Buying Microsoft Surfaces in bulk: More hints in the fine print
Summary: Microsoft's channel partners are unearthing more details about Microsoft's volume-purchasing program for its Surface RTs and Pros.
As I blogged yesterday, Microsoft has started allowing business customers to buy Surfaces in bulk, via a new Surface Commercial Order page.
Yesterday, Microsoft officials declined to provide any details about the volume-ordering program. However, on March 20, I received a statement from a Microsoft spokesperson about the program:
“Commercial customers interested in Surface can visit www.surface.com to place orders for Surface RT and Surface Pro. We will continue to take a measured and phased approach to provide customers and partners with the best experience possible. We are, and always have been, committed to the channel, and you can expect to hear from us on that front when have more to share.”
Beyond that statement, the Surface team still isn't talking about the new volume program.
Fortunately, a few of the company's partners have looked into the program and discovered some interesting tidbits. I've included a few screen shots (below) from one Microsoft partner showing what's on the new site.
Microsoft's reseller partners are quite interested in this bulk-ordering capacity, as many of them have been hoping Microsoft might permit them to buy Surfaces (especially the Pros) at a discount and resell them to customers, bundled with various services. So far, the Surface team has not allowed this and, instead, has continued to rely on the retail channel and Microsoft's own stores as the distribution vehicle for Surface RTs and Pros. I've heard a rumor Microsoft might allow its partners to start selling Surfaces as of this July, but company execs aren't saying that publicly.
The new Surface Commercial Order site, from those who've checked into it, is definitely aimed at Microsoft volume-licensing customers. Those looking to buy in bulk are required to provide the name of their Microsoft representative. They also can opt to provide their premier account number, enterprise agreement number and/or volume license number when ordering.

As far as pricing goes, no discounted prices are listed on the site. The prices listed are the same estimated retail prices that customers pay currently. (The three-year service plan, the one new addition, is listed as $150 for Surface RTs and $200 for Pros.) One would assume volume purchases would entail volume discounts. (Maybe these are applied at the end of the purchase process? Update: A couple individuals who tried ordering say no. There are no discounts applied.)

Also: For customers in countries other than the U.S. and Canada hoping to use the Commercial Order site to get around Microsoft's current geographic-distribution limitations, you're out of luck. Only those in the U.S. and Canada are allowed for now to buy Surface Pros through the site. And only those customers in countries where the Surface RT has been cleared for distribution can buy Surface RTs in bulk through the site.
One last point worth noting about Microsoft and its Surface strategy. I've seen more than a few Microsoft customers, partners and company watchers claim that Microsoft is now positioning Surface RTs as consumer-focused devices and Surface Pros as business-focused devices. This is not actually the case.

On Microsoft's own Surface business page, both Surface RTs and Pros are listed as being options for business users. The Surface Commercial Order site makes this clear, as well, given that it provides a way for large/volume licensing customers to buy both RTs and Pros.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Looks like ...
So surface is....
And if you were a project manager, making presentations or taking notes in a meeting, you now have an access to a device that would allow you do all these without hesitation.
So surface is not for dancing, but also for work and education! Good days for Surface are to come.
surface fail
Poor Henrique
Yup. That about sums it up. ;)
William Farrel
kkk
You need to examine the number of IP that Microsott has, versus all others,
If you actually believe any of the junk you posted, then you need to go back to school to learn what innovation is really about.
Not necessarily
Re: You need to examine the number of IP that Microsott has, versus all oth
Otherwise it wouldn't be on the losing end of the whole patent-protection racket.
Please ...
While you're at it, please point me at an OS from a search website vendor that is clearly has a GREAT many similarities with Apple's 'grid of static icons' iOS UI, which rests atop an OS that was largely created by others and an app platform that was created by Sun without correctly licensing said platform.
All those tablets with those features
You respond about accessories?
You may not like the tiles because you are tied to the past, but those who want to move forward with their tablet can do are embracing windows 8.
Kickstands?
Not quite innovation
As for the tile concept, IBM incorporated it in Lotus Notes ver 5.0.1 in something like 1989 as its standard desktop interface and is still contained in the latest version, though not as the default.
I think the tablet is the successor to the Palm TX, etc. more so than the pc. Also, the emergence of the direction of locking into Google as a new defacto suite of services seems to not be dissimilar to what Lotus was designing Notes to be before the internet was around and now is trying to accommodate.
As for the cloud, it is no different than the old server system I used except I used cable to the server and terminals to access it. As the cloud concept develops, I can see something like Chrome making sense. Nothing more than a terminal with a gui rather than prompt. No need for more than a fast communications port, video port, etc., but not the need for large storage or processing power. A smartphone with a dock having hd video port, hq audio, keyboard and either faster wifi or data with better plans. The dock could contain tv and radio tuners, hdmi, and other connection ability, maybe connectivity to a Pi like low cost computer for local processing if advantageous.
I am not a techie or engineer but with the current technology and developing systems, I think we can reengineer the computer to be what what so many companies have contributed towards but only in fragments as things evolve.
As for working without the dock, I've seen a few persons with the 5" phones and they seem unwieldy in use. Maybe only a matter of getting used to them but, they'd not fit into a man's shirt pocket that for me set the target maximum size. Belt clips, etc. may be okay but these seem not to be the trend or at least for the phones I looked at a couple of months ago. Not to be sexist but not sure if the is something similar to a man's shirt pocket on woman's clothing.
Sorry to go off topic but, there is so much slamming going on with almost nothing positive as to developments and direction with meaning nor recognition that much of what is being touted as new is merely updates of earlier concepts. Maybe the wrong group but, possibly we could come together and think about the future and where we could go with it.
Imagine the merging of hollography, 3-d,.and google glasses. Games, presentations, cad, video, and so many other things could be done and monitors eliminated. The phone itself could be radicalized. Think about the future without television, cable, retail music, movies on mediums, all just streamed. Yes, I know this will kill industries like cable companies, require major business model changes by networks, but, it ks both foreseeable and doable. The companies are now experimenting with the fragments that one day possibly change our lives. New homes will have the sitting room that evolved to the living room and created the family room change the family room into the entertainment room. Where you walk in pop the phone into a dock and can sit and watch with friends the release of the newest blockbuster. Holdover? The popcorn and hot nacho machines.
Long live the future and forward thinking.
Not a single
Henrique Fail
Seems Likely
You would think...
Agreed
When you're the new product on the block, you have to offer some incentive to get people to buy what they don't know as opposed to buying what they do know.
People will pass up something that would have done exactly what they needed as they don't know enough about it, in lue of something they know they can finagle to do pretty much everything the need it to do given that both products cost the same.
Lower the price and some may see the savings as worth that risk.
I can tell you a bit about "the plan"
WE ARE HERE….
INTSERT PLAN C, PLAN D, PLAN X here…
Skip into the future…Final outcome: Windows 8 is a failure, Windows RT is a failure, Windows Pro is a failure…reboot Windows, reboot mobile strategy, reboot Ballmer.
Wrong