ie8 fix
madison

Four reasons why IT is more than a 'commodity'

By | June 9, 2010, 9:13am PDT

Summary: MIT Digital Business experts explain why the ‘IT-doesn’t-matter’ crowd has it wrong.

Not everyone is convinced that IT simply is becoming a standard utility, much like the water and electricity that flows into our businesses. Michael Shrage, director of the MIT Center for Digital Business, for one, says the perceptions about IT as a standard utility miss the mark, and that IT is a huge value creator — if applied properly.

And Erik Brynjolfsson, management economist at MIT, says IT is an innovation machine. Both Shrage and Brynjolfsson shared insights on the capabilities IT offers to organizations seeking greater value and innovation in the most recent issue of MIT Sloan Management Review.

Shrage says it’s a mistake to view IT simply as a commodity — as he put it, those that those who aren’t clever and innovative with their resources will get what they pay for:

“If you think IT is a commodity, get out of business. That’s like saying people are a commodity, or talent is a commodity, or capital is a commodity.”

Shrage says the issue with IT is that companies become too focused on the technology itself, which should be secondary. He urges managers to “work backwards from the value they want to create.” Companies need to be looking at what value they can bring to the world, then leveraging technology to support that initiative.

Brynjolfsson observes that “IT can change the innovation process itself,” and outlined the four key ways IT is making a difference in the companies’ capacity to innovate:

Measurement: Corporate performance measurement is radically improved through what Brynjolfsson calls “nano data:” clickstream data, Google trends, detailed e-mail data, and ERP system data, for example. “By studying these data very carefully, companies can have much better knowledge of their customers, of their business processes, of their product quality, and of defects of their supply chains”

Experimentation: The virtual environments enabled through IT allow for testing and simulations at little cost. “You can get at causality in a way that you can’t with just pure measurement and observation. And that, of course, is the gold standard for being able to have actionable knowledge about what’s really happening in your business, what innovations are paying off and which ones aren’t.”

Sharing: Through new tools such as social networking wikis and blogs, new ideas can quickly be surfaced across the enterprise. As Brynjolfsson puts it, there are “1,001 small innovations that regular business managers and line workers do every day at their jobs.”

Replication: IT makes it possible to quickly replicate the tools and documents that enable innovations to scale up across the enterprise, Brynjolfsson says. Not only does this apply to bits of software and data, but also “business processes themselves.”

(Photo Credit: Josh Miller/CNET)

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Joe McKendrick is an author, consultant and speaker specializing in trends and developments shaping the technology industry.

Disclosure

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant, editor and speaker.

Joe has performed project work (white papers, articles, blogs, research and presentations) for the following companies in the IT marketspace:

  • CBS Interactive/CNET/ZDNet (this blog)
  • ebizQ
  • Evans Data
  • Gartner
  • IBM
  • Informatica
  • IDC
  • Microsoft
  • Systinet/HP
  • Teradata
  • Unisphere Reseach, a division of Information Today, Inc.
  • WebLayers

Joe has also performed research work for the following sponsoring organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research, a division of Information Today, Inc.

  • IBM
  • Luminex
  • Noetix
  • Oracle Corp.
  • Teradata
  • Informatica
  • International Oracle Users Group
  • Oracle Applications Users Group
  • Professional Association for SQL Server
  • International DB2 Users Group
  • International Sybase Users Group
  • SHARE (IBM large systems users group)

Biography

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. Joe is co-author, along with 16 leading industry leaders and thinkers, of the SOA Manifesto, which outlines the values and guiding principles of service orientation. He also speaks frequently on Enterprise 2.0 and SOA topics at industry events and Webcasts, and serves on the program committee for this year's SOA & Cloud Symposium in London. As an independent analyst, he has also authored numerous research reports in partnership with Unisphere Research, a division of Information Today, Inc. for user groups such as SHARE, Oracle Applications Users Group, and International DB2 Users Group. In a previous life, Joe served as director of the Administrative Management Society (AMS), an international professional association dedicated to advancing knowledge within the IT and business management fields. He is a graduate of Temple University.

5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Its a tool, whose value depends on boundaries and context
mkmckinn 13th Jun 2010
I liked dwwright99's comment: its a resource to be marshaled, like human capital... its what we use to capture, manipulate, and transmit data. However, its ability to be more than a commodity (confer a sustainable competitive advantage), depends in part, on a) its boundaries and b) the context of its use.

IT has boundaries: capability, network, and permission. Consider fax.

On capabilities, there remain things we can't digitize... remember the Fedex ad with the butcher dangling sausages and saying "fax this". 3d printers let us e-share plastic models, but how long before clothes, food, genomes? Will those technologies not confer competitive advantage?

Technical challenges once overcome face distribution, or network challenges: fax infrastructures were not always universal and those that deployed them faced a tradeff: capital and operating cost for capability - advantage was conferred if faxing, was important (directly for operatons or tangentially for attracting technology motivated talent).

Beyond capability and network barriers, licenses and patents constitute permission barriers. Surely a food faxing patent licensee would have a competitive advantage - at least over those that didn't and again, as long food distribution was valuable.

Context helps determine value because its relative (compare the value of a half consumed water bottle to a water starved prisoner to that of a rich tourist). In business terms, the Rothschild's made fortunes learning of Waterloo's outcome by carrier pigeon. Info transfer speed conferred advantage then but now, perhaps the pressing problem is not "how fast", but "what" (think sausages)? Further complicating value are technology changes and interactions - making value, and thus commoditization, non-binary. Consider iPhone versus coverage, (read: AT&T versus Verizon). Some consumers buy iPhone coolness where while others buy reliability... and "can you hear me now" is not unlike "in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king".

Now consider IT downtime, few would think to consider it valuable, but those that face it develop alternatives. They pay a price but inherit a capability. A capability that becomes obvious when ironing out ERP implementation challenges, or facing uncontrolled network outages. Think colour blindness and its ability to improve dangerous insect detection in Costa Rican men.

In closing this lengthy post, perhaps the best argument is that if IT is what we use to capture, manipulate and share information then the human brain is, by definition IT. Would anyone argue the human brain can't confer a competitive advantage?
0 Votes
+ -
I think indoor plumbing is more important than IT but...
hamobu-22333136139518773481685514128812 9th Jun 2010
...I agree with the central premise of the article which is that we have not even begun to fully explore capabilities of common IT infrastructure.
0 Votes
+ -
IT is a commodity when it operates to "keep the lights on". When IT aligns to business and "business drives technology", then IT becomes value add. IT needs to start with the corporate objectives and drive technology to meet and add-value to the top-line versus cost cutting to the bottom line to be more than commodity.

Moving from Silo's to Services aligned with business is a starting point. Taking those services and categorizing them as Business Driving - Business Quality - Business Efficiency - Business Operations - provides an understanding that the first is driving revenue and the last driving out cost. This is the first step to promoting IT as a value add in managing resources to the business driving services. Combining it with automation freeing resources to now apply technology to future growth objectives turns organizations into leaders in their industry.

Those that lead their industry make market time decisions to changing market dynamics and leverage technology to leap over their competition and IT organizations that are "business driven" are not commodity.

Michele Hudnall
http://www.novell.com/communities/blogs/mhudnall
The point is that the building and running of IT is becoming more commoditized, not the business use.

For example, E-mail is a vitally important for many companies. It is used for customer marketing, customer support and performing business transactions. However, that does not mean that a company needs to run its own email servers to obtain these benefits.

Kim Terry
www.terrosatech.com
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Four reasons why IT is more than a 'commodity'
dwwright99@... Updated - 10th Jun 2010
"Companies need to be looking at what value they can bring to the world, then leveraging technology to support that initiative." ...well,duh. Information Technology is just one of the resources an organization has to marshal effectively to be successful. Granted, it is a multi-faceted resource than can be difficult to utilize, especially since it is a much newer resource than the better known hard assets like plant and materials, and expensed resources like people. Some aspects, like pure processing cycles and storage are close to commodity status, but that leaves much to be managed; don't think of IT as a monolith.
I liked dwwright99's comment: its a resource to be marshaled, like human capital... its what we use to capture, manipulate, and transmit data. However, its ability to be more than a commodity (confer a sustainable competitive advantage), depends in part, on a) its boundaries and b) the context of its use.

IT has boundaries: capability, network, and permission. Consider fax.

On capabilities, there remain things we can't digitize... remember the Fedex ad with the butcher dangling sausages and saying "fax this". 3d printers let us e-share plastic models, but how long before clothes, food, genomes? Will those technologies not confer competitive advantage?

Technical challenges once overcome face distribution, or network challenges: fax infrastructures were not always universal and those that deployed them faced a tradeff: capital and operating cost for capability - advantage was conferred if faxing, was important (directly for operatons or tangentially for attracting technology motivated talent).

Beyond capability and network barriers, licenses and patents constitute permission barriers. Surely a food faxing patent licensee would have a competitive advantage - at least over those that didn't and again, as long food distribution was valuable.

Context helps determine value because its relative (compare the value of a half consumed water bottle to a water starved prisoner to that of a rich tourist). In business terms, the Rothschild's made fortunes learning of Waterloo's outcome by carrier pigeon. Info transfer speed conferred advantage then but now, perhaps the pressing problem is not "how fast", but "what" (think sausages)? Further complicating value are technology changes and interactions - making value, and thus commoditization, non-binary. Consider iPhone versus coverage, (read: AT&T versus Verizon). Some consumers buy iPhone coolness where while others buy reliability... and "can you hear me now" is not unlike "in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king".

Now consider IT downtime, few would think to consider it valuable, but those that face it develop alternatives. They pay a price but inherit a capability. A capability that becomes obvious when ironing out ERP implementation challenges, or facing uncontrolled network outages. Think colour blindness and its ability to improve dangerous insect detection in Costa Rican men.

In closing this lengthy post, perhaps the best argument is that if IT is what we use to capture, manipulate and share information then the human brain is, by definition IT. Would anyone argue the human brain can't confer a competitive advantage?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix