Blu-ray: death by streaming
Summary: The studios - and Sony - have lost their Blu-ray bet: streaming has won the war for consumer's hearts and minds.
The Blu-ray gamble has failed: streaming has won the war for consumer's hearts and minds. Blu-ray will limp along, but the action is in streaming.
The news this week: DVD/Blu-ray sales down 20% from the year ago quarter. Yes, Blu-ray sales were up 10%, but the larger dynamic is that people prefer to stream video rather than buy - or rent - optical media.
In the meantime, Netflix has seen its business soar, and become the largest single consumer of Internet bandwidth in the US. According to Sandvine:
In North America, Netflix is now 29.7% of peak downstream traffic and has become the largest source of Internet traffic overall. Currently, Real-Time Entertainment applications consume 49.2% of peak aggregate traffic, up from 29.5% in 2009 – a 60% increase. Sandvine forecasts that the Real-Time Entertainment category will represent 55-60% of peak aggregate traffic by the end of 2011.
Translation: consumers want what they want and they want it NOW! Note that streaming is growing fast even as Blu-ray player penetration is still creeping up.
But streaming quality sucks! Compared to Blu-ray streaming video looks terrible. But if you like what you are watching, who cares?
As Philip Kortum, psych prof at Rice and co-author of the study "The Effect of Content Desirability on Subjective Video Quality Ratings" put it:
If you're at home watching and enjoying a movie, we found that you're probably not going to notice or even concern yourself with how many pixels the video is or if the data is being compressed. This strong relationship holds across a wide range of encoding levels and movie content when that content is viewed under longer and more naturalistic viewing conditions.
Blu-ray's window of opportunity has slammed shut.
The Storage Bits take As I warned almost 3 years ago:
The question the studios need to ask is: “do we want to be selling disks in 5 years?” No? Then keep it up. Turn distribution over to your very good friends at Comcast, Apple and Time Warner.
Oh, and Netflix.
I love movies and have collected over 1,200 DVD and Blu-ray disks to watch on a 10 foot screen with 5.1 DTS - when I can get it - audio. But even I am often seduced by the convenience and selection of Netflix online.
I still prefer physical media if it doesn't cost too much, because then I can watch movies on my notebook, iPad or iPhone. So I don't expect or want disks to disappear.
But Hollywood and Sony brought this on themselves. They overestimated the importance of video quality and the price people were willing to pay. And underestimated how popular streaming video would become.
My larger concern is whether Blu-ray will succeed as a writeable data storage medium for home and business use. Prices are coming down - I'm planning to buy a burner when prices drop below $100 and media below $1 - so I'm hopeful.
Comments welcome, of course. "Remember Betamax? SACD? Minidisk? Laser Disk? DVD-Audio? There are more losers than winners in consumer storage formats."
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
So basically you like taking a step back to the 70's in a way when Cable wasn't in 99.9% of the market and we used directional antennas to recieve OTA broadcasts. Or when you go to a swap meet and find copy of Star Wars on VHS that has been played 1000 times, do you get the Zenith down from the attic to watch it?
Most people are idiots then would be the key factor in your first sentence. Now I may agree with that, but don't put me into the group that doesn't care about what my 2,000 dollar worth of HDTV Satellite PS3... displays.
The only time I don't care about the quaility is when it is FREE or cheap enough to use the "You get what you pay for." phrase. Reason why netflix is 8 bucks a month for streamin is probably due to the lack of enough idiots that would pay 9.
I do see that by 2020 this quality difference will be a moot point but you will still have bandwidth caps, download limits and 15 things not yet invented clogging up the works.
Remember how bloggers always moaned how Macintoshes were "lacking" without
As it <b>systematically</b> turns out, Steven Jobs was right, and bloggers were wrong.
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
I guess MS was right too
since they decide not to nativelly support Blu-Ray in Windows, either
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
bradavon, is doesn't
That was pulled from Win7 due to licensing costs (Sony wanted too much for something who's future wasn't garanteed).
When you buy a Blu-Ray drive you need to purchase software to go along with it to watch blu-ray disks, as the drive comes with te minimum free software to do so in most cases.
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
People are stupid.
Message has been deleted.
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
perhaps the conventional movie theaters are dying... they would not be the first "casualty" of progress. now it is almost impossible to find good quality hand made furniture for general availability... building furniture was once a widespread trade. i have no doubt that streaming quality will eventually surpass even BluRay's quality as research into better compression algorithms continues. this is a growing pain of the industry, not a funeral for quality
Message has been deleted.
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
what projector are you using? did you really say "i have a screen and projector in my home that rivals the theater" and also say "i've played back a DVD and a BluRay of the same movie, and shuffling the order of the clips i played back, neither BluRay nor DVD was reliably selected as higher quality"? because if the second statement is true, the first most definitely is not.
Blue Laine-Beveridge
Excuse me?
<i>How on Earth is that grounds for deletion?</i>
Consider that movies can be captured from 35mm film and scanned at either 2048x1556 or 4096x2160 resolution for digital projection, and then compare that to Blu-Ray's 1920x1080 resolution, and you'll realize that Blu-Ray is already obsolete as far as "ultra high quality" images go. And it hasn't even caught up with 35mm film quality!
Movie theatres are <b>not</b> going to disappear.
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
<a href="http://www.barskareviews.com/barska-scopes">barska scopes</a>
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
This was very insightful and I really enjoyed reading it.
<H1><a href="http://www.my-pittsburghchiropractor.com">Pittsburgh Chiropractor</a></H1>
I just buy HD content online, skip the need for a Blu-Ray player
which is also hitting sales of players, not just streaming alone.
That's not HD.
RE: Blu-ray: death by streaming
Agree: '50s film noir looks great streaming, but Hollywood blockbusters with quality special effects - think Avatar or Inception - deserve Blu-ray. But they are the exception, not the rule. Rom-coms in Blu-ray? Not worth a premium.
Robin