Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
Summary: According to a newly released report by Symantec's MessageLabs, malicious PDF files outpace the distribution of related malicious attachments used in targeted attacks.
According to a newly released report by Symantec's MessageLabs, malicious PDF files outpace the distribution of related malicious attachments used in targeted attacks, and currently represent the attack vector of choice for malicious attackers compared to media, help files, HTMLs and executables.
The report also notes a slight increase in the distribution of executable files, a rather surprising trend given the fact that spam and email filters will definitely pick them up.
PDFs now account for a larger proportion of document file types used as attack vectors. However, it should be noted that office-based file formats are still a popular and effective choice used in some targeted attacks. In 2009, approximately 52.6% of targeted attacks used PDF exploits, compared with 65.0% in 2010, an increase of 12.4%. Despite a recent downturn in the last three months, if this trend were to continue at the same rate it has for the last year, the chart in figure 2 shows that by mid-2011, 76% of targeted malware could be used for PDF-based attacks.
PDF-based malware campaigns are here to stay, though:
"PDF-based targeted attacks are here to stay, and are predicted to worsen as malware authors continue to innovate in the delivery, construction and obfuscation of the techniques necessary for this type of malware," said MessageLabs Intelligence Senior Analyst, Paul Wood.
Are cybercriminals picky? Not necessarily as it's entirely based on the campaign in question. In this case, they appear to be interested in bypassing spam and email filters by distributing a ubiquitous filetype that's often allow to pass through them in the first place.
Email attachments combined with social engineering tactics, are among the many attack vectors, cybercriminals take advantage of. Next to email attachments, the use of web malware exploitation kits is growing, with the majority of publicly obtainable data indicating that they continue relying on outdated and already patched vulnerabilities for successful exploitation.
See also:
- Report: Patched vulnerabilities remain prime exploitation vector
- Report: ZeuS crimeware kit, malicious PDFs drive growth of cybercrime
- Report: AV users still get infected with malware
- Seven myths about zero day vulnerabilities debunked
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
some tiny readers without the bells and whistles might help combat against PDF exploits.
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
Bells and Whistles are nothing compared to view in browser
Thereby, the default action of clicking ANY web pdf link is to *immediately* download and open the file.
WHERE ELSE does **ANY** IT Dept or staff allow such an action? Can you click on ANY EXE file on the web and suddenly have it downloading and opening on you?
NO.. you have to click the link.. CONFIRM you want to Save/Run/whatever ... and EVEN THEN after the file is downloaded and the system attempts to run the file, you are STILL prompted to confirm you want to run the file ... of course this is solely because its an EXE ...
**BUT**
When the attack vector is to use files that would seem harmless against you, WHY THEN should these files be allowed to continue to automatically download, and open without a SECOND CHANCE for the user to stop the action?
So that last part would be good for .PDF / .DOC / .XLS / .etc.
And what pisses me off even more, is that this issue hasn't been a hot button pushed by every IT person out there back to Adobe and respective companyes to NEVER AGAIN do something so stupid as Auto-Open, Auto-Run a file extention and in adobe's case, make it so difficult to stop the process..
ie. with adobe its not a simple matter of 'de-selecting' the "show in browser" ... you have to manually edit the registry, to disable the bypass of extention properties ... otherwise, the best you get from taking that checkmark away, is that the file downloads automatically still.. and then auto-opens inside the full reader ... hardly worth the checkmark at all.
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
"...if this trend were to continue..."
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
trending long term ...
So ... Trending ... take with a grain of salt if you need to ... but its important to get the concept out there that these things can be very bad if they continue..
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
RE: Report: malicious PDF files becoming the attack vector of choice
MS recently shipped a security update to disable autoplay on external USB devices.
just as well I would be ok if MS shipped a kill switch to disable the Acrobat/Adobe Reader auto open PDF registry parameter.
With Adobe Reader 10x (as well as 9.x) Adobe is forcing install/enable of their AIR platform. Blah! If users are intent on continuing to run Adobe Reader I recommend avoiding 10.x/9.x and stick with 8.x version (without AIR), at least as long as Adobe continues releasing patches for 8.x.
But most users are best served to opt for a lightweight/low foot-print PDF reader (not Adobe Reader).
Related question: If Apple can integrate a PDF Reader in MacOS, why is not Microsoft able to do the same?
How does a pdf transmit a virus?