Holographic storage rises from the dead
Summary: Holographic storage has incredible potential, but has never made it to market despite$100 million and years of R&D. But now it gets one more chance to make good.
Two years ago InPhase Technologies, who had labored for a decade to bring holographic storage to market, bit the dust. But thanks to the patient and deep-pocketed VCs at Signal Lake - who bought InPhase's remains - the technology will have another chance.
Today at NAB in Las Vegas hVault is resurrecting the technology for one more try.
How does it work? Holograms use 2 coherent laser beams - a reference beam and an illumination beam - to create an interference pattern that is recorded on photo sensitive media. Shine a laser on the recorded interference pattern and the original image is reconstructed in glorious 3D. As the laser moves around - or you do - you see the image from different perspectives.
Holographic storage has some nifty properties.
- A small fragment of a hologram can reconstruct the entire data image. The fragment won’t let you move as far around the image, but for 2D images, like a photograph, it means a scratch isn’t fatal.
- Data density is theoretically unlimited. By varying the angle between the reference and illumination beams - or the angle of the media - hundreds of holograms can be stored in the same physical area.
- Photographic media has the longest proven lifespan - over a century - of any modern media. Since there’s no physical contact you can read the media millions of times with no degradation.
But with a new medium comes a whole host of difficult and expensive problems, developing every piece of the product including:
- Holographic media
- Mass production of the media
- The read/write algorithms and optics
While keeping the price down.
The Storage Bits take I've never gotten a clear story on why InPhase failed to bring a product to market, but that should be Job #1 for hVault. Yes, the economics are daunting, but they won't get better until you get traction.
I've got a briefing scheduled with hVault for Wednesday. I'm looking forward to hearing more and sharing it with you.
What questions would you like answered? Put them in the comments.
Comments welcome, of course. I wish them luck.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Questions:
Cost?
Speed?
Actual capacity?
Shipping anytime soon?
All shall be revealed
If it works in Star Trek......
;-)
Then Sony will get into the mess...
Sony? Not likely.
Holocube?
Apparently the biggest problem was the reading, as you would get 100 Gig per slice.
Love to see details!
I've been waiting on the cube...
Come on, guys!
Already have MY tag: "Psyberglas". Dibs -- you heard it here first!
Mindset
Baffled
Then build it
Aerogels, like your ideas, are a bit wobbly
While some of the phrases you use express coherent thoughts, they are unconnected. "Fractal" is a cool word, and has some bearing on simulating reality, as things tend to remain complex the closer you look at them, but in reality, fractals only exist as a mathematical concept. To refer to a "fractal aerogel" makes as much sense as a "boolean tomato."
It's nice to "think" about things, but this company is actually trying to make something that works in a practical fashion, and I look forward to any concepts they are willing to share with Robin, rather than get mired in random speculation. I could say "Think avocado," and, "Think mortar and pestle." This does not give you a good recipe for guacamole.
Except they're NOT "flexible".
Next: "fractal". I forget the specific university which reported this, four or five years back, but they basically found that a pseudo-random fractal pattern of CCD pixels, WITHOUT a lens in front of it, generates data which can be massaged to result in quite detailed image data. THEY are the ones who used the term "fractal" because THEY found it was PERTINENT to being able to extract the data. And by the way, aerogels by definition display fractal characteristics; the same kinds of structural patterns occur all over, at all different measurement scales, patterns which can be controlled by the specific chemistry used in production.
Oddly enough, I feel no need to explain any of the rest of what I had to say. If you don't get it, that's fine by me. The people who ARE familiar with the concepts I reference WILL "get my drift".
Physic is wrong
Also, holographic memory isn't really unlimited. What it does give is access to a larger area of the disk. A hologram is after all, an interference pattern. That's all. There is a finite amount of information that can be stored on one. what it will get you is tighter packing at a given wavelength than traditional optical disks which store only one possible value per bit, and have to have several wavelengths separating the tracks.
Still, the promised storage densities of holographic storage are already being reached or approached by magnetic media.
Lifetime of holographic disks isn't really unlimited either. Lifetime of CD's seems to be around 10 years. Magnetic "floppy" disks around 3 years, and magnetic tape around 50 years. for true long term storage, the winner is still baked clay tablets from Sumeria. Paper lasts for around 2,000 years, if kept in the proper environment. We really don't have a good true 'long term' information storage medium.
Does it have a consumer use?
Seems like it would be a good way to roll out a product that could aid a larger market while generating revenue to feed to the 3D holo technology.
Stable?
Quite stable; re the article: "100 years plus"...
I wouldn't be so sure
It's not clear to me how you can get back all the original digital data if part of it is damaged. The example given by Mr. Harris of a picture still being there but not in full 3D format after some damage may not apply to digital data storage. Pictures are by their nature somewhat holographic on their own. If you lose a few pixels, you can still usually make out the object. Or if you lose the image of a face from one side, you can still figure out who the person is.
Random digital data is not nearly so robust. You lose a few bytes, and they're lost. Maybe there's some way to encode the data in a hologram so that it is still retrievable when parts of the hologram are lost, but it's not clear what it is. You can't possibly keep breaking a hologram up into smaller and smaller pieces and expect each piece to have a full and perfect copy of the data stored in the original hologram. There are limits to nature.
This would change Data Centers... Forever!!!
Other companies are also working on it...
http://www.research.ibm.com/topics/popups/deep/storage/html/holo.html
http://ge.geglobalresearch.com/blog/breakthrough-in-micro-holographic-data-storage/