ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

The cadence of Microsoft security patches

By | March 14, 2010, 9:00am PDT

Summary: While the exact details of Microsoft’s security patches are generally treated as news, the expected workload each month really shouldn’t be a guessing game because Microsoft’s patch releases are predictably cyclical.

Guest editorial by Andrew Storms

Every month, like clockwork, Microsoft releases security bulletins and every month people ask me if it’s small or a big release. While the exact details of the patches are generally treated as news, the expected workload each month really shouldn’t be a guessing game because Microsoft’s patch releases are predictably cyclical.

I don’t have any special inside knowledge, and I can’t speak for Microsoft, but when I look at the publicly available information it’s pretty clear to me how the cycle works.

60 Day QA Cycle

A 30 to 60 day QA cycle on a Microsoft patch is typical, and it’s actually pretty easy to tell how many days a patch was probably in QA. If you are curious, download the patch manually and take a look at the date the file was digitally signed. This isn’t an absolutely accurate date because a patch could drop in and out of the QA process several times, but it’s a reasonable approximation.follow Ryan Naraine on twitter

Using this method I calculated the average dates for the Dec 2009 patches at 54 days, November 2009 patches at 36 days, and October 2009 at 45 days. It’s not too hard to jump from those numbers to an average 60 day cycle.

Roller Coaster Months

The security teams in charge of acquiring, testing and installing patches can feel like they are on a roller coaster with Microsoft patches. In just the first three months of 2010 we’ve already had wild swings in the number of CVEs and bulletins. January saw 2 bulletins, followed by huge February with 13, and then this week we saw just 2 again.

[ SEE: Skeletons in Microsoft's Patch Day closet ]

If we plot the number of bulletins along side the number of CVEs patched each month, there is a distinct pattern. Most Microsoft patches are obviously on a two month push.

The first graph plots Microsoft release trends from January 2006 to March 2010. The second graph shows just the last two years, 2008 and 2009, where the wild up and down pattern is more obvious.

Lessons Learned

We’ll never be able to predict the exact patch details for any month, but security teams can use these data points to help with planning. We all know that resources are short, but the risks and threats continue to grow, so better utilization of resources has never been more important.

There are no shortage of vendor patches. Luckily, Microsoft not only releases their patches on a predefined schedule, they are also fairly predictable in size. Since March was a pretty light Patch Tuesday, we can expect that the bulletin count for April will jump back up into double digits.

If you are the resource manager for a team of people in charge of your company’s patching methodology, just knowing that can help you plan. This month is your chance to catch up from January. Thinking ahead to April, it makes sense to anticipate a large release from Microsoft so plan to have all hands on deck.

Not really much of a mystery after all, is it?

* Andrew Storms is nCircle’s Director of Security Operations. He is responsible for the definition and enforcement of the company’s security compliance programs as well as overseeing day-to-day operations for the Information Technology department.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and social media enthusiast specializing in Internet and computer security issues.

Disclosure

Ryan Naraine

The most important disclosure is of my employment with Kaspersky Lab as a member of the global research and analysis team. Kaspersky Lab is a global company specializing in anti-malware and secure content management technologies. I do not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Ryan Naraine

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and social media enthusiast specializing in Internet and computer security issues. He is currently security evangelist at Kaspersky Lab, an anti-malware company with operations around the globe. He is taking a leadership role in developing the company's online community initiative around secure content management technologies.

Prior to joining Kaspersky Lab, Ryan was Editor-at-Large/Security at eWEEK, leading the magazine's and Web site's coverage of Internet and computer security issues and managing the popular SecurityWatch blog, covering the daily threats, vulnerabilities and IT security technologies. He also covered IT security, hacker attacks and secure content management topics for Jupiter Media's internetnetnews.com.

Ryan can be reached at naraine SHIFT 2 gmail.com. For daily updates on Ryan's activities, follow him on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: The cadence of Microsoft security patches
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Thankfully I own a Mac!
Trolleur 15th Mar 2010
I own a Mac and it's so refreshing to see a product with so few security
issues that they don't even have to release fixes on any schedule. It's so
wonderful!
That is it gets hacked the fastest. Last year it was hacked in less than 30 seconds.

And Charlie Miller the winning hacker 2 years running said Mac's are easier to hack than Windows.

It took a bout a year for them to fix the vulnerability that Charlie used last time.

He is predicting that he will win again on a Mac.
0 Votes
+ -
Man are you out of touch. When you download updates for your Mac, you obviously don't take notice of how many patches are included, do you.
OS X has 20:1 more patches than Vista or Windows 7 since 2007.

They come in what are called Mega Patch releases, or even Super Patch releases where there are hundreds of security and bug fixes.

I'm sorry but the misconception about Apple is hilarious. If this site was not ABM and not pro Apple, we'd see blogs about how many times OS X has had the same patch, patched and patched again and again and again.

OS X has so many layers of band-aids Apple is going to be forced to write the system over from scratch at some point. Well, they don't write it, but they'll have to reconsider how they assembled the BSD, NEXTSTEP, Mach from CMU etc and find better open source to use to fill in the voids and tie the software together.

Apple creates nothing, copies everything.

Steve Jobs in 1996 said "We are shameless about copying great ideas".

That started with xerox and continues to this day with things like touch technology.

They use open source teams, like openDarwin, then dump them when they've enhanced the code Jobs was looking to get free development on, like GCD. the openDarwin team disbanded in 2006 because they realized Apple was using them as pawns to be a testing ground for Apple projects but never sharing enough OS details for them to make openDarwin a full OS.

yeah, if you think your Mac is not patched, then you are very naive. Windows 7 having a high month of 13 fixes is a number Apple can only dream of getting down to.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The cadence of Microsoft security patches
Loverock Davidson 15th Mar 2010
Knowing that Microsoft releases patches on a schedule has
been absolutely wonderful for us. We know when to plan
for patches and do so accordingly. The number of patches
doesn't matter too much for us because we push them all
out in one batch. So 2 last month, 10 this month, its all
the same. I couldn't imagine going back to the old days
of using a primitive OS that tells you it has updates
daily, requiring an install and reboot.
Linux OSes are getting patches daily, so at month's end you've received far more patches and OS X is mega patch city.

Why are the super low patch numbers from Vista and Windows 7 what is reported so much?

How many Monster patches does OS X need before zdnet starts to blog about who is really patching more often and vastly greater numbers?
Why aren't we hearing about how overly patched OS X is, and the real security picture?

I don't expect that from zdnet any time soon.



It makes no sense whem
0 Votes
+ -
What's there not to understand?
still not nice 16th Mar 2010
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Linuxvirus

Now if there's something you know about that these folks don't, I'm sure they'll be glad to hear it. Honest injun. grin
What a whining bunch the Linux crowd is, they conveniently don't mention unpatched linux boxes get hammered, like Breezy and the malware that had Ubuntu servers attacking each other...and that was at Ubuntu, not just any old Ubuntu users.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=453

the very people that develop Ubuntu were running unpatched servers and got hammered. That is TOO Funny. ROTFLMAO!! oh...wait a sec...LOL LOL...sorry I can't stop laughing.

Oh, and Google, the mighty Linux savior had it's own properties penetrated. LOL!!!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The cadence of Microsoft security patches
efsane Updated - 8th Apr 2011
Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
sesli sohbet sesli chat
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix