Buy a Chromebook Pixel today? No way. But tomorrow could be a very different story
Summary: The Chromebook Pixel is the most expensive Chromebook on the market, and its specs mean it can run with fully-fledged laptops - but would I buy one today? No. But it could be a different story in the future...
The Chromebook Pixel is the highest profile Chromebook out there. At just under $1,300, it's easily the most expensive too, and at the heavier end of the spectrum. It really is quite a piece of kit: on several occasions I've had to fend off colleagues' covetous advances to get some alone time with the machine.

The reason for some of the Pixel's appeal (and that extra weight) is its touchscreen and anodised aluminium chassis design, which includes a backlit keyboard and glass touchpad. The glass touchpad gives the Pixel "exceptional smoothness and accuracy", Google reckons. And it's not wrong.
Does the Pixel really need a touchscreen?
Not that you'll be relying on the touchpad's exceptional accuracy too much if you use the touchscreen - and, if you're used to using Windows 8, there's a good chance that you'll be reaching out to paw at the screen more than you might have imagined.
However, while touchscreens make sense for Windows 8 hardware given Microsoft has redesigned elements of the operating system to be geared around touch input, the Pixel is a slightly different proposition, and that's one of my issues with it.
Whereas on Windows 8 different swiping actions perform different tasks — say, opening the Start menu by swiping right to left or switching back to the last-used app by swiping left to right. But in Chrome OS, there are very few specific touch features - and therefore reasons for the touch input in the first place. Sure, you can use it to navigate between windows, resizing them along the way, and some might even support other features such as pinch-to-zoom, but right now, very few do. Until that changes, there's almost no need for the touchscreen at all.
As things stand today, the web is still largely designed for use with a keyboard and mouse — it's all search boxes and small text links to navigate, neither of which is suited to an all touch input. Perhaps by the time the Chromebook Pixel 2 makes it onto shelves there may be enough apps that support touch input to make a touchscreen worthwhile, but for now, it simply adds expense and weight.
Hardware overkill
Almost without exception, there are very few concerns with the rest of the hardware - although I would take a micro HDMI output rather than a Display Port plus adaptor, which wasn't included in the box.
In fact, I (like many others) would say the hardware is almost overkill for the rest of the laptop. The beauty of the average Chromebook (and they haven't been a runaway success so far, by any means) is the price. For around £200, you can have a fully functional laptop that allows you to do everything you'd normally do in the browser, with a reasonably long battery life and quick boot time.
The audio playback was surprising too with loud, if not crystal clear sound, coming through the speakers. Sadly, it showed a trait seen in many, many other laptops too - it got rather warm under the USB ports when in use. Still, that didn't stop me using it as my everyday work laptop for a little while when my underpowered everyday machine became too slow to bear.
While the Pixel mostly matches up to what its rivals can offer (although I would have expected a more generous battery life: with the screen on around 70 percent brightness, it lasted for around two and half hours or so of continuous playback), it can't compete in the most crucial area: the price.

The verdict
It's hard to sell the idea of a Chromebook Pixel to a lot of people. At first glance it has a lot in common with a laptop — you can do most of the things you'd want to do on laptop on a Pixel — but, unlike a laptop, you can't use Skype or download any of the other apps traditionally found on such machines.
However, the biggest difference most people will notice between a Pixel and an average laptop is simply the price. People will accept cut-down functionality at a cut-down price, but combine cut-down functionality with an asking price larger than a MacBook Pro's and it all starts to make a lot less sense.
There's really very little to consider in making this decision. I'd love a Chromebook Pixel: it's definitely stylish, it has a reassuring quality feel to it and there's not any sign of the flex or paint rubbing off that I quickly saw in the Samsung Chromebook (which retails for around £230). I like the fact it boots quickly, and most of what I want to do, I do in the browser.
And still, I couldn't even consider buying one now. Perhaps when there are more touch-enabled apps it would be more enticing, but I could never hand over that amount of money for what I'd perceive to be a bit less than a laptop.
Right now, it feels like a concept machine, a glimpse at what could — and likely will — be, rather than a machine for today's needs. But give it a year or so and I'd bet we'll see the premium Chromebook market making a lot more sense.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
This is clearly a concept machine
I don't agree when people compare a $200 chromebook and a $1300 chromebook to say it makes no sense, that price range exists with other type of laptops.
Samsung just updated their series 9 laptops and the price is $1900, you can get the "same" for $300. It's true that the Samsung has a good capacity SSD and the best processor, but stills behind regarding resolution... and it's a lot more expensive than the pixel.
Very expensive products are hardly made for the majority, it requires a lot of skills and maybe luck for some company be able to do it.
I believe in a way, retina mac laptops and Pixel deprecated a lot of other low resolution laptops, hopefully they soon will stop using 768 lines on large screens.
The thing about Chromebooks is......
Because it sucks
I can see very little reason to buy one of these, or any chromebook for that matter, over a tablet ... and considering you can buy a reasonably spec'd laptop for around the ~£300 mark I simply can't see why anyone would want to limit themselves by being locked into the Google ecosystem.
The only thing it has going for it is it's amazing hi res touch screen ... fortunately if they ever get popular we'll be seeing them on better spec'd and inherently more flexible laptop/tablet style devices.
I can't see how Google can win by offering less ... I guess they've taken a leaf out of Apples book ... so maybe I'll be proved wrong.
Google can win with this
The trade off of course is the loss of ability to run native applications, and thus the Chromebook obviously doesn't satisfy the entire market. Given how many people's needs are met with non-native applications these days the market for Chromebooks is large. Essentially anyone that needs only the features of a tablet but requires a real keyboard. When you consider that with increased processing speeds and bandwidth the future is clearly trending toward non-native applications and thus computers like the Chromebook really represent a segment of the future of personal computing.
Value added feature
As an aside, I actually hate Google. I own an iPhone, Windows Phone 8 and Windows PC. I am a Windows administrator. But even I can see the benefits here.
Never!
No one...
spyware
Look at the business model
Sure, Apple, Microsoft, and others can spy on their users, but for those two, they manage to make a lot of money without doing so. They sell real products. Google sells advertising.
All you Google fan boys out there, remember Google has a profile on you (and billions of other people) on their servers. One day that info will be leaked and we will see an identity theft day that will shock the world.
I see the conspiracy theorists out in abundance.
tomorrow could be a very different story
Doc
Lower the price
One of his last complaints is a misconception
But you are 90% of the people
Ugh - need EDIT back... are NOT 90% of the...
S5 vs Pixel
My daily driver is a Honda Fit, and today I took a test drive in a Buick Encore, which is almost the same size, but has about 20% less cargo space, and costs $10,000 more than the Fit. The comparison between the two is not unlike the S5 and the Pixel.
There is definitely an "early adopter" tax on new hardware, but the Pixel sets a path for higher-end Chromebooks with Haswell processors and HD screens, at a lower price point.
If you can use a chromebook for 99% of your work ...
If you judge the value of someone's job based on...
Best, and probably most accurate line, about Pixel I have read...
Tomorrow is another day...