ie8 fix

Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW

By | March 24, 2011, 4:43pm PDT

Summary: As many of you know, South By SouthWest Interactive is the largest tech conference in America, hosting thousands of attendees to see hundreds of talks, panels and lectures about all aspects of tech and interactive life. All speakers are required to check in at SxSW green rooms and wait for one hour before talks. This year, [...]

As many of you know, South By SouthWest Interactive is the largest tech conference in America, hosting thousands of attendees to see hundreds of talks, panels and lectures about all aspects of tech and interactive life.

All speakers are required to check in at SxSW green rooms and wait for one hour before talks. This year, along with water and soft drinks, all speakers were greeted with free schwag from a PR company that sponsored SxSW’s 2011 green rooms.

Austin company Ink PR distributed breath mints and cards with a short list of “speaker tips” for all presenters, literally left in piles on each green room table.

Of note to several presenters was the final point on Ink PR’s list of speaker tips reading, “A speech should be like a woman’s skirt: long enough to cover the topic, yet short enough to be interesting.

When asked about endorsement of the cards or the sentiment expressed, SxSW’s official response to me was that they had not been aware of the cards.

I reached out to Ink PR to get their response to speakers who had mentioned they were offended by the last line.

Rather than respond to me directly, Ink PR acknowledged that the cards were offensive in a blog post titled, “Here’s A Tip: Lighten Up.”

Ink PR wrote,

The last tip on the card was a quote, attributed to everyone (including Winston Churchill) and no one over many years, and considered a sound piece of advice to toastmasters and speech makers alike. (…)

I’ve heard some of the speakers took offense at our “sexist” tip cards. To those speakers, this all-female high tech/clean tech PR firm says no offense intended and offers up this one additional piece of advice – not taking ourselves so seriously can be a good thing in life. Try it.

It’s certainly true that everyone has different levels of what’s acceptable, and what’s not, when it comes to discussions and jokes about sex and gender. In fact, the first two people to bring it up and express offense were male speakers, each from different parts of the industry.

Some people may claim women smart enough to be in tech should be “beyond this” - as in, “beyond being offended by this.”

But tech (and tech media) is still an old boy’s network. And if you think it’s not, then you’re not paying attention.

I think that if a woman wants to make her living by shortening her skirt, that’s her prerogative. Telling me what length my skirt “should” be may seem like a harmless joke (though it’s a very, very old and boring one to begin with).

But get it straight: should’s are what keep us in the tech ghetto.

Incidentally, the word “sexist” was Ink PR’s addition to the conversation, not mine. But I’m glad they pointed it out.

The idea that what keeps half the population “interesting” is a short skirt is not only sexist, it’s so deeply denigrating that it appalled everyone who talked about the cards - SxSW speakers of varying genders and orientations.

It posits the argument that there is one thing about a woman that “keeps things interesting.”

It pretends that I can’t look at you as a speaker, think My god, she’s hot and still, “despite” that, listen the hell to what you say.

A woman who’s sexually desirable may or may not have good ideas - the two things are irrelevant to each other.

I am a 5-year SxSW speaking veteran. My skirt will be as long or as short as I feel like making it, thank you very much, and if that’s the only thing that “keeps things interesting” for you when I talk, then you missed a train that left the station quite a few years ago.

And whatever does or doesn’t make me “interesting” to you: you ignore my ideas at your peril.

Image via Ink PR.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Violet Blue is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation.

Disclosure

Violet Blue

I am currently freelancing part-time (only) for ReadWriteWeb for their general news blog and their Start (startup tools) channel; this was made in agreement that I would not write about anything that might conflict subjects in my blog (no sex content). I'm under contract to publisher Cleis Press for editing three more books (only) with the topics of women's/couples' erotica. I have been writing and editing books for Cleis Press for ten years on the subjects of erotica and human sexuality (guidebooks). I'm not under exclusive contract anywhere/to anyone/to anything, I have no investments.

Biography

Violet Blue

Violet Blue (tinynibbles.com, @violetblue) is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation. She is regarded as the foremost expert in the field of sex and technology, a sex-positive pundit in mainstream media (MacLife, Forbes.com, The Oprah Winfrey Show, others) and is regularly interviewed, quoted and featured prominently by major media outlets (from ABC News to the Wall Street Journal). A published feature writer and columnist, Violet also has many award-winning, best-selling books; her books are featured on Oprah's website. She was the notorious sex columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle. She headlines at conferences ranging from ETech, LeWeb and SXSW: Interactive, to Google Tech Talks at Google, Inc. The London Times named Blue one of the 40 bloggers who really count.
51
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
FAULKNE 13th Oct
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
billstreeter Updated - 24th Mar 2011
They seem fairly inept at PR, even for a PR firm.
0 Votes
+ -
@billstreeter

Being good at PR doesn't mean you should be an apologist for people with no sense of humor.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
zwhittaker 24th Mar 2011
Loved the article, Vi, and totally agree with your thoughts. Even though with my burgeoning masculinity, I too am, as you know, a strong advocate of gender and LGBT equality, and cannot agree more with your stance on this. It's just a shame I don't have the figure to pull off wearing a skirt myself when I lecture.
0 Votes
+ -
@zwhittaker

You look silly in a skirt anyway. Tights and a boa for you, big boy.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
Violet Blue 24th Mar 2011
@zwhittaker Thank you, Z. I reserve the right to admire your speech as much as your bottom, but I promise that the two shall remain irrelevant.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
rluxemburg 26th Mar 2011
@zwhittaker go Utilikilt.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
truenorthern@... 24th Mar 2011
There are actual issues of inequity and inequality in our world, i suggest you put in some actual effort and address them. This cheap attempt at making something out of nothing is beneath you.
0 Votes
+ -
Why even bother with the so-called issue? If VB doesn't care what we think of her skirt length, why even discuss it? I can admire her discourse and her ass at the same time, I think.
0 Votes
+ -
As a "chick" in tech, PR, and more importantly a woman, not only does this NOT offend me, it makes me smile. It gets the point across in exactly the same manner as these pros are suggesting - its short and to the point. As VB points out, the tech industry has long been a "male dominated" industry. Does that stop us from jumping in and participating? From pointing out the obvious so we can all move on and focus on what matters...good content and good people. I have media trained numerous executives and guess what the number one success factor is? Coachability! Meaning, if one is open to advice and is willing to step outside his or her own comfort level, its likely that there is at least a .0.1 level of improvement wink Can't hurt. Thanks for the post, V.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
kevindarling Updated - 24th Mar 2011
Reminds of when I saw a woman come into a Radio Shack back in the 70s and ask for a replacement plug. Male or female, she was asked? Then the salesman had to explain which was which. She was offended that sexism extended even to electronic parts and threatened his job.

Lighten up, was good advice in that case, and still is in this one.
0 Votes
+ -
The trick is to recast the joke.
Ad Astra 24th Mar 2011
"A speech, like a man's performance in bed, should be long enough to hit the right spots, and short enough not to chafe."

"A speech, like a kilt, should be long enough to cover the subject adequately, and short enough to retain interest."

"Remember that your audience is here for many events. Don't make yours the one that stands out for "Oh, god, I was checking my watch from the moment they put up the second slide."

You speak at 110 words per minute. Your audience members are all literate. Give them a four page handout of 1800 words or so with graphics, and spend the 10 minutes of your speech giving them guideposts and contextual hooks for that handout.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
Violet Blue 24th Mar 2011
@Ad Astra - Agreed. I had many versions trying to find the right one to recast the "tip" for people who don't wear skirts, but the problem with this is that men's sexual value isn't as on the surface as a pair of tits or a skirt. And that's why this came across to a lot of people as a not-as-lighthearted issue.

"A speech should be as tight as a man's pants. Compact enough to see if he's of any value, but not so tight you give away everything."

There is no real inverse for this - it's only a terrible thing that can be said about women's value as assessed by sexual worth.

Since this is a women-owned firm and these are female project managers and copywriters then the situation is actually closer to a gay man calling his friends *** and telling them to lighten up if they take offense. "We've reclaimed that word, you uppity little homo ******!!!" AKA, "Oh, come on...aren't women past that? We can act like bimbos with characteristically stupid ideas and catty with each other, and as long as we have short skirts, the boys will hang on every word we say and buy us creamy appletinis!! The feminist revolution worked!!!"

Fact: crap like this is EXACTLY the kind of dumb PR **** that establishes a certain tone of discourse in which women are tacitly or explicitly ignored, downplayed and stolen from.

I wasn't the only one to think this, either. One female speaker wrote me saying, "It's obvious to say that this card is offensive. Skipping over the MadMen-fetish copy and the fact that a winky emoticon couldn't save this failed attempt at being cheeky, this card being dropped at SXSW, where there's a lot of female speakers, is what feels like a slap in the face."
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
Ad Astra Updated - 24th Mar 2011
@violetblue

The thing is, I give a variation of that advice regarding skirts and interest levels - one on one - when I edit fiction for people. Along with three or four very basic techniques for tightening up fiction.

I would never present it in a "generic context" - in order for that quip to be effective as both humor and as an instructable moment, it needs a personal context, and the person hearing the joke has to understand and trust the person giving the nostrum.

Which means that, yes, there are contexts where this sort of quip is viable. That example was not one of them...but let's NOT say "It's SEXIST! BURN THE WITCH!" - which would be the typical response if the PR firm had been male. "How dare they think this is acceptable? Have they never heard of Gloria Steinem?" followed by fuming and vitriol.

Can you be certain that you'd react this mildly if the PR firm had been all male? I suspect your response would be similar, but more harsh. There'd be less of the "I expect you to behave better as a woman-run company." vibe and more downright ire.

Feminism is about the abolition of special privilege. It is not about the selective abolition of special privilege. If a woman expects me to buy her a creamy appletini for wearing a short skirt, she's going to be horribly disappointed. I may choose to buy her a drink because she's got an interesting perspective and is articulate...but I've bought my share of beers for guys talking processor specs.

(I have also come to the conclusion that if I'm at SXSW, and the woman I've been drinking with at the Alamo is giving "I'm interested" signals, I'm using my smartphone to record her consent with a date stamp. One of the special privileges that women give up with feminism is ambiguity and playing the hinting game. If I don't get to use ambiguity to hint at meanings, you don't get to either.)
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
Violet Blue 24th Mar 2011
@Ad Astra - The interface won't seem to let me reply to your second comment inline, so I'm using this "Reply" box.

I think we're in agreement about a few things, though I think you've misjudged my reaction to the gender of the PR company by lack of information and unfamiliarity with my work. And I find it sadly typical that whenever women make points like this, the language trotted out is always "witch hunt", etc. Quite the opposite - again, if I had wanted to make the post a witch hunt I would have used the quote (and others) from the female speaker in my previous comment as part of the original piece. That is a witch hunt tactic.

It is also very typical to tell any woman who mentions something like this that it is a "non issue" and that she is overreacting.

Also, do remember that the term "sexist" was not mine. That was Ink PR. I responded to their use of the term.

I thought it was very interesting.

This isn't "my" issue, but so many people were upset and passed pictures of the cards around because they thought it was inappropriate and tasteless that I felt compelled to write about it and ask for comments.

I prepared this post and solicited quotes thinking (like everyone I talked to, and all who reached out to me) that it was a male PR firm. I had a harsher opinion *after* the discovery, but consulted with editors and pulled it out of the piece - like the "slap in the face" comment from speaker Ariel Waldman.

I don't agree with you about women giving up flirting in lieu of being taken seriously (or as sexy), or having a "stamp" for consent. That seems like a bit of a stretch.

Also, FYI: I do not identify as a feminist.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
lelandhendrix@... 25th Mar 2011
@violetblue
I have a question for you, and while I realize you are quite busy, I hope this catches your attention enough for a short reply.

In your talkback, "Ad Astra" said
"I would never present it in a "generic context" - in order for that quip to be effective as both humor and as an instructable moment, it needs a personal context, and the person hearing the joke has to understand and trust the person giving the nostrum."

This piques my interest. I would like to know how the "short skirt" quote from InkPR's printed cards would be received by you, if YOU were being coached, one-on-one, by a presenter. If the coach were a male, and also if the coach were a female, neither of which knew you personally.

I think this quip is a relic and is somewhat amusing on its own, but when I opened this web page I didn't read any of the text at all before examining the picture. The moment I read that last line, I got a weird feeling about it's propriety. And I'm a 34/yo male.

I think there is a huge difference between saying this line between two people, and putting it in bold print for the world to see. For a long list of reasons I won't go into here.

How do you feel about that aspect?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
Loverock Davidson 24th Mar 2011
Darn it, I came to this post hoping to see some pics of short skirts sad
0 Votes
+ -
The least we could have gotten
klumper 26th Mar 2011
after all the infantile, knee jerk tripe. meh
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
millionbaker Updated - 24th Mar 2011
Hi Violet -

There is more being read into the content of these cards than was ever intended. We provided brief tips on how to best get a point across to an audience via a speech or panel. Clothing directions were not part of our recommendations. The tip in question is an analogy only, and one that compares a speech to a skirt, not a woman and her ideas. By no means is it my opinion, nor the opinion of anyone on my team, that what a woman wears has any bearing or value or even connection with the ideas she stands for. Yes, I do agree that the analogy has sexual undertones - certainly you appreciate sexuality - but by no means was it intended as a sexist remark. It is unfortunate it is being taken as such.

Happy to discuss further if you'd like. You have my contact information.

Starr Million Baker
INK Public Relations
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
Playdrv4me 24th Mar 2011
@millionbaker

Much ado about nothing.
0 Votes
+ -
Say it again
klumper 26th Mar 2011
@Playdrv4me
Much ado about nothing.

The female inferiority complex raises its flustered head but again. Ironic how it's always strongest and most evident in so called "professionals."
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
Violet Blue 24th Mar 2011
@millionbaker

Starr, I did attempt to discuss this with you.

On March 19, during my preparation for this article, I emailed you asking:

"I wanted to reach out to Ink PR for comment regarding this line.

Specifically, I'd be interested to hear your response to these views. And, based on the above opinion, is this something you would distribute again at future events? How does this line fit within the spirit of your PR firm and indeed the SxSW conference as a whole?

Let me know what you think - and thanks for your time."

This was your opportunity to set the record straight.

You responded on March 22 with simply a link to a blog post entitled "Here's A Tip: Lighten Up."

This would have been a great time to have that conversation.

You may not have expected for more to be read into the cards than you intended - but as noted in my article that is not how the tip has been perceived by many. As a PR professional you should know more than anyone that it's not how the message was intended that is important - it is how the message is perceived.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
millionbaker 25th Mar 2011
@violetblue

Violet, you are absolutely correct on the bottom line - it is about how the message is perceived and we obviously missed the boat with this one. I remain surprised at the response, but I believe there is a lesson to be learned in everything we do and this has been a good reminder that 1) we should always strive to truly know the audience we're communicating with, 2) humor is very hard to pull off, and 3) respond as quickly as possible and via multiple channels. It was my (again, apparently mistaken) thought that by writing a blog post I was being helpful to you in some way - putting my thoughts out there in public for everyone to reference - but apparently that response was not appreciated.

Thanks for the thoughts.

- Starr
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
triciawang Updated - 25th Mar 2011
@millionbaker

Hi Starr, I just read the thoughtful apology that you wrote on my blogpost about your firm's tip cards.
http://bit.ly/SX300MM

I, however, felt that your apology on my blog post sounded much more genuine than the apology you have made here on Violet Blue's blogpost on ZDNet. Why is that?

I have to question whether you truly understand why people are offended when I read about your initial reply to Violet where you responded to her with a blogpost titled, "Here's A Tip: Lighten Up." Wow, now that's pretty bad form considering that you are a PR firm - exacerbating publicity faux pas by sending passive aggressive responses to someone who privately reached out to you for dialogue?

I also just finished reading your own blogpost, "Lessons Learned," where you outline things that your firm could've done better. One thing that is missing is the attempt to understand historical and cultural contexts.

This phrase as it is used in this context is an old one - it has its roots in the early days of the golden age of public relations.
As intriquing as we all find the world of Mad Men, none of want to go back to that era.

Understanding context is critical. People often hear, "I got gypped." But if you don't understand the context from where it came from, who it is addressing, the group of people that "gypped" refers to, then it might not seem offensive.

I'm not saying that you should be down with every "female" conciousness agenda, but as an all female PR firm you should not be as you say "surprised" that so many women and men consider the tip cards to be a solid problem. And then in a reply to Violet you say again that "you remain surprised at the response" - well if you remain surprised then that to me doesn't sound like you actually understand how your tip cards were offensive still.

Sadly, there still seems to be a disconnect on your end in understanding why people were upset by this and your original intent.

tricia
triciawang.com

btw I tried to post this comment on your website, but it seems like you're only allowing comments in that AGREE with your point of view - more evidence that you really aren't open to discussion.
http://ink-pr.com/blog/2011/03/lessons-learned/#comment-1467
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
JFletcherNYC 25th Mar 2011
@millionbaker but THAT is the issue. If the analogy doesn't reflect your or anyone at your agency's opinions and if, in fact, you do believe the analogy could possibly come off as sexist..then as someone in the agency world, where perception and anticipation of perception is our JOB....why would you even use it? I'm not getting into what I actually think of the analogy itself...but if I was your client I would have trouble trusting you with my brand and managing my public reputation. Lesson learned I hope.

Thanks Violet for this insightful and thought-provoking post.

-Proud woman in tech
0 Votes
+ -
"Agency world" banality
klumper 26th Mar 2011
@JFletcherNYC
...the agency world, where perception and anticipation of perception is our JOB ...

AND ...
where every cookie-cutter, milk toast approach signifies excellence. wink Here's to a politically correct rainbow coalition for one and all, whether it reflects reality - or the real world - or not. [agency erudite: er, why should that matter?]

Go LCD girl.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
jeverettk 28th Mar 2011
@millionbaker
Happy Women's History Month.
0 Votes
+ -
Continuing conversation
Ad Astra 24th Mar 2011
@violetblue

I wasn't trying to say you were calling it sexist; you made that clear that that came from a different source. If I came off the mark, my apologies for the ambiguity.

My hackles tend to rise (defensively) at anything that comes close to using the s-word, because it's commonly used as shorthand for "You're unable to judge this because of your genitals. Get out of the way."

Rather, I'd prefer the discussion to avoid the label and focus on "Is that fair? Would it be fair if the assumptions were reversed?"

Perhaps a more meta-intriguing issue:

Isn't it just as offensive to assume that the men in the audience will pay more attention to a woman's appearance (and the packed message of sexual valuation) rather than her slide deck and handout as it is to assume that a woman will only be valued for what she's wearing?

Most of the women I saw giving presentations at SXSW were wearing the same jeans-and-polo shirt and jeans-and-turtleneck look as the men. It was remarkable for its uniformity.

I've enjoyed your articles for years. Whether I agree or not with your pieces, they make me think, and you do have a perspective I don't always consider, and like to see.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
WorkflowGuru 25th Mar 2011
@millionbaker

I, for one, understood and appreciated your analogy and found your blog response spot-on. Bravo for successfully injecting a bit of controversy, a very effective PR tactic.

To those offended, would your ire be more or less if the analogy used was the kilt version included in an earlier post?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
mail.walker@... 25th Mar 2011
After reading these comments I realize that some haven't read the whole article, nor the card. I think that maybe some people need a lesson on separating sentences and ideas. I clearly do not see any link between the skirt and anything else than a short speech.

I would say as a marketing strategy it's brilliant. If you've been shocked or found this interesting enough to reply to, I bet you're not going to forget that quote...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
chandreshvij Updated - 25th Mar 2011
@mail.walker@...
I agree.... I have been reading this article and the reaction of other people and why did they fell offensive...
We often uses characters to relate our thoughts and this comes as a surprise that the so-called speakers in tech forums were more inclined towards the sexual characterstics of female spokespersons/speakers presuming they felt offended with the quote than to the point they (female speakers) had in the tech conference.

Speeches are meant to be long but it is a creativity to make it interesting so that the audience is glued to their seats instead of thinking when will they be served beers and coffees..
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
jeverettk Updated - 28th Mar 2011
@mail.walker@...
It's pretty cut-and-dry simple. The DIRECT implication is that if the skirt isn't short, then "things" are not interesting. To my mind, it's precisely the vaguery that makes it offensive. What are they suggesting would "be" more interesting if the skirt is shorter? In it's present form, it leaves it open to suggest that the wearer should be judged by her skirt. If you word it so that it's clearly just the skirt that's being judged, then it's a little more palatable, if still not completely appropriate.
0 Votes
+ -
Once again, literalism ruins a good joke. Too many people in IT are kinda thin on the concept of "analogy".
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
clokverkorange 25th Mar 2011
I agree with INK, actually. Lighten up. You probably go home and see worse (and mor sexist) jokes on Big Bang Theory and the Chappelle Show than that tame remark.

Also you totally missed the gag, it seems. Nowhere in there does it say "A woman's skirt should be short to attract attention, rather than the woman relying on her smarts which may be lacking". The reason this "seems" like a harmless joke is because it is.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
Violet Blue 25th Mar 2011
@clokverkorange Except the Chappelle Show and Big Bang Theory are not a business conference.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
paulgraydon@... 25th Mar 2011
See, this is why we can't have shiny things, too many people would find the shininess offensive, or decide that it's obviously insulting to a blind person who can't see it in all it's glory.

It's like we're going out of our way to be offended at something. Now see if it had been something actually offensive "Talks should be like shaking a baby...." maybe this would be justified. If you can't see a joke and even have the maturity to acknowledge that it's a joke that doesn't harm anyone, even if it's one you don't find funny, and then just move on I feel very, very sorry for you.
0 Votes
+ -
No such thing as bad publicity...
stoda04 25th Mar 2011
Of course, the full quote is "There is no such thing as bad publicity except your own obituary," but I didn't want you to ruminate about me making a death threat.

Not only did you make a lot of out nothing in terms of the "tip" cards, but you've done an excellent job of getting INK PR's name out there. I'm sure anyone who read this blog post has subsequently gone and checked out the INK website if they weren't familiar with the company already (I know I did).
"A speech should be like a woman's skirt: long enough to cover the topic, yet short enough to be interesting."

* candy ass

Lighten up -- or put on a hijab and niqab if it turns yer crank.
0 Votes
+ -
Knee-jerk reflex: Check.
Righteous indignation: Check.

Oh, give it a rest already!
0 Votes
+ -
Had the cards not had this single line, would this column, and all the PR it generated, even exist? Would the cards and breath mints have been 'news-worthy'? Or did this single comment perform exactly as expected?
0 Votes
+ -
Those cards weren't demeaning!
D. W. Bierbaum 26th Mar 2011
... after all, they didn't specify the gender of the person wearing the skirt! They didn't even say the skirt-wearer was a human being! (could have been a chimp, or even a giraffe!)

Yeah, I don't believe that either... wink
0 Votes
+ -
Sheesh.
amandabee 26th Mar 2011
It's a small thing, the card. But Ink just keeps digging themselves in deeper and deeper. Is it so hard to say "Damn. We thought the quote was funny and a little edgy. We're realizing it was also totally inappropriate for a green room card and we apologize to everyone who went into the green room to prepare for a talk and wound up faced with inexplicably misogynist and objectifying messaging."

I don't think the "ado" is over the cards themselves. They're pretty mild in the grand scale of objectifying bs at technology conferences, but a PR firm that just can't seem to stop pushing the blame onto the offended is a sight to behold.

Thanks for speaking up on this. I'd like to see more inspiring women speaking about at interactive next year. I'm hoping they can focus on what they came to say instead of having to "lighten up" or wonder if it is really the opinion of the organizers that "the point" of a woman can be concealed by her skirt.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
bb_apptix 28th Mar 2011
Violet, the quote has nothing at all to do with your skirt length. or a woman "make[ing] her living by shortening her skirt".

The quote is about keeping a speech interesting and to the point, and not dragging and losing, confusing, or boring your audience. It has nothing to do with the way you're dressed.

BTW, I can look at a woman as a speaker, think, "My God, she?s hot" and still, despite that, listen to what she's saying. I will also say this, if her looks are distracting, it makes it harder to listen to what she's saying. A speakers appearance should not distract from their message. Dress should always be appropriate, and this goes for men as well as women.

But alas, this quote was about speeches not dress. Why are we talking about dress anyway? Perhaps because some confuse the quote as being about skirt length (which it is not), and forget that the quote is about speech length.

If anyone is offended by the quote, ?A speech should be like a woman?s skirt: long enough to cover the topic, yet short enough to be interesting.? I feel sorry for them, for they have missed the point entirely.

Long and short are relative terms. Did you ever think that when this quote was first uttered, that short may have meant showing your ankles?

Sheesh...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Tech PR, and short skirts at SxSW
jeverettk 28th Mar 2011
@bb_apptix
Officer, this drive wasn't about running over an old lady! It was about me getting the drugstore for my emergency refill of Vicodin!
0 Votes
+ -
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
0 Votes
+ -
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
0 Votes
+ -
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
0 Votes
+ -
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
0 Votes
+ -
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
0 Votes
+ -
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
0 Votes
+ -
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix