagine those that run Apache/Windows are a niche.
Why are you afraid to admit Windows is a POS? Not every OS has such gaping holes and issues. Stockholm Syndrome seems to fit the majority of Windows users. It's uncanny how some will defend an OS and applications with gaping holes that don't exist on other OS's. Other OS's have their issues but are not a security risk like Windows.
Windows -does- have problems
But going with what my title is... yes, Windows does have problems. OSX has problems. Linux has problems. I'd say that the reason why Nasdaq was hacked is because of what it is, not because of what OS runs on it. Anything can be hacked, anything can have viruses programmed for it, anything can be compromised.
I don't "defend an OS with gaping holes", I just get tired of your anti-Windows tirades. Once again, do you have any proof that no Linux severs or OSX servers have ever fallen?
You don't even have any proof that it wouldn't have happened to an...
This is a good point, a Linux/Apache server CAN be way more secure than WIN/IIS, but only if the security configuration on the web-facing files & directories is carefully set up and maintained.
@AndyPagin
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
No, I call it like I see it. Plain and Simple. No need to sugar coat anything. MS is not my gravy train - I've been around before MS was prevalent and will be around long after. Windows is a POS whose time has come and gone. MS needs to rewrite rather than patch the sinking ship. Spare me the details on how Server 2008 is a rewrite; it is not - it has many of the same issues as previous versions.
But the fact is that it's easier to deliver a more secure solution on a Non Windows platform than it is on Windows.
Other OS's can and do fall but it's the amount of effort required. It's harder to get into a non-Windows machine than it is a Windows box. You can lock down a non Windows machine easier.
All OS's have issues. Why would I pick the one that's the hardest to secure, has the most issues, and is the easiest to attack? You wouldn't secure a building with a lock that is easiest to pick, bump, or bypass would you? Yet you will build Websites on the lease secure software.
Let's face real facts
If it was easier, then Windows Server Share would be at zero percent. According to W3Techs, Windows powers 1 out of every 3 servers. According to IDC, it's almost 1 out of every two.
What you should be pointing to, if you wanted to show a lack of Windows, would be Supercomputers. Almost all of them run Linux.
It appears that the majority disagrees with you
And I would imagine that shocks you.
:|
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
Majority who? Most web servers are not running IIS.
It's not even close:
Apache 151,516,152 59.35% 161,591,445 59.13% -0.23
Microsoft 56,723,544 22.22% 57,392,351 21.00% -1.22
As you have said in your other post
You can ASSUME most Apache is not Windows, but until you get more evidence, it's only your biased assumption.
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
Be gone, troll.
RE: Nasdaq confirms servers hacked via web-facing application
billed as a "secure"