ie8 fix

Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.

By | January 19, 2011, 2:32pm PST

Summary: Typical. Steve Jobs takes his liver on vacation and all hell breaks loose. An uncensored Playboy app? Has the world gone mad?

Typical. Steve Jobs takes his liver on vacation and all hell breaks loose.

The Apple CEO and notorious sex-positive advocate is famous for saying that there will never ever be any porn in the Apple App Store ever, and that people who want that kind of sicko thing can just put on their raincoats and go to the adult bookstore where they sell Androids.

Except this morning, we woke to media fap-fap-fapping away about Playboy CEO and notorious prude Hugh Hefner Tweeting that, yes Dorothy, there will be Playboobs on the iPad.

An uncensored app? Has the world gone mad?

Not so fast, Hefster.

What he actually said and how it has been spun, and what’s really going on, are very different. Stop looking at porn in Safari on your iPad for a minute and stay with me.

Hugh Tweeted, “Big news! Playboy–both old & new–will be available on iPad beginning in March.” Through the day he’s been Tweeting, “Yes, all the back issues of Playboy will be available on iPad, & current issues as well” and “Playboy on iPad will be uncensored.”

First, there’s the notion that Playboy is actually relevant, racy and pornographic. This is up for debate, if you can stay awake long enough. Or unless extreme Photoshop is your flavor of hardcore. If so, then you are a special kind of pervert, and I admire that.

But like a Playboy centerfold’s jiggly Golden Globes as seen before Rubber Stamp Tool and after, there are two very different versions of what Playboy is making for the iPad. CNet reported this morning Pacific Time,

Playboy confirmed that it’s releasing a Web-based subscription service that would give users access to every issue of Playboy past and present.

This service would be compatible with the iPad and use some of the iPad’s features.

But the magazine added it’s planning to release a non-nude version of a Playboy-branded iPad app in the coming months that would adhere to all of Apple’s policies and guidelines.

Got that? There will be no uncensored Playboy in the App Store. Like many other NSFW websites, Playboy is making an app for the iPad. But the app store version will be as chaste and breast-free as Steve Jobs’ fantasy garden of pure ideology.

Hef isn’t doing much right now to dispel confusion about Playboy’s upcoming iPad compatible web service and the separate censored iPad app, but maybe no one told him. Or maybe hopping around after all his bunnies left him out of breath and a little lightheaded today. That’s okay. The brand needed a little Viagra boost.

I’m sorry to be the one to tell you that Playboy isn’t porn anymore.

Oh, and also that the Playboy iPad App will indeed be censored.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Violet Blue is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation.

Disclosure

Violet Blue

I am currently freelancing part-time (only) for ReadWriteWeb for their general news blog and their Start (startup tools) channel; this was made in agreement that I would not write about anything that might conflict subjects in my blog (no sex content). I'm under contract to publisher Cleis Press for editing three more books (only) with the topics of women's/couples' erotica. I have been writing and editing books for Cleis Press for ten years on the subjects of erotica and human sexuality (guidebooks). I'm not under exclusive contract anywhere/to anyone/to anything, I have no investments.

Biography

Violet Blue

Violet Blue (tinynibbles.com, @violetblue) is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation. She is regarded as the foremost expert in the field of sex and technology, a sex-positive pundit in mainstream media (MacLife, Forbes.com, The Oprah Winfrey Show, others) and is regularly interviewed, quoted and featured prominently by major media outlets (from ABC News to the Wall Street Journal). A published feature writer and columnist, Violet also has many award-winning, best-selling books; her books are featured on Oprah's website. She was the notorious sex columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle. She headlines at conferences ranging from ETech, LeWeb and SXSW: Interactive, to Google Tech Talks at Google, Inc. The London Times named Blue one of the 40 bloggers who really count.
81
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
JACOBSONR 14th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Playboy is doomed anyway.
nickswift498 19th Jan 2011
Let's face it: print porn magazines like Playboy are doomed. The porn industry has already moved on to distribution via the internet because it's cheap, convenient, and (most importantly) anonymous. The app store may be porn-free, but that's a moot point, since porn is still easily accessible from any internet-connected device, and the trend is favoring smaller companies over media giants like Playboy.
0 Votes
+ -
@nickswift498 The porn industry has already moved on to distribution via the internet because it's cheap, convenient, and (most importantly) anonymous.

I'm guessing someone there knows this already... which kind of explains why they're doing the subscription based web offering.
0 Votes
+ -
@nickswift498 So.. walking up to a news agent and buying a magazine with cash is LESS anonymous then connecting to a web site from home, setting cookies & history all over your browser and paying for the service with a credit card?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
ddferrari 20th Jan 2011
@jreesnc Very well put! I totally agree.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
rebel_angel_@... 21st Jan 2011
@jreesnc it may actually be less anonymous, but the perception is that it's more anonymous because it doesn't require in-person interaction with another human being. You're sitting at a machine interacting with another machine somewhere out there.

Similar dynamic to the use of a bank machine when there's a teller ten feet away. You're still interacting with the bank, and the same information is exchanged, but for many it's somehow more comfortable to use the machine.

When you view porn online, you're unlikely to have people you know personally find out and thus be exposed to your peers as a wanker who's willing to pay for it. In this sense it's more private.

You're absolutely correct in saying that in a very real and important sense online transactions are less anonymous than a cash purchase in person, but it's the perception of "interpersonal anonymity" that counts. For many, the idea of a faceless corporation or government collecting data on their habits is less threatening than the thought of a wife/husband/girlfriend/parent/child/friend finding a hidden stack of mags/vids/paperbacks, or the thought of being caught buying porn by someone in their community that they know, or even just seeing the smirk on the face of the kid at the video store. Stuff on the computer is usually password-protected so it seems "safer".
0 Votes
+ -
A "web app" to get around Apple's walled garden??
oncall Updated - 19th Jan 2011
Shocking! Who coulda seen that coming?!?!

LOL, sorry I am just laughing that anybody actually bought that there was going to be porn in Apple's app store before hell froze over or at the very least before SJ steps down as CEO. Not gonna happen folks.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
rparker009 Updated - 20th Jan 2011
0 Votes
+ -
@oncall It was the same at Ruger... They had to wait until William B. Ruger passed away to put extended mag release on the 10/22 or anything vaguely tactical/black/mean-looking on their firearms.
0 Votes
+ -
Playboy is porn?
People 19th Jan 2011
???
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly my question
wackoae 19th Jan 2011
@People Playboy is closer to ART than porn. Sure they have female nudity, but the nudity is very classy ... more like photographic art of the (mostly bleach blond) female body.
0 Votes
+ -
This makes total sense.
matthew_maurice Updated - 19th Jan 2011
First, yes-Playboy isn't porn anywhere. Second, trying to fight Steve in his own yard is pointless. Building a web-app that robust mobile browsers on all smartphones can leverage for a great experience makes tons of sense. Also, let's not forget that Apple is now nixing free apps that provide content only to print subscribers. Finally, of course Hugh isn't doing much to straighten things out. Boobs in an app-store app is news, a web-app that serves up naked women really isn't.
0 Votes
+ -
I only read the articles anyway!
dotben Updated - 19th Jan 2011
I'm pleased Playboy will be releasing a special 'non-nude' version for the iPad because I only ever buy Playboy for the articles anyway.

On the other hand you could argue that with its glass screen and easy-wipe surface the iPad is designed to be the ultimate fapping device...
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
LiquidLearner Updated - 20th Jan 2011
it's going to happen anyway
why not tax it Apple
0 Votes
+ -
I only read the Playboy articles anyway!
kenosha77a 19th Jan 2011
Who looks at pictures now-a-days! That's so 60's.
0 Votes
+ -
Oh, Violet Blue. Your choice of using a graphic of Marilyn brings back very distant (but fond) high school memories.

I attended a prestigious local all male Catholic High School. (BTW, I've heard all the jokes) In our senior year, a few of us "bright young lads" were given a chance to learn something called "computer programming". Our computer equipment we used in 1970 consisted of a teletype keyboard/modem combination connected, via a phone line, to a local business mainframe computer. Does anyone recall the equipment where you dialed the access number and then placed the phone handle in the modem "twin cup holders" next to the keyboard? (When you think about it, its very freudian .. by I digress)

Our computer program was punched out on "five hole across" paper tape rolls and then feed into a paper tape "reader". (It wasn't a very wide paper roll .. but it was very long.)

Of course, the first program that was successfully completed by our "gang of five" (There was only five crazy computer curious individuals in our senior class) was a program that printed out ... in exquisite detail, I might add, of the iconic Playboy bunny graphic.

Ah, the good ole days! And now, I'll get to re-read all those great 60's articles once again. (Like I said, I never EVER looked at the pictures. Well ... maybe once or twice. GRIN)
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@kenosha7777 I'm taking credit for Marilyn. happy
0 Votes
+ -
You Insensitive Bastard
yobtaf Updated - 20th Jan 2011
@jperlow
I take deep offense to your wise crack about Steve Jobs health condition.
He man could be dying and your making fun or it.
Who is your boss?
I want to report you!
0 Votes
+ -
hypocrite much?
SonofaSailor Updated - 20th Jan 2011
@yobtaf

Funny, you take such a strong position on commenting about health, yet you have a clever little uid - Fatboy - spelled backwards.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
Yobtaf . . .
JLHenry 22nd Jan 2011
I take deep Offense at you taking deep offense at something Jason didn't do . . . . Where do I go to report you, loser?
0 Votes
+ -
I'm with you . . .
JLHenry 22nd Jan 2011
@kenosha7777

When I went in the Ohio Nat. Guard, The unit I was going to be assigned to (Med 200 Discharge during basic, so I never got past basic) was a support battalion charged with computing firing angles, etc. for the artillery, etc. The computer (which could be hauled into the combat zone) was housed in FOUR 40 foot trailers which were designed to connect together. This included the A/C needed to cool the computer.

The Computer was 4k, and used punch cards to load the program that needed to be run.

What did they use to this thing for when it wasn't running important programs?

ASCII pron, of course. wink
0 Votes
+ -
YES!
james347 19th Jan 2011
YES!
0 Votes
+ -
Playboy is way past its' prime.
lars626 19th Jan 2011
There was a time when the articles really were a major part of the magazine.
There was a time when the photographs were of real people not the modified and touched up ones of today.
Playboy peaked somewhere in the 1970-85 era.
Alas, when will Hef remember that he is no longer 35.
0 Votes
+ -
@lars626 just accept that everything was much better when you were young. Touch up techniques have been around since the photography was invented. Of course not at such an advanced level but still quite ok.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
lelandhendrix@... 20th Jan 2011
@pupkin_z Where do people think the "dodge" and "burn" techniques in Photoshop came from? This was editing by hand and required skill, but was commonly done.
0 Votes
+ -
Playboy
mwidunn 19th Jan 2011
The fact someone could say -- with a straight face -- that Playboy isn't porn just shows how bad things have gotten. I guess it's not when the alternatives are simulated rape and "snuff" films.

Another reason for me to LIKE Apple.
0 Votes
+ -
@mwidunn There is nothing wrong with the human body.

What is really wrong is sexually trouble/religious nuts people shoving their morality crap on others by claiming that nature is evil.

Funny how the worlds biggest deviants are ALWAYS religious nuts.
0 Votes
+ -
definition
banned from zdnet 20th Jan 2011
@mwidunn
there is a clear definition of porn. you can find it in any dictionary. just look it up.

and no, the playboy is not showing porn. it only shows nudity. but i know, i know even nudity is already too much for some in prudish lala land.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow...
jasonp@... 20th Jan 2011
@mwidunn
The logical progression for porn is boobs...snuff film. You're right...that shows how bad things have gotten. Nutballs abound.
0 Votes
+ -
ebook
John Titlow 19th Jan 2011
If this is ture, i'll spend more time read ebook with ipad.
0 Votes
+ -
What's the point in a censored playboy? There are much better articles in other magazines. Besides, I don't know about America but in The UK no man is going to read playboy in public. It maybe very soft core but a porn mag it still is.
0 Votes
+ -
Mr. Obvious
Nerill Updated - 20th Jan 2011
Not to be Mr. O here, but I think many of you are missing VB's point: subtly embedded in an inflammable issue (nicely done btw).
The point, I believe, is not porn, but Apple's insane desire to control, pervasive throughout their entire product line. China could learn a thing or two. Which is the reason I will neither live in China nor become an Applehead.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
Trep Ford Updated - 20th Jan 2011
@Nerill ... Nicely said. Let's recognize censorship when we see it and not pretend it's not there.

That said, I'm OK with the fact that there are folks in the world who want someone to "sanitize" their content for them. I'm not one of them, but as consumers, it's their right. I'm also OK with a company deciding to provide such a pre-filtered approach. Again, that's also their choice.

I'm certainly not OK with such folks thinking that can or should require anyone else to have their content similarly filtered against their will.

Apple has decided to be a provider of pre-filtered content. If we don't want pre-filtered services (and I, for one, do not) then we simply look to other brands for our gear. I don't have a problem with that. I'm glad we live in a country where you can choose which approach you prefer. Sounds a far sight better to me than being forced to accept filtered or unfiltered content against your will.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
DeusXMachina 21st Jan 2011
@Trep Ford
No one is forcing you to choose here, and certainly not Apple. Apple has always said that the proper venue for this content is HTML5 and web apps. Apple has made NO efforts to censor this content on the iPad.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
Nerill Updated - 21st Jan 2011
@Trep & Deus

Thanks for your comments. Just a small reminder though, I use the word "pervasive" & "insane" for many of the decisions Apple makes. The point, I had hoped, was not necessarily about their sanitization of content (people DO want others to make decisions for them, I guess???), but their need to control even AFTER they have sold a product to you. Case in point (& there are many others) is their decision to use pentalobular screws on many of their products (to keep users from maintaining/repairing their own equipment)

Why people continue to stand for this (by being a customer) bewilders me.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
DeusXMachina 21st Jan 2011
@Nerill
Considering the fact that almost no one ever needs to disassemble their devices, and the fact that you can get a driver and replacement philips head screws (in order to placate the nagging) from iFixit for under $10, while a little annoying, I fail to see this as some sort of earth-shattering, evil incarnate, issuing forth the legion of hell issue you are making it out to be. Insane? C'mon now. Apple would rather dumb people not get in and (pentalobular) screw things up. Big deal. Lots of manufacturers do the same thing. Heck, even Torx wrenches were rare at one time, and were included for the same reason, making devices with Torx screws hard to open.
Given the popularity of the iOS devices, I wouldn't be surprised to find pentalobular drivers available at Big Lots! and Harbour Freight Tools for $1.99 within months.
0 Votes
+ -
Pentalobular screw(ed)
Nerill 22nd Jan 2011
@DeusX
You make a good point, savvy users CAN take steps to bypass Apple's attempts to control. My point was not to focus on this one thing, but indicate their entire client philosophy: "If you buy from us we want to be in control": understandable for a business. This desire for control means if users wish to deviate, they MUST "hack" their devices and/or their software/firmware. DeusX, your position WRT Apple seems steadfast: your prerogative. For everyone else, Google "Apple" & "control-freaks" together. This is a far cry from their Mac 1984, rage against "Big Brother" Olympic commercial.
Oh, and BTW, iFixit's "Liberation Kit" $10 screwdriver and two screws, will cost an additional $30 if you want it in a week (vice a month).
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
DeusXMachina Updated - 22nd Jan 2011
@Nerill
I understand your point, I really do, and I DO find some of Apple's policies annoying, but there is a bigger picture. I am NOT an Apple apologist, contrary, perhaps, to the beliefs of some here. There are many things that Apple does wrong, and I wish they would be a little less anal retentive about certain things. But their are two facets to the alternate viewpoint.
1) Because they have a LOT of capital invested in the stores, and those stores give great services, and readily swap out broken parts, and fix things on the spot, their costs would go up significantly, and they would have a hard time justifying it, for even a small relaxing of this policy, especially since it effects such a small percentage of the custoMer base, who would not bother to open the devices up, even it you could open it up via a menu command! It is a cost control measure, not a draconian control measure.
That said, Apple could have made it FAR more difficult to open the cases, but did not.
As for content, again, Apple has made NO effort to censor the device. This is just a poorly conceived internet meme. ANY content can be designed for inclusion via HTML5 web apps, and Apple has made NO attempt to censor or control this market in ANY way. What Apple HAS done is place regulations on what IT sells, via the store. This is their exposed face to the world, and it makes perfect business sense, as evinced by their current market position, to exercise that control. While annoying, and perhaps a bitt too extreme, it is also that control that has helped garner their market position. For every person such as yourself who bristles at the walled-garden, there are ten people who buy the device BECAUSE of the experience the walled-garden provides. And since Apple has stated that you are free to install ANY HTML5 app, that can address any of the alternate markets, in the end, I think Apple has made, at least generally speaking, the right decision, at least from a business stand point.

And that is why, even coming from a mostly libertarian mind-set, I would not take a position that Apple is evil, that they are trying to control what people see, and that I will never buy Apple. They are NOT trying to control content, they are legitimately trying to control what THEY themselves sell in their own store. I can not fault them for that.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
spoonology@... 21st Jan 2011
@Neril

Well said and I wholly agree! Apple is just a power hungry, controlling company that wants the consumer to blindly buy into their ideals with their minds and pocket books.

Buying a mac or an iPad is like buying a car that only the manufacturer can work on, or provide upgrades or content for. Gee I'd love to buy a custom AA battery for $20.00 from Apple when the store sells packs of 10 AA batteries for $5.00.

Certainly, I wouldn't want Apple to waste any profits by providing manufacturing plants in America to stimulate the economy or create jobs. No, it is much better to send all of the manufacturing operations over seas for the sake of the bottom line.

Also consider that Community gatherings are great, as long as the topics discussed are vetted and approved by Apple. Apple is great, if you have no intention to think for yourself or have your own opinion. Apple has no problem setting the boundries in which societies across the world sould remain within.

..... Yeah, good luck with that...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
DeusXMachina 22nd Jan 2011
@spoonology@...

As stated elsewhere, you are misinformed.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
spoonology@... 24th Jan 2011
@DeusXMachina@...

I am a bit confused as to your reasoning to why I am misinformed?

While I agree my statements ar a bit on the inflammatory side, I speak from direct professional experience. I have been an electronics industry professional for many years (which includes IT), and unless things have radically changed, Apple's hardware is propriatary and can only be worked on by Apple or a third party vendor that is contracted with Apple. So it do-it-yourselfers, are mostly left at the mercy of Apple's or the third party's pricing scheme.

It is a well documented fact that Apple's primary manufacturing center(s) are in China and not in the US.

Censoring is defined as: "The practice of suppressing a text or part of a text that is considered objectionable according to certain standards" as defined by http://www.medialit.org/reading_room/article565.html
Those standards are defined by Apple for their product lines. Which means that Apple controlls what will and will not be readily available for download onto their devices.

Now I'm not saying that Apple can't do what ever they want with their product lines and or content that Apple develops. Simply that Apple, in doing so, essentially states, "It's my way or the highway".

In summary Apple's hardware and software are inextricably bound together in one package. Either you take it all or you leave it all, and any company that presumes to tell the customer what they want is not a company that I will support.
0 Votes
+ -
HTML5
Nerill Updated - 23rd Jan 2011
@DeusX - Wow, a nicely written and thoughtful response. You present facts and carefully considered opinion, and not flames: it is a pleasure to talk with you.


In any event, contrary to YOUR philosophy, I am not a Libertarian (I cant afford it), so I always take a jaundiced eye when a private corp tries to force me in a certain direction (often it is a direction I would like to go, but I always check the horses teeth just to be sure). I fully understand how our economy needs industry to be successful (my retirement fund depends on it), and that their scoring method is money. In this case, following the money of HTML5 is interesting. It IS a great innovation with video and audio tags embedded in the code and able to play without (flash-like) addons. The concern I have is not HTML5 itself but the codecs needed. As you know, HTML5 runs via the efficient H.264 which is a licensed product (open for non-profit use till 2015 when the rules may change). H.265 is touted to be the Flash killer. But it is controlled by MPEG LA, a company that manages a consortium of patent holders related to H.265: of which Apple among others is a member (Adobe is not). So, commercial users must pay a royality to use HTML5 (because of H.265) of which Apple (and not Adobe) will be a recipient.
Now comes my speculation: who will be the greatest commercial users of HTML5(?): on line & mobile Ads of course. The holy grail of on-line ads are ones that run without needing an addon (i.e. shockwave flash). HTML5 would be that way. Support for it would be written into the browser/mobile OS code. There is then an enormous potential for profit to whoever owns the companies and codecs for this type of advertising: esp if it is based on a universal (and commercial) video standard. Interestingly, Apple built (bought?) the iAd platform, which delivers ads based on HTML5. Imagine the profit potential for Apple: use of its codecs AND a primary source for mobile advertising. Admittedly, this is a fairly simplistic overview of my speculation (hm, maybe Ill write a book lol). But I hope you can understand my point.


Apple is a business and I dont begrudge its success. My primary concern are those agencies who profess their desire to make my life better (for seemingly altruistic reasons) when there is really an underlying purpose that only provides for the rich getting richer at my expense. /sigh, I know it is little more than windmill tipping, but I need to voice my thoughts when I dont feel right about something.
0 Votes
+ -
Steve, Steve...
ussafs3 20th Jan 2011
If Steve Jobs had invented the VCR there wouldn't have been any p0rn on that either and we'd all own a Betamax now.
0 Votes
+ -
I think . . .
JLHenry 22nd Jan 2011
@ussafs3

You've confused 'VCR' with 'VHS' . . .
0 Votes
+ -
Playboy uncensored iPad app
discotheque 20th Jan 2011
CamContacts pioneered a system to view its flagship site on Apple-based devices such as the iPhone and iPad without the need for an app, back at the beginning of 2010. Sorry Playboy, but CamContacts got there first.
0 Votes
+ -
This really should be irrelevant
the_doge 20th Jan 2011
And, I'll bet, probably IS irrelevant in more civilized societies (most of Europe, for example). It's only news in places like the USA, where so neurotic sexual obsession is still so widespread. It was, I think, Oscar Wilde who said that nobody had ever been seduced by a book. I think the same might apply to an iPad. >:-)
0 Votes
+ -
Teenagers need Playboy
sip01 20th Jan 2011
I'm sure there are a lot of pimply-faced acne-plagued teenagers exercising their left wrist to Playboy centrefolds. Good to know they won't be spurting all over their iDevice.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Playboy Uncensored iPad App? Wrong.
DeusXMachina 21st Jan 2011
@sip01
I think that voids your warrantee!
0 Votes
+ -
Can you imagine . . .
JLHenry 22nd Jan 2011
@DeusXMachina

Explaining THAT at the Geniusbar?? wink
0 Votes
+ -
Given how badly...
neverhome 20th Jan 2011
Hef treats his harem, I cannot imagine having anything to do with Playboy. He's nothing but an over-aged degenerate.
0 Votes
+ -
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix