Samsung accused of sexual discrimination at China plant
Summary: The South Korean firm is facing allegations from a labor rights group that its hiring practices violated Chinese law, after it put up a recruitment poster for female workers without communicable diseases.
South Korea's Samsung has come under renewed fire for its labor policies in China, following accusations of illegal discrimination in its hiring practices in its China factories.
Rights group China Labor Watch (CLW) announced on Monday that it had photographed a recruitment poster for new roles at its 6,000-strong plant on August 29, that required applicants "be female and not possess any type of communicable disease".
It claimed those requirements were illegal under Chinese labor and employment law.
CLW pointed out the poster at the Tianjin Samsung Telecom Technology plant violated article 12 of the Labor Law, which states: "Labourers shall not be discriminated against in employment, regardless of their ethnic community, race, sex, or religious belief."
The group added Samsung was also violating article 30 of the Employment Promotion Law, which states: "No employment unit, when recruiting employees, shall refuse to employ a job candidate on the basis that he/she is a carrier of any infectious pathogen".
CLW noted that the plant was managed by Samsung and 90 percent owned by the firm.
"It is impossible that Samsung does not know about the illegal hiring practices at its factory. Thus, we can only conclude that Samsung, in their previous statements, has being lying to the public about the lawful treatment of its workers," the group added.
The news comes just days after the group issued a statement accusing Samsung of "inhumane" treatment of workers, including unpaid work and physical abuse at its plants in China.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Where are the people who asked for bans ....
Kardashian Kim
Yes. They did. Mystery solved.
This is the second contentious issue is a week or two . . .
PR All Around
timing? (who stands to benefit the most - is a new iPhone being released atm ;-));
are we talking about a single factory or a a proven case of several factories? (a manager of a single factory could be a sexist, racist, whatever and get away with it...you can't make the leap of "It is impossible that Samsung does not know about the illegal hiring practices at its factory.";
is it even true? (how many times have we read, and seen on CNN, a story that was completely fabricated or one that relied on popular misconceptions to twist a relatively simple issue into one that involves conspiracies, etc.)
I'm sure there are several other logical questions people should be asking themselves but most don't because people want to be entertained; and what entertains more than a juicy bit of gossip?