Ed Bott
Robin Harris
Opening Statements
A recipe for success
Ed Bott: Apple has been kicking ass in the high-end portable PC market over the last couple years. The MacBook Air has become deservedly popular for its exquisite engineering. But that’s all about to change. The pieces are finally clicking together for PC OEMs to make small, light, great-looking portable PCs at commodity prices. That is historically when the Apple versus Wintel battles get interesting. In this economy price is more of an issue than ever, and economies of scale should drive the price of ultrabooks down quickly.
I predict ultrabooks will be a big hit with PC buyers who like the MacBook Air form factor but prefer Windows to OS X. The combination of genuinely interesting hardware and a mature, smoother, more reliable Windows should narrow or even erase the design gap between Apple’s MacBook Air and those of the top Wintel OEMs. Historically, that’s a recipe for success.
Another profitless bit of me-too-ism
Robin Harris: Apple has re-defined music players, smart phones, tablet computers and, with the MacBook Air, the notebook computer. They've also gobbled up the lion's share of the profits and will do so again in Ultrabooks.Apple dominates over-$1,000 PC revenue with a 90% share. They dominate tablets likewise. The last 2 MacBook Air models have been a huge hit. Apple's strategy is to win profits, not volume.
Now, aided by an Intel war chest estimated at $300-$500 million, the PC vendors are striking back with the same tired "cheaper, not better" strategy that lost them the profitable markets segments in high-end PCs. It's another profitless bit of me-too-ism by the 20th century anachronism known as Wintel.
Wintel will lose the Ultrabook battle.
The Rebuttal
Closing Statements
It’s about time
Ed Bott
Four years ago, when Apple introduced the MacBook Air, it cost a fortune and it got mostly terrible reviews. It took Apple several more years to get it right, thanks mostly to improvements in processor and chipset design by ... Intel.
It's taken Intel's Windows customers a bit longer to get their act together, but the Ultrabook category represents an impressive step in the right direction: a commodity product that enables hardware makers to create small, light, powerful PCs that are optimized to run Windows.
I have no doubt that Apple will continue to make huge profits by selling its small notebook as a luxury item to the top of the market.
I also have no doubt that Ultrabook prices will continue to drop, because that's what the Wintel ecosystem does best.
Thankfully, this year Windows users will finally have a range of choices in an obviously desirable form factor. That's what competition is about.
A different view of win
Robin Harris
Many have a different view of "win" than I do. PCs and Ultrabooks are low-profit losers. The Wintel companies chasing the Ultrabook market - really, the MacBook Air market - can't win from a business perspective.
Manufacturers that ship a lot of product and eke out a small profit can't innovate fast enough. Ed conceded the point: "For five years, the Wintel ecosystem has been working on miniaturizing the components that make up an Ultrabook."
Just as Apple is the #1 supplier of all-in-one systems - the iMac - and surely the most profitable, it is clear that they will remain the #1 supplier of Ultrabook-class notebooks. And as in smartphones, they will win the lion's share of the profits, enabling continued investment and innovation that Wintel can only dream about.
That's a win in my book.
Price matters
Jason Hiner
This one was almost a draw. Of course, we don't do draws in the Great Debate. Robin is right that the Ultrabook movement hasn't really shown us a whole lot of innovation so far. It's mostly a lot of uninspired MacBook Air knock-offs.
Still, price does matter and I agree with Ed that the Ultrabook vendors are going to aggressively drop the price of their laptops in 2012 and undercut Apple. That will leave the high end of the market (and most of the profits) to Apple, while putting Ultrabooks in the hands of a lot more buyers. So, when we ask who wins this market, it depends on how we define winning.
I'm going to side with the majority of consumers, who will ultimately get a much better laptop than their last one when they buy an Ultrabook for under $1,000. That means Ed gets the nod.
More from "The Great Debate"
Wintel will catch and exceed Apple. Apples tactic of everyone will be happy with our limited product line is ass nine. I'm sorry but I will never buy an Apple product....EVER!
@rob.sharp@...
Yeah, well, that's how they manage to reduce the price of their systems and still stay profitable. Every time a user "clicks and buys" on one of those pieces of bloatware the software vendor makes a few bucks, the distributor makes a few bucks, and the hardware vendor that shipped the system with the bloat installed gets a few bucks. Compare that to Apple - you basically get to pay a higher price for less 3rd party bloatware and more *ahem* apple experience.
Some of that "bloatware" is actually practical. I like Lenovo's security suite, including their fingerprint software. I love the fact that most reputable vendors have some kind of backup included on top of MS's shadow copy, including having the user pop in a few DVD's the first time they start up the system. I believe Apple moved their "backup" service to the cloud, i.e. your system disks (?) are in your i-tune account. Kinda silly if you ask me, but anyhoo. I guess it saves Apple $1.50 for every user rather than having to burn the discs. Perhaps their version of "premium" services and devices is slowly...."evolving"?!
And just how do Ultrabook makers provide their system backups? Don't you have to burn it to DVDs? Which means, for UltraBook owners, they, too, need to buy an external drive. Or burn the backup to a thumb drive. Which they have to buy.
While I'm here, the question "Can Wintel win..." needs a goal defined. As Robin said, if it is numbers, Wintel will win. If is profits, Apple will win. Since I'd rather have profits than numbers, I vote "No."
I don't have an ultrabook, but I have an HP Pavilion dm1 that has no optical drive and I had an Acer Aspire1 netbook (obviously with no optical drive) and both systems' recovery software allowed to create recovery media to a thumbdrive as well as DVD.
I personally chose DVD with my USB burner plugged in as I think DVDs are more reliable than thumbdrive for long term storage, but I understand that not everybody's got a USB burner.
I'm not for ultrabooks even if my reply seems to support it. I'm for the small form factor but not at the price ultrabooks are selling. The HP Pavilion dm1 I've got is a small form factor with long battery life even though it's not as thin as an ultrabook and it's got a real 640Gig hard drive instead of an SSD, but the price is right!
Based on history, I believe the answer to (1) is "yes". As in the "regular" laptop market, there are people who are locked into Windows and don't care about OS X and will gladly pay less for an Ultrabook that gives them the minimum features and capabilities they need.
Also based on history, I believe the answer to (2) is "no". Also as in the laptop market, the large number of competitors will quickly drive the Ultrabook into becoming a commodity with vanishing profit margins.
Which raises question 3 - should Apple be worried? Definitely no. There's no reason to believe their view of the Ultrabook will be any different than their view of the laptop - let the competitors sell as many of them as they want at insufficient prices.
I fully agree...and further suggest that the debate be refined by this distinction.
The original question is similar to this one - with Ford producing so many cars - will Mercedes get out of business? Will Mercedes win over Ford's customers? No and no. In any market there is a place for high end / high profit, and low end / low profit products. Companies on the both ends of the specter can struggle if they make mistakes.
Personally I will never buy an Apple product if i can help it, but tastes differ.
It's been noted that prototypes of an ARM based MacBook Air have existed. That implies that traditional OS X programs can run on the ARM architecture platform.
Therefore a future ARM based MBA with advances in CPU and GPU intergrated power could offer a significant advantage over an Intel x86 class CPU.
Secondly, I believe a merger of OS X and iOS is far easier than a merger between legacy Windows apps with the Win 8 platform (but that opinion is just that, an opinion. I wouldn't be surprised that I was proven wrong on that.) However, the Wintel platform must still prove it can compete on performance and battery charge duration characteristics in a mobile ultrabook class environment.
Finally, Apple, during the last 12 years or so, has demonstrated an ability to innovate advanced design concepts whereas the Wintel ecosystem has continuously shown only a half-backed reactionary desire to copy Apple products. (The Android ecosystem has copied Apple initiatives much, MUCH better than its Windows counterparts.) I would look to and expect Apple to continuously advance the "ultrabook" computer concept further with it's MacBook Air line of mobile computers than the Wintel consortium's ability to advance their ultrabook class of laptops can.
And I am just talking about the x86 based versions. The Samsung Slate XE700 has shown that tablets don't have to limit CPU power, but they do not fulfil the stricter power requirements of Win8 nor do they provide the always on Connected Standby state.
When Win8 hits, I would expect there will be plenty of tablet+keyboard candidates to be used to replace laptops come hardware refresh. Some will stick with laptops, but most will make the small jump.
I vote that Ultrabooks will be irrelevant.
As popular as MAC OS X products are, there's a simple financial reason why numbers are still tiny compared to Windows hardware sales. This will carry forward to Ultrabooks which will probably cut corners but be a hell of a lot cheaper.
I'm never gonna double the price I'm ready to pay to have something a few millimeters thinner.
when u pay over 1k for a ultrabook, the usefulness factor is probably the most important buy factor
I like the previous poster who pointed out the difference between a unorganized federation of companies attaining market share, ala Android, and making profit. Even with Android only Samsung is making any money and they point to the fact that they offer a broad bench of products, not just Android devices.
So Winarmtel might collectively attain market share (though the tablet market condition seems to indicate otherwise) but "win" is hardly what I would call losing money at the expense of market share. Less face it, the only company really making money with Wintel PCs is Microsoft [edit to add] and Intel (why else the continued revolving door of Wintel PC makers?). At some point hardware makers should see this as a problem to be solved.
Joe
So, someone please explain. I understand the products are built well. They look cool/etc. Get over that. I'm asking functionally, why does anyone think these are better.
Her computer came preloaded with a pile of games that crapped out after three plays. She doesn't know whether to buy them or get rid of them.
She's saddled with Internet Exploder, and all kinds of protectionware, search toolbars, and crap.
Windows 7 on its own is a pretty nice OS. But not after the computer vendor weights it down with all their crap.
Meanwhile, the Macbook I got has exactly what the showcase floor models suggest its got... other than what I added from the Apple App Store. It has no crapware, no frightening antivirus warnings from three different vendors whose junk was preloaded. It does have iLife, which is very, very useful, and yes, "just works." And my Safari isn't loaded down with eight hundred toolbars.
Apple is going to do what Apple is going to do ... they do not worry about the industry (or their customers for that matter). They just work on creating the most usable and capable devices they can.
The Windows side does what the windows side always does ... they basically say me too, and they copy the features of Mac OS X and Linux they feel their customers want.
To tell you the truth my bet to the future of Ultrabooks in the long term is chrome and cloud computing initiatives. Especially with the ever expanding abilities of cloud based applications like Google Docs.
That's my 2-cents for all it's worth.
What they still don't seem to get, a GOOD part of the recent success of Apple's MacBook has "Intel"s Core iX series written ALL over it!
My apologies if you did NOT post this comment intentionally.
How many times are you going to repeat your original post, Geekygirl68?Does running up the vote count mean that much to you? I find your repeated post somewhat amusing. I'm pretty sure everyone that wanted to read your comments did so 23 hours ago. Your original comments were acceptable if standard fair but really - did you need to repeat them?
Currently one can buy a basic notebook with a 15" screen, i3 processor, 4 Gb memory, and a 320 Gb hard drive for about $400, so you would think you can get something in a netbookish size for about this, but nooo.... For $400, you are looking at an underpowered Brazos or Ion/Atom processor. The closest thing that combines a smallish size with good specs at a good enough price is the ~$500 Toshiba Satellite L735-S3350, but that weighs almost 5 lbs and is fairly thickish at about 1.5" thick. Swap out the hard drive with an SSD for about $200, and you have reasonable fast ultracompact notebook for $700. But for $300 more, you can get an MacBook Air that's a lot slimmer, lighter, a little bit faster, and with a higher resolution screen.
Basically the MacBook Air is the ultraportable notebook version of the iPad: if you come up with something comparable with about the same price -- or worse, higher -- it will fail like the HP TouchPad did. That means the current group of Ultrabooks are not going to fly. You would need the PC equivalent of a Kindle Fire or Nook -- something less powerful but still perfectly useable at about half the price of the Apple product -- to make serious headway. Basically something like a suped-up netbook that can be sold for no more than $500-600. Long live the netbook -- sorry Ultrabook.
Join the conversation!
Debate Event Reminders
The Great Debate Newsletter
With the Great Debate newsletter, you get a front-row seat to every argument until the final gavel falls.
Upcoming Debate
-
Can PC makers survive in a post PC world?
May 29, 2012 | 7:00 AM PDT
Add to Calendar




very interesting
frauen
It's Wintel Bro.
RE: Can Wintel win the Ultrabook market?
You mean how Microsoft is ditching Intel for ARM?
Meh, anything can happen now. I'm not making predictions.
RE: Can Wintel win the Ultrabook market?
Delusional Man is Delusional
That being said, Ed and Ultrabooks are the clear winners, without even needing the backfiring help of Robin Harris. The only thing Robin was missing was some retort about how wintel is failing because OSX Lion "grew" faster in its first 2 weeks than Windows 7....