Researchers intercept dangerous new banking Trojan
Summary: Malware hunters have intercepted a new banker Trojan being used by cyber-criminals to steal financial credentials from banks in the United States.
Malware hunters at SecureWorks have intercepted a new banker Trojan being used by cyber-criminals to steal financial credentials from banks in the United States.
The Trojan, dubbed "Bugat," targets Automated Clearing House (ACH) and wire transfer transactions by small- and mid-sized business in the U.S., much like the virulent Clampi Trojan that has stolen tens of millions of dollars.
According to SecureWorks researcher Jason Milletary, the Bugat Trojan includes features commonly found in malware used to commit credential theft for financial fraud.
- Internet Explorer (IE) and Firefox form grabbing
- Scrape or modify HTML for targeted sites
- Steal and delete IE, Firefox, and Flash cookies
- Steal FTP and POP credentials
- SOCKS proxy server (v4 and v5)
- Browse and upload files from the infected computer
- Download and execute programs
- Upload list of running processes
- Delete system files and reboot computer to render Windows unable to boot
The Trojan communicates with a remote command and control web server to receive commands and to exfiltrate stolen information.
As part of this process, the malware also receives a list of URL target strings used to monitor the victim’s web browser activity. These target strings indicate a strong interest in websites used for business banking and wire transfers. Bugat may also use HTTPS in an attempt to secure its command and control communications.
For more information on these types of attacks, see reporting by Brian Krebs on the WaPo SecurityFix blog.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
Could you please clarify?
[i]Delete system files and reboot computer to render Windows
unable to boot[/i]
I get that it affects Windows.. but does it affect anything else?
This will be a recurrent problem until everyone switches to safe systems
The most secure computer is not going to protect against stupid users. [nt]
A system is composed by both machines and users, safety is on both sides
CAUTION HOT!
It is a trojan. HOW can machine protect a system if despite the warnings issued by the OS the user deliberately hits the button that says "YES! YES! YES! I AM THAT STUPID. RUN THIS FILE THAT I JUST DOWNLOADED FROM THIS COOL WEB SITE IN NIGERIA THAT PROMISSES ME 100 MILLIONS OF DOLLARS"?
MS could approve apps for Windows
Windows application that isn't approved by MS.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! I'd love
to see the reaction of the Apple cultists after
that one. Considering how much they all
[b]freaked[/b] out when it was announced that
all 64 bit Vista drivers would have to be
signed by MS, I can only imagine the outcry if
that policy was extended to apps. Of course,
when Apple does it to block the installation of
competing software, then it is okay.
Cue the double standards...
Huh?
problems in Windows? That makes no sense.
Anyways, the solution already exists and has been in use for a
long time in less crappy OSs. It's called having a software
repository, and everything else being source.
MS should do exactly that....
this for their mobile devices, they too would be plagued by this modern
technological scourge. The only ones who would object to this, are the
nerds and techies of this world. The ordinary user type folks are evidently
all for this, as shown by the success of the iTunes app store.
Yes it is..
How is your system so safe? Oh, I know
Can't beat that for security.
That was so silly that not even I know what to say
Yes you can.
keyloggers/etc without you knowing.
Anyways, a far easier more practical solution is to use
an OS that was actually designed with security in mind.
Which would be? (nt)
One based on a UNIX-like kernel.
Nothing to do
I second that - MAC/Linux user ... dwell on this ...
That's how you are being perceived, by other reading your posts.
No, Mac and Linux users have computers....
other crap out periodically, try to maintain an obtuse registry and other
futzing around with a cantankerous Windows operating system. Windows
7 is a bit better, but still requires more work than a Mac. Macs just work.
That is why Mac users have more time to razz hapless Windows users.
"Macs just work"? Is that before or after the $300 refund?
No, Mac and Linux users have computers....
That's been refuted over and over...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/22/security_report_windows_vs_linux/#bursting
and
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/22/security_report_windows_vs_linux/#winvslinuxdesign