Nokia Siemens Networks sued by Iranian activist for human rights abuses

Nokia Siemens Networks sued by Iranian activist for human rights abuses

Summary: An Iranian activist currently in detention in Iran has filed suit against Nokia Siemens Networks, Nokia and Siemens for human rights abuses. The activist was detained during civil unrest in the aftermath of last year's elections after his mobile phone communications were intercepted allegedly using lawful intercept capability provided to the Iranian government by Nokia Siemens Networks.

SHARE:
TOPICS: Emerging Tech, Nokia
8

A law suit has been filed in US Federal Court this week against Nokia Siemens Networks as well as parent companies Nokia and Siemens by Isa Saharkhiz and his son, Mehdi Saharkhiz. Isa Saharkhiz was picked up by the Iranian authorities as a result of monitoring of his cell phone during the civil unrest in the aftermath of the Iranian elections last year. According to his lawyers:

Since his arrest, Iranian officials have tortured Mr. Saharkhiz and subjected him to other inhumane and degrading treatment or punishment. Currently, his health is deteriorating, suffering from untreated injuries caused by torture, resulting from Iranian authorities withholding necessary medical care.

Amnesty International confirmed the seriousness of the case in an alert issued last year:

Journalist Issa Saharkhiz was arrested on 4 July 2009. Amnesty International considers him to be a prisoner of conscience, held solely on account of the peaceful expression of his views, including regarding the outcome of the election and is at risk of torture or other ill-treatment.

Issa Saharkhiz (aged 56), journalist and a campaigner for presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi was arrested in Northern Iran on 4 July and taken away to an undisclosed location. His whereabouts have still not been disclosed by the Iranian authorities, despite his family and lawyer’s efforts putting him at danger of torture. Amnesty International fears that he has been subjected to enforced disappearance.

On 20 June 2009, his family home in Tehran was raided whilst he was travelling in Northern Iran and his computer and elections campaigning materials supporting the opposition presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi were confiscated. On 2 July, Issa Saharkhiz had posted an article on news website Rooz in which he criticized the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Sayed ‘Ali Khamenei

Among other things the law suit demands that Nokia Siemens Networks:

  • cease all unlawful support of intercepting centers of the Iranian government
  • help secure the release of Mr. Isa Saharkhiz through the use of their connections with the Iranian Government
  • be penalised to the extent that would prevent Defendants from harming others in the future in other similarly situated countries like Iran.

Nokia Siemens Network acknowledged the suit and declined to comment directly but have issued the following statement:

We will say that the misuse of communication technologies, intended for legitimate use, to infringe human rights is wrong. It is those who misuse technology who must be accountable for their actions. We condemn the abuse of technology to suppress political activity, and deplore any government, anywhere, that employs torture.

At issue here is the provision of lawful intercept capability to the Iranian government. NSN argue that they merely provide the same capability that is provided under license to most other countries in the world. Activists contend that lawful intercept capability is used in western countries only after a judicial review process to protect unwarranted intrusion where as in countries like Iran police and security forces may just use the capability immediately without any checks and balances on civil rights proections.

In the their 2009 sustainability report Nokia Siemens Network provided some more explanation:

In 2008 Nokia Siemens Networks provided a monitoring center to allow Iranian law enforcement authorities to implement the Lawful Interception capability in MCI’s mobile network......... 

We are aware of credible reports that the Iranian authorities might have used technology we and other companies supplied to suppress political activity. Nokia Siemens Networks condemns such abuse, whether it takes place in Iran or elsewhere, and regrets having provided the monitoring center to Iran. 

Contrary to media reports, at no time has Nokia Siemens Networks provided “deep packet inspection” or any other capability designed to conduct content-base surveillance of internet or other communications traffic to Iran.

Expect this story to play out for many years ahead as there are pretty fundamental human rights and business ethics at stake. Does a telco serve the greater good by providing communications technology to Iranians en masse even if it enables surveillance by an oppressive regime. In a press release Nokia Siemens Networks blog justified its actions last summer:

Nokia Siemens Networks provides the mobile technology for millions of people in Iran to communicate with each other and the outside world. Nokia Siemens Networks firmly believes that providing people, wherever they are, with the ability to communicate ultimately benefits societies and brings greater prosperity.

 Do you agree with Nokia Siemens networks the greater good is served in such cases?

Topics: Emerging Tech, Nokia

James Farrar

About James Farrar

James has more than 15 years of experience working on corporate sustainability issues from both the corporate and NGO campaigning perspective.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

8 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Sovereign Countries

    The real question here is whether or not sovereign countries can make laws that other countries disagree with. If we accept the basis of this lawsuit and decide that other countries *can* pass judgement on the laws of another sovereign state, we have to ask: whose ideology determines the acceptable set of laws? What makes anyone think that Western liberal-socialist dogma is the 'right' answer? Hubris?

    Steve G.
    aureolin
    • well said

      Of course, this can be seen inside the US, as well, as the vocal minority formed by the religious right seek to force their way of life onto others...

      If forcing your views of the world on others is acceptable inside a country, there would be no problem seen with forcing your views onto others OUTSIDE the country... even if the "others" are an entire other nation.
      shryko
      • RE: Nokia Siemens Networks sued by Iranian activist for human rights abuses

        @shryko @aureolin I see where you are coming from on this but human rights are universal and not culture specific. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
        jamesfarrar.1@...
  • Tragic use of technology

    It is unfortunate that Issa Saharkhiz was arrested and treated roughly for backing a candidate the Iranian government did not want. While NSN supplied the technology, it was the government that misused that technology. As Steve G pointed out, how can one country force its laws on another country that is run in a completely different way.

    It has been instructive to watch the Iranian regime crush any resistance (real or imagined) against the rule of the clerics. I admire those who stood up and voiced their disagreements with that regime peacefully while knowing that the regime will do everything to stop them including torture and murder.
    sboverie
  • RE: Nokia Siemens Networks sued by Iranian activist for human rights abuses

    It may feel comfortable to be "politically" correct in asserting that a nation or company not take a stance for human rights, but it is not morally correct. We no longer live as primitives. In this global society, human rights transcend politics and the abuse of people in the name of religion. Noikia-Siemens made a terrible mistake. But it is not the first time that Siemens has foregone ethics in favor of profit. In this situation, the least Siemens should do is agressively condemn the actions of the Iranian government, no matter what the cost.
    G. Edward Kalbaugh
    President & CEO, Allegent Advisors
    GEK2
  • RE: Nokia Siemens Networks sued by Iranian activist for human rights abuses

    I'm one of the attorneys representing Mr. Saharkhiz in this case. I want to thank you for paying attention to this case, and I want to offer our input to expand this discussion. I appreciate if you can provide us a venue to answer your audience.

    Ali Herischi, Esq.
    aherischi
  • RE: Nokia Siemens Networks sued by Iranian activist for human rights abuses

    Ali

    Delighted to have your input to expand the story. Scroll up to 'Blogger Info', select 'contact' and there you can send me a direct email.
    jamesfarrar.1@...
  • RE: Nokia Siemens Networks sued by Iranian activist for human rights abuses

    As I recall the issue of corporate responsibility for the results of their cooperation with an unjust government was dealt with at the "Second" Nuremberg Trials" at which a number of German companies (Krupp Holdings, Flick KG, and IG Farben) and their officers and management were found guilty.

    Alfreid Krupp's statement regarding his innocence bears an interesting resemblance to that of Nokia/Seimens: "The economy needed a steady or growing development. Because of the rivalries between the many political parties in Germany and the general disorder there was no opportunity for prosperity. ... We thought that Hitler would give us such a healthy environment. Indeed he did do that. ... We Krupps never cared much about [political] ideas. We only wanted a system that worked well and allowed us to work unhindered. Politics is not our business."<br><br>That position was wrong then and wrong today.
    JakeRader