Adrian Kingsley-Hughes
Yes
No
Matthew Miller
Best Argument: No
Audience Favored: No (63%)
Closing Statements
The future of the e-reader is the tablet
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes
I will concede that the e-ink screens on e-readers are nice -- very nice, and so pleasant on the eyes -- replicating the paper experience is, in my opinion, a step back. Modern displays, in particular the high-pixel-density 'retina' displays, are so crisp and clear that they ideal for even extended bouts of reading.
While there's no doubt a case for standalone e-readers--for the mainstream market the trend is moving away from standalone devices and towards convergence devices that bring multiple functions into a single device and is easy to carry around. Not only is this cheaper -- one device costs less than multiple devices -- but a single device is easier to manage and carry around.
There's still a place for e-books
Matthew Miller
I work all day on a mainstream display so it is refreshing to go to an e-reader for book reading and get away from a machine that distracts me with email, social network updates, web browsing, gaming, and other unnecessary annoyances. I actually think there is a lot more potential for growth in the e-reader market as many people still read paper books and have yet to transition to electronic form. If Amazon and Barnes & Noble start giving away e-readers they may speed up the adoption of e-books and grow the market. People still try to figure out if there is a place in their lives for tablets.
And the winner is...
Rachel King
This was actually a very hard decision for me to make as I think both gentlemen made some solid points. After racking my brain over this issue for a considerable time, I ended up leaning towards the niche argument, thus giving the win this week to Matt Miller.
But first let me say that there were definitely several issues on which I agreed strongly with Adrian. For one, I’m a minimalist. So I prefer buying, owning, and carrying around as few electronic devices as possible. I have owned Nook e-readers in the past, but I have consolidated and typically only read on my iPad 2 and smartphone now. It also just gets too expensive to buy (and later upgrade) more gadgets all of the time.
However, I still find the reading experience -- especially outdoors -- to be far, far better on electronic-ink displays than on virtually any tablet or smartphone with a color display.
That said, there are still a few spots where technology hasn’t caught up -- although that’s not to say it won’t within the next few years, if not sooner.
So there are some categories, such as e-readers and digital cameras, where it is still difficult to defend the consolidation argument still. For example, I still own a point-and-shoot camera (the Canon PowerShot S100) because it’s incredibly portable and snaps high-quality photos...while my Samsung Galaxy Nexus just doesn’t.
As the technology to make them advances and becomes more affordable, e-book readers will continue to drop in price, making them more appealing to consumers who don’t care or want all of the features that come with a more expensive tablet.
Furthermore, being that they are cheaper to produce and sell, e-readers could have a lot of potential in developing markets. While I don’t have figures for this, I would predict that e-readers could have some more educational use cases too and be distributed to students much like low-cost laptops.
Overall, while it will be downsized considerably in comparison to what it was during the last few years, I believe the dedicated e-reader segment can still exist as a niche market.
Talkback
Do They Have e-Ink Tablets?
Key word in title: "driving"
Different devices
Why would one need a dedicated e-reader when...
Personally, my Android phone has become my emergency book collection (much nicer than reading magazines in doctor's offices). A lot of great public domain books have been published over the last three millennia or so (currently, I'm working on Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations").
It's not just functionality that matters
Your use of the word "emergency" says it all.
Over time the two devices will converge.
The problem I have with e-readers in general is unlike a physical book you don't own the ebook, you just have a license to read them and that license can be revoked at any time. Something I'm not comfortable with considering the cost of physical books and ebooks are nearly the same and in some instances physical books are actually cheaper.
When was the last time your e-book licenses were checked?
How about lending that e-book
The argument is that tablets will replace ebooks
That said, I have over 100 books on my ereader and I haven't paid cent one for them. They are all in the public domain. Most of them are classics that I have never felt the need to buy simply because I don't want to lay down my cash for a book I may not want, and some of the classics I've read I'm glad I didn't pay for.
As for borrowing, my Kobo Touch is capable of downloading content from our public library. In other words I can borrow "books" without having to worry about carting home the physical book. There is a time limit to read the book before it locks, but there was always a time limit with borrowing books. I've paid my share of fines to the library.
I prefer my ereader because it is easier on my eyes and I can sit for longer periods reading than I can looking at a back lit screen. I don't have to worry about if it's too bright out to read, not like my friends who have to try and shade their smart phone screens to read (usually text messages).
Just for the record, Kobo Touch can access the internet through Wi-Fi but it is not a good experience but it does provide Sudoku for the times I don't feel like reading, and I may be addicted to that.