Chromebook wars: Pixel vs. Samsung Series 5 550

Chromebook wars: Pixel vs. Samsung Series 5 550

Summary: Is the new Chromebook Pixel better than the previously best-equipped Chromebook, the Samsung Series 5 550? Of course, but is it $850 better?

SHARE:

On my test machine table, I have Google's brand new Chromebook Pixel. Beside it, I have what had been the fastest Chromebook before it, the Samsung Series 5 550 Chromebook. Is the Pixel better? Yes. No question about it. But, here's the real question: Is it $850 better?

Chromebooks
With its machined metal case and sharper, brighter display, there's no question that the Pixel looks better than the Samsung Series 5 550. (Credit: ZDNet)

That's not a mistake. The Pixel lists for $1,299. Some people are still reeling from Chromebook Pixel sticker shock.  The Samsung Series 5 550 costs just $449. Yow! All that for a Chrome OS-based laptop which just has the Chrome Web browser running on top of an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution.

Some people are convinced that there's no way that anyone will buy a Pixel. I find it hard to believe myself so I decide to compare and contrast my Samsung S5 550 with the Pixel to see if I could justify the Pixel's price tag.

Chromebook Pixel hands on (photos)

So, let's start with the hardware. The 550 comes with a dual-core Intel Celeron_867 processor running at 1.3GHz. It includes 4 GB of RAM, a 16-GB solid state drive (SSD) and a 12.85-inch screen powered by Intel HD Graphics. The 550 also includes 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-FI, Bluetooth, a Gigabit Ethernet port, an HD camera, two USB 2.0 ports, a 4-in-1 memory card slot, and a DisplayPort for external monitors. That's not much in the way of system resources, but you don't need a lot for Chrome OS. I've used mine for months and I've never felt any lack of power.

The Pixel is a much more powerful machine. For a CPU it uses is a 1.8GHz Intel Core i5 processor, For memory, it has 4 GBs of RAM and a 32-GB SSD for storage. Its display, at 12.85-inches features 2560 x 1700 resolution and 239 pixels per inch, is much more impressive than the 550. It also comes with 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-FI, an HD camera, a pair of USB 2.0 ports, a 2-in-1 SD/MMC card reader; and DisplayPort. The one thing that the 550 has that the Pixel doesn't, is a Gigabit Ethernet port.

The Pixel certainly feels faster. To see how the Pixel's higher processor power manifested itself objectively, I threw the most popular Web browser benchmarking tests at both machines.

I started with SunSpider JavaScript 0.9.1, the grand-daddy of JavaScript benchmarks. On SunSpider, where lower results are better, the Pixel wasn't quite twice as fast as the 550. The Pixel scored 480.4-milliseconds to the 550's 776.3-milliseconds.

Next, I tried the pair on Google's latest Web-browser benchmark, Octane. This test is based on Google's earlier V8 test suite. Like SunSpider, it measures JavaScript performance. With this test, higher is better. Once again, the Pixel, with a score of 11,846 was almost twice as fast as the Samsung with its 5,585 score.

Moving along, I tried the two with the FutureMark's vendor-neutral Peacekeeper. Like the others, this test measures JavaScript performance, but it also evaluates HTML5 performance. On Peacekeeper where higher is better, Pixel was, once again much faster than the 550 with a score of 3,753 to 2,142.

On the Mozilla/Firefox Kraken 1.1 benchmark, where lower scores are better, guess what happened? Yes, that's right, Pixel won again. But this time it was more than twice as fast as the 550 with a result of 2,265.5-milliseconds to 4,962.4-milliseconds.

Last, but not least, I tested both on RoboHornet, the newest Web browser benchmark. In this test, higher scores are better, and while the Pixel won comfortably, it didn't blow away the 550 as it had on the other tests, with a final score of 120.68 to 80.61.

For battery life, I found that the Samsung Series 5 550 did better than the Pixel. My 550 managed to last for almost six hours with a single charge. The Pixel came in at just over five hours.

So, if all you were going to judge the two only on strictly specifications, the Pixel is the clear winner... but a winner that you'd pay $850 more for? I don't think so! But, wait, there's more.

The Samsung Series 5 550 is a fine, inexpensive laptop. It feels good and it works well. The Pixel on the other hand, with its machined aluminum exterior, is down-right pretty. It's one of the few laptops I've seen outside of an Apple Store that's actually attractive.

It's beauty isn't just cover deep. The screen is as good, if not better, than the Retina display on a 13-inch MacBook Pro. At first, I didn't think it would make a big difference to me. Then I set the Pixel right next to the 550. Wow. What a difference! It was like seeing a beat-up VW bug next to a 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL-Class. OK, so for work purposes, I can get by with my 550, but again, and with feeling, wow.

The Pixel's screen is a touchscreen, but given its looks, I'd rather not touch it. Fortunately, the broad, sensitive touchpad and the well-spaced keyboard, lets me use the computer without any need to use the touchscreen.

As far as the operating system and application functionality is concerned, the two Chromebooks are identical. They both run Chrome OS -- what else could they? If you like Chrome OS, as I do, you'll love the Pixel for its other features. But, as far as what you can do with one, there's nothing fundamentally you can do with the Pixel that you can't do with the Samsung's $249 ARM-powered Chromebook.

The Pixel does come with one extra, added feature though, besides its good looks, that may influence some buyers. It comes with a terabyte of free Google Drive cloud storage for three years. At $49.99 a month that's an $1.800 value. Hmmm...

OK, so no, in and of itself, the Pixel is not worth $850 more than the Samsung Series 5 550, but if you need serious cloud-storage -- I mean if you want to move all your small business' files to the cloud -- then the Pixel is actually a bargain. You'd pay $499 more over those three years for that same storage.

So, while for most Chromebook users, the Pixel, despite its great looks, isn't worth the money. But if you're ready to use Google Drive for most of your storage needs, then yes, the Pixel is actually a bargain. Who knew?

Related Stories:

Topics: Laptops, Browser, Google, Hardware, Linux, Samsung

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

73 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • the pixel does not look better

    The samsung shows less light bloom and more detail, even if the pixel shows ramped up color on its display. That photo makex the pixel's TN panel look worse than it is.

    Then give it a new name afterward. "Pixel" is too lame...
    HypnoToad72
    • It would look pretty good running W8

      The Pixel can run Mint via SeaBIOS. I would assume that means it can run W8. Has anyone even tried?

      And if you want, you can install Chrome on your W8 desktop and have your Chromebook back.

      All of a sudden, it looks not too shabby.
      x I'm tc
      • Re: It would look pretty good running W8

        But it's not Windows 8 Hardware Certified. That means it lacks the myriad of security precautions to ensure that your Windows 8 installation is not immediately infested with all kinds of dangerous malware.

        Putting Windows on this is just opening yourself up to a world of hurt.
        ldo17
        • I assume you're being sacrastic

          But, of course, W8 is fantastically secure even on older hardware.

          Which begs the question, has anyone actually tried to run W8 on this laptop? With the exception of the small storage, it might be a best-in-class ultrabook.
          x I'm tc
          • Re: W8 is fantastically secure even on older hardware.

            I'm sure that's fantastically true.
            ldo17
  • Chrome book has not reason to exist.

    It doesn't matter how much it costs $199 or $1500, Chrome book is a useless device.
    Browsers are free these days and no one should pay a penny to line Google's pocket with cash.
    Owlll1net
    • My Chromebook is free

      I own an Acer Chromeboook C7. It cost $200 but it came with 100 GB of Google Drive storage free for 2 years. On Box 100 GB cost $100 /Year.
      Make your own Maths, I got it for free. The same Acer model with installed Windows costs $349 ( Windows 7).

      All in all, the Acer Chromebook save me $349 ( 4 GB)
      This said, it can do as much as my Windows laptop does. In fact, I stop using my Dell Windows laptop since I have my Chromebook.
      I can do everything I need with my Chromebook. I can find web applications replacing all my Windows legacy applications. It is cheap, light, fast, secure, maintenance free, no windows bloatware, and constantly update. It requires less CPU and less RAM even though there are more and more Native Client Applications.
      oldman60
      • Your math is rubbish

        I can by 2 cheap SD card (100GB) fo $50 and will last for 5 years. I have my cloud in my pocket, no need to pay for data.

        Buy an AMD Windows laptop for $299 and I could do anything and everything.

        Your logic is flawed.
        Owlll1net
        • Let it go...

          Dude, you really are ignorant when it comes to technology trends, or your fear keeps you from accepting new technology. Just because you find it useless, others do not. You need to realize that YOUR thoughts are not of others for the most part. Just let it go, you'll be much happier.
          NickA55
          • It's a google hate thing

            No logic or sense to it. It would be funny if it wasn't so boring.
            Little Old Man
          • SJVN is an MS hater, what is your point?

            There is nothing logical about spending $250 to get a 'browser'. If it was boring, why are you reading Zdnet and the 'boring' talk back.
            Owlll1net
          • You do get more than a browser

            you get a computer, browser, and cloud storage that expires in three years, unless you cough more money.

            Is it a good buy? For my style of computing, no. For someone else, possibly, but right now that market seems very small.
            Cynical99
          • Ok....

            You get a computer but what can you actually do that is *NOT* web based?
            Gisabun
          • How do you run ie?!

            Out of thin air?!
            Browsers need powerful machines to run all sort of things, from silver light sites to state of the art HTML5.
            AleMartin
        • $299 > $200

          You AMD still cost more than my $200 ACER. Could you collaborate in real-time with worldwide users with your SSD card ? Google Drive is more than SSD in your pocket. You can´t share your SSD or collaborate in real-time on your documents. Indeed, you can access your SSD every where, every time but not from every devices. Moreover what happen if your loose your SSD? What if your SSD is damaged? What happen if you wash your SSD? Please could you answer Mister Parrot.

          All in all, your SSD still cost $349 since you have to add $50.
          oldman60
          • Most Wndows laptops comes with 500GB harddrive

            Anybody with a sound mind will backup their data. And no one need a cloud to backup. A 3 TB harddrive cost less that $99.

            Windows 8 has Office 365 and Office 13, I can collabrate with Lync or Skype.

            Google apps are a joke. Go out more often my friend.
            Owlll1net
          • Only one flaw

            Only one flaw in your argument on backups. Cloud storage is offsite. The External drive is On Site. Should the ultimate disaster strike, such as a fire that destroys your residence, the external drive won't do you much good, where the cloud will still have your data intact.

            On the other hand, read the Cloud user agreement carefully. I believe you'll find that anything you put out there in the cloud can be turned over to government authorities without even telling you. So, if you have something you'd rather not give to the local authorities, don't put it out there on the Cloud.

            Yes, Google apps are a Joke!
            Cynical99
          • Obsessive stupidity

            on full display
            D.T.Long
          • And that was for Owlll1net ...

            who really needs to get out more. The whole spectacle is painful to watch.
            D.T.Long
          • DT Long, call CloggedBottom

            If you don't have a partner to go out, give a call to Cloggedbottom. :-)
            Owlll1net