madison

Study: increase enterprise data usability, save billions

By | September 1, 2010, 8:25pm PDT

Summary: Make it slightly easier for business users to get quality data, and save billions in productivity, says a new study out of Sybase, University of Texas and Indian School of Business.

A new study released by Sybase found that businesses can save significant amounts of money simply by increasing the usability and accessibility of enterprise data.

How?

The study, underwritten by Sybase and conducted by researchers from the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas and Indian School of Business, connected the dots between what they called “data
usability” and corporate financial performance. This takes into consideration the additional processing time  required to make data valuable for the business. Improve data usability, and the subsequent processing time can be reduced by as much as 10 percent, the researchers say. And this translates into potentially billions saved.

Researchers say data usability can be improved by focusing on the following factors:

  • Intelligence of data “can be improved through the accuracy of the prediction, trends analysis, recommendations and profile matching/associations made by the associated applications. For example, what percentage of recommendations made by a business intelligence application results in cross-selling?”
  • Remote access to data and applications is essential in an increasingly mobile workforce.
  • Sales mobility “involves the ability of salespersons to use portable devices and applications to exchange information related to all aspects of a deal or transaction with a customer.”
  • Improvements in data quality will result in improvements that “may come through better and timely decisions (which may increase customer satisfaction, loyalty and hence revenues), as well as fewer errors and rework, lower working capital requirements, faster receivables, etc. (which will lower costs).”

A 10 percent improvement in any one or two of these attributes affects common business metrics, the study says.

A 10 percent improvement can add up to big dollars. Researchers determined that if a median Fortune 1000 business (36,000 employees and $388,000 in sales per employee) increased the usability of its data by just 10 percent, it would translate to an increase in $2.01 billion in total revenue every year, or $55,900 in additional sales per employee annually.

Return on Equity (ROE) could be boosted by 16 percent, and if the average Fortune 1000 business were to increase the mobility of its sales organization’s data by just 10 percent, Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) would increase by 1.4 percent as a result of net income increasing by $5.4 million. Also, if the average Fortune 1000 company were to increase both intelligence and accessibility of data by 10 percent, Return on Assets (ROA) increases by 0.7% percent — “the equivalent of squeezing $2.87 million of additional income out of the average Fortune 1000 business’s assets, assuming assets remain fixed.”

UPDATE: Fellow ZDNet contributor Eric Lai (who works for Sybase) also posted details about the study here at the ZDNet community, pointing out that the results punch a hole in Nick Carr’s famous assertion that “IT Doesn’t Matter.”

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Joe McKendrick is an author, consultant and speaker specializing in trends and developments shaping the technology industry.

Disclosure

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant, editor and speaker.

Joe has performed project work (white papers, articles, blogs, research and presentations) for the following companies in the IT marketspace:

  • CBS Interactive/CNET/ZDNet (this blog)
  • ebizQ
  • Evans Data
  • Gartner
  • IBM
  • Informatica
  • IDC
  • Microsoft
  • Systinet/HP
  • Teradata
  • Unisphere Reseach, a division of Information Today, Inc.
  • WebLayers

Joe has also performed research work for the following sponsoring organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research, a division of Information Today, Inc.

  • IBM
  • Luminex
  • Noetix
  • Oracle Corp.
  • Teradata
  • Informatica
  • International Oracle Users Group
  • Oracle Applications Users Group
  • Professional Association for SQL Server
  • International DB2 Users Group
  • International Sybase Users Group
  • SHARE (IBM large systems users group)

Biography

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. Joe is co-author, along with 16 leading industry leaders and thinkers, of the SOA Manifesto, which outlines the values and guiding principles of service orientation. He also speaks frequently on Enterprise 2.0 and SOA topics at industry events and Webcasts. As an independent analyst, he has also authored numerous research reports in partnership with Unisphere Research, a division of Information Today, Inc. for user groups such as SHARE, Oracle Applications Users Group, and International DB2 Users Group. Joe is also an active SOA contributor for ebizQ/TechTarget. In a previous life, Joe served as director of the Administrative Management Society (AMS), an international professional association dedicated to advancing knowledge within the IT and business management fields. He is a graduate of Temple University.

Talkback Most Recent of 1 Talkback(s)

  • 4 Gates of Patanjali
    My namesake from 2000 years ago has what is known as the 4 Gates of Patanjali:

    Before you speak, think:

    1. Is it True?
    2. Is it Necessary?
    3. IS it Kind"
    4. Is it the Right Time?

    Now, if we followed these priciples, we would certainly have a lot less conflict in the world.

    It should be noted that:
    - If any fails, don't speak.
    - If all pass, you MUST say it!


    Now, this same reasoning can also be applied to data collection, in the form of:

    1. Is it Valid?
    2. Is it Necessary?
    3. Is it Beneficial?
    4. Is it Timely?

    Again, similar consequences ensue:

    - If any fail, don't collect or keep it.
    - If all pass, you MUST collect it and keep it.

    Imagine how much storage could be saved and needless data-sifting could be avoided if these infomation principles were followed.

    Of course, these principles must be viewed in the context of business imperatives (such as what is Valid) and legal requirements (such as what is Required and Timely).
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Patanjali
    1st Sep 2010

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
Click Here

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources