ie8 fix
madison

Zero Day

Ryan Naraine, Emil Protalinski and Dancho Danchev

"Zombies ahead!" sign says something about SCADA security

By | January 29, 2009, 8:30pm PST

An electronic road sign hacked to alert drivers to hoards of the undead provides a nice pedagogical example of why SCADA security is such a “big deal”.

Earlier this week a road sign was hacked to warn drivers about zombies disturbing their evening commute. The hack itself was trivial: an intrepid individual discovered that electronic road signs shared a common default password. The default password would have been discovered and publicized years ago if the systems were connected to the internet, but they were left alone for years as very few people had the gumption to walk up to one of the signs and attempt what is essentially a dictionary attack against the authentication mechanism. Without the forcing function that is sustained attack, engineers have no reason to improve the security of their systems.

It seems that everyone laughed off the hack as a simple gag, but you are left to wonder what security problems that already exist in systems that are semi-attached to the grid.

There are a large class of systems that are semi-attached to the grid which do have similar security problems. Known as SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition) Systems, these computers are responsible for controlling physical plant like nuclear reactors and oil refineries. Many of these systems were deployed years ago, well before the information security industry fully understood code quality problems and how they can be exploited by attackers. That is all well and good as long as you can guarantee an air-gap between the control network and anything a human being can touch.

Maintaining a guarantee that none of the systems will touch a publicly accessible network is pretty challenging for ten to twenty years as you bring on new staff that may not know why the air gap was originally put into place. Eventually someone hooks up the SCADA system network to a PC that provides a nice Windows XP-based visualization interface, and they also hook it up to the internet so they can get pages at home when something goes wrong.

The Feds have known about this issue for some time, and have invested heavily in improving SCADA system security. Hopefully they complete the job before some hacker discovers the system, and well… it’s “Zombies ahead!” time.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adam J. O'Donnell, Ph.D. is an R&D engineer who has focused on computer security since 2000.

Disclosure

Adam O'Donnell

Adam J. O’Donnell currently works for Cloudmark, a messaging security company whose clients include the majority of the Tier 1 customer-facing service providers as well as mobile carriers and social networks. He serves on the advisory committee for the SOURCE Security Conference, as well as several conference technical program committees. Many of his close friends work in the security industry, and he will disclose those relationships as he deems it necessary.

Biography

Adam O'Donnell

Adam J. O'Donnell, Ph.D. is an R&D engineer who has focused on computer security since 2000. He currently is the Director of Emerging Technologies at Cloudmark, a messaging security company located in San Francisco.

Adam early on mastered the art of writing in complete sentences, using both hands and one foot. Later, he learned to do so with each individually. After fourteen years of apprenticeship in the mist-covered hills of central Nepal, Dr. O'Donnell emerged an unparalleled digital warrior and in desperate need of a anti-fungal wash.

Approaching both life and enterprise security with the verve of a particular capuchin, he is respected the world over as an observer of all he sees. Adam's dry blade of analysis will sever the hard candy shell surrounding most technical security concepts, and significantly goo-ify the remaining so as to be consumable in small bites with sufficiently large servings of digestive aids. Just what the doctor ordered.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
20
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: �mbies ahead!�ign says something about SCADA security
birumut Updated - 4th May 2011
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
seslisohbet seslichat
0 Votes
+ -
Security of the Grid
Andrew Merrick 30th Jan 2009
Thanks for bringing light angle to what is essentially a very hot topic! We all need to take a breather every now again, stop worrying about the security of parts of the grid and calm down.

I'm wondering if you wouldn't mind yourself touching on how digital security effects the grid and the end user. What are the greatest risks?

I've already found some interesting information at this site: http://www.justaskgemalto.com

I was wondering what your perspetive might be.
0 Votes
+ -
This isn't SCADA
Vitaly McLain 30th Jan 2009
What do digital road signs have to do with SCADA? I agree that this is an important field to look at, but I really think that this is a stretch.

First of all, your assertion that roadsigns have been left alone for years is not true. They get hacked all the time (one next to my house said "Internet Hate Machine was here" just recently.) They are often unlocked and have a simple keypad inside, and both the default password and the mechanism to reset the sign to its default password have been around since the days of BBS's. They are stand alone devices and they have nothing to do with data acquisition or control of RTUs, PLCs, or IEDs. They do not use any SCADA protocol, either.

We as an industry should think about SCADA security, but let's not use trivial, unrelated incidents to thrust the subject into the limelight.
Technically, that traffic sign *is* a SCADA device. It controls the output to the sign, controls its access to the traffic network (if connected to a larger network), and who can gain access to the device.

You need to view things from a holistic perspective, not just from one isolated event. This mindset, this way of thinking, has caused more trouble than good, because people "cannot see the forest for the trees".

You are merely seeing just a single tree.

Also, even if this event were isolated (and I am certain that it is), specific information was given out on the Internet providing answers to the how's, when's, what's, why's and where's. Essentially, someone provided the "keys to the kingdom" as to *how* to hack these devices. The threat vector just got *bigger*. If these devices are connected to a wireless network, and if that network is connected to the same network that controls other things, other devices, that would determine if lives and/or property could (potentially) be lost, would you take that risk? Probably not.

The fact is, you need to treat everything as "related", relevant or not that it may be. Trivial incidents point out to much larger-scaled events utilizing more complex mechanisms. The principles are similar, perhaps even identical, and anyone with a decent thought process, might be able to correlate the attack vectors between the two scenarios.
0 Votes
+ -
Digital Road signs are SCADA
eric.murphy@... 6th Feb 2009
They even have thier own widely adopted industry protocol - NTCIP. There is even an OPC Server available for it:

http://www.matrikonopc.com/opc-drivers/235/protocol-driver-details.aspx

There are cities with huge networks of their dynamic road signs connected to a network and controlled by HMI's. Controlling traffic flow might not be the same league as controlling the power grid, but hacking the system could still have serious consequences.

OPC Exchange
http://blog.matrikonopc.com


True this case may not be SCADA but how many other government and city based infrastructure could be as easily compromised? This is just a proof point that there is a need for better controls for security, compliance and availability.
0 Votes
+ -
You would add two devices at each end of the wire. The devices would communicate with a secure protocol, and from there to the SCADA devices. They would have to be cheap (like a small routers) to be practical. That doesn't mean that also an air gap should exists.
0 Votes
+ -
SCADA
Aussie_Troll 30th Jan 2009
Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition.

Ummm what part of a street side sign relates to SCADA?

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/21/1056119529509.html

"

The cyberspace invaders
June 22 2003




While terrorism has made the world more security conscious, governments and the private sector have been slow to realise how vulnerable they are to attacks on information systems. Gary Hughes reports.


At first the attacks went unnoticed.

A spate of mysterious faults and communications breakdowns hitting a network of 150 computer-controlled sewage pumping stations belonging to Queensland?s Maroochy Shire Council were put down to glitches in the new system. Pumps were not running when they should, alarms were not being triggered and reported from smaller computers running each pumping station, and communications between the computers through a two-way radio link were being lost.

Finally, an engineer from the company that installed the system began monitoring and recording all transmitted signals and messages and concluded that someone was deliberately hacking into the control system to cause the disruptions. After three months, the culprit was arrested, but not before a million litres of raw sewage was released into local waterways and $50,000 had been spent cleaning it up."


Now thats more to the point.. and is really SCADA.

0 Votes
+ -
^ FUD
metac0m@... 31st Jan 2009
This is a standard bogey man tale for the FUDers.

The attacker worked for the company that installed the system, had advanced knowledge of the system and the attack did not occur over the Internet.

It is really an example of the insider threat which is greater risk. This does not mean that security of SCADA systems should not be improved and taken seriously.
0 Votes
+ -
I dunno about that, but...
Hallowed are the Ori 2nd Feb 2009
...I DO know that 1,000,000 gallons of sewage would cost a damn sight more than $50,000 to clean up.
0 Votes
+ -
No special devices needed
Vitaly McLain 31st Jan 2009
SCADA devices usually communicate over a serial cable, or something similar. The networked ones use protocols like DNP3 (to go from the RTU to the HMI), and those can be tunneled over IPSec or anything else. They're usually on an internal network. If you're talking about something like ICCP, which is used between separate companies, then certainly it should travel over a VPN link or a private line.
0 Votes
+ -
security was enough
Aussie_Troll 1st Feb 2009
He got caught, went to jail, what more do you want ??

enough security is security that works.

Also during the time he was active, we modified the firmware in the RTU's so he was not able to communicate with the RTU's remotely.

I did not mind maroochy QLD in Australia is a really nice place to spend your time grin

Sitting in the bar, sipping ice cold beer burning eproms is a nice way to work.

Plus you can put Cyber warrior on your resume LOL
0 Votes
+ -
I own and operate one of the most active mailing lists in the World, discussing SCADA/control systems security. As an observer (with an IT and IT security background), I cannot help but wonder if all of this "FUD" ("fear, uncertainty and doubt") is leading to something bigger.

I see and work with "big picture" concepts. This scenario, although improbable, could lead up to something even bigger. As an industry and community, you cannot rule that out.

Why? Let's look at the scenario at 9/11.

Certain circumstances, non-specific events took place well before the 9/11 event, and many mistakenly took it as something else -- something more benign -- discarding the event and information about it. Interestingly enough, that event lead to other, also smaller events, which eventually lead to that tragic day of "9/11". This could (potentially) be one of those circumstances.

My point is this: we cannot rule out anything nowadays, no matter how small. I am NOT stating that we need to be paranoid about anything or everything, but merely that it may be part of a larger, much bigger "game in play". This is a newer form of holistic intelligence being implemented today in our corporations, in our governments, and it is (slowly) being developed to "look at a much bigger picture".

This may be a "testing the waters" event, or it may simply be an isolated event. The fact is, you don't know -- not until you've totally and completely ruled it out as being "benign" and/or "unrelated" to (perhaps) other correlated events; you cannot rule the event out until you've done your homework.

Do any of you know if this event is not part of a much larger event? Or do you think that it's a small group of college kids having a good prank? If you're not directly involved with the investigation, how can you rule out that this might not be a "test" for something else?

Think about it...
0 Votes
+ -
Why? Let's look at the scenario at 9/11.
vilppuu@... 2nd Feb 2009
"Anderson Tapes"
0 Votes
+ -
What defines the term "SCADA"?
Bob Radvanovsky 1st Feb 2009
I have read and heard of many of the arguments of what defines the term "SCADA" from our mailing list. It is an acronym, probably as a result from the post-Cold War era. The second letter "C" represents "CONTROL". To this date, there are quite a number of people still arguing over what defines this term, and to many, it's a moot point to argue because of its nebulous definition.

Mind you, an electronic traffic sign, although small and isolated, can be networked with other traffic signs. Newer signs are coming out with video cameras built-in, used to "monitor traffic". This means an integrated device, something that could be utilized to control even more devices of a much larger configuration, or perhaps allow an attack vector to control an entire network, utilizing the electronic traffic sign as the launching-point into an infrastructure's network.

Small as it may be, and even if this was merely isolated, the fact is, it was tampered with, and its controls were manipulated.

The premise is that this is a smaller-based version of a similar scenario of something that is equal in intelligence as the electronic traffic sign, but controlling things on a much larger scale, such as a pump, a valve, a switch, or a relay, to something even bigger, and so on and so forth.

This kind of thinking is called "follow the pipe", and is used to determine the extent of the amount of risk involved, and how much of a threat vector can be implemented against " scenario", by performing tracebacks to its source...or as far as you can go/get to the its source.

If you can *guarantee* that nothing will get hacked, then I wish you all the best of luck, as you will manage to find the "perfect security job". The definition of "security" is relative, meaning, that...at that particular point in time, it *was* secure. Does that mean, one minute, one hour, one day, one week, one month, one year, onquarter century from now...that it continues to remain "secure"? If you integrate something into a much larger network, you introduce risk into the equation (or, if already connected, increase it). Remember: you cannot completely *remove* "risk", but merely *reduce* it.

You need to view things from a much larger perspective...
0 Votes
+ -
Pixelated Aliens
clovenlife 2nd Feb 2009
I'm suddenly reminded of the pixelated alien invasion and the serious overreaction. These signs are easy to change.. I think I read how to change these sign in a 2600 magazine 10 years ago. Now that someone got the attention of the media, its becoming ridiculous. lets keep perspective here.
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Pixelated Aliens
Vitaly McLain 3rd Feb 2009
Or we can write a huge rant about how this is really SCADA and how we need to use this to "redefine our thinking."
Well it _is_ on the table now and the "sugar cube in the gas
tank crowd" will be seeking further ways to implement their
future attacks.
0 Votes
+ -
Hordes, not hoards
LeonBA Updated - 6th Mar 2009
A hoard is a cache of something, like money. A horde is a mob of things or people, such as zombies.
</nitpick>

That's pretty funny though--better even than the one that was changed to "Klaatu Barada Nikto" last year. But you're right that there are some real potential security issues with this, as with any system (e.g., Linksys wireless routers) that use a default password.
I'm amazed brute force password attacks can still work. DECADES ago VAX/VMS had a "3 strikes and you're locked out" policy. Wait 15 minutes since last attempt to login before it will even check your password before saying "Invalid password."
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
seslisohbet seslichat

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix