Microsoft's next CEO: Is an insider Redmond's best bet?

Moderated by Larry Dignan | September 30, 2013 -- 07:00 GMT (00:00 PDT)

Summary: Steve Ballmer's successor will have to steer Microsoft through some rough seas ahead.

Robin Harris

Robin Harris

Yes

or

No

Ken Hess

Ken Hess

Best Argument: Yes

45%
55%

Audience Favored: No (55%)

The moderator has delivered a final verdict.

Opening Statements

Speed and wisdom needed

Robin Harris: Microsoft's almost 100,000 employees are a big ship that will take time to turn around. While Balmer's missed opportunities made Microsoft look dumb, they have a deep bench.

What Microsoft needs is an executive who knows who the most effective players are. Who understands where the company is strong - they design some pretty good hardware - and where they've gotten flabby, if they are to win in a mobile world.

No outsider would know this - and it would take them at least 18 months to find out. This insider has to to be willing to break many eggs and buck Ballmer's recent "everything to everybody" non-strategy. But the world's most profitable company can't afford a year or two of on-the-job training - and only a capable insider can move fast enough and wisely enough to ensure that Microsoft's best years are ahead. 

It's time for a Microsoft 2.0

Ken Hess: It's time for some new blood and a new perspective in Microsoft's lead position. This is a rare opportunity to bring someone in from the outside who has seen Microsoft, its successes and its failures, from an outside-in viewpoint. Because of Microsoft's unique position in the technology software market, this transition takes place at a major crossroad in its history and in its future.

Cloud computing, tablet computing, mobile computing, and SaaS offerings have been key areas where Microsoft has been perceived as lagging or slow to embrace. Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012 haven't seen the kind of adoption rates predicted, its Surface Tablet sales were disappointing compared to those of Apple and the ever-growing Android-based market.

For Microsoft to continue down its current path means doom for the company. To make the kinds of changes it needs to make, Microsoft will have to, in essence, reboot itself. It's time for a Microsoft Reformation, a Microsoft 2.0, if you will. 

Corporate cultures often become too inbred, too complacent, and too happy with past successes. Microsoft has awoken in a brave new world and wonders what has changed. What has changed most is how consumers and businesses want to use software and how they want to pay for it. A Microsoft insider, I'm afraid, will not adequately (pardon the pun) fill the bill.

Talkback

23 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Although I have voted "No", I don't really know the answer to this

    Large companies are tough to manage, and an insider's knowledge is valuable. But Microsoft has developed an unwelcome stubborn streak in the last year or two that has not served them well.

    Their determination to underserve desktop computing customers with a relatively poor mouse and keyboard experience; their stubbornness with respect to the XBox One's features and behaviour (only pulled back from once the damage was done.)

    They need fresh eyes that are more committed to the customer, and less stubborn about carrying out big visionary things that may not be all that visionary anyway (let's face it, if customers don't accept the way you want it to be, you can't call it a vision when the viewpoint does not catch on.)

    Can a less stubborn leader be found inside the company? I hope so.

    Microsoft has a lot of assets and a pretty strong leadership team. But they'd find an infusion of outside talent a big life-giving boost, I think. But boy, they would need to be a quick study.
    Mac_PC_FenceSitter
    Reply 19 Votes I'm for No
    • There are reasons Microsoft needs a clean slate (so to speak)

      Microsoft behaved badly under both Gates and Ballmer.

      This was part of the reason why Microsoft lost the trust of many consumers. Microsoft needs to be seen to be a changed company.

      Microsoft needs a new business model (selling software licences is yesteryear). It needs to embrace open-source, which in itself needs a new culture. Microsoft's mobile competitors all used open-source software in their browsers and OS kernels to become quicker to market.
      Vbitrate
      Reply 12 Votes I'm Undecided
      • Wrong

        Microsoft has adopted the right courses, it mained its P.C. dominance and it was on Mobile long before the rest, the internal fiefdoms were against the development of Windows Mobile, Zune and KIN which made them slower to adapt to the swiftly changing enviroments, Microsoft did it better than any other company, Windows Vista was way ahead of its time, in reality Windows 7 IS Windows Vista, only under a different name (yep, it's the Mojave experiment all over again), the differences between 8 and 8.1 (Blue) are bigger.

        Microsoft's main problems, their lack of unity was solved under Ballmer, in order to be more successful Microsoft needs a C.E.O. who'll be loyal in keeping their products, not selling-/spinning-off Bing, Xbox, M.S.N. and other divisions for short-term profits, Microsoft needs someone who believes in the seamless interconnectivity of EVERYTHING in and under the Cloud.

        A Redmond (wo)man is best fit for this job, not an outsider.
        Taizong Yuan
        Reply 10 Votes I'm Undecided
  • Only with the right insider

    Microsoft has grown to the point that there are insiders who really have not seen any other culture than Redmond's. In my opinion Sinofsky was one of these and was part of the problem. I have to vote yes, because the problems are deep and need someone who understands the situation. I want to vote no since many of those near the top are the cause of much of the problems. That is why I want the right insider, since it is way to likely that some of the boot lickers near the top will become the next golden boy (like Sinofsky) for an outsider.
    oldsysprog
    Reply 7 Votes I'm for Yes
    • Yep

      As long as it's not Elop, 'cause,
      ELOP = FLOP.
      Taizong Yuan
      Reply 2 Votes I'm Undecided
  • I like Microsoft's Vision

    and I would hate for that vision to change with somebody who is only looking out for the bottom line. Someone from the outside might not get it. Microsoft has had a few failed products but they are an extremely profitable company and if they stay the course they will stay profitable. I have a Windows Phone 8 and a convertible touch screen laptop and 3 desktops and one android tablet (Nexus 7) The only reason I don't have a Surface RT is the Nexus. It is that good. Windows 8 is a great product misunderstood :-(
    bvonr
    Reply 11 Votes I'm for No
    • ...

      I completely agree with you, I've been trying to explain this to others for a long time.
      Taizong Yuan
      Reply 5 Votes I'm Undecided
  • Not is it the question...

    Be of inside or not, not is it the question, should the new MSFT CEO syntonize with the company and to its employees, should somebody to be that he knows the world of the soft. and of the hard. and be ahead to the technological changes that are to come. Will Be Pat Gensilger of VMware?
    luis river
    Reply 12 Votes I'm Undecided
  • MSFT should hire an ex-insider outsider

    Elop fits in that mold, but I'd be open to hear about other strong candidates.
    erichon99
    Reply 19 Votes I'm Undecided
  • It'll be some cost-cutting "turnaround expert"

    Look, Harris, anybody currently at Microsoft is part of the problem. And Hess, without Steve Jobs zombie powder, where are they going to find somebody with enough vision and charisma to turn the company around? You think somebody like Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos would touch Microsoft with a 10 foot radiation hazard suit?
    Vesicant
    Reply 13 Votes I'm Undecided