'Crack the cloud management nut and a cascade of benefits awaits'

'Crack the cloud management nut and a cascade of benefits awaits'

Summary: The rise of JBOCS architecture, or 'Just a Bunch of Cloud Services,' with no coordinated governance or rhyme or reason for enterprises, spells trouble.


"Crack [the cloud management] nut and a cascade of benefits awaits..."

That's the call from Jason Liu, CEO of UC4 Software, saying that the rise of external cloud engagements outside of IT's scope threatens to lead organizations into an entanglement of services and technologies.

Maybe a good way to describe what is evolving is a JBOCS architecture, for "Just a Bunch of Cloud Services," with no coordinated governance or rhyme or reason from en enterprise point of view. The result is entanglements, subscriptions to duplicate services, as well as contracting for services that already exist free and clear from the IT department.

As Liu explains in a recent editorial in Wired, the urge to tap into services on demand from outside sources is too irresistible for many businesspeople.  But the result is a chaotic situation that rivals the headiest days of siloed IT architecture:

"To business person, the advantage is being able to circumvent the IT project backlog, CAPEX controls and the IT department all together. The likely motivation is to accelerate project delivery and relieve the headache of internal red tape. To corporate performance, this can hurt the bottom line through the cost of un-optimized public cloud engagement and also through un-integrated project development and application management. To the IT organization, this deteriorates control of application and infrastructure processes and widens the gap between IT and the business."

To avoid this chaos, Liu urges organizations to begin the move to more centralized, private, hybrid and public cloud strategies as soon as possible.  As he is the head of an IT process automation company, he naturally encourages this type of solution for getting on top of the challenge. But with the relentless proliferation of cloud into every aspect of business operations, a huge, hard-to-control patchwork is morphing out of control.The compelling economics of cloud may get washed out.

"The need for centralized cloud engagement – and overall centralized management of applications and infrastructure – remains," Liu points out. "Crack that nut and a cascade of benefits awaits."

IT needs to strengthen its hand in this regard, he urges. "The centralization of company-wide computing needs onto a single, automated platform that incorporates cloud engagement enables an IT organization’s ability to provide IT-as-a-Service."

Topic: Cloud

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Distributed computing

    Of course the fact that there are still many unsolved theoretical problems in distributed computing may be a stumbling block.

    SOA (or "let a thousand stovepipes bloom" as Chairman Mao might have put it) is very, very distributed.

    Though some of the brightest minds in computer science have wrestled with these issues, I am confident that if you put 1000 Java programmers in front of 1000 computers they are bound to come up with at least one answer. None of these answers will be the right one of course, but as long as you've already sold the product this hardly matters.
  • Is JBOCS a variant of Tahositaahti?

    Tahositaahti* is a part of the ancient tried, tested and unproven method of Miuayga*.

    In Tahositaahti the rugby metaphor of Scrum is replaced with ad-hockey, which is just like real hockey, but you make up the rules as you go along and the punch ups are much, much more violent.

    *Tahositaahti - Throw a heap of services in the air and hope they integrate
    *Miuayga - Make it up as you go along.
    • Very tried-and-true ancient practices indeed!

  • Again?

    Another person with a vested interest in cloud, the cloud idea is a bad one right now. Business doesn't understand it and Me? I am an average IT admin/coordinator/troubleshooter (mainly MS, some apple, linux) but with no solid simple standards that I could represent to my clients, with no "real" extra security benefits...they could care less. If it runs fine, don't break to fix it and the studies as i understand them (only a lil study @ this time) only show sharing, and redundancy with maybe some extra speed for virtual applications....but none of this overwhelms an IT set up that is already meeting or exceeding company expectations. so why? so why? and why again go to cloud to be "up to date"...bull.