ie8 fix
madison

US federal government: cloud first, but 'cloud' needs to be defined

By | April 11, 2011, 2:59pm PDT

Summary: Federal working group preparing cloud roadmap for US agencies, to provide guidance with protocols and definitions.

What is ‘cloud computing’?  That’s what the federal government needs to determine as it aggressively pursues this strategy to cut costs and improve the flexibility of its agencies.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) plans to issue a first draft of a “Cloud Computing Technology Roadmap” by the end of fiscal 2011, intended to provide agencies with a single, standardized process for cloud adoption and management, Fierce Government IT reports.

The US federal government now has an active policy to put cloud-based options before on-site software and systems options in new IT purchasing. But moving to cloud options could potentially be even more chaotic than the existing huge $80-billion annual patchwork of federal IT purchases.

The NIST Cloud Computing Standards Roadmap Working Group is spearheading this effort. The goal of the working group and roadmap is to “survey the existing standards landscape for security, portability, and interoperability standards/models/studies/etc. relevant to cloud computing, determine standards gaps, and identify standardization priorities.”

Standards and definitions the working group will likely include in the roadmap include the following:

  • Basic Definitions & Standards:
    TCP/IP, HTTP, HTML, XML, SOAP, REST, WSDL, SSL/TLS, XML/XMLD, JSON, TRP, DNS, SMTP
  • High Level Standards & Definition for Cloud and Web Services:
    OVF, OCCI, CDMI, SPML, Web services, GridFTP, OAuth, OpenID, WS, WSS, SAML, Frameworx, XACML
  • Categorization of Cloud Computing Related Standards:
    Cloud Taxonomy – output from Reference Architecture Working Group

Functional areas to be addressed in the roadmap include the following:

  • SaaS Self-service management
  • Application specific data formats
  • Application functional interfaces
  • Resource description and discovery
  • QoS specification, monitoring, reporting
  • SLA specification and negotiation
  • Billing and metering
  • Identity and access management
  • Provisioning, management, replication, federation
  • Single sign-on plus strong authentication
  • Security auditing and compliance

In addition, the US General Services Administration, the purchasing arm of the federal government, says it intends to release, by summer, the first version of FedRAMP — which provides common security and monitoring services for cloud services to help agencies avoid guesswork.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Joe McKendrick is an author, consultant and speaker specializing in trends and developments shaping the technology industry.

Disclosure

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant, editor and speaker.

Joe has performed project work (white papers, articles, blogs, research and presentations) for the following companies in the IT marketspace:

  • CBS Interactive/CNET/ZDNet (this blog)
  • ebizQ
  • Evans Data
  • Gartner
  • IBM
  • Informatica
  • IDC
  • Microsoft
  • Systinet/HP
  • Teradata
  • Unisphere Reseach, a division of Information Today, Inc.
  • WebLayers

Joe has also performed research work for the following sponsoring organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research, a division of Information Today, Inc.

  • IBM
  • Luminex
  • Noetix
  • Oracle Corp.
  • Teradata
  • Informatica
  • International Oracle Users Group
  • Oracle Applications Users Group
  • Professional Association for SQL Server
  • International DB2 Users Group
  • International Sybase Users Group
  • SHARE (IBM large systems users group)

Biography

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. Joe is co-author, along with 16 leading industry leaders and thinkers, of the SOA Manifesto, which outlines the values and guiding principles of service orientation. He also speaks frequently on Enterprise 2.0 and SOA topics at industry events and Webcasts, and serves on the program committee for this year's SOA & Cloud Symposium in London. As an independent analyst, he has also authored numerous research reports in partnership with Unisphere Research, a division of Information Today, Inc. for user groups such as SHARE, Oracle Applications Users Group, and International DB2 Users Group. In a previous life, Joe served as director of the Administrative Management Society (AMS), an international professional association dedicated to advancing knowledge within the IT and business management fields. He is a graduate of Temple University.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: US federal government: cloud first, but 'cloud' needs to be defined
mickyduncan 13th Apr 2011
nice article Mr McKendrick.

re above comments: whether is a standard is open; closed; made-standard-by-popularity; made standard-by-committee is perhaps irrelevant.

why? cloud computing is an architectural discipline and why do we need a committee to define a meaning of a word. particularly when cloud computing incorporates SaaS which Progress Sonic and Tivoli have perhaps been doing for some time before cloud became the topic of the month.

sometimes committees do nothing but damage or take so long establishing standards that the world just moves on without.

take HL7 for example. this is a classic example of designed-by-committee that has historically been rejected by nearly all facilityies outside of hospitals.

http://blog.interfaceware.com/hl7/the-rise-and-fall-of-hl7/

http://mickyd.wordpress.com/2011/04/10/hl7-is-nehta-short-sighted/

mickyd.wordpress.com
As long as the standards are open (not beholden to any one company), then it is okay. While I personally want to limit what information is hosted online, others are free to include every it of information they want out there.
@Rick_K
I totally agree.
nice article Mr McKendrick.

re above comments: whether is a standard is open; closed; made-standard-by-popularity; made standard-by-committee is perhaps irrelevant.

why? cloud computing is an architectural discipline and why do we need a committee to define a meaning of a word. particularly when cloud computing incorporates SaaS which Progress Sonic and Tivoli have perhaps been doing for some time before cloud became the topic of the month.

sometimes committees do nothing but damage or take so long establishing standards that the world just moves on without.

take HL7 for example. this is a classic example of designed-by-committee that has historically been rejected by nearly all facilityies outside of hospitals.

http://blog.interfaceware.com/hl7/the-rise-and-fall-of-hl7/

http://mickyd.wordpress.com/2011/04/10/hl7-is-nehta-short-sighted/

mickyd.wordpress.com

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix