CommBank core overhaul on track

CommBank core overhaul on track

Summary: The Commonwealth Bank of Australia's core banking project is progressing on track and on time, according to SAP's local head Tim Ebbeck.

SHARE:
TOPICS: SAP, Banking
6

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia's core banking project is progressing on track and on time, according to SAP's local head Tim Ebbeck.

Tim Ebbeck
(Credit: SAP)

"On time, on budget and on track for value delivery," he said of the project that will have SAP's system at its core. "Six months after they signed a contract with us they had their first product out on the new core banking platform," he said. "Not talking about it, not designing it, not architecting it. Out. Working." According to Ebbeck many people didn't seem to realise how far ahead Commonwealth Bank was with the project.

It had gone so smoothly that many didn't know a changeover had occurred, according to Ebbeck. "The people actually using this don't know it's actually the new integrated core banking system," he said. "There's actually products out there running today on that new platform and it's not just in one part of the business isolated over here — it's part of their core offering."

So far, the Commonwealth Bank has publicly announced the launch of term deposit products and a new front for NetBank — although that triumph was dulled slightly by the NetBank issues the bank dealt with at the end of the financial year. Commonwealth Bank CIO Michael Harte has said that the bank hopes to get the whole core banking program done in three and a half years, angling to gain a first mover advantage.

Fittingly then, Commonwealth Bank was the first to announce its decision to modernise the banking systems which sit at the core of its business. National Australia Bank has also announced plans, but after embarking on phase one of the project — creating a system for its new online bank with Oracle — the bank hasn't gone public with the next step.

NAB had brought in consultants Ernst & Young to track the progress of the project and there were reports that the report the firm had given was not positive. However, a spokesperson for the bank said the check was routine and that the project is moving to plan.

Yet Commonwealth Bank won't wait for banks to catch up. "It's all right to talk about a platform, it's another to actually deliver one," Ebbeck said. "I know for a fact that Commonwealth Bank is actually doing so."

Ebbeck feels confident enough about how the project is going to take on another banking customer for the same type of work.

"If you'd asked me this question 12 months ago, my honest answer would have been that I wouldn't do another one right now. I don't think it would be right for SAP and I don't think it would be right for either customer. I don't think that's true any longer," he said.

Westpac and the Australia and New Zealand Banking group are yet to decide which core banking system they will run with when they decide to upgrade, although ANZ has said that will be a while coming in Australia.

Ebbeck believes the Commonwealth Bank experience is an ace in SAP's pocket. "I'd contend that Commonwealth Bank is a case study in business transformation globally," he said. "I'd never seen a project run as well and efficiently with an eye to value delivery as distinct to just specification delivery."

Topics: SAP, Banking

Suzanne Tindal

About Suzanne Tindal

Suzanne Tindal cut her teeth at ZDNet.com.au as the site's telecommunications reporter, a role that saw her break some of the biggest stories associated with the National Broadband Network process. She then turned her attention to all matters in government and corporate ICT circles. Now she's taking on the whole gamut as news editor for the site.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

6 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • On track?

    More double speak from SAP and CBA! It's only on track beacause all the critical parts have been de-scoped. SAP is simply not a Banking solution and the differences between a factory/wharehouse and a Bank are very evident.
    Retirement of legacy systems is the guage of how well this program is tracking.
    anonymous
  • Bravo for real understanding

    Thanks for the real journalism.
    Projects are deliberately run slow and fat to maximise consultant profits.
    "success" is achieved by lowereing the bar, not by software achievement.
    The "project" model should be cast from alll sensible IT builds. Empower your IT division with a prioritised program of work and resource them properly and thety will achive far more than the consultants ever will!
    anonymous
  • Can't argue that

    So why does everyone keep using these consultants? Why does this country keep wasting half it's IT budget on these dodgy sales consultants from the US? Am I missing something here?
    anonymous
  • They sell to the board.......

    Large consultancies sell to the board, the IT department doesn't really come into it.

    Promises are made at a high level to the board who take them on at face value, after all would the senior leadership of SAP, IBM, Accenture et al. deceive?

    Then when things go wrong the board see complaints and warnings from their own business and IT people as criticism of themselves, which they cannot accept.

    The next step is to remove the offenders for the crime of being unable to adapt to the new way - when generally all they want to do is have working systems.

    Then in come replacements who are "on-board with change", the stories are spun and success is reported. Salesmen get their commissions, the board get their fees and the consultants are retained to sort out the mess they have created.

    I suppose at some level it would be nice to actually deliver something of worth, but failing that having a model that perpetuates exhorbitant fees comes in a good second.....
    anonymous
  • Why so cynical?

    Is it so hard to imagine that a large IT project could be on track?
    I suspect a lot of problems in big projects are due to nay-sayers like the above posters trying to death ride the project, more than the consultants whose pride and reputation are at stake.
    anonymous
  • CBA and SAP

    You know the definition of a consultant - someone who borrows your watch to tell you the time.
    anonymous