Heather Clancy
David Gewirtz
Opening Statements
Safer than the status quo
Heather Clancy: Many SMBs have been playing Russian roulette with their data, opting for the most rudimentary storage and archiving procedures. Or none at all.
Cloud storage services are rewriting the status quo, with some research firms predicting a 26 percent growth in adoption over the next several years among the SMB set.
Cloud storage services are safer than the naysayers suggest, if managed properly. In fact, cloud storage services are helping many SMBs craft meaningful business continuity plans for the very first time. In many cases, these services are far more cost-effective than on-site solutions.
Cloud storage services also allow teams to get to important files from virtually anywhere, using a Web browser, smartphone, media tablet or desktop application. That is a big plus when it comes to mobility, business process innovation and the need to collaborate.
Is it safe for SMBs to use cloud services? Here’s the real question: Is it safe for them not to use them?
More from Heather Clancy:
Practice local backup
David Gewirtz: Cloud storage and cloud-based backups can be wonderful resources for individuals and small businesses. I use them myself.
The issue, though, is whether you should rely on them. Put another way, should you bet your business or your livelihood (or even your family's most cherished memories) solely -- solely -- on cloud-based storage and backup?
The answer to that is a resounding "NO!"
If you rely solely on a cloud service provider, you're putting all your eggs in one basket. Many cloud providers are still in early-stage funding. Many have changeable policies. Many charge so little, they're completely unresponsive to customers in trouble. Some simply just go out of business.
So my message to you is to consider cloud backup providers, but make them just one part of your strategy. Make sure you practice local backup as well.
Otherwise, you may be stuck in a cloud with no silver lining.
More from David Gewirtz:
The Rebuttal
Closing Statements
It just makes sense
Heather Clancy
There is no evidence to suggest cloud storage and backup services are less safe than local alternatives. That is especially true when you consider for many SMBs, the alternative has been a limited data management and archiving plan – due to the complexity and expense of many on-premise solutions.
Like another other technology investment -- whether it is on-premise or in the cloud -- a truly safe cloud backup plan must be backed up by a real business strategy and commitment.
Small businesses must do their diligence when selecting a cloud storage and backup provider. Look for real security (including encryption) and serious bandwidth support. Make sure the cloud provider has its own backup and disaster recovery plan for its servers – the servers on which your data will be housed. And check out the financial backing of the provider to make sure it has a long-term future.
But here is the crux of the matter: The cloud allows small businesses to get a grip on the value of their data and take steps to safeguard it and share it like never before.
The cloud is not safe
David Gewirtz
Heather is one of the IT authorities I respect most at ZDNet. I regularly read her columns, discover new and important things, and learn to think with a more informed perspective.
That said, and with all due respect to a favorite colleague, I have to tell you that not only is she wrong in this regard, she's dangerously wrong.
The cloud is not safe. First, the cloud isn't just one cloud. The cloud is made up of many different companies, with different infrastructures, agendas, skill sets, levels of funding, and degrees of dedication. Some cloud providers are very good, and some, quite frankly, are terrible.
It's not that you should avoid the cloud, it's that you shouldn't rely only on the cloud. Think about how important your company and your livelihood is, how important the livelihood and trust of all your employees is, and then take the small extra effort necessary to split your backups among different methodologies, mediums, and vendors.
A tiered backup strategy that divides your eggs among a number of baskets is the only truly responsible backup strategy.
Proceed with caution!
Josh Gingold
This is a difficult debate to score because the primary question, whether cloud storage and backup is safe, is perhaps a bit more complicated than it implies. In reality -- and I'm not copping out here -- cloud storage and backup may or may not be safe depending on your business and the inherent interdependencies that must always be considered.
At a basic level, yes, many cloud providers now offer more security and other measures than many if not most businesses are able to provide on-premise. In addition to security there are the issues of access, redundancy, scalability, and perhaps most of all, expertise. Cloud storage and backup solutions are purpose-built and providers expend a lot of resources making sure it's safe so they can win more customers.
For the most part, at least in my experience, the cloud is really very safe and actually a very good idea for storage and backup. However, the cloud also requires a certain degree of caution and therefore may be best as a "safeguard," as Heather says, as opposed to the only solution. For this reason, I must say "Not So Fast!" and agree with David Gewirtz. Now is not the time, as David says, "to bet your business or your livelihood...solely on cloud-based storage and backup."
So, at the very least, please proceed with caution.
More from "The Great Debate"
Not exactlly, I have a large degree of control on what happens on my local storage. I have no control over the service provider hiring a kid fresh out of school that makes a huge mistake or the hundreds of things that can go wrong.
And the moment one lease's it, as I recently read, there is no "total cost of ownership" any longer. No equity, no control - or any real control, you're delegating it to somebody who may or may not have individual interest in mind or in heart, because they are too busy thinking about their own survival (undercutting competition, which means corners get cut along the way...)
Never mind Terms of Service agreements... once lawyers become cheap then everybody can afford one and everybody will need one... see "undercutting competition" above for more...
"Most IT Support companies recommend the use of cloud hosting." I certainly wouldn't as a professional working in this field. It is anything but safe.
* and I doubt they asked every IT support company as well... that gets expensive, trying to remain ethical when agendas sound cooler...
It's the CIA Triad and I do wish people would stop touting it as a model for security. It simply isn't. It's just a bigger target than most.
What's a "CIA Triad", apart from the old song sung by Jefferson Airplane some 45 years ago?
Encypting files before backing them up to the cloud is an extra layer because you can't always trust the hoster to protect your data from itself.
I feel much safer doing my own archival and backup on my own physical media.
On the contrary, they surely are non-reliadble for sensitive/important files and documents, those I keep local only and they never escape my 1.5 TB FreeAgent GoFlex Portable HDD
You're trusting your sensitive/important files to a Seagate HDD??? Of course, you said you also share warez, so... yeah, those drives are 110% reliable.
When used responsibly, I think cloud storage is as safe as anything. It's up to the user to ensure security, though.
Unless you have a disaster plan that includes multiple physical copies stored in geographically diverse locations, your data is not going to be safer than cloud storage. If you're worried about security (and that's a separate issue than the safety of data from an integrity standpoint), there are methods to use that protect yourself there too. The combination of safety+security is sufficient for most personal and business application.
Short message to allow a long one . . .
Don't put all of your eggs in one basket. A cloud provider is one basket. They are susceptible to legal issues (see megaupload).
I agree with David.
I send my subversion changes directly to the cloud, but I also always keep a local copy.
You would have to have very rose-coloured glasses to rely on the cloud solely.
A single backup is good, 2 or more is better. Companies have been doing this for decades. At my work we have 2 backups onsite in 2 different building and a triple redundancy server backup. Media storage has become cheaper, faster and more reliable than ever it was in the past. Where's the problem?
Join the conversation!
Debate Event Reminders
The Great Debate Newsletter
With the Great Debate newsletter, you get a front-row seat to every argument until the final gavel falls.
Upcoming Debate
-
Can PC makers survive in a post PC world?
May 29, 2012 | 7:00 AM PDT
Add to Calendar




I don't understand why debate is necessary
A single backup is good, 2 or more is better. Companies have been doing this for decades. At my work we have 2 backups onsite in 2 different building and a triple redundancy server backup. Media storage has become cheaper, faster and more reliable than ever it was in the past. Where's the problem?
Blame government?
I'll show you mine if you show me yours
What's a "CIA Triad", apart from the old song sung by Jefferson Airplane some 45 years ago?
Most IT support companies?
* and I doubt they asked every IT support company as well... that gets expensive, trying to remain ethical when agendas sound cooler...
*BINGO*
And the moment one lease's it, as I recently read, there is no "total cost of ownership" any longer. No equity, no control - or any real control, you're delegating it to somebody who may or may not have individual interest in mind or in heart, because they are too busy thinking about their own survival (undercutting competition, which means corners get cut along the way...)
Never mind Terms of Service agreements... once lawyers become cheap then everybody can afford one and everybody will need one... see "undercutting competition" above for more...