madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine and Dancho Danchev

Under worm attack, US Army bans USB drives

By | November 20, 2008, 10:34am PST

Summary: Under sustained attack from what is described as a rapidly spreading network worm, the U.S. army has banned the use of USB sticks, CDs, flash media cards, and all other removable data storage devices, according to internal e-mail messages seen by Wired’s Noah Shachtman. According to the article, service members have been ordered to “cease usage [...]

Under worm attack, US Army bans USB drivesUnder sustained attack from what is described as a rapidly spreading network worm, the U.S. army has banned the use of USB sticks, CDs, flash media cards, and all other removable data storage devices, according to internal e-mail messages seen by Wired’s Noah Shachtman.

According to the article, service members have been ordered to “cease usage of all USB storage media until the USB devices are properly scanned and determined to be free of malware.”  Eventually, some government-approved drives will be allowed back under certain “mission-critical,” but unclassified, circumstances. “Personally owned or non-authorized devices” are “prohibited” from here on out, according to the e-mails.

The USB device ban was handed down by the commander of U.S. Strategic Command and includes everything from external hard drives to “floppy disks. It takes effect immediately.

To make sure troops and military civilians are observing the suspension, government security teams “will be conducting daily scans and running custom scripts on NIPRNET and SIPRNET to ensure the commercial malware has not been introduced,” an e-mail says. “Any discovery of malware will result in the opening of a security incident report and will be referred to the appropriate security officer for action.”

The threat from malware that spreads via removable media has been on a steady rise with some estimates showing a 10 percent increase in detections this year.

ALSO SEE:

Malware-infected USB drives distributed at security conference

Malware found in Lenovo software package

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and social media enthusiast specializing in Internet and computer security issues.

Disclosure

Ryan Naraine

The most important disclosure is of my employment with Kaspersky Lab as a security evangelist. Kaspersky Lab is a global company specializing in anti-malware and secure content management technologies. I do not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Ryan Naraine

Ryan Naraine is a journalist and social media enthusiast specializing in Internet and computer security issues. He is currently security evangelist at Kaspersky Lab, an anti-malware company with operations around the globe. He is taking a leadership role in developing the company's online community initiative around secure content management technologies.

Prior to joining Kaspersky Lab, Ryan was Editor-at-Large/Security at eWEEK, leading the magazine's and Web site's coverage of Internet and computer security issues and managing the popular SecurityWatch blog, covering the daily threats, vulnerabilities and IT security technologies. He also covered IT security, hacker attacks and secure content management topics for Jupiter Media's internetnetnews.com.

Ryan can be reached at naraine SHIFT 2 gmail.com. For daily updates on Ryan's activities, follow him on Twitter.

Talkback Most Recent of 175 Talkback(s)

  • Um...good luck on that!!
    Do they not realize that the cost of lost productivity from completely un-networking and banning shared media FAR outweighs the cost of security s/w and remediation from time to time? Ever hear of anti-virus and backups? Or maybe they're still running Win 98. Sorry, my bad.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    techboy_z
    20th Nov 2008
  • Actually . . .
    "Do they not realize that the cost of lost productivity from completely un-networking and banning shared media FAR outweighs the cost of security s/w and remediation from time to time?"

    In the case of a normal business, you would be right.

    In the case of the US Army, you are wrong. They are perhaps the biggest target of attacks and attempts at security breaches - and they have a lot of valuable secrets. I'd say you can't even begin to estimate the costs, much less claim to know how they compare to lost productivity.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    CobraA1
    20th Nov 2008
  • Linux not the Answer
    Linux would never pass all the requirements the governemtn puts on software. Even if the governement moved towards Linux, wouldn't you think that vast resources would be all of a sudden place on hacking Linux.

    The problem is not with the Army. It is DOD wide. They are all on the same network called ONENET. The networks are managed centrally. The whole idea for them is to take control away from local IT administrators and manage it from DC. They are very paranoid about network breaches as it is possible for a probleme to affect DOD worldwide. Limiting USB devices is a problem. People end up taking work home all the time. Productivity will take a huge hit. They simply have to find a security solution that works. Purchasing Thumb drives and issuing them to personnel in need of them after those drives have been certified would be a pretty good start or allowing folks with personally owned ones to be certified and used. Changing the entire operating system, would actually be insane and would cost Billions of dollars, even though Linux does not cost a dime.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    mebarnabee@...
    20th Nov 2008
  • It would be expensive, however...
    However, Linux is the better solution than Windows.

    It's built for networking from the ground up.

    It's built for access control from the ground up.

    It's built for multiple user accounts from the ground up.

    And remote access to a Linux box is how most Linux boxes are used (we call them servers...).

    Also the government can control the source code and make a distro that is closed source and owned by the government.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    T1Oracle
    20th Nov 2008
  • nono
    actually i dont think its legal to make open source closed source, thats the whole point of open source.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    itchy8me
    21st Nov 2008
  • Wrong. You can close OSS.
    I know of a start up company that has that in their business plan.

    Also, there are closed source Linux distros (one example: http://librenix.com/?inode=2973)

    Irregardless, it all depends on licensing and if the government needs it then they could certainly negotiate.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    T1Oracle
    21st Nov 2008
  • no comprehendo
    i don't understand, i thought the whole point of open source was to protect the communities code from being closed... please explain.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    itchy8me
    21st Nov 2008
  • Open source
    ...just means that the code is publicly shared. The purpose is often to get community involvement in the development of the code. However many will allow private entities to use the code in closed source products.

    Some disagree with this and think that it is unfair, but if the licensing allows it then the private entity is fully within their rights. However, most (if not all) licenses do require that all derivative works give credit to the original source.

    Google has a closed source custom Linux distro for internal use.

    It is all about the licensing, and different people choose different licensing for their own reasons. I don't know why you would let a private entity close your source code, but for the case of government use I'd consider it patriotic to allow it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    T1Oracle
    22nd Nov 2008
  • Bushgotations?
    "...if the government needs it then they could certainly negotiate."
    Yeah, rigggggght!
    The Bush Administration (thery're STILL in orifice, REMEMBER?) negotiate on anything other than oil and how to line their own pockets with OIL MONEY? Get real...they just take what they want.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    redbeard74
    24th Nov 2008
  • The flaw with buying thumb drives would be
    That the user takes the drive home to a computer that his or her kids have been surfing the web on and now has every form of viral infection known to man or beast. Basically, undoing all the work in procuring and certifying the thumb drives. As long as you have storage devices that get attached to systems with limited protection connected to civilian internet connections you're going to have these issues.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    maldain
    20th Nov 2008
  • Violaters of the policy need to be slammed!
    Any employee with access to a DOD network that would export files to a USB drive to be used on a "shared" pc and then import back into the DOD network needs to be fired, military personnel NJP or some punitive action including courtmartial!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    overclocked
    21st Nov 2008
  • What about...
    As an Electronics Tech with 35 years of experience I find that the ability to bring some of my stored experience from home has been indespensible.

    Also, if I generate personal time-keeping at work it would be nice to take that information home, too.

    All I can do now is export it as text and e-mail it to myself...

    See my later post as to why this extreme measure should have *NEVER* been needed!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    madrucke@...
    22nd Nov 2008
  • It certainly,,,
    ...should have never been needed - it should be impossibe for anyone to connect USB drives or any other non-approved devices/memory at all to the computers.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    fairportfan
    25th Nov 2008
  • Who to slam...
    Look I agree that idiots who do not practice good surfing and do not keep their personal systems "Clean" need to be slammed and slammed hard because they've ruined it for all of us...

    And, there is NO EXCUSE because all DOD employees have access to free use of AV Software if downloaded from a .MIL url...

    Of course now it's kind of hard to get home without a USB drive...

    There is a UCMJ or US Code about Forcing a Safeguard...

    Anyone that brings files to work without doing due dilligence in ensuring it's clean needs to have charges filed...

    But, again... The experts failed us!!!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    madrucke@...
    22nd Nov 2008
  • Congress has already written...
    ...the requirement to consider Open Source in a DND procurement bill.

    With Secure Extensions, Solaris 10 is a far more secure OS than Windows or Linux by the way. Look it up.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    914four
    20th Nov 2008

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
Click Here
Click Here

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
Click Here