ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

Police arrest Mariposa botnet masters, 12M+ hosts compromised

By | March 5, 2010, 5:38am PST

Summary: Spanish Ministry of Interior arrests 3 botnet masters operating a 12M+ infected hosts botnet that managed to steal sensitive data from 800,000 users across 190 countries, some of which include Fortune 1000 companies and 40 major banks.

According to a statement published by the Spanish Ministry of Interior, the botnet masters behind a 12M+ infected hosts botnet dubbed Mariposa, were arrested in a cooperative effort between law enforcement, security vendors and the academic community.

Following the arrest of one of the botnet masters, law enforcement officers seized sensitive data belonging to 800,000 users across 190 countries, and found evidence of infected hosts located within the networks of 500 of the US Fortune 1,000 companies and more than 40 major banks.

Just how sophisticated were the botnet masters behind Mariposa? You’ll be surprised to find out.

  • On December 23 2009, in a joint international operation, the Mariposa Working Group was able to take control of Mariposa. The gang’s leader, alias Netkairo, seemingly rattled, tried at all costs to regain control of the botnet. As I mentioned before, to connect to the Mariposa C&C servers the criminals used anonymous VPN services to cover their tracks, but on one occasion, when trying to gain control of the botnet, Netkairo made a fatal error: he connected directly from his home computer instead of using the VPN. Netkairo finally regained control of Mariposa and launched a denial of service attack against Defence Intelligence using all the bots in his control. This attack seriously impacted an ISP, leaving numerous clients without an Internet connection for several hours, including several Canadian universities and government institutions.

The initial reports describe the group as not so technically sophisticated “normal people” making a lot of money through cybercrime. A logical question emerges - how is it possible that a group of “normal people” can build such a massive botnet? By outsourcing.

The name Mariposa actually means butterfly, which is the original name of a commercially distributed DIY malware kit, sold online for 800/1000 EUR, unless of course the arrested botnet masters weren’t using a pirated version, which is ironically, a common practice within the cybercrime ecosystem these days. What’s particularly interesting about the malware was the fact that it was using its own UDP-based protocol for communication, which according to the original author was developed with stealthiness in mind since UDP connections are rarely logged.

Moreover, the bot has typical for modern malware releases anti-debugging features, as well as built-in DDoS functionality relying on TCP and UDP flood tactics. The three main propagation vectors include MSN, removable media, and through P2P, targeting the following networks - Ares, Bearshare, Imesh, Shareaza, Kazaa, Dcplusplus, Emule, Emuleplus, Limewire.

Just like the majority of commercial DIY malware releases, this one also includes a disclaimer attempting to position it as a “tool for educational purposes only”, with the DDoS option itself described as a tool for “stress testing” your own infrastructure. Also, despite the initial claims that the “mastermind of ‘botnet’ scam remains a mystery“, commercial releases by the original coder of the bot have been circulating in the underground marketplace since 2007. With the recent bust of his customers, he’ll be definitely keeping a low profile for a while.

The Mariposa botnet is the tip of iceberg in respect to DIY botnets (Research: Small DIY botnets prevalent in enterprise networks; Inside the botnets that never make the news - A Gallery) aggregated using commercially, or freely available malware kits.

What this incident proves is that not only is cybercrime becoming easier to outsource in 2010, but also, that even inexperienced people can quickly gain access to capabilities once reserved for sophisticated attackers.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Dancho Danchev is an independent security consultant and cyber threats analyst, with extensive experience in open source intelligence gathering, malware and cybercrime incident response.

Disclosure

Dancho Danchev

More details on Dancho Danchev's current and past professional affiliations, can be found in his LinkedIn profile.

Biography

Dancho Danchev

Dancho Danchev is an independent security consultant and cyber threats analyst, with extensive experience in open source intelligence gathering, and cybercrime incident response. He's been an active security blogger since 2007, and maintains a popular security blog sharing real-time threats intelligence data with the rest of the community on a daily basis. More details on Dancho Danchev's current and past professional affiliations, can be found in his LinkedIn profile. You can also follow him on Twitter

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
66
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Police arrest Mariposa botnet masters, 12M hosts compromised
efsane Updated - 8th Apr 2011
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli sohbet sesli chat
0 Votes
+ -
This story is already old, but...
JCitizen Updated - 5th Mar 2010
thanks for the illustrations, they make it more interesting!
0 Votes
+ -
How to identify the targets?
Jevans47 5th Mar 2010
Have you found any test to identify the infected
computers?
0 Votes
+ -
This site is relative bot spam free.
storm14k 5th Mar 2010
I don't see these spam posts to often so I'd say ZDNet is doing a pretty good job. Now if we could only get rid of the Redmond bots. wink J/K
0 Votes
+ -
Hear! Hear!

lol... grin
0 Votes
+ -
Here's at least one example. (nt)
Lester Young 9th Mar 2010
.
0 Votes
+ -
Except for that produced by the ABMbots
Lester Young 9th Mar 2010
Anybody we know?
0 Votes
+ -
What is more baffling, however...
Hallowed are the Ori 5th Mar 2010
... is that Spammers seem to think that if they can just manage to bypass all the layers of defenses set up to stop their unending stream of sewage, the recipients will throw their hands up with glee and scream "Hallelujah, I am so glad this ad for counterfeit clothing got through to me, because I've always wanted fake-branded clothing!!!"

And yes, I know that if they keep doing it, it must be because someone is stupid enough to do business with a Spammer.

They've destroyed usenet, made email a pain in the ass, and are now working on message boards and social networking sites.

They're all scum, and if they all died tonight I wouldn't shed a tear.
0 Votes
+ -
Scum, scum, scum, scum...
wasabitobiko 5th Mar 2010
Oh how I relish the days of usenet and spam free email.. and right.. their wouldn't be spam if there wasn't gullible jacka$$es who were buying this crap.. and BTW.. Who wears Ed Hardy? Ed Hardy is for douchebags!

Funny story.. I met a programmer a couple of days ago at a coffee shop. When i asked what kind of apps he writes, he told me he writes email harvesting apps. I instantly had this visual of shoving my fist down his throat and pulling his heart out through his esophagus. Instead, I "accidentally" spilled my coffee on him!
0 Votes
+ -
Thats What I'm Saying
LegendsOfBatman 5th Mar 2010
But, what is going on? People REALLY shop this way?
I guess these are the same people who believe they really had a South African relative leave them several godszillion dollars. A South AFrican relative they never knew about, at that. And I guess the fact it's sent to "undisclosed recipients" isn't enough a clue that being the "last known relative" is bull. lol.
0 Votes
+ -
I assume it's 1 in a million
SMparky Updated - 5th Mar 2010
If these guys reach 1 person in a million perhaps they actually can make money that way. It's hard to believe people are that stupid, but remember IQ's. If the average is 100, and we're all above average here, that means there are a lot of dimwits out there.

The sad thing is the number of banks and real businesses that have infected computers. Their executives should be held accountable to their shareholders. If they have a virus infection it should be reported with their quarterly results. It's not always IT that's to blame, since it's the executives that make the policies and hold back IT sometimes.
0 Votes
+ -
Barnum's Principle
AndyPagin 9th Mar 2010
There's a sucker born every minute. Simple as that.
0 Votes
+ -
This way to the egress !!
geoffrey.langlois@... 30th Mar 2010
Re: Barnum.
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting.
AzuMao 5th Mar 2010
Could you please clarify which platform(s) this easy-enough-for-the-average-joe-blow-to-use backdoor affects?
0 Votes
+ -
Let me guess..
wasabitobiko 5th Mar 2010
Another overzealous Linux user?.. Of course their attacking MS crap but you do realize that if Linux or MacOS held enough share of the market, someone would find a way to exploit those OS's as well..

And for the record.. I use Linux on my home server and would use on all my machines if it weren't such PITA to set up..

One GUI installer for all Linux platforms and Linux could gain significant market share.
0 Votes
+ -
The Old Moronic Marketshare argument again
thedavidmckenzie 5th Mar 2010
microsoft is not hacked because of its market share its hacked because its weak.

