Open source can save your life

Summary: Quick, if your life depended on it, which health care information system would you rather your hospital used:A proprietary system developed by software engineers based on marketing input, bug reports and customer requests?An open source system developed by thousands of health care practitioners including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, techs and developers, tested and refined in hundred of hospitals?

Quick, if your life depended on it, which health care information system would you rather your hospital used:

  • A proprietary system developed by software engineers based on marketing input, bug reports and customer requests?
  • An open source system developed by thousands of health care practitioners including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, techs and developers, tested and refined in hundred of hospitals?

Well?

A Vista that works. Known as VistA (Veterans health Information Systems and Technology Architecture), it consists of over 20,000 programs that share an Electronic Health Record (EHR). While it was initially developed at the Veterans Administration Hospitals - America's single largest health care system - the open source product is freely available.

What does the VA know? The government can't do anything right - except for the finest military in the world, the National Labs, the very popular Medicare program, DARPA, aviation safety, GPS, the original Internet and hundreds of other excellent agencies and programs - so how good can VA care be? Is "best" good enough?

According to a Fox News BusinessWeek magazine article:

The 154 hospitals and 875 clinics run by the Veterans Affairs Dept. have been ranked best-in-class by a number of independent groups on a broad range of measures, from chronic care to heart disease treatment to percentage of members who receive flu shots. It offers all the same services, and sometimes more, than private sector providers.

According to a Rand Corp. study, the VA system provides two-thirds of the care recommended by such standards bodies as the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality. Far from perfect, granted -- but the nation's private-sector hospitals provide only 50%.

And while studies show that 3% to 8% of the nation's prescriptions are filled erroneously, the VA's prescription accuracy rate is greater than 99.997%, a level most hospitals only dream about. That's largely because the VA has by far the most advanced computerized medical-records system in the U.S.

And for the past six years the VA has outranked private-sector hospitals on patient satisfaction in an annual consumer survey conducted by the National Quality Research Center at the University of Michigan. This keeps happening despite the fact that the VA spends an average of $5,000 per patient, vs. the national average of $6,300.

[bolding added]

One more kicker: vets are older and sicker than the general population, making this performance even more impressive. It wasn't always so - my late father, a WWII vet and a doctor, wasn't impressed in the '80s - but during the Clinton administration the VA launched a successful effort to improve care using technology and common sense.

Spend less? Get more? No wonder health reform is controversial!

Errors can be hazardous to your health Almost 200,000 people a year die of preventable hospital mistakes according to a recent report. That's 4x the deaths of traffic accidents - too bad hospitals don't have seat belts.

We don't know the exact number because the American Medical Association and American Hospital Association spent $81 million lobbying against a national medical error reporting system. They said the system would drive medical errors underground: doctors "burying" their mistakes?

Shocking. I so-o-o trust the medical establishment.

The bigger picture With the complexity of diagnosis and treatment, the many drug interactions, and the scarcity of good information on what works and what doesn't, it is obvious that information technology can - and in the VA and some other countries has - lowered costs and improved care as the President says.

But in today's system, the insurance companies make more money when they don't pay for care. And it is the sickest among us who suffer the payment denials, since they need the most care.

Today insurance companies make their money cherry-picking the healthiest and denying the sickest. So centralized electronic health records are a weapon that can be turned against us at any time as proof of a "pre-existing condition" to deny reimbursement.

Requiring that insurance companies offer insurance to everyone who applies and eliminating the "pre-existing condition" excuse are crucial reforms. After all, "life" is a pre-existing condition that inevitably leads to death.

Given the results the VA has shown, a "public option" is a great way to push the insurance companies and for-profit hospital chains to improve care, reduce errors AND drive down costs.

The Storage Bits take In a field as complex and fast-changing as health care a proprietary system would be hard-pressed to keep up with the needs of thousands of hospitals. Open source won't be perfect either, but putting the resources close to the people using them just makes more sense.

We are rapidly approaching a day when there is enough storage capacity for each of us to store detailed health-related records. Not just doctor's visits, but exercise details, diet, drinking and more.

When all Americans have access to non-emergency health care and aren't penalized for pre-existing conditions that information will help all who care to live stronger, longer and healthier lives. At lower cost to society.

Comments welcome, of course. I wrote more about my father's WWII experiences here. And I look forward to the day when American doctors and nurses can go back to doing what they signed up for: taking care of people in need.

Topics: Open Source, CXO, Health, IT Employment

About

Robin Harris has been messing with computers for over 30 years and selling and marketing data storage for over 20 in companies large and small.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

72 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • VA health care

    Since 2001, the VA has had remarkable bipartisan support for just about all the funding they needed or could handle. When the gravy train ends, will the VA revert to what it was in the '90s?

    The VA has made a point of hiring military veterans who truly want to serve their fellow veterans for many/most of their staff positions. This dedication and mutual respect would be hard put to be duplicated on a much larger scale or outside the selected patient and provider groups.

    Likewise, the VA doctors and nurses and other providers are a self-selected group who value their work much more highly than opportunities to get wealthy. Their pay is not directly dependent on the number of patients seen.

    The VA also carefully regulates the number of patients it serves, which allows it to control its fate in areas of quality, quantity, and budget. If the number of patients begins to overwhelm its resources, elegibility rules are tightened, and those on the bottom rungs of the tiered elegibility system get to go elsewhere. Ask me how I know this.

    Finally, the VA gets a lot of help from various veterans organizations (which are financially supported by veterans). At the front of the list of supporting organizations are the Disabled American Veterans, but there are many others.

    None of this is to knock the VA health care system. Your article correctly states its current state of excellence. But much of its excellence is owed in one way or the other to fellow veterans and other military supporters who put their time and money into serving veterans. Duplicating this excellence where there is not the level and culture of dedication to fellow brothers in arms will be very difficult.

    decisions have consequences
    thinking about consequences
    • Please give the VA credit

      The improvement happened pre-2001. In fact, the VA's improvement
      probably would have withered under the Bush administration, just as
      FEMA's did, had it not been for wars and the attention that veteran's
      issues received.

      Please give the VA credit for proving that a government-run health
      care system - and the VA is the largest health care system in the US -
      can offer high-quality care for a substantially lower cost than the
      private sector does now.

      Most hospitals get help from volunteers. How is the VA different?
      There's a lot more to it than what I covered.

      Bottom line: a health care SYSTEM is a lot different than health
      insurance. The VA built a great system that saves lives every day.

      Robin
      Robin Harris
      • You're seriously confused about VistA

        Was that a conscious effort to mislead by labeling your hyperlink to WorldVistA as VistA? WorldVistA may be open source, but VistA isn't. It's in the public domain only because taxpayers *paid* for it. This is just another example of open source getting a free ride on the paid labor of other -- you know, those government contractors and middle Americans you disdain so highly in other contexts.
        Vesicant
        • It's in the public domain but it isn't open source

          For some of the less sophisticated among us (myself included), the distinction is somewhat indistinct. Maybe you could enlighten us as to how we place something in the public domain, but it isn't open source?

          Scientific research comes to mind - the kind that is funded, is published and in the public domain and, yes most assuredly, open source. How does VistA escape that distinction and, for that matter, why would it want to?
          IT_User
          • I should do your research?

            Google is your friend. I would assume.
            Vesicant
          • No, better you explain

            No research is going to validate your dichotomous statements.
            IT_User
        • FOIA and Open Source

          VistA is available under the Freedom Of Information Act. VistA was not developed by contractors, it was developed by VA personnel. This is why it is available under the FOIA. As given by the FOIA, VistA is pretty difficult if not nearly impossible to setup. What WorldVistA has done is to implement VistA under Linux with an Open Source MUMPS database engine, Greystone Technologies MUMPS. If you have a checking account somewhere, it is probably being tracked on a MUMPS database. This is an industrial grade MUMPS interpreter/compiler/database and VistA provides a means of organizing the MUMPS data structures with a Data Dictionary with all of the bells and whistles, email, RPC, HL7, telenet, ssh, batch processing, a security menu system, all of these are part of VistA. So what WorldVistA has done is to package this model for you under Open Source. That means that no one can ever come along and slap a copyright on it and take it away from you for having it or using it.
          BaronMind
    • VistA is still here for a reason

      The VA Central Office has been trying to get off of VistA for over 20 years. The VA has been 2 to 5 years from getting off of VistA for that whole time. If the management has that kind of desire, why haven't they? Because there is nothing that comes close to VistA. Why is that? Because it is the people who are at the point of care that have built VistA. These were and are the subject matter experts. They have been empowered to model their process and hook it onto the existing other functionality of the hospital. This is a strong and enabling technology and the result is a system that has stood the test of time and circumstance to be the best healthcare system available. It was built to be enhanced. It is available to be downloaded and installed. There is over a gigabyte and a half of free documentation for nearly all of the functionality of VistA. There are groups working on adding even more functionality to the VistA system. There are efforts to bring the Indian Health Service version functionality into VistA and we would hope that the Department of Defense might also smile on this effort outside the government which is making all of this available in open source. Check out http://worldvista.org and http://hardhats.org . Sign up and join the community. There is a lot to be said for end-user involvement in VistA development.
      BaronMind
  • don't mix OSS with socialized medicine

    OSS is for the all the people, socialized medicine is demanded only by a small minority of craizy liberals.
    Linux Geek
    • Thank you

      You expressed my reaction excellently.
      pdf6161
    • Who's crazy?

      The US spends 50% more per capita for health care than the average of
      all industrialized nations - yet our results are worse.

      Since when did "spend way more, get less" become a core American
      value?

      People who say America can't do better than Canada or France are just
      losers who should be ashamed of themselves. How about some respect
      for your fellow Americans?

      Robin
      Robin Harris
      • How about some respect for "fellow Americans"?

        Have you been listening to what most "fellow Americans" have to say, or too busy authoring blogs?

        The Government is not the VA, and the VA is not the Government, regardless of any technical connections. One day you may be able to see the difference.
        Ole Man
      • define 'better'

        If I'm paying for YOUR health care, I don't care what the cost is per capita, it ain't BETTER!

        ericesque
        • That's a very short-sighted view.

          Everyone gets sick eventually. What it means is that when you're the one who needs care, those who you helped pay for in the past are now helping to pay for your care.
          masonwheeler
          • that's a very socialist view

            The US is a very charitable nation. If we want to fund care for the sick that can't foot the bill, we need to do it through voluntary contributions, not by mandating contributions through the federal tax system!
            ericesque
          • If that actually worked, we wouldn't be in this mess.

            That's already been tried, plenty of times, without any success. Private charities just don't raise enough money to take care of large-scale social problems. Never have, never will. Human nature always gets in the way.

            My personal favorite would have to be the attempt to help with the unemployment problem during the Great Depression through charitable contributions. They ended up raising about $1 for every unemployed worker in the country.

            Granted, universal health insurance isn't the ideal solution. It's kind of ridiculous, when you think about it. Health is a basic human need that everyone ought to be able to afford on their own paycheck. You don't see people selling food insurance, do you? When's the last time someone offered you an air insurance policy? But the real solution that this implies will provoke even more trouble from the far-right FUDmongers, which is why nobody's talking about it.
            masonwheeler
        • You paying for someone elses claim

          In general, isn't that how insurance is supposed to work?

          :o)
          Jack-Booted EULA
        • You're paying twice!

          I hate to break it to you, but you are paying for sick Americans twice! Once when you pay your HC premiums and once when you pay your taxes.

          The root cause of this is because we have laws that make us physicians give care to the uninsured. If I went into a car dealership and asked everyone there is they would donate $2,000 each to get a $30,000 car; I probably would not leave with a car. But if an uninsured person comes to the ER with a $30,000 appendicitis, we all chip in. This will never be capitalism, until there is an option to walk away from the deal. Ericesque, are you saying, we should step over him on the way to work and just let him die?

          By pretending that Healthcare can be handled in a pure market, we incur more costs:
          1) Many uninsured people treat the ER like it is a clinic (very costly);
          2) Uninsured sick people often delay preventative and mild interventional care until they are very sick (very costly);
          3) Publicly traded insurance companies learned a long time ago they must produce profits for shareholders in order to compete in the marketplace. The best way to turn a profit is to insure well people. By insuring through employers (sick people can't work) and having pre-existing clauses in their insurance contracts, they do that. Then remove older Americans that get their care through Medicare (this is the most costly group to insure). The result is that private insurance covers about 70% of insured Americans, but only pay out about 30% of the actual care.

          Your taxes cover the rest: DoD, VA, IHS, Medicaid, Medicare and don't forget the wonderful programs for US congress, president, and all federal employees! The uninsured increase your premiums and taxes to cover the losses at the hospital,etc level.

          Matthew M. King, MD
          flydoc40
      • EXCELLENT points!

        Especially when IBM has commercials running that have someone from France saying how their system is the best.

        Puts the kibosh on "America is #1"(try #37)

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZT-1eEsZqo

        Great commercial; what it doesn't say is much louder than what it does say. :)
        HypnoToad72
    • A small minority?

      Last I checked, a little over 50% of the American people and close to 70% of American doctors supported universal health care. That doesn't sound like a small minority of "crazy liberals" to me...
      masonwheeler