Canonical's cloud-in-a-box: Under the hood

Canonical's cloud-in-a-box: Under the hood

Summary: Canonical's Ubuntu Linux-powered Orange Box, with its 10 servers in a single container, is the perfect cloud sampler.

SHARE:

I'm a lucky man. I'm one of the first people to actually get my hands on Canonical's Ubuntu-Linux powered Orange Box.

Orange-Box
Canonical Ubuntu-powered Orange Box.

The Orange Box  (PDF Link) is a cloud-in-a-box — a complete mobile cluster. It's designed for OpenStack cloud testing, cloud prototyping, and proof of concept. Each Orange Box comes pre-loaded with Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, Metal as a Service (MaaS), and Juju — Canonical's DevOps program.

Inside the Orange Box, you'll find 10 Intel micro-servers, aka Next Unit of Computing (NUC). Each is powered by Ivy Bridge i5-3427U CPUs. Each mini-server has four cores, Intel HD Graphics 4000, 16GBs of DDR3 RAM, a 128GB SSD root disk, and a Gigabit Ethernet port. The first micro-server also includes a Centrino Advanced-N 6235 Wi-Fi Adapter, and 2TB Western Digital hard drive. These are all connected in a cluster with a D-Link Gigabit switch.

Special Feature

Cloud Computing: Moving to IaaS

Cloud Computing: Moving to IaaS

Infrastructure as a Service providers make a very compelling argument for businesses to stop running their own data centers and simply purchase server capacity on-demand and scale up and down as needed. This is our deep dive on IaaS strategy and best practices

Put it all together and you get a 40-core, 160GB RAM, 1.2TB SSD cluster in a 37.4 pound box. With its flight case, it weighs in at 70 pounds. In short, while you can't lug it onto a plane, it's just light enough to journey with you as checked luggage.

For power, the Orange Box uses a single unified internal 320W power supply. This, in turn, only needs a single, ordinary 110-volt outlet. Yes, that's right: a ten-node cluster that can run in your living room.

At a price of £7,575, or about $12,700, you're not likely to have one in your home office. Nor will Canonical sell you one. As Dustin Kirkland, ‎Canonical's Ubuntu Cloud Solutions Product Manager, made crystal clear: Canonical has no desire to get into the hardware business. While Canonical helped designed the box, the Orange Box is built by the UK company Tranquil PC. They, on the other hand, will be more than happy to sell you an Orange Box .

That said, you need to know that you can't simply line up a dozen of them in a data center and go to town. While this is a fast machine, it's not data-center fast. For example, 1Gbps Ethernet is fine, but for serious work you want 10GB. The same is true of the i5 processors — nice, but they're not Xeon E7 v2s. Nor is DDR3 memory the equal of error-correcting code (EEC) RAM.

With that in mind, I can still see companies buying Orange Boxes for branch offices. Indeed, I've already heard from businesses wanting to do exactly that and wanting to know what I thought of the idea. My answer: Yes, you could use them for a small OpenStack cloud or, say, a Hadoop big data or MediaWiki deployment.

What Canonical really wants you to do with an Orange Box, though, is use it to see just how good Ubuntu, MaaS, and Juju can be for deploying an OpenStack cloud and data-center applications. Indeed, they have an entire program, Jumpstart, designed for just this purpose.

With Jumpstart, Kirkland said, "Canonical engineers will deliver an Orange Box to your office, give you two days of training, and then leave it in your hands for two weeks." Then, you can experiment to your heart's content at your own pace and with your own workloads. Canonical's engineers will visit you again to review what you learned and discuss deploying the Ubuntu software stack into your own data center.

How easy is it? It took me 10 minutes to set up an OpenStack cloud. Let me repeat that, 10 minutes to set up a full OpenStack cloud over 10 servers.

Based on what I saw in my few hours of tinkering with Ubuntu, MaaS, and Juju, you're going to want to say "Yes, I want this software stack in my data-center and I want it now."

First, while there's nothing fancy about MaaS. It's an easy-to-use server setup and configuration tool. It's nice, but any system administrator with a few years under his or her belt has built similar tools. What MaaS does have going for it is that it's the easiest to use program of its sort I've used to date—and I've used a lot of them over the years.

The real magic for server and cloud administrators is in Juju. This program lets you get rid of the busy work of setting up and managing standard server programs and their relationships on the cloud. With it you can easily automate all the work you have to go through in setting programs up and their relationships at a service level, instead of at the server level.

You don't have to build these services yourself with Juju. Juju uses "charms." “These are," according to Jorge Castro, a Canonical developer, "Shareable, re-usable, and repeatable expressions of DevOps best practices. You can use them unmodified, or easily change and connect them to fit your needs. Deploying a charm is similar to installing a package on Ubuntu. Ask for it and it’s there; remove it and it’s gone." Castro described Charms as being like Lego blocks, and he's right. It really is that easy. 

Juju-interface
Using Juju is easy as moving icons and drawing lines between services.

To use charms in Juju, the easy way to get started is to play with them on the Juju charms site. This site gives you a sandbox so you can play with Charms. You can also set up Juju charms to work on your own servers or an Amazon Web Services, OpenStack, or Azure cloud.

Charm's killer feature is that, while you can set them up, deploy, and use them with a command line interface, the main Juju interface lets you set up complete clouds and services from a graphical user interface that looks and acts like a white board. There may be an easier way to set up serious programs, but I've never seen it.

How easy is it? In my playing with the Orange Box it took me 10 minutes to set up an OpenStack cloud. Let me repeat that, 10 minutes to set up a full OpenStack cloud over 10 servers. That wasn't just simply installing OpenStack's components, that was setting up the machines with Ubuntu with MaaS, installing the operating system, deploying the applications, and getting their interconnections up and running. An OpenStack expert might take half-a-day to do this. Most people would take about a week.

I then took the entire system down. Why not? If I wanted my OpenStack cloud back, I could have it back up while I took a coffee break. If I'd made changes to my OpenStack, I can just save it a yaml file, invoke it with a charm, and, ta-da, I have my reconfigured OpenStack cloud back again.

Next, I set up a Hadoop big data cluster over three servers in five minutes. Try doing that in less than four hours any other way and let me know how it goes for you. I then ran a TeraSort, which is a Big Data map/reduce program that's often used to benchmarking Hadoop. With three nodes on my Orange Box, TeraSort took two minutes and 50 seconds to go through a 10GB test file.

That was nice, but it could be better. So, again thanks to Juju, I reset my Hadoop cluster to use seven servers in less time than it took me to write this paragraph. Just trying scaling your servers that quickly. My newly empowered Hadoop cluster now took only one minute and a second to map/reduce the 10GB test file.

Get the idea? Ubuntu, MaaS, and Juju makes deploying and managing cloud and data-center applications far easier than any other set of tools.

Let's say though that you don't love Ubuntu. No problem. Besides being able to use Juju with MaaS. Amazon Web Services, OpenStack, or Azure clouds, Juju is also being ported to Windows 2012, Azure, and CentOS.

I don't impress easily. I've seen way too many technologies sound good, but then not deliver the goods. The Orange Box is a great way to sample Canonical's cloud infrastructure services, but the real stuff is in those software programs. I can easily see Juju becoming the way to deploy cloud services on all platforms. It's that good and it's that flexible.

Related Stories

Topics: Cloud, Hardware, Linux, Open Source, Ubuntu

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

4 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Copy editors?

    First, yes this comment is primarily unrelated to the actual technical content of the article. I'm just curious as to the status of copy editing on ZDNet. It seems to be pretty common amongst content-aggregation sites really, this one just happened to have a few things that really jumped out as "This was copy-edited/proofed with a spellchecker, wasn't it?" moments.

    "While Canonical helped designed the box"
    "First, while there's nothing fancy about MaaS."
    "Just trying scaling your servers that quickly."

    I'm sorry, I just can't help seeing all of the things like that. I blame a family of English majors, they ruined me.

    On a more relevant note; while I have no real concrete use for something like this, this article still makes me want one.
    kh_l2k
  • Really Steve?

    "I don't impress easily. I've seen way too many technologies sound good, but then not deliver the goods. "

    Do you actually believe that? Because this reader certainly interprets all of your columns to be pre-ordained.

    If it's Linux or Open source then you think it's going to save the world. If it's Apple it's a 50/50 bet, and if it's Microsoft, it's Devil Spawn. Sorry SJV but I no longer listen to your opinion.
    gr1f
    • really steve

      "Sorry SJV but I no longer listen to your opinion." Oh really but you do read them, why?
      carlson11
  • Funny how the desktop opion so differs from reality

    http://thecloudmarket.com/stats#/totals

    When you look at the real stats from cloud market you see that over 50% of the cloud is running Ubuntu. Additionally: when you look at MySQL again see a clear leader
    http://www.mysql.com/why-mysql/cloud/

    I'm sure that you can find some opinionated reply to the PaaS interface that Juju offers, or make some argument that other linux bigots simply don't run Ubuntu on their desktop.

    But in ignoring these two products from serious consideration from a roadmap is foolish, buying proprietary and not having clear and clean language as to the costs to migrate to openstack risky.

    Funny how facts are such stubborn things despite all of the zealous responses

    Finally Ubuntu has been sending in engineers for fixed cost consulting now for years, the ability to buy/rent the orange box and prototype in less than two weeks, work with the engineers to get the "security context" of specific data challenges integrated, and the save it off to a yaml file?

    What might I ask is there not to like especially if you have cloud experience and a really good set of user stories and use cases that simply need illustrating?

    The idea of the GUI PaaS in this article seems like to the old hard-head who has to do everything command line like cheating, like allowing innovators to innovate. But if you didn't run Juju and went on AWS your IP address isn't command line by default, it is GUI.

    Companies not offering this level of integration working right off the load balancers within PaaS are doomed, not a matter of if? It is a matter of market share simply making them obsolete.
    cdaringer