ie8 fix

Virtually Speaking

Dan Kusnetzky, Paula Rooney and Ken Hess

Saying good bye to Autovirt

By | January 6, 2012, 3:49am PST

Summary: AutoVirt couldn’t get funding and had to close its doors. Will its good ideas be picked up by another supplier or is it really the end?

I was reading Virtualization, Data Migration Upstart AutoVirt Closes Doors by CRN’s Andrew R Hickey. The article announced the sudden demise of an interesting and innovative storage virtualization company, AutoVirt. The reason given was that AutoVirt had not been able to successfully close another round of funding and had to cease operations. My condolences go out to the management and staff of the company.

I’m wondering if this is the leading edge of an industry trend.

In the past, company founders having a good idea, a working engineering prototype, a reasonable go-to-market strategy, and an executive team having the talent, the skill and the ability to turn the idea into a growing concern were able to get funding. The investors understood that they were planting seeds and watering the ground, but time and careful tending were absolutely required for growth. Careful multi-year plans were made and the team started executing knowing that if some level of success could be seen, additional rounds of funding would be available to keep the idea alive.

What’s new today is the short term thinking I see in the investment community.  If an idea doesn’t produce a bumper crop immediately, they cut their investment and go onto something else. Good ideas are left to rot in the field.

While it is possible that a large storage virtualization supplier, such as EMC, Hitachi Data Systems, IBM or NetApp might come along and buy up the intellectual property for a song and incorporate it into other products, it is just as possible that it is just the end of a dream.

I see similar thinking in the marketing departments of start ups as well.  They’re looking for “silver bullets” rather than carefully building a brand image over time. This, of course means, that it is quite possible that they never follow a course long enough to get anywhere.

Are we in the era of short term thinking?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Daniel Kusnetzky is a distinguished analyst and the founder of the Kusnetzky Group LLC.

Disclosure

Dan Kusnetzky

The Kusnetzky Group LLC is an independent technology industry research firm that focuses on system software, virtualization and cloud computing technology.

Dan's opinions are based upon research, personal experiences and actual use of technology. They are not based upon the relationships the company may or may not have with suppliers, end user organizations, the media, consultants or other analysts.

Dan's research is available on a subscription basis through the Kusnetzky Group LLC. Dan's attendance at industry events or at client meetings may be sponsored by the client. Clients may provide hardware or software for testing prior to the publication of analysis that includes that product. Clients may also provide shirts, jackets, coffee cups, folders, backpacks, pens and other event chotchkies. While nice, these don't effect Dan's opinions or insight about those clients or their products.

Biography

Dan Kusnetzky

Daniel Kusnetzky, Analyst and Founder of Kusnetzky Group LLC, is responsible for research, publications, and operations. Mr. Kusnetzky has been involved with information technology since the late 1970s. Mr. Kusnetzky has been responsible for research operations at the 451 Group; corporate and marketing strategy for Open-Xchange; system software and virtualization research at IDC; and program and product management at Digital Equipment Corporation.; Today, Mr. Kusnetzky focuses on system software, virtualization technology and cloud computing.

7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

off base...
jointocomment 2nd Mar
"company founders having a good idea, a working engineering prototype, a reasonable go-to-market strategy, and an executive team having the talent, the skill and the ability to turn the idea into a growing concern"

There are a lot of assumptions in your statement there...most of them wrong. AutoVirt did NOT have an executive team with talent...consequently they flushed out the real engineering talent and the engineering prototype was never able to get farther along than early Beta quality. The idea is still ok, but that particular team was never going to make it happen and the investors recognized this...Someone starting clean could possibly make do better, but the relationships have already been tainted such that the major players are now a little put off to the idea...
have always looked at ROI windows in terms of 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, etc. The idea of continuing to sink money into a losing concern for years and years has NEVER been considered smart business.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Saying good bye to Autovirt
dkusnetzky 6th Jan
@baggins_z I agree that it is a numbers game. I have seen however, that investors have strong guidelines that may or may not make sense in a specific area of hardware or software. So, a company making real progress, and not losing money, might be thrown out with the bath water if those strong guidelines are not met.

Thanks, by the way, for taking the time to comment.

Dan K
0 Votes
+ -
five years versus 90 days
plumley@... 6th Jan
If you accept that "Greed is Stupid" then understanding short term goal pusuit makes perfect sense. After all these are the people that bought into "lose a little on every sale and make it back in volume", can you say "Mortgage Derivatives!"
0 Votes
+ -
More on point...
...Autovirt does have a valuable, unique product, and some vendor will get a bargain when they gobble up this technology. It's too bad that great technology doesn't guarantee a great sales force and operational efficiency.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
RE: Saying good bye to Autovirt
dkusnetzky 6th Jan
@n0mb I find that the history of the IT industry is littered with dead companies that had developed interesting technology, but hadn't developed a good sales or marketing model. It's sad.

Dan K
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Saying good bye to Autovirt
virthddman 8th Jan
Sad to hear about Autovirt. 2X is a company that is going strong for those looking for alternatives as Citrix moves on enterprise accounts?
Check @2X-dot-com
0 Votes
+ -
off base...
jointocomment 2nd Mar
"company founders having a good idea, a working engineering prototype, a reasonable go-to-market strategy, and an executive team having the talent, the skill and the ability to turn the idea into a growing concern"

There are a lot of assumptions in your statement there...most of them wrong. AutoVirt did NOT have an executive team with talent...consequently they flushed out the real engineering talent and the engineering prototype was never able to get farther along than early Beta quality. The idea is still ok, but that particular team was never going to make it happen and the investors recognized this...Someone starting clean could possibly make do better, but the relationships have already been tainted such that the major players are now a little put off to the idea...

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix