Blu-ray is dead - heckuva job, Sony!

By | October 28, 2008, 12:31pm PDT

Blu-ray is in a death spiral. 12 months from now Blu-ray will be a videophile niche, not a mass market product.

With only a 4% share of US movie disc sales and HD download capability arriving, the Blu-ray disc Association (BDA) is still smoking dope. Even $150 Blu-ray players won’t save it.

16 months ago I called the HD war for Blu-ray. My bad. Who dreamed they could both lose?

Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory
Delusional Sony exec Rick Clancy needs to put the crack pipe down and really look at the market dynamics.

In a nutshell: consumers drive the market and they don’t care about Blu-ray’s theoretical advantages. Especially during a world-wide recession.

Remember Betamax? SACD? Minidisk? Laser Disk? DVD-Audio? There are more losers than winners in consumer storage formats.

It’s all about volume. 8 months after Toshiba threw in the towel, Blu-ray still doesn’t have it.

The Blu-ray Disc Association doesn’t get it
$150 Blu-ray disc players are a good start, but it won’t take Blu-ray over the finish line. The BDA is stuck in the past with a flawed five-year-old strategy.

The original game plan
Two things killed the original strategy. First the fight with HD DVD stalled the industry for two years. Initial enthusiasm for high definition video on disk was squandered.

Second, the advent of low cost up-sampling DVD players dramatically cut the video quality advantage of Blu-ray DVDs. Suddenly, for $100, your average consumer can put good video on their HDTV using standard DVDs. When Blu-ray got started no one dreamed this would happen.

Piggies at the trough
The Blu-ray Disc Association hoped for a massive cash bonanza as millions of consumers discovered that standard DVDs looked awful on HDTV. To cash in they loaded Blu-ray licenses with costly fees. Blu-ray doesn’t just suck for consumers: small producers can’t afford it either.

According to Digital Content Producer Blu-ray doesn’t cut it for business:

  • Recordable discs don’t play reliably across the range of Blu-ray players - so you can’t do low-volume runs yourself.
  • Service bureau reproduction runs $20 per single layer disc in quantities of 300 or less.
  • Hollywood style printed/replicated Blu-ray discs are considerably cheaper once you reach the thousand unit quantity: just $3.50 per disc.
  • High-quality authoring programs like Sony Blu-print or Sonic Solutions Scenarist cost $40,000.
  • The Advanced Access Content System - the already hacked DRM - has a one-time fee of $3000 plus a per project cost of almost $1600 plus $.04 per disk. And who defines “project?”
  • Then the Blu-ray disc Association charges another $3000 annually to use their very exclusive - on 4% of all video disks! - logo.

That’s why you don’t see quirky indie flicks on Blu-ray. Small producers can’t afford it - even though they shoot in HDV and HD.

The Storage Bits take
Don’t expect Steve Jobs to budge from his “bag of hurt” understatement. Or Final Cut Studio support for Blu-ray. I suspect that Jobs is using his Hollywood clout from his board seat on Disney and his control of iTunes to try to talk sense to the BDA.

But the BDA won’t budge. They, like so much of Hollywood, are stuck in the past.

A forward looking strategy would include:

  • Recognition that consumers don’t need Blu-ray. It is a nice-to-have and must be priced accordingly.
  • Accept the money spent on Blu-ray is gone and will never earn back the investment. Then you can begin thinking clearly about how to maximize Blu-ray penetration.
  • The average consumer will probably pay $50 more for a Blu-ray player that is competitive with the average up-sampling DVD player. Most of the current Blu-ray players are junk: slow, feature-poor and way over-priced.
  • Disk price margins can’t be higher than DVDs and probably should be less. The question the studios need to ask is: “do we want to be selling disks in 5 years?” No? Then keep it up. Turn distribution over to your very good friends at Comcast, Apple and Time Warner. You’ll be like Procter & Gamble paying Safeway to stock your products.
  • Fire all the market research firms telling you how great it is going to be. They are playing you. Your #1 goal: market share. High volume is your only chance to earn your way out of this mess and keep some control of your distribution.

Time is short. Timid incrementalism will kill you.

Like Agent Smith delivering the bad news to a complacent cop: “No, Lieutenant, your men are already dead.”

Comments welcome, of course.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Robin Harris has been messing with computers for over 30 years and selling and marketing data storage for over 20 in companies large and small.

Disclosure

Robin Harris

Robin Harris is a president of TechnoQWAN, a consulting and analyst firm in northern Arizona. He also writes StorageMojo.com, a blog which accepts advertising from companies in the storage industry, and has a 25 year history with IT vendors. He has many industry contacts, many of whom are friends and all of whom he has opinions about. Robin has relationships with many companies in the technology industry. Every company he writes about may have sought to influence his opinion through carefully-crafted marketing messages and self-serving white papers, gifts ranging from desk calendars, t-shirts, lunches and trips as well as analyst or consulting assignments. He also invests in some technology companies. He may accept payment for services in stock as well. Robin discloses financial investments in or client relationships with companies named in Storage Bits. To help readers sort out the gold from the dross in his writings, Robin tries to communicate his reasons as clearly as he can. If you agree, you are intelligent and discerning. If you disagree, well, you disagree. In all cases, Robin encourages readers to subject everything they read, see or hear on the internet or from politicians to some simple questions: * What assumptions are implicit in the world view and judgments of the author? * What, if any, is the factual basis for the opinions the author expresses? * Is it reasonable, logical and clear? Your critical faculties: use ‘em or lose ‘em!

Biography

Robin Harris

Harris has been messing with computers for over 30 years and selling and marketing data storage for over 20 in companies large and small. He introduced a couple of multi-billion dollar storage products (DLT, the first Fibre Channel array) to market, as well as a many smaller ones. Earlier he spent 10 years marketing servers and networks. After leaving corporate life he founded TechnoQWAN, a consulting and analyst firm. He also developed StorageMojo into one of the top storage industry blogs.

Robin writes, consults, coaches and lives among the mountains of northern Arizona.

Talkback Most Recent of 821 Talkback(s)

  • Agreed
    They really have priced themselves out of the "Average Joe" market. Why should I pay to get all of my DVDs on BDs again when they're usually at least 10$ more expensive?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Resplendent
    28th Oct 2008
  • Absolutely! BD content pricing is insane!
    I want to buy more Blue discs, but I just can't justify it when a new release appears at Best Buy for $15 on DVD and $30 on Blue at the same time. Give me a break! Blue are not TWICE as good as DVDs, particularly on my player which outputs DVDs at 1080p. Until the price of the content drops significantly, Blue will never gain market share. I refuse to pay more than $5 more for it.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    BillDem
    29th Oct 2008
  • Why Robin Will Be Wrong Again
    No offense, Robin, but when CDs came out, they had a really long, rough start:

    1. CD Players were expensive
    2. CDs were pricey.
    3. Nobody could burn their own CDs.
    4. Production was extremely expensive (indie artists couldn't afford that).
    5. Most people didn't think the quality was better enough for the money.

    Now look at the current situation:

    1. Blu-Ray players are starting to become standard options on new laptops and PCs, and are becoming cheaper and cheaper.

    2. Blu-Ray movie supplies are already there (Blockbuster, NetFlix, Best Buy, etc...)

    3. Consumer Blu-Ray burning is already a reality, and overall production costs are dropping.

    For people like BillDem who don't want to pay $30 for a Blu-Ray, that's fine, just give it time. VHS was around for a long time while everyone switched over to DVD, and some people still use VHS today. I have TROUBLE selling my old VHS movies on CraigsList for more than $1 each.

    In a few years, Blu-Ray will be in almost every home that currently has a DVD player, and we will be arguing about the next latest and greatest media format.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    jhilgeman
    29th Oct 2008
  • Or not!
    "In a few years, Blu-Ray will be in almost every home that currently has a DVD player, and we will be arguing about the next latest and greatest media format" - Not at the current price point. $300 for the player and $30 for a BD? I'll pass, thanks.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    EclipseDS
    29th Oct 2008
  • You Sure
    When I bought my first DVD player is was a floor model by Mitsubishi and was 400+ dollars, while a NIB was going for 600+. Back in the mid 90's that was a pile of money for something that had a very small following. (only 1 Blockbuster in Milwaukee even rented DVDs at that point). Yet here we are years later, and they give them away for $20 some weeks. Blu Ray will take the same course over time. The download market is not to the point yet that disc based films have to worry.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    BDigital
    29th Oct 2008
  • It's not the player prices it's the TV
    A blu-ray movie with out an HDTV is kind worthless. Sure I could have the player and it if it was cheap enough I could use it on my regular TV with regular DVDs but the Blu-Ray content is of no use to me. I could buy a HDTV but I can't justify the expense. That's the problem with Blu-Ray.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    voska1
    30th Oct 2008
  • HDTV in homes?
    I'm just an average Joe and I have had a HD plasma TV for 3 years and a DLP HDTV for over a year. I did have HDTV programing thru a dish but now use our local cable as they provide a large HD programing option. While I spent 3 months in Houston,TX. I used the DLP TV with a HD antenna and picked up several local channels transmitting HD digital which was very impressive. I still buy regular dvd disks as so far the pricing of the two brands of HDDVD has just been unreasonable, I could afford it, I just choose not to be raped by the industry! Everybody who can afford TV can afford a HD TV.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    chuckster1954
    30th Oct 2008
  • now that's a rational response...
    I agree. Even 37" HDTVs are expensive. $599 is the cheapest I've seen. But, ignore the hype for flat panel displays and get in on the ground floor with a DLP or CRT rear projection HDTV. They can be found for much less and look just as good. They're just a little bigger. If you have the room, who cares.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    kfumike
    30th Oct 2008
  • No use for HD when standard TV is fine
    Only two reasons to switch to HD, programming is no longer available for standard, or my standard TV dies.

    Change in viewing quality does not equal the change in price...yet.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Dr_Zinj
    9th Dec 2008
  • Difference does not justify the price.
    I am an avid HDTV user and have experimented with all the technologies out there. Unlike the intro duction of the DVD and CD (both replacing extremely inferior media), the difference in the BD compared the the newer look forward players just does not warrant the price. I choose to pass but would reevaluate if the price becomes more comparible.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    thebeefman
    30th Oct 2008
  • $22 from on line retail for new releases
    and players are already under $200.

    Name brand quality DVD players still cost $100. Not a big jump in cost.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    HighQualitySound
    29th Oct 2008
  • $22?
    Maybe wait a few weeks and rent the std res one at Redbox for $21 less?

    :o)
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Jack-Booted EULA
    29th Oct 2008
  • Only the upconverting ones
    No, that's not true. Name brand DVD players are cheap, $30 if you can find one. For $100 you get the upconverting name brand DVD player. It's difficult to find non upconverting name brand DVD players but they exist from time to time in places from time to time. I've seen Panasonic, Toshiba, and Sony DVD players for $30 in the past year.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    voska1
    30th Oct 2008
  • Agreed
    Upconverting DVD Players are alot less than $100. I bought a Toshiba HD-DVD Player with 2 free HD Movies for $79 which I use mainly to watch regular DVDs [and some HD DVDs from Blockbuster Online] upconverted to 1080. Figure $20 for the free movies and that's only ~$59.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    agredon
    1st Nov 2008
  • $22
    Yeah Blu players cost $300 that IS a big jump.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    rkinne01
    6th Dec 2008

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources