By the numbers: Australia's lack of patent ideas

Summary: Is Australia behind the game when it comes to patenting new ideas?

Australians might have come up with the Hills Hoist, the Box Kite and the Black Box Flight Recorder, but we seem to be losing the race for ideas lately.

(Credit: Phil Dobbie/ZDNet)

In fact, when you look at the number of patents issued worldwide, we're hardly in the race. The World Intellectual Property Organisation tracks patents filed by residents of 162 countries; of the 495,000 registered in 2010, only 1178 (0.2 per cent) came from Australia. Basically, there was one patent filed for every 19,000 people. Compared to the US, where 107,792 patents were filed by residents — one for every 2900 people — that makes them seven times as inventive as the Aussies.

But the Americans are losing ground as well — to a tide of ideas from Asia. Japan, the land that brought us digital audio, the camcorder and pot noodles, is still going strong. Since the early Nineties, they have consistently accounted for more than a third of the world's patents. One in every 680 people is filing a patent each year, making them 28 times more inventive than Aussies.

Then there's the rising tide of inspiration coming from China. Yes, China. The country that used to specialise in ripping off designs from other parts of the world is now coming up with ideas of its own. Chinese residents have gone from accounting for less than 1 per cent of patents in the late Nineties, to 16 per cent in 2010 (the latest figures available).

We're not alone in our singular lack of ideas. Britain and Canada fair little better, and Iceland managed just seven patents in 2010. It's a concern though, surely, that in the emerging digital global economy where ideas are crucial, so few are coming from our neck of the woods.

Perhaps we can take comfort in the quality of some of our ideas — and in the ability to execute. It was an Australian company that worked with director James Cameron to design and build the Deepsea Challenger, the 12-ton sub that can plummet to depths greater than 11km. It's a feat many have described as comparable to space exploration, and it came out of a workshop in Leichhardt. It took out top prize in the Australian International Design Awards on Friday night.

Sadly, most of the other award winners came from overseas. And no mention of the fridge magnet that tells you when your dog needs worming; another Aussie invention for which we can all be proud.

Topic: Patents

About

Phil Dobbie has a wealth of radio and business experience. He started his career in commercial radio in the UK and, since coming to Australia in 1991, has held senior marketing and management roles with Telstra, OzEmail, the British Tourist Authority and other telecommunications, media, travel and advertising businesses.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

4 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • It's Not The Ideas, It's The Execution, Stupid!

    Patents only cover ideas, not the implementation of those ideas. The important thing is not who came up with the idea (which usually occurrs to several people at around the same time anyway), but with who is able to turn it into a successful product.

    Who do we credit with innovating the light-bulb in its modern form? Thomas Edison. Did he get a patent on that? No! Did Henry Ford get a patent on the Model T? No, but he and other car makers had to fight off George Selden, who was trying to patent the entire idea of making a motor-car.

    As Edison said, anything worth achieveing is 5% inspiration, and 95% perspiration. If they copy your inspiration, that only gets them 5% of the way to achieving what you have achieved.
    ldo17
  • If Australia had as much state sponsored corporate

    espionage as China does you could make as big a turnaround as they have in the last 20 years
    Johnny Vegas
  • Never mind the quality…

    feel the width.

    Patent offices simply administer the system, they do not check or validate that patents are original or even patentable. Their strategy is to check that the paperwork is correct and leave the patentability arguement to courts.
    Fred Fredrickson
  • Actually it isn't

    "that makes them seven times as inventive as the Aussies" not it makes seven times more patent applications - nothing to do with inventiveness.

    There are many reasons for not patenting; cost of defending them then largest.

    The company I work for is very inventive, we gave up on the patent system many years ago.
    Richard Flude