The Global Cyber War Hacks and Attacks Scorecard

By | December 13, 2010, 6:28am PST

Summary: Here’s a list of the big-league damage — from original Operation Payback and first Anonymous campaigns to the current pro-Wikileaks DDoS attacks.

The global cyber war is on.

Visa, MasterCard, YouTube, the Church of Scientology, the MPAA, PayPal, the RIAA, Gawker Media, Warner Brothers, PostFinance… the list is overwhelming to look at.

You might immediately think of Anonymous, of Operation Payback - but there are others, such as #Gnosis, of this past weekend’s massive hacking of Gawker Media.

Contrary to current conventional thought that this is all one “group” associated with Wikileaks, even Wikileaks was taken out for over a day, right before Amazon kicked them out of the cloud, and the Anonymous site had a heavy DDoS attack resulting in 2 hours offline.

Since September of this year, major attacks have taken out (hacked, exposed, exploited or service-disrupted and largely taken offline) a lineup of companies and entities that many previously thought of as untouchable.

A significant number of those attacked openly mocked online community “hacktivists,” resting on an assumed “untouchable” status. In fact, that assumption is kind of what they all have in common.

Well, that and a certain arrogance - at least that is what was cited in the Gawker attack, which was (is) an example of serious attack that is not actual downtime. #Gnosis stormed Gawker’s shores and pillaged their villages, publishing commenter passwords, obtaining emails and BaseCamp access, and promising a full database dump. The damage is severe.

#Gnosis is new, and they are not 4Chan, or Anonymous.

For me, Anonymous is associated with the individuals wearing V for Vendatta Guy Fawkes masks who went up against the Church of Scientology back in 2008. This meme started when Tom Cruise went all creepy-crazy about Scientology in a video that the church then had removed from YouTube in a censorious flex of muscle.

Attacks began on the Scientology church, and a video was made by “Anonymous” wearing the iconic masks. Anonymous/Project Chanolgy launched DDoS attacks on the church along with various pranks such as black faxes sent to Scientology centers.

Most remarkable were the physical protests staged by people in cities and at Scientology centers all over the world. They all showed up wearing the Fawkes mask, ostensibly to protect identities from the Church of Scientology.

In close association is Operation Payback, who reminds us of their origins with their logo of a black pirate ship with its mainsail emblazoned with a cassette tape and crossbones. Avast ye scurvy copyright dogs; they’ll reduce you to analog.

The ship is a nod to Pirate Bay’s logo: the ship. The tape, likely a freely exchanged mixtape of music from a variety of RIAA artists, is important. Operation Payback (”…is a bitch”) went after entities that used strong-arm tactics to try and stop file sharing.

The first documented shot with Payback, if you will, was actually not from OP hackers. It was fired from “music industry good guys” - when a company hired Aipex Software to launch a DDoS attack on the servers of torrent sites - namely Pirate Bay - that were not responding to the industry’s takedown notices.

Operation Confuse The Media

Not all of the big-league hits have been from Operation Payback, but that hasn’t stopped media outlets from crediting them for many of the recent attacks. In fact, most major media outlets are in a state of utter confusion about what is happening, how it is happening, and why it is happening.

It’s important to note that Operation Payback and Anonymous are not the same thing, and they are also not the same as 4chan, nor do they act as Wikileaks or Pirate Bay. This confuses mainstream media, who is used to simple, take-me-to-your-leader answers - but distributed and decentralized are not simple concepts.

For instance, many articles slingshot off the Wikipedia page for Wikileaks, not bothering to notice that Wikipedia’s own citations for Wikileaks are not primary references, and in many cases are unsatisfactory and even misleading.

It is not unlike watching your peepaw unsuccessfully try to distinguish his emails from his “FacePage.”

Well, the rest is poorly documented history. But we do know that the scorecard is riveting. Whether it’s Operation Payback, Anonymous, or any number of other activists - the targets comprise a list with names so big it almost looks like a farcical Hollywood creation.

The Cyber War Hacks and Attacks Scorecard

I wanted to see the big-league damage - from original Operation Payback and first Anonymous campaigns to current pro-Wikileaks DDoS attacks.

This is not a complete list, just highlights:

ACS: Law (represents Warner, MGM, Universal and Sony) Big data breach; downtime: 179 hours

AFACT (Australian copyright enforcement) Downtime: 21 hours

Aiplex Software (DDoS attack on Pirate Bay) Downtime: Over 123 hours

Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft Downtime: over 4 hours

British Phonographic Industry Downtime: .06 hours

The Church of Scientology Downtime: over 24 hours, 12 days of attacks

Davenport Lyons (known for mass “pay up” notices to individuals) Downtime: 8 hours

EveryDNS (dropped Wikileaks site) Downtime: unknown

Gawker Media (see above, #Gnosis, damge undetermined)

Gene Simmons (advocated suing filesharing individuals into poverty) Downtime: 1 day, 14 hours

Hustler (suing unprecedented amounts of individuals, threat to name individuals) Downtime: 2 hours

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (response to Pirate Bay verdict) Downtime 14 hours

Joseph Lieberman (told Amazon to drop Wikileaks) Downtime: 12 minutes

MasterCard (pulled plug on Wikileaks payments) Downtime: 1 day, 13 hours

Ministerio de Cultura Downtime: over 20 hours

Ministry of Sound (demanded identities of file sharers to force payment) Downtime: 3 hours

Motion Picture Association of America (pro-DRM, pro- “pay up” filesharing schemes) Downtime: 23 hours

PayPal (closed Wikileaks account) Downtime: 8 hours, 15 minutes

PostFinance (closed Wikileaks’ Assange’s bank account) Downtime: over 10 hours

RIAA (pro-DRM, pro- “pay up” filesharing schemes) Offline: Over 7 days

Sociedad General de Autores y Editores (Spain copyright group) Downtime: over 41 hours

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Downtime: est. 24 hours

United States Copyright Office Downtime: 31 minutes

Visa (pulled plug on Wikileaks payments) Downtime: 14 hours

Warner Bros. Industry (response to Pirate Bay verdict) Downtime: over 2 hours

At this writing Amazon Europe is stated as hardware failure (despite Fox News reports) - December 12, 2010, see below:

What’s The Score?

It would be ideal to have financials - I’d like to see how much, if any, these entities lost. The pain and suffering award goes to Gawker (#Gnosis) - truly the most humiliating of the lot. The RIAA, with 7 days down, is quite astonishing - followed by ACS: Law (both Operation Payback).

Yet who ever thought Visa, MasterCard, and PayPal (Anonymous) could be publicly smacked around - all in a day?

Or, just another day online.

What do you think: whose side are you on - if any? We’re watching for your comments.

Main image via LAist.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Violet Blue is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation.

Disclosure

Violet Blue

I am currently freelancing part-time (only) for ReadWriteWeb for their general news blog and their Start (startup tools) channel; this was made in agreement that I would not write about anything that might conflict subjects in my blog (no sex content). I'm under contract to publisher Cleis Press for editing three more books (only) with the topics of women's/couples' erotica. I have been writing and editing books for Cleis Press for ten years on the subjects of erotica and human sexuality (guidebooks). I'm not under exclusive contract anywhere/to anyone/to anything, I have no investments.

Biography

Violet Blue

Violet Blue (tinynibbles.com, @violetblue) is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation. She is regarded as the foremost expert in the field of sex and technology, a sex-positive pundit in mainstream media (MacLife, Forbes.com, The Oprah Winfrey Show, others) and is regularly interviewed, quoted and featured prominently by major media outlets (from ABC News to the Wall Street Journal). A published feature writer and columnist, Violet also has many award-winning, best-selling books; her books are featured on Oprah's website. She was the notorious sex columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle. She headlines at conferences ranging from ETech, LeWeb and SXSW: Interactive, to Google Tech Talks at Google, Inc. The London Times named Blue one of the 40 bloggers who really count.
46
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: The Global Cyber War Hacks and Attacks Scorecard
Vicky_wizard 22nd Oct
Don't attack pawny sites. If you want to flex your muscles or show your capabilites try our security the best in the world at ANZ Melbourne and will you weannies Amercans run away

Vicky - Melbourne
0 Votes
+ -
Just another day online
John Zern 13th Dec 2010
Many of these companies have been hacked and breeched long before wikileaks was an idea in somebody's head.

Nothing really new here.
0 Votes
+ -
@John Zern
But This article express a movement toward making pay those who are less ethical or for any reason what so ever displease a group or namy group by there action .

It represent that some people will get back at those ( wrong-doer ) and will make them pay at every corner .

THAT SAID i dont condone nor support such action but as observer this will end up badly for sure
0 Votes
+ -
@Quebec-french, who are you (or me) to determine what's ethical?
Should I feel that unmarried people having sex is unethical, I should consider those that do as "wrong-doers", and to get back at them?

from Visa or Amazon's standpoint, they acted ethically, not wanting to deal with a group they feel is unethical themselves?

So are there really any wrong-doers beyond those doing the hacking?
0 Votes
+ -
you are right neither of can make the call
Quebec-french 13th Dec 2010
John Zern
But some one is doing it because there are attack on there site .
On ethic is can make a lots of call base on human right ,base on equitable trade ,base on protection of consumer,base on the responsibility of business and such.
Im a staunch believer that is something ugly happen in busines its your fault .
@John Zern
What's new is the extent and the timing. Many of these were simultaneous attacks, while the previous ones occurred individually.

These are interesting times, indeed.
0 Votes
+ -
Actual down time, zero!
guihombre 13th Dec 2010
Mastercard != Mastercard.com
visa is not visa.com

One is a credit card clearing house, the other a WEBSITE PROMOTING the said credit card clearing house.

So basically they defaced a poster advertising a service they didn't like, and they did it with chalk that washes off in the rain even.
0 Votes
+ -
Not the porn sites, we need to keep that online. The rest of them...no real feelings for.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Global Cyber War Hacks and Attacks Scorecard
Hallowed are the Ori 13th Dec 2010
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Not the porn sites!!!! Won't someone please think of the porn sites!!!!!
I'm just your average middle aged white guy, but I love seeing the masses rise up against tyranny. Even the US, supposedly the standard-bearer of free speech in the world, has shown itself unwilling to stand for principle in the face of embarrassment from Wikileaks. PayPal, MasterCard and every department of government or the corporations that pull their strings?. Crush these tyrants, crush them all!!
@Bert1000

I believe in fairness and Free Speech but to bluntly paint everything you take, do, or smear as free speech as just wrong. People need to have common sense as to how to handle the information they are given ethically or not. How would you like it if I got all your personal information good and bad(does not really matter how) and your family and blasted it out to the general public as Free Speech? Let me ask you this, When will all the stupidity end?
0 Votes
+ -
@lenohere
Free Speech is free speech. Can individuals get hurt by free speech? Absolutely. But the chances that individuals will be adversely affected is the cost we pay to have a the right to speak out against tyranny and oppression. Will bad decisions be made about how to handle information? Yes. But the benefits society gains from Free Speech in its least restricted model far out-weigh its costs.
0 Votes
+ -
1984
Bradish@... Updated - 13th Dec 2010
@Bert1000 What has happened to wikileaks and its Aussie leader is censorship by US government pressure. What is appalling is I recall Obama lecturing University students in a Shanghai 'Town Hall' meeting that the internet must be open to all and is the true expression of freedom. What a joke the US has made of the concept of freedom. Sad day for our friends in the US...more to come you way no doubt (BTW, take another read of Orwell's 1984...you might be amazed, again)
@Bradish@... So if a maid who cleans your house steals a bunch of your personal information (finical records, love letters, personal e-mails, personal photos, ect...) and posts them on the web that is just freedom of the Internet? You have free speech and you have theft, in this situation the two over lap each other and the US is just attempting to correct the actions of a thief. Everyone has secrets they don't want spilled in public and protecting those secrets is normal behavior. Freedom of the Internet is the ability to say and publish what you want but when you start dealing in information which was stolen you are crossing a legal line. It's fun to play the underdog against the big bad US who is far from perfect but in this case Wikileaks crossed a morel line and is now paying the price.
@Bradish@...

Based on your summation, It is ok for me to have someone give me your STOLEN personal data and information, and publish it in the internet for everyone to see? And it is ok for me to do because I am covered by freedom of speech? If you are ok with that, You have a serious bigger issue than with just the government my friend.
0 Votes
+ -
The DDoS was not hacking, it was protest
HollywoodDog 13th Dec 2010
It would be the same as having a large crowd surround their office buildings. The purpose was protest, not destruction, and that's what it achieved.
We should be happy and thankful that these protesters reminded the companies that their reputations depend not only on what the state department thinks of them, but what the public and their customers think of them as well.
I'm on the side of truth acting as a deterrent to wrongdoing.
0 Votes
+ -
@HollywoodDog Read Mr. Zern above he has a valid point. Wikileaks broke the contract then what Amazon did was accurate.
0 Votes
+ -
Well, that consists of you defining "what's wrong"
John Zern Updated - 13th Dec 2010
You've decided for yourself what's right or wrong, so you see nothing wrong with this.

As I mentioned above, If I feel premarital sex is wrong, and I take down some business's website because of my feelings, how is what I'm doing "right"?

as "ItsTheBottomLine" pointed out, wikileaks broke their agreement with Amazon. Amazon did nothing wrong, as the people at wikileaks can read, (and chose to ingnore?) the TOS. So because wikileaks screwed up, Amazon is fair game to be taken down?

Nice set of ethics you have there. (BTW: Not everything that happens has the government behind it all)

Beside, theres a great many people out there that think what wikileaks did was wrong, so maybe Amazon didn't want to be the "cloud behind wikileaks!", for fear of losing business, or maybe wast so much time and money defending against people trying to hack or deface wikileaks, hence why they have a TOS, hence why they invoked it.

Is it unethical or wrong to try to protect one's business from hackers?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Global Cyber War Hacks and Attacks Scorecard
Hallowed are the Ori Updated - 13th Dec 2010
@John Zern

Don't bother. You're arguing with a brick wall.
@John Zern

Spot on! If you stand back from it all, when have hackers in general been on the side of what is right and moral?
0 Votes
+ -
So GlitterDog...
search & destroy Updated - 14th Dec 2010
We should be happy and thankful that these protesters reminded the companies that their reputations depend not only on what the state department thinks of them, but what the public and their customers think of them as well.

Who the hell are you speaking for me, anyway?

Do you seriously believe I'll stop using Visa & Mastercard because a bunch of dirty cybera$$holes in Iceland are pissed off at them?

Get real.

lol...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Global Cyber War Hacks and Attacks Scorecard
Snark Shark Updated - 13th Dec 2010
Scientology is a plague, and while some genuinely nutty anarchist types were behind those protests against them, so were a lot of legitimately concerned people, I think.

The attacks on Corporate America, and people taking up in this up apparently in Mr. Assange's name, is another thing entirely. And a bit asinine. And its discrediting people who save their protests for things which matter. Wikileaks has, I believe, been a useful ally to those Scientology protesters (you can go peer onto their websites and see all kinds of mentions of Wikileaks), but going against a bunch of nutters like the Scientologists, vs. going against the US government, and all of Corporate America? Two different things. The seeming joining of these campaigns is disturbing. And I bet it results in a lot of people who were on the fringe dropping out and deciding they want nothing to do with these folks.
0 Votes
+ -
Viva le hackers
whisperycat 13th Dec 2010
When a credit card company can dictate to me who I can donate money too purely on the basis of government pressure - FOREIGN government pressure at that - then yes, let the hackers step up. There was nothing but silence from th whiners when the CIA forced Wikileaks offline, but then patriotic hyppocrisy has become the signature of the American government (whichever flavour they be).

I closed my Amazon and PayPal accounts. I hope Visa are now realising that, having bent over to help the US illegally enforce American political will on a global credit card owning customer-base, they must now take the heat for their spinelessness.
0 Votes
+ -
Condoning Criminals and Terrorists?
tomogden 14th Dec 2010
That's a dangerous attitude. We can't afford even a tacit approval of this kind of activity. There is nothing more dangerous than the delusions that fuels these movements, and they could just as easily take any one of us and make us into a member of that same mindless mob--no affiliation necessary
@whisperycat

I'm going to take a stab in the dark here but, your closing of your Amazon and Pay Pal account because of the moral correct actions taken but these companies is not going to mean a hill of beans to them. I could be wrong but last I checked their stock values still look fine. Like the rest of these misdirected folks you will huff and puff and throw cyber stones but in the end you are in the vast minority and your actions will have no impact.
Agree with Snark Shark. Confusion of issues muddles protest. I also agree with Hollywood Dog. It's actually simple basic behaviorism. People (as in corporations/businesses/government) will do what they can get away with. If there's no punishment not only will the injustices increase, they will intensify.
0 Votes
+ -
@KarrasB But I don't understand in the Amazon case wikileaks broke their contract by publishing information that was not theirs. That breaks a contract...period. Ironic isn't it...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Global Cyber War Hacks and Attacks Scorecard
whisperycat Updated - 13th Dec 2010
@ItsTheBottomLine - Amazon were perfectly happy to take on Wikileaks when DDos attack forced the Wikileaks site offline

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1928662/amazon-hosts-wikileaks-website-ddos

If Amazon were concerned about Wikileaks publishing work they didn't own, they would never have hosted them in the first place, now would they?
0 Votes
+ -
Poor Anon
TruXter Updated - 13th Dec 2010
Their defense is their biggest flaw.
not knowing who is what or what is who.
They defend something one day, and fight fight against it the next day. Like Parana in a tiddle wave, go with the flow no matter where it goes.
For them to organize more, would be folly. but to stay the way they are, they can easily be sent to attack the wrong guys. Riaa could easily get these guys upset with people who pirate stuff, if they were witty enough to use the chan right.


lol
nwfgs are so lost these days.
They do not understand repercussions. If it doesn't happen in thirty minutes IT NEVER WILL!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Global Cyber War Hacks and Attacks Scorecard
Agnostic_OS Updated - 13th Dec 2010
IMHO the biggest problem is that the anti-liberty powers that lurk in every government of the world has been handed a big fat excuse for clamping down on Internet freedom.
Watch out as corporations and official agencies start lobbying big government for better web spy laws.
0 Votes
+ -
Sorry, but i don't believe that the so called "Hacktivism" is a good thing, it only re-inforces the fact that Wikileaks, P2P and piracy need to be fought. Sorry, but this is just self-glorified stupidity for people to be parading around in V for Vendetta faces and think they are doing any of this has any legitimacy. They are retarded and going to force more kickback to fight them
0 Votes
+ -
I don't see vandalism as the right answer and the hacktivism is just that. Attacking brands, though, is nothing new, and is a trend that will only grow: http://bit.ly/f64afo
To see the interviews with the hacker known as The Jester who initially took out the WikiLeaks site, including two videos of his XerXeS DoS attack tool in action see the following posts:

https://infosecisland.com/blogtag/427/Jester.html
0 Votes
+ -
Small Site affected too on this Cyber War
amik0002@... 13th Dec 2010
This war is very attracted worldwide attention. and such other physical war, a little also affected such as hacked
The stated purpose of Anonymous (if you believe what they proudly posted on the Fox news site when they hacked it) is this:

?We are the face of chaos? We ruin the lives of other people simply because we can ? Hundreds die in a plane crash. We laugh. The nation mourns over school shooting, we laugh. We?re the embodiment of humanity with no remorse, no caring, no love, or no sense of morality.?

When Anonymous (or 4Chan, where child pornography is posted as a lark) or whatever sub-group of bullies decides they have had enough of something they don't like and further decides to "shut them down" -- it's mob mentality at work. There's a reason mobs are known for lynching people, rioting and the like, not for reasoned discourse or high principles. Because mobs are *always* run by bullies.
During the first week of November 2010 Burma was hit with a major DDOS. Arbor has published some technical data on it (see link below). It was larger than the attacks against Estonia (2007) and Georgia 2008. I have'nt noticed any new reports on this cyber attack against this country that was going through a national election. It is very significant however that "such power exists" in cyber space . Where it came from no one knows and now it has withdrawn to its hiding place. To me the organisers of this "cyber canon" represent a worthy candidate for your list of cyber attacks and one of concern to all of us concerned with cyber security.
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2010/11/attac-severs-myanmar-internet/

http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2010/11/attac-severs-myanmar-internet/
0 Votes
+ -
responder@deepandcrazy.com
antihacker101 14th Dec 2010
heres the deal(from my head) according to details of the worm i been fighting. most of what you see such as wiki links are psychological decoys along side the others. what makes itworse is that a situation may be a solution to help hide the real truth. i know the russian situatin is real, cause it was again trhough my systems around 3 weeks ago just like the other hacks. i still get over 2k or more per hour day and night since feb 2009. i dont like the idea that a e4 in service is targeted to take blame. he may be a spy, but not the main spy. i cant put other info, cause if im correct, may degrade intent for the good guys and help the bad guys, but i will put them on a time limit forcing the truth out. and if its what i think, i will change in the proper areas. apnic for example linked to a ceo from microsoft now showing as china. a lot of dns information is being changes to psychologically push our consiousness away from their intent.
im hoping its us..... or we are screwed...

the ddos started in aug 2009 and happens right before you all have issues such as twitter did and hotmail did at the begining after the apr fools worm.
pscyhological
I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate! nccma cooler
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post. this thread is amazing i like your work and i appreciate you that you have share a useful stuff thanks for sharing the i shop abatwa
I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.Bookmarking now thanks please consider a follow up post. power sa shop
I think the representation of this article is actually superb one. This is my first visit to your site. Thanks a lot and keep sharing the information. Keep updating the information for all of us. Thanks ZDNet Government was launched as the brand's first industry vertical, with a mission to cater to IT professionals in the public secto I agree with your post. However, do you have any sources I can cite for my paper wheel car com bury
Well welcome, hopefully you can become a vital member of the community and really help to push far ahead of google. Which Im sure the development team would love. This will of course earn you alot points too and get you on the leaders board. z d n e t t h a n k Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas.
Thanks nice info z d n e t I really liked your current article write more..let me add you to its favorite The articles you have on zdnet s i t e are always so enjoyable to read. Good work and I bookmarked it.
Fantastic news about the new release.I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you b o o k m a r k e d to check out new stuff you weblog post.Im not sure i come to an agreement with you on every level, howevor it absolutely was a good posting, many thanks for taking the time to put up your ideas
Good day to confirm this comment I would appreciate T h e b e s t o f Z D N e t d e l i v e r e d your website very nice to everyone Yes, Oracle is the only one with shared-disk architecture, but that is there advantage. It means you can add or remove nodes and the database lives on. In a shared nothing architecture, if you lose a node, you lose the system. I'm sure Oracle appreciates EMC highlighting their advantage.I also desire to signal in your RSS feeds. Thank you as soon as once again and maintain up the great operate Awesome post! Thank you very much || thanks for nice content this is really benefit to me.
We at ANZ Melbourne have the best cyber security in the world and have kicked out many american punks. YOu should not show your pawny skills of hacking with poor sites as stated above but rather try your hand at ANZ and we will see you fall like little dolls.

Vicky
Don't attack pawny sites. If you want to flex your muscles or show your capabilites try our security the best in the world at ANZ Melbourne and will you weannies Amercans run away

Vicky - Melbourne

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix