Debian 7.0 Wheezy: Hands on with a pre-release build

Summary: UEFI and GPT are OK, Secure Boot not quite yet, according to my exploration of a recent pre-release build.

The next release of Debian GNU/Linux, 7.0 or "Wheezy", is less than a week away now — so I decided to take one last look at a pre-release build. 

My intention was to see how it looks and works in general, how it gets on with installation on various systems of mine, and whether and how it is working with GPT partitioning, UEFI BIOS, and Secure Boot. 

For this test, I downloaded the netinst image of the daily build on Saturday, 27 April. There are a lot of ISO