ie8 fix
madison

Lawson – Issues on two fronts: Earnings and Icahn

By | July 8, 2010, 7:16pm PDT

Summary: Lawson’s earnings today and the position that Carl Icahn has accumulated in Lawson Software make for an interesting time for software buyers. How might Lawson react?

Today, Lawson Software (LWSN) announced earnings below analyst expectations. Specifically, profits of $2.6 million were reported (vs. year earlier number of $8.6 million) resulting in a 2 cents/share profit. Analysts were expecting something closer to 11 cents. Revenue was up overall. The market didn’t appreciate this news.

Lawson, in the words of television character Ricky Ricardo, has ‘some splaining to do’. Corporate raider/investor Carl Icahn has taken an 8.5% stake in the company. Carl has targeted many other firms in the past including the late TWA. Carl used to be a big advocate for unleashing the value locked up in some companies. What that often meant was that some company’s parts were worth more than the whole.

Mr. Icahn will likely want to see Lawson’s stock price improve. He could suggest the following changes too:

- Spin off the Intentia software business. Proceeds from this sale could be used for a special shareholder dividend.
- Sell off the core Lawson ERP business.
- Scale back additional R&D expenditures
- RIF more Lawson employees
- Etc.

Any of those moves would be designed to increase short-term cash flow and hopefully raise Lawson’s stock price for a while. Would these be good moves long-term? I’m not so sure.

Mr. Icahn could also suggest a housecleaning of Lawson management and/or its board. With his own team in place, Mr. Icahn could implement wealth creation strategies with a freer hand.

Mr. Icahn could also use the current earnings results to increase his stock position in Lawson. The greater his holdings, the more board seats, etc. he can control.

Lastly, Mr. Icahn could force the firm to assume debt and/or go private. While this would resemble a private equity move, it would let the company do more side deals without SEC scrutiny. What could those deals be? Well, the company could acquire some SaaS vendors and re-make Lawson’s market relevance in this space. Or, the company could be acquired/merged into another ERP provider although this seems unlikely at this time. Or, the company could become another ERP consolidator.

Loading up the company with debt is something leveraged buyout and private equity firms do. They take a company private using borrowed money while protecting their equity investment with a preferred class of stock. This plan works when the acquired company can be re-sold in a couple of years at a profit. However, if the company can’t meet its debt servicing costs, the whole enterprise can be lost.

If I were a software shopper, I’d want to have a long, considered conversation with Lawson executives before doing a deal with them. I’d also want to construct into any contract a number of protections should the company experience a material change of control. Software companies that experience slow growth, may have leadership changes or face merger/acquisition threats are companies that may develop product development direction changes that are not what buyers originally expected. These are interesting times for Lawson and interesting times dictate one take special care.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Brian is currently CEO of TechVentive, a strategy consultancy serving technology providers and other firms. He is also a research analyst with Vital Analysis.

Disclosure

Brian Sommer

I am co-owner of TechVentive, Inc. The company has been engaged on numerous consulting engagements, often for technology firms, service firms and litigators. As a general rule, I do not write about current clients of TechVentive. Should that occur, I will note this in blogs. Readers should assume that I have had client relationships with many ERP and other technology providers. Some of these relationships may be quite small and short-lived while others more significant. One of TechVentive's business units publishes research reports about technology providers. As a result, this business receives small amounts of revenues from a wide variety of software firms, software buyers and others when they purchase copies of reports. Some firms do secure reprint rights to these reports. None of these purchases, individually, represents a significant amount of total revenue for me and the nature of it is hard to predict where it will come from. I also provide some marketing strategy and/or market segmentation work for software firms as I have developed a unique database that segments the largest 4000+ technology buyers in the world. Many technology firms periodically engage me for unique views into this database for future marketing campaigns. I do not blog about these efforts and do not blog about client firms while they are active clients unless some pressing news story erupts. If that event occurs, I will indicate any perceived or real conflict of interest. Occasionally, I will develop unique intellectual property pieces for technology or service providers. If I should blog about a vendor with whom I have recently developed a special information product, I will note this in a blog to avoid any appearance, real or unintended, of bias. For the most part, I have no investments in technology firms. While I've been offered friends and family stock and other inducements in the past, I have steadfastly refused these. I used to be a partner with Andersen Consulting and had no ownership stake in the firm for many years. I frequently refer to this in my blogs and do not hide my prior association with the company. I did purchase a few shares of Accenture and Cognizant stock in late - 2008. I have sold some of those positions in late 2009. Readers should assume that most software conferences that I write about involved some measure of fees waived and/or travel reimbursement. I do not charge vendors to attend these events nor will I accept payment for same. I do get reimbursed for many speaking engagements. I generally note at the end of blogs whether the vendor reimbursed me for travel expenses. Generally, this includes airfare and hotel. I do not request, receive nor accept travel perks such as first class airfare.

Biography

Brian Sommer

Brian is in a unique position to diagnosis the winners and the losers in technology and services. He was the longest running (10 years) and most senior director of Andersen Consulting's (now Accenture's) global Software Intelligence unit - a position that required him to pick the best possible software solutions for hundreds of clients globally. He advised the firm on ERP software market forecasts and helped establish manpower planning estimates by vendor for deployment globally.

Brian continues to remain close to technology buyers and sellers. When he left Andersen Consulting, he co-created a dot-com with blogger and former arch-enemy at Price Waterhouse, Vinnie Mirchandani. That firm helped broker efficient services contracts between software buyers and systems integrators. Since then, he's created TechVentive, Inc. - a company that helps technology firms better understand their markets - and Vital Analysis - the research and publishing arm of TechVentive.

Brian still travels the world and publishes an impressive number of articles, research reports and blog posts annually to help software and services buyers make better business decisions. He can be reached at: brian @ vitalanalysis.com

The discussion hasn’t started yet. Why don’t you begin it?

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix