Is HP permanently broken?
Summary: Of course Ms. Whitman won't succeed as HP CEO. But why is HP's board so confused as to hire her?
The continuing soap opera that is Hewlett-Packard's boardroom and executive suite raises the question: is HP permanently broken?
Devices vs systems HP started building devices (an audio oscillator) in the 1930s. They remain largely a device company – even after spinning off instrumentation and test equipment - to this day with printers and PCs.
As a device company HP was characterized by strong product divisions building premium quality and, often, market-leading products. HP pioneered the programmable calculator business in the early 70s and the HP 12C business calculator has been a top seller for decades. And they've done well with printers.
But the computer business is about systems, not devices, and here HP has had a harder time finding its way. For example, its early PCs and minicomputers used instrument buses to connect peripherals rather than more standard computer buses: handy for the instrument business but not so good for users.
With the collapse of the minicomputer industry in the late 80s, and the success of HP's printer business, HP was almost the only minicomputer maker able to survive the transition to a PC dominated era. But it wasn't until they acquired Compaq – who had earlier acquired the leading minicomputer maker DEC – that HP got engineers with a serious system and storage focus. And it wasn't until Cisco entered the server business that HP got serious about networking.
HP's big problem While there is plenty of grist for the tabloid mill in HP's executive circus – why does a millionaire CEO fiddle expenses for dinner with a woman who isn't his wife? – the board's lack of a strategic vision keeps them from setting priorities for the CEO. In other words, when you don't know where you want to go, any CEO will do.
In 1999 HP divested its multi-billion-dollar test equipment business to better focus on its systems businesses. That was a good start but it did not go far enough.
Going forward The company needs to go all in on systems. This means:
- Spinning off the remaining non-systems businesses including printers, calculators, imaging and PCs.
- Focus on quality systems solutions to major business problems, instead of raw devices spackled together with professional services.
- Committing to massive disruption of the storage and networking businesses by moving to 40% gross margins from the current 60+% range through the use of volume and scale out technologies, open source software and targeted innovation leveraging the latest technology.
Can HP compete with 40% gross margins? Well, Apple has done pretty well.
New franchises in the IT industry are built on major disruption of existing markets. Storage and networks are ripe for disruption and HP is well-positioned to remake the economics.
The Storage Bits take These issues are why HP's board appears to be riven by intractable disagreements and hamstrung by the enormous sprawl of HP. The company lacks a strategic vision, but it is profitable enough that no one wants to shake things up.
Companies, like people, rarely make hard choices until they are in crisis. And HP is far from crisis.
But the current board – hardly a hardware systems exec among them – has no strategic vision for the company. And HP's portfolio of businesses will evade serious crisis for years.
It is other players that will force the issue.
- Intel is powerful and highly profitable and continues to cast about for new ways to leverage its chipmaking prowess.
- Apple has a huge war chest and a vision for consumers that will ultimately drive the systems business.
- Cisco still wants into the server business and is increasingly desperate.
- Storage vendor EMC's successful technology publishing model is sucking up a rising percentage of the highest margin sales.
Somehow, someday, these players and other secular trends will come together to bring an external crisis upon HP. That is when hard choices will be made.
Until then, enjoy the show.
Comments welcome, of course. I started watching HP in the early '80s when I worked at DEC. I wish they'd get their storage act together.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
The only valid reasons for HP to sell off the PC business were if they sold it to someone who could run it even more profitably (there isn't anybody) or if they urgently needed the capital and had no other way to raise it. Both of these conditions are false, so it was a stupid decision.
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
+1
You must not be a CEO, you have a clue.
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
PCs aren't all that profitable - unlike printer ink - and HP doesn't have much flexibility to innovate since they outsource the OS and CPU. Nor are they a growth industry. WebOS might have changed that, but I'll guess we'll never know.
IBM got rid of PCs and printers years ago and are doing very well. HP could too.
HP aren't IBM
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
The storage and networking industry run on 60+% gross margins. HP may not be doing that well in storage despite selling half of all disk drives produced because they don't have a strong franchise or a clear strategy.
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
What the board is looking for is STAR power.
Pagan jim
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
I totally agree, and I think they should have at least brought Carly Fiorina back.
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
You pretty much summed what HP needs to do. Quality solutions paired with quality hardware are what customers (consumer and enterprise) want. If HP decides to keep the personal systems group and printer business, they need to reduce the number of models they manufacture and focus on quality. I'm still using my HP 11C scientific calculator some 27 years later.
Agilent has continued to do well in the instrumentation and test equipment business. When this was spun off, we, in the scientific community, thought Agilent would become synonymous with mediocre instrumentation and poor innovation. By focusing on quality products and support services, Agilent remains the instrument maker of choice. And, BTW, HP workstations and desktops are the systems of choice since they interface very well with Agilent instruments in a fully-automated lab environment.
They were a multi-headed monster.
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
But, they may find the demise of calculators, printers, PCs and monitors is a little premature. If that's so, then they didn't be the farm on it.
The smart businesses use their profitable business to pay for the future, and hedge their bets.
RE: Is HP permanently broken?
But seriously...
Here, the spin off jargon involves: "shareholder value"...
But seriously, what's the problem here? Is HP too big, and therefore too hard to manage? The WebOS/tablet fiasco shows a lack of coordinated vision, and an unwillingness to invest enough to follow through on a wise vision. The tablet bandwagon reaction from many companies shows a reactionary process of product design -- which is always a difficult strategic position. Hardware only manufacturers are weak on software, and thus many of their offerings don't have the software critical infrastructure, vision, and quality that has added value to the iOS platform.
However, HP does have a significant software division, but it doesn't leverage that to its potential in their consumer PC/tablet product design, and instead has tied one hand behind its back by running that business like any other hardware OEM.
Well then, the CEO, whoever it is, has to shake things up, and inspire and motivate the brains of the tech people and visionaries within the company, and coordinate vision and direction.
Relying on the WinTel platform is a hindrance in terms of product deseign for any company, since they are critically dependant on the whims (and hurt by the mistakes) of Microsoft and Intel for technical architecture. But there is still room for (hopefullly leanly written) value-add software features that tightly integrate onto proprietary pc hardware addons on top of the platform.
Of American WinTel PC manufacturers, the HP brand has a bit more "gravitas" and value-add R&D potential than Dell, and it'd be a waste if HP cuts away its PC business. Personal feelings: while Dell makes just-ok-low-price pcs, don't leave America with just Dell and Apple as the major players -- that prospect is troubling.
But seriously
Here, the spin off jargon involves: "shareholder value"...
But seriously, what's the problem here? Is HP too big, and therefore too hard to manage? The WebOS/tablet fiasco shows a lack of coordinated vision, and an unwillingness to invest enough to follow through on a wise vision. The tablet bandwagon reaction from many companies shows a reactionary process of product design -- which is always a difficult strategic position. Hardware only manufacturers are weak on software, and thus many of their offerings don't have the software critical infrastructure, vision, and quality that has added value to the iOS platform.
However, HP does have a significant software division, but it doesn't leverage that to its potential in their consumer PC/tablet product design, and instead has tied one hand behind its back by running that business like any other hardware OEM.
Well then, the CEO, whoever it is, has to shake things up, and inspire and motivate the brains of the tech people and visionaries within the company, and coordinate vision and direction.
Relying on the WinTel platform is a hindrance in terms of product deseign for any company, since they are critically dependant on the whims (and hurt by the mistakes) of Microsoft and Intel for technical architecture. But there is still room for (hopefullly leanly written) value-add software features that tightly integrate onto proprietary pc hardware addons on top of the platform.
Of American WinTel PC manufacturers, the HP brand has a bit more "gravitas" and value-add R&D potential than Dell, and it'd be a waste if HP cuts away its PC business. Personal feelings: while Dell makes just-ok-low-price pcs, don't leave America with just Dell and Apple as the major players -- that prospect is troubling.
But seriously...
Here, the spin off jargon involves: "shareholder value"...
But seriously, what's the problem here? Is HP too big, and therefore too hard to manage? The WebOS/tablet fiasco shows a lack of coordinated vision, and an unwillingness to invest enough to follow through on a wise vision. The tablet bandwagon reaction from many companies shows a reactionary process of product design -- which is always a difficult strategic position. Hardware only manufacturers are weak on software, and thus many of their offerings don't have the software critical infrastructure, vision, and quality that has added value to the iOS platform.
However, HP does have a significant software division, but it doesn't leverage that to its potential in their consumer PC/tablet product design, and instead has tied one hand behind its back by running that business like any other hardware OEM.
Well then, the CEO, whoever it is, has to shake things up, and inspire and motivate the brains of the tech people and visionaries within the company, and coordinate vision and direction.
Relying on the WinTel platform is a hindrance in terms of product deseign for any company, since they are critically dependant on the whims (and hurt by the mistakes) of Microsoft and Intel for technical architecture. But there is still room for (hopefullly leanly written) value-add software features that tightly integrate onto proprietary pc hardware addons on top of the platform.
Of American WinTel PC manufacturers, the HP brand has a bit more "gravitas" and value-add R&D potential than Dell, and it'd be a waste if HP cuts away its PC business. Personal feelings: while Dell makes just-ok-low-price pcs, don't leave America with just Dell and Apple as the major players -- that prospect is troubling.
Of course, she won't succeed?
RE: Is HP permanently broken?