The Web turns 15 - but are the bigco's ruining the party?

The Web turns 15 - but are the bigco's ruining the party?

Summary: In this current era of the Web, control and centralization is still happening - but instead of the browser being the main unit of control, it's now user data. [...]

TOPICS: Browser

James Boyle wrote that this month marks the 15th anniversary of the creation of the first web page on the World Wide Web. He pointed out that what makes the Web so great is what people have built on it over the last 15 years. An obvious statement perhaps, but it's worth highlighting because the most often-cited definition of Web 2.0 is using the Web as a platform. Web 2.0 in a lot of ways is a continuation of Tim Berners-Lee's original vision for a read/write Web - where users create and collaborate, and not just consume.

It's a nice optimistic picture isn't it? Let me put this to you...

The Web was built on open and decentralized formats and standards, but there are signs that closed networks and centralization are still a threat. And I'm not talking about Microsoft's domination of the Web browser and vanquishing of Netscape in the 90's. Because in the Web 2.0 era, there are more subtle examples going on. Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! are all in a race to get as many people to use their portal or homepage offerings as possible. But much of their offerings are what's been termed roach motels. The user data goes in, but it can't check out. In this current era of the Web, control and centralization is still happening - but instead of the browser being the main unit of control, it's now user data.  

I thought TechDirt had a nice analysis of James Boyle's article, but take this extract:

"Despite what media companies (and connectivity companies) would like people to believe, they don't own the internet. They came and joined the party because that's where the people were. They didn't create it, and they don't get to control it."

Well that's the rose-tinted glasses way of looking at it. It's correct to say that media and Internet companies joined the party because that's where the people were (and increasingly are). But I would suggest to you that Microsoft, Yahoo and Google are all in the business of attempting to control your Web experience. Not overtly, but subtly. They want you to put your data into their systems, but they really have no intention of letting you own it or take it back.

APIs are the same. Have you noticed how many restrictions are placed on many big company APIs? Sure you can build new applications and remix content, but in most cases you don't own the data.

Something to think about. Is the Web nowadays really as decentralized and uncontrolled as we like to think it is? Is it getting better, or worse?

Topic: Browser

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • On the whole, worse

    As many things get worse when they are heavily commercialized. Lots of good ideas carried to extremes and corrupted. I have to say though that the web is still the best way I know to learn things/get information.
  • Worse, but it could be fixed.

    The most intrusive item on the web is the assortment of "user Agreements" or "terms of service" that allow for the theft and business copyright of any information originated and posted by an individual.

    Congress could easily and quickly fix this by a simple law that grants copyright to the originator and specifically prohibits any web site from claiming the copyright under any conditions except for a negotiated individual contract signed by both the web site authority and the originator.

    This should include clearly the right of the originator to remove the posting from the site at the originator's discretion.

    There is NO justification for your writings or ideas to belong to someone else just because you used a tool that they supplied. Your house doesn't belong to the manufacturer of the hammer that the carpenter used to build it.
    Update victim
  • Are the bigco's ruining the party?

    Happy Birthday Internet. Bigco's have found the internet to be the biggest, most reliable place to conduct business. Small staff loads after the initial outlay of cash for equipment. The detrimental areas are the EULA's that are included everywhere. Most consumers' don't read the warning labels on consumer products they purchase for home use and so it goes with EULAs on the internet.

    One would need a team of lawyers to spend hours interpreting the incredible sized EULAs which allow bigco's to seize at no loss to themselves, your information and surfing habits.

    Many folks believe that a "point of and click" to get beyond the EULAs to get the goods is necessary simply because they don't understand a major portion of the language. Will this stop? No. We're all part of the instant gratification world. The sooner the better.

    Bigco's haven't destroyed the internet per se; many have enriched it. However, discussion about personal privacy issues would be a great addressable topic. We've given up a major portion of personal annonyminity through the EULAs due to bigco's protection of their bottom lines to gain profit.