Chinese tourists will need NBN: Rudd
Summary: Former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has said that Labor's national broadband network (NBN) will be essential to satisfy Chinese tourists who already pump $4.2 billion annually into the Australian economy.
Kevin Rudd said today that China's emerging middle class wants to be able to check on their home and business while travelling in Australia.
"The expectation of high-speed broadband being available for everything is absolutely fundamental," Rudd told a forum of tourism businesses in Hobart.
"They won't feel comfortable being isolated from news back home, news concerning their business or the intrinsics of their business operation."
Rudd took a swipe at the Coalition broadband policy released last week, which doesn't provide a fibre optic connection to most premises.
"There's no ifs, no buts, no Malcolm Turnbulls about what sort of broadband you want," he said.
"Our high-income tourists from China and elsewhere will simply have this as an elementary expectation, and frankly, it's one of the reasons why we're doing it."
The Mandarin-speaking former foreign minister was speaking about Tasmania's ability to attract a share of Chinese tourism's $102 billion annual spend worldwide.
He said China's 573,000 tourists last year spent $6,422 per visit to Australia, more than visitors from any other country, and that the market would be worth $7.4 billion by 2020.
Rudd said that Tasmania's "clean, green, and blue" reputation appealed to tourists from the world's largest country.
But he warned that Australia needed more Chinese-language speakers and a greater understanding of Chinese culture.
"If you think mum's home-baked meat pie is the way through, think again," he said.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
This must be a joke
No, the real joke is...
strange comments
It's arguable :(
mixing the subject
Hmmm
Yes... speaking of clowns, keep counting Corolla's Dick and leave the serious stuff to those who can see past the politics.
Ooh and have you found that page for HC yet.
What do the coaltion clowns have to offer here? A $30+ billion taxpayer funded disaster with 25mbps download speeds not much better than we get on ADSL2+. Upload speeds so embarrassing they didn't even cover that topic in their plan which looks like it was written up by a bunch of retarded chimpanzees... or Abbott himself.
Yes, I can see why the most feverish of coaltion supporters would go out of their way to defend this plan, they make it a point to be ill-informed so it is understandable but anyone with an ounce of knowledge on this subject knows better. Not many can justify the $30+ billion price tag for such a poorly thought out policy either.
Really!
Yes, really. If you cant understand why people would find faster speeds preferable when planning a holiday then there really isn't much else to say. All else being equal what do you think they are going to pick.
Have you ever travelled?
This is beyond comical, well into delusional.
What I find comical is your inability to comprehend what I have said. It's a pretty simple and straight forward concept to understand too.
Fancy...
BB Availability does matter
HC
"A $30+ billion taxpayer funded disaster"
Because FttN would be a government initiative and such initiatives are always lazy, mismanaged and wasteful (as claimed many times by the anti-NBN FUDsters) using their logic, MT's plan must therefore surely blow out to $60B or $80B, don't you think?
"Yes, I can see why the most feverish of coaltion supporters would go out of their way to defend this plan"
You would think so, but personally I haven't seen too many actually doing so (as even them and their coalition emblazoned cleaning cloth are unable to polish such a turd). So they are simply continuing the old trusty... the NBN will be a white elephant, slow roll out...
*rolls eyes*
Sure.
"don't you think?"
Possibly. Actually tbh it wouldn't surprise me since infrastructure is not really the coalitions thing after all, so cost blowouts are likely due to their lack of experience rolling out telecommunications networks.
"You would think so, but personally I haven't seen too many actually doing so"
Well yes that is true I'm guessing most are hiding from embarrassment so far but if the coalition win I think it will become more apparent either way...
"NBN will be a white elephant"
Of course if the coalition win they will redefine what the NBN is so it will be a self fulfilling prophecy here :-)
The argument is getting idiotic
Heaven forbid that users should should pay for what they use. And what business person on holiday actually needs 1Gb to check on their business back home? What are they actually doing to use that much bandwidth?
Wireless is all that's needed.
Keeping in mind our politician's records on none-core & written in blood heat of the moment policies what are we likely to get from either party?
In that vein lets take a simple analogy:
1/. A national mobile phone network for approx $43B that's already underway.
or...
2/. A National roll out of walkie-talkies for approx $30B claimed to be faster & cheaper (if & when Telstra & Murdoch tweak it to their taste).