Look at Apache, dominant market share, relativly few hacks compared to IIS, which has less market share.
0 Votes
+ -
Show us the data.
Lester Young 9th Mar 2010
You can't substantiate that and you know it.
0 Votes
+ -
O Rly?
PlayFair Updated - 9th Mar 2010
I guess you've never checked zone-h.com. Look at the archives of hacked sites. It is generally accepted that IIS runs on about 25% of servers, while Apache runs on about 50%. Yet, there are a bit less Windows servers compromised than the ratio would indicate.

Why is it that Linux sites are compromised more than twice as often then, according to the site statistics?
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks
Lester Young 9th Mar 2010
That's worth a bookmark.
0 Votes
+ -
Where on zone-h.con does it say..
AzuMao 9th Mar 2010
..how many % of servers were hacked due to a vulnerable in IIS vs how many % were hacked due to a vulnerable in Apache?

All I see are countless pages of "site X was visibly defaced", "site Y was visibly defaced", etc.

It doesn't seem to say anywhere on that site how many were noticeably defaced per webserver. It also doesn't seem to say how the noticeable defacement occurred (was it a vulnerability in the OS? In the webserver? In a scripting language? In some unrelated program the owner was running? A weak password being guessed? A weak admin giving out the password???), and the only thing it lists anywhere on the whole website are noticeable defacements. Meaning when some script kiddie replaces the front page with "HAHAHA PWNT", not when someone hacks into the server and steals all the data on it or anything like that.

Completely useless.
I use Gmail, amongst others for my email. I regularly
receive spam messages, which are nicely sorted into my
spam box. I would so much rather see them disappear into
a void rather than have to vet them over and over.

My point is if Gmail is clever enough to send them to my
spam box, why don't they stop them getting through in
total to me - end of spam!!!!
This way, if you try to register to some forum that used a blacklisted mail server, you can go to the spam filter and get the registration link. This has happened to me twice already in only 5 years. If it was simply deleted I wouldn't have been able to register.

Also, emails in the spam folder don't count toward maximum allowed space, and automatically get pruned after a while.

I'm pretty sure that most email services work this way.
0 Votes
+ -
If you use Gmail
jorjitop 7th Mar 2010
you are using spyware.
0 Votes
+ -
Source?
AzuMao 7th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
False positives...
archetuthus 8th Mar 2010
Just to give you the chance to rescue any "false positives" that the filter might wrongly tag as spam.
I have always felt that these "hackers" should be dealt with in a fair and simple way....Drag them from their beds, take them to the middle of the street and execute them. These idiots will get the hint very quickly when they see their peers on YouTube being "offed".

Chuck
Wis, USA
0 Votes
+ -
Great idea!
AzuMao 5th Mar 2010
Please excuse me while I send out some trojans from your computer while you aren't looking.

I hope you've never sinned because you'll be dead in a few hours, if your solution is in place.
in his solution, they track you down for execution.
0 Votes
+ -
RTFA (nt)
rtk 5th Mar 2010
.
0 Votes
+ -
I already did. Did you?
AzuMao 5th Mar 2010
As I mentioned before, to connect to the Mariposa C&C servers the criminals used anonymous VPN services to cover their tracks, but on one occasion, when trying to gain control of the botnet, Netkairo made a fatal error: he connected directly from his home computer instead of using the VPN.


In other words, an IP in a residential block connected to the command servers, and the owner of it was instantly assumed to be the evil hacker, because the computer was in his house. Ergo you can frame someone simply by sending trojans and such from their computer.
0 Votes
+ -
The home IP address was used.....
Lester Young 9th Mar 2010
...to manage the botnet, not to send trojans.
0 Votes
+ -
@Lester Petty nitpicking.
AzuMao 9th Mar 2010
Replace "trojans" in my post with "command
messages". Happy?
0 Votes
+ -
Just wait...
OneTwoc21 5th Mar 2010
More will come, wherever there is money to made there will be people. Personally, i dont mind them, they keep me and my company in business, they write my pay check! I posted on another blog about this, so bare with me if you've read this already. These people, as scum as they may be in people's minds, do create employment for people such as myself, sort of like, if all the crime in the world was gone, we wouldnt need judges and attorneys and what have you. I wonder what kind of economical collapse that would cause happy Either way, a big win for the masses, not so much for us techs, we'll probably see a slow in business as this stuff fades, then somebody will come along and start this same deal and push it and create another world of pain for everybody, and a flow of business for us. Weird how that works huh? happy
0 Votes
+ -
Crime Economics
AndyPagin 9th Mar 2010
The real financial cost of crime massively outweighs the profits (& taxes) of crime prevention/detection organisations.

However you're right about one thing, crime continually evolves and takes advantage of new oppertunities. In London in the 1960s most big money crime came from blowing safes, then Chubb bought out an unblastable safe, so the criminals switched to robbing security trucks with sawn-offs, now most cash is electronic they've switched to cyber-crime. At least no-one gets shot.
Maybe the answer is to go back to an email standard other than smtp which makes spamming harder?
I read an appliction for a patent- That claims to be able to stop spam, by delaying somesort of signal. Since the spammer is using a botnet or whatever. He'll not know not to send info?? Or something like that. Then the server would cut him off and not accept his spam??
0 Votes
+ -
Do you hate Australia???
ozchorlton 7th Mar 2010
Why is the East coast of Australia, cut off your graphic, of the (susposed) world???
Do you hate Australia?
or,
Do you, just not care about anywhere outside the USA, (or think that the world stops as the US border)?
0 Votes
+ -
He cares about..
AzuMao 7th Mar 2010
..everywhere except New Zealand, New Guinea, and the East coasts of Australia and Siberia.

There are others places besides those and the US.
0 Votes
+ -
Anyone want to..
AzuMao 7th Mar 2010
..pool together some money to rent one of those botnets to DDoS these spammers' websites?
An excellent idea, if we had someone we trusted to hold the money long enough to pay for the project!

Ha! devil
0 Votes
+ -
I've used Symantec, Panda and SunBelt Vipre anti-virus programs (liking Vipre best).

But isn't ANY up-to-date AV prog supposed to kill these unsophisticated critters the first microsecond they try some unauthorized action on a PC?

I know that no AV can instnatly keep up with zero-day assaults, so updates need to be ongoing, and mostly are these days.

But if the other 98% of the botnet assaults use unsophisticated and even well-known exploits, WHY wouldn't any standard AV program?kept up to date and scanned with frequently?snuff these lil SOBs like Dirty Harry?
0 Votes
+ -
Signature based heuristics are obsolete...
JCitizen Updated - 8th Mar 2010
there are many good solutions that you can put into an in-depth defense that have some of the best HIPs and heuristic engines going on the market, and almost if not ALL of them have very good free versions.

In my experience many of the best anti-malware are free. One of them is not improved much by purchasing, because I don't trust the anti-virus on it yet; and that is AdAware. The free one does a rip-snorting good job foiling ad server signals to make your browser speed up in performance. I haven't found a reliable way to disable the paid version AV yet.

Many of my utilities can foil the mission of malware while it is actually infecting or resident on the PC already! And I've never seen any of them foiled by the malware, if you are operating properly. Standard accounts go a long way on Windows. I'm sure AzuMayo will suggest switching to open source as on operating system.

Nothing wrong with that if it fills your needs.
How do you tell?
Anything nasty is going to be in or above the kernel.. do you run your primary OS in a VM and debug it from outside? If not, how do you know that there's nothing bad going on?
0 Votes
+ -
quarantine (nt)
Lester Young 9th Mar 2010
.
0 Votes
+ -
I'll take that as a yes.
AzuMao 9th Mar 2010
0 Votes
+ -
By the alerts, Az...
JCitizen 10th Mar 2010
You get a popup, for example from Snoopfree on an XP install that says "wpor[9uff849xxjw[qau wants to read your IE session."

You block it, and do a full update on all your AS solutions until you find the offender and remove it.

This is just one example. Geeks would probably use something like a comparator, or HighJack this. But my clients don't have the time or skills to mess with this way of doing security.
0 Votes
+ -
My bad, J...
AzuMao 10th Mar 2010
...I thought SnoopFree and HiJackThis ran under the operating system, and were thus useless against anything nasty messing with it.

They are actually VMs?
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli sohbet sesli chat

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix