.XXX Domain Approved: Now Begins The Era Of Meaningless TLDs

By | March 20, 2011, 4:26pm PDT

Summary: After ten years of saying no and vocal opposition by everyone potentially affected from an .XXX top level domain, last Thursday ICANN went and approved .XXX, despite the concerns.

After ten years of saying no and vocal opposition by everyone potentially affected from an .XXX top level domain – everyone except .XXX profiteers, that is – last Thursday ICANN officially approved .XXX.

Porn already owns the best .COM real estate it ever needs. Yet now .XXX’s pimp daddies at ICM Registry and its backers have free reign to scoop up all the domain squatting and defensive registrations they can handle.

No one is looking at an .XXX domain and thinking, “That’s where I’ll cash in.” They’re thinking, “I better buy my business name, my daughter’s name, and my own name… just in case.”

ICM claims it will only sell domains to those their own 5013c “management” arm IFFOR deems as “officially in the adult entertainment industry.” It is unclear how this is determined. Meanwhile, ICM has already pre-sold over a quarter million domains.

Internet porn giant Kink.com knows a protective business decision when it sees one: Kink felt strong-armed to pre-purchase their brand’s domains in the copycat .XXX realm to protect their brands, and have defensively purchased thousands of domains.

Sure, it’s porn’s money to spend as they please. And you don’t have to buy anything, either. But this speaks volumes to the false sense of endorsement that may have contributed to one of ICANN’s most confusing decisions to hand piles of money to a group of relentless entrepreneurs since the creation of .AERO.

ICM is bragging to have sold over a quarter million pre-registrations. At $75 a pop shot for reg, and 268,788 sold (as of this writing), that’s a current total of $20,159,100 in pre-sales.

ICM’s Stuart Lawley bragged to Bloomberg that ICM is set to make at least $200 million a year, and he predicts to snag between 3 and 5 million registrations.

Do you think anyone else is thinking that inventing a TLD compelling people to register primarily out of defense would be a really profitable business model?

If so, you’re in luck. ICANN is about to make it easy to do exactly that: the generic TLD process is set to be finalized by this June.

It’s Not Because We Need More Porn

Lest you forget: I am a pro-porn female. I’m all for more porn. But: with great porn comes great responsibility.

My ZDNet colleague Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols remarked Oh My God! Porn is Officially On The Internet! - and he was wisely pointing out the single most collective WTF most of us have with .XXX: it seems redundant.

He hit the turgid nail on the head while explaining that yes, Virginia, not only is there already lots of XXX online if you look for it – but remarkably, even those who you’d think would stand to gain from creating more adult real estate strongly opposed .XXX.

ICM nee .XXX still claim to have support from adult industry people – somewhere – yet every porn group on the planet spoke out against it.

ICM nee .XXX still claim to have the endorsement of family groups – somewhere – yet family and religious groups came out in droves to oppose .XXX.

On top of all this, .XXX was opposed by groups not nearly as fringey as religious conservatives and porn peeps: even the ACLU begged ICANN to see .XXX as a very bad idea from a human rights perspective.

Meanwhile, ICM’s IFFOR flowchart of “about us” community support for the alleged board of .XXX oversight – IFFOR, for .XXX responsibility management – is still merely a .JPG of “insert name here” empty spaces.

ICANN Issues A License To Print Money

What’s even more confusing than the utility of a TLD no one wanted, makes no sense and whose backers can’t even bother to back up their claims with a single person not on their payroll who thinks this is a good idea - is the very notion that ICANN has the power to make shady businessmen into billionaires overnight.

.XXX’s owners, ICM Registry, are comprised of a former real estate developer, an ex-employee from scandal-ridden domain bidding business SnapNames, and an ex-fax machine salesman turned “internet pornography and child safety consultant.”

But lest you think that ICANN is a bunch of easy pushovers anyone can just pressure and loophole and wheedle into getting them to make a dot-SEX that you happen to already own, think again. It’s not that easy.

Though not impossible, apparently.

.XXX: Pushed Until ICANN Gave In

The first time .XXX was proposed to ICANN was by Canadian real estate developer Jason Hendeles in October 2000. Turning from real estate to technology in the late 1990s, Hendeles started ICM Registry and a company called ATECH, literally short for “A Technology Company.”

(ATECH was also called NameSystem.com and was one of the early second wave of registrars to apply for ICANN accreditation in 1999. ATECH lost their ICANN accreditation on June 25, 2010 due to ATECH’s failure to pay its accreditation fees as far back as at least April 2009.)

