Spam rates massively down on shutdown of rogue ISP

Summary: Several major news outlets are reporting that the shutdown of a rogue ISP in the Bay Area has lead to a massive drop in the global amount of spam. While this is "good thing", this event is not an end of spam, nor is it even the beginning of the end of spam; it is merely a temporary lull.

Several major news outlets are reporting that the shutdown of a rogue ISP in the Bay Area has lead to a massive drop in the global amount of spam. While this is "good thing", this event is not an end of spam, nor is it even the beginning of the end of spam; it is merely a temporary lull. Thanks in no small part to evidence gathered by Brian Krebs, The San Jose based McColo was dropped from the Internet yesterday resulting in a massive decline in spam rates around the globe. The common consensus right now is that the takedown resulted in a 35% to 50% drop in inbound spam sending attempts.

The shutdown has removed pieces of infrastructure critical for the operation of several spammers, but this does not mean they cannot adapt. We have seen that command and control servers can be eliminated by using distributed control algorithms, and storefronts can be hidden across compromised websites. The spammers may even regroup by recreating the services provided by McColo somewhere in Eastern Europe.

While many people would like to declare this event as the first step in the end to spam, I can pretty much guarantee you that it isn't. Over the next few weeks, spammers will further decentralize their operation, turn the botnets back on, and restart their barrage.

Topic: Security

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

9 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • It's not about spam

    If McColo had had the sense [1] of a decapitated cockroach, they'd still be in business. Spam doesn't even get you a return phone call from Global Crossing, but kiddie porn?

    [1] Yeah, I know: Rule 3.
    Yagotta B. Kidding
  • RE: Spam rates massively down on shutdown of rogue ISP

    I like would like Pakistan's death penalty to extend to spammers. I have talked to FBI cyber investigators and I get the feeling that they don't give a shit unless it affects national security.
    yagijd
  • RE: Spam rates massively down on shutdown of rogue ISP

    Sweet! Users:1 Spammers: 10,036
    dreampod
  • My spam is down hugely!

    I usually have 100+ spam messages in my inbox when I wake up and today there was only 25 or so. This proves that most of the spam is indeed controlled by a single small organization. Now what needs to happen is to find out who these people are and delete them in the same manner I would their messages!

    I still believe, however, that the main reason that a solid effort is not being made to combat spam is that there are parties (other than the spammers) who stand to profit from our misery. Those who provide spam control solutions would be out of business if spam were indeed controlled.

    In addition, the government (read: W) doesn't give a rat's ass about what the needs of the people are and hence the problems we all now face today!

    Just my 2? worth . . .
    cppsolutions
    • And do you think...

      The "New" government (Read: O) won't use this as the basis to control all Email? O's agenda will make "Spam" look like wedding cake frosting!

      "W" is indeed a Global Socialist!(IMHO). A vile National Communist is better? (IMHO, of course)
      RS9
      • Double Fail

        Cppsolutions fails utterly for trying to involve presidential politics in a discussion of spammers.

        You fail even more spectacularly by utterly ignoring the issue and posting some BS about Obama being a communist?

        Fail X Fail = Fail
        bmerc
  • RE: Spam rates massively down on shutdown of rogue ISP

    I'm sure it is only a temporary lull in the storm, but ... if it were repeated again ... and again ... and ... and they all move o'seas it'd be a lot easier to block them and forget them. I say let the other countries have them; then they might wake up too.
    twaynesdomain-22354355019875063839220739305988
  • RE: charge for email

    In the days of the hard-copy distribution of un-solicited advertising arriving at one's front door, the senders obviously had to pay poistage to get their messages sent. Why cant ISP's charge a small amount (a few cents or equivelent) for each outgoing email. It's still a lot cheaper than hard-copy postage and would be virtually trivial for bona fide email senders - but those who would send hundreds of thousands or millions of SPAM mail (whether legitimate or illegetimite, good or bad, devent or indecent etc etc, could not possibly afford it - especially given the almost vanishingly small rate of returns experienced.
    Gray Eagle
  • RE: Spam rates massively down on shutdown of rogue ISP

    Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
    <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">seslisohbet</a> <a href="http://www.yuregininsesi.com">seslichat</a>
    birumut