ICM Registry first pitched the .XXX TLD to ICANN stating that .XXX would be the solution for managing adult content and protecting children - along with their other proposal .KIDS, which was to be a “green” space for children online.

These domains weren’t going to be cheap: ICM wanted $75 per customer.

[Next: The High Cost of Saving the Children]»

Topics

Violet Blue is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation.

Disclosure

Violet Blue

I am currently freelancing part-time (only) for ReadWriteWeb for their general news blog and their Start (startup tools) channel; this was made in agreement that I would not write about anything that might conflict subjects in my blog (no sex content). I'm under contract to publisher Cleis Press for editing three more books (only) with the topics of women's/couples' erotica. I have been writing and editing books for Cleis Press for ten years on the subjects of erotica and human sexuality (guidebooks). I'm not under exclusive contract anywhere/to anyone/to anything, I have no investments.

Biography

Violet Blue

Violet Blue (tinynibbles.com, @violetblue) is a Forbes Web Celeb, SF Appeal contributor, a high-profile tech personality and one of Wired's Faces of Innovation. She is regarded as the foremost expert in the field of sex and technology, a sex-positive pundit in mainstream media (MacLife, Forbes.com, The Oprah Winfrey Show, others) and is regularly interviewed, quoted and featured prominently by major media outlets (from ABC News to the Wall Street Journal). A published feature writer and columnist, Violet also has many award-winning, best-selling books; her books are featured on Oprah's website. She was the notorious sex columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle. She headlines at conferences ranging from ETech, LeWeb and SXSW: Interactive, to Google Tech Talks at Google, Inc. The London Times named Blue one of the 40 bloggers who really count.
98
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: .XXX Domain Approved: Now Begins The Era Of Meaningless TLDs
jam@... 14th Nov
@Birdo The ICANN bylaws do not require that the Board follow the direction of any of the Advisory Committees, even the GAC. They are ADVISORY, and part of a multi-stakeholder process. The ACs advise, and the Board weighs that advice and then decides.
Who do you think should 'regulate" ICANN? Besides the different stakeholders in the governance of the Internet, from all over the world? ICANN is already accountable to them.
Just in from Cupertino. Safari 6 for Mac and iOS now blocks .xxx TLD by default...
0 Votes
+ -
oh no!
Mcleary316 20th Mar 2011
@dazzlingd oh no!
0 Votes
+ -
@Violet: why is wrong when p0_rn companies have to rush to register their .x_xx domains but not wrong when TV companies rush to protect their names in the .tv TLD? What about the .mobi TLD? Why isn't there any uproar for poor corporations that need to secure their names in those popular TLDs? I don't care if certain companies wanted those other TLDs. It's not simply OK when they want it, and not OK when they didn't. In both cases the TLDs would be meaningless. And speaking of being meaningless, how many domainOfCorporationForProfit.ORG do exist out there now? Are those meaningful?

Yep, we may be in the meaningless TLDs era but it didn't start with .x_x_x. It started long ago.
@nomorebs
The .tv extention is actualy a top level country ID and was assigned to a very small Island in the pacific called Tuvalu. Being a very small country of just 26 square kilometres it is leasing its Internet domain name for a very tidy profit. I'm sure if ICANN had relised it would be used that way they might have not assigned that extention.
0 Votes
+ -
@NZJester : OK, forget about .tv. The case is still there for .mobi, .info, and .org which are also meaningless since you don't have to have a mobile site, be part of a mobile business, provide an informational website, or be a non for profit organization to register domains at those TLDs
0 Votes
+ -
As if "meaningless" TLDs are BAD...
dgurney 21st Mar 2011
Limited top-level domains should have been abolished years ago. They've been meaningless that long, and create a fake "shortage" of meaningful domain names in the first place.

There's no technical reason that domain names shouldn't end with any string you want them to.

GET RID OF TOP-LEVEL DOMAINS. Then this whole problem goes away forever, and we can turn our attention to something else.
A good articles this with some interesting information I didn't know. You always write great
articles which engage and entertainers me and I'd like to say thanks for taking the time to write such great things. I always come and read your articles and think you do a really top job. Kind regards, free mp3 DJs Miss Molly Henderson. I hope you have a lovely week.
But I think none of the current .com based porn sites would suddenly switch to .xxx, so it is totally meaningless to say that is going to save our children from watching porn. But at the same time I am no expert in this kind of matters.
@Rama.NET
AGreed
San francisco movers
san francisco Locksmith
San jose dentist
San Francisco dentist
Great article. Telling how this .xxx scourge got the green light from the payed off ICANN members.

As far as .xxx "protecting the children", everyone knows thats all garbage. Some areas in schools, ect will be blocked, but for the most part kids will be surfing for smut on the .xxx domain and thats a fact.

Get rid of ICANN or at least regulate them. They didnt even listen to GAC when it came to .xxx. Hell they didnt listen to anybody except their master ICM who put cash in their pockets.

When the lawsuits start (ofcourse there coming) things are going to get awkward and comical with ICANN's voting staff.
0 Votes
+ -
how do you think they paid them??
sparkle farkle 21st Mar 2011
shocked
0 Votes
+ -
oh gee................
semi-adult 21st Mar 2011
@sparkle farkle
A process involving suction and bodily fluids comes to mind...
  • Flagged
@Birdo I sure hope that the .XXX Domain does not go by the wayside like .mobi

Buy XXX Domain
@Birdo The ICANN bylaws do not require that the Board follow the direction of any of the Advisory Committees, even the GAC. They are ADVISORY, and part of a multi-stakeholder process. The ACs advise, and the Board weighs that advice and then decides.
Who do you think should 'regulate" ICANN? Besides the different stakeholders in the governance of the Internet, from all over the world? ICANN is already accountable to them.
I wonder how many people are going to go crazy buying .xxx domains hoping they will some day be worth it. Not in this life time, Lol! Watch me regret this in 5 years..
0 Votes
+ -
I wonder if someone has already registered "xxx.xxx"
Looks like something you can do.

lol...
0 Votes
+ -
Great article
Reality-based 21st Mar 2011
Great article, much meatier than the usual ZDNet article.
See this would have made more sense if all of the entertainment sites that had .com or .net names were auto-switched to .xxx for free, only paying what they did for .com and .net, and for the time being if someone went to the .co/.net version of the site they would be informed that the .xxx version is the right site. After a while all of the .coms and .nets could be removed and this move would have made sense, this way anything with .xxx could be blocked and noone would have to worry about their children accidentally bumping into something they shouldn't, otherwise this is simply another way for them to force people into giving them money.
@KBot
This is exactly what I was thinking. This is how this should be, then all system could easly block .xxx from who needs not see it. Of couse there will always be a way for kids to get thier eyes on porn, but if this was done right, like you explain, it would make it a lot harder. I mean just think how easy it is to see porn online right now. Then give ICM the resposabliity of monitoring this so they will actualy earn thier money. Fine them up the whazooo if they screw up.
@KBot

Brilliant! And then the .com and .net names could be recycled to ease the crunch and these supersquatters could be cut out without making a dime.
0 Votes
+ -
@KBot

or maybe parents ought to police their own kids' activities on the internet, instead of always expecting someone or something else to do it for/make it easier for them?
0 Votes
+ -
ICANN't stand it.
JohnMcGrew@... 21st Mar 2011
The world needs fewer TLDs, not more. You're right, Violet. It's just a scam to force people into wasting more money to protect their names. If ICANN really cared about the state of the Internet, they'd be working on a way to get rid of TLDs, which are an archaic notion today anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
wrong
dgurney 21st Mar 2011
Well, right, in a way: The world needs NO TLDs. There's no reason for them anymore. The last string of characters in a domain name should be completely free-form, which eliminates this entire problem once and for all.
@dgurney
The way some companies are useing the TLDs does still make them relavant. When I put .co.nz onto a lot of major brands I get direted to the New Zealand related information of those companies.
0 Votes
+ -
I have no ******* clue why this is a bad idea. With this, parents can now easily block "most" adult material with 1 step only! i most adult sites shift to those domains. No need for those lousy filtring names and stuff.
In my openion, this is a great step in making the internet safe and cleaner. Provided adult websites aren't allowed to own other .domains
0 Votes
+ -
@LittleM

I think you are right on. This only provides protection if the .com porn sites are forced to move to the .xxx domain. There should be a 90-day time period wherein the .com owners have exclusive rights to their corresponding .xxx addresses.
@LittleM, I'm with you. I fail to see the big problem here. Those with kids...just include this to the family filter and call it good.
@cporterweci
And there is the problem... the .com porn sites will NOT be forced to switch over and what they are afraid of is that the now "friendly" .com names (like Dinsey, or any other kid friendly domains) will have their evil side of .xxx out there. Granted not necessarily aimed at children but may be found there none the less.. That, IMO, is what this is all about...
0 Votes
+ -
...which is why this will not work.
JohnMcGrew@... Updated - 21st Mar 2011
@LittleM, the porn sites are never going to give up their .com territory, simply because they know that if they were segregated to the .xxx territory, they'd instantly be filtered out by every nanny-filter and corporate entity. Why would they do that?
@LittleM "Provided adult websites aren't allowed to own other .domains"

Big if. They are already there...
0 Votes
+ -
They can't make em move
big red one 21st Mar 2011
@LittleM Who is going to take those .com domains away? The whole reason they can have porn sites in .com territory is freedom of speech, so no one can force them into giving them up.

But not only the porn sites will want those .xxx domains. Have you ever looked up your own name, only to find there's a .com with your name on it? How would you feel if there was a yourpersonalname.xxx site?
0 Votes
+ -
@LittleM Of course adult websites are allowed to own other domains. That will never change, which is why .xxx is just a cynical ploy to blackmail existing rights holders. If I had somefantasticpornname.com and had promoted it heavily, there's no reason why I'd bother trying to rebrand it to .xxx since .com works well and is recognised globally. The only reason to buy a .xxx domain is to prevent someone else using your brand.
we've been trying to get them to accept .xxx as a viability since 94. We wanted to be the xxx registrar. they've been saying NO since then.

If all of the adult stuff resided in XXX it would be easy to filter out domain names.

all of the porn haters need to understand one thing-- porn built the Internet and porn pays for it. You don't have to like it but like advertising on TV, it pays for the "free" Internet.
@dbeecher@... Please cite anything that would show where porn "built the internet" and "pays for the internet"
@dbeecher@...
Where's the free Internet? At home, I'm currently paying $49.95 a month and a little over $300 a month at work. I WANT FREE INTERNET, TOO!
@dbeecher@...
My thoughts exactly!
@dbeecher@... Bull ****.
Porn did not start the internet.
Porn did not build the internet.
Porn did not make it viable or useful.
All porn did was clutter up the internet; just like it did the rest of the world.
I don't have to agree with you, but I'll defend your right to say what you want with my life. It'd just be nice if you would put your mind in gear, before you open your mouth. (or type a reply).
@redwood49931@... says someone that has no idea where all the online marketing methods came from.....

fair enough....educational institutions and the military started it.....porn made it move forward

BTW...to all those that don't know what free internet means....it does not mean free connection....just free content.... apply some common sense wink

Cheers
Australians couldn't give a XXXX about this and over here XXXXXXX (6X) is composted chicken's 51 HT or a beer
They should now make all the other TLDs rated. No more smut dot coms - go to XXX or get fined. Now, that would make sense...
@Dagdamore that's called censorship....and you can't just take someone's business from them...regardless of what you think about what they sell. They paid good $$ to market their TLD sites outside of a .XXX TLD....they own them....the end!
@ColdFusion_z

Shame on you. The US has a Supreme Court a subject with enough funding to pay for the lawyers is never at a legal end.
How is it that ICANN can do this without opening .xxx to other registrars? Is that not restraint of trade and prohibited by the FTC?

I won't be surprised if the eventual next phase is to evict the entire porn industry from all existing TLDs where they now reside and force them over to .xxx
@artistdomain BINGO....I'd like to know the same....seems rather unfair....conflict of interest could be hiding ion there somewhere
I want .null for sites with no meaningful content.
seems like a good way for goverments and special interest groups to infringe on free speech by forcing certain content, (porn, religion, etc), to specific zones to limit or prohibit access. book burning and censorship for the 21st century.
@tjohnson@...
Say what???
@mtabholt I'll use small words for you....

If you can force porn on to .XXX then you could force religion to .CHR or some such nonsense.

As tjohnson said....censorship for the 21st century.

BTW...cen-sor-ship (broken out into syll-a-bles so you can read it) is when some group hides the message from another group they don't like. Do you get it now?
0 Votes
+ -
Awesome article and very illuminative. It's quite apparent you've done your homework Violet. Definitely opened my eyes regarding the potential for this to open up a huge can of worms; re: allowing anyone to basically print money when they decide some new useless TLD should come into existence. Where do we draw the line?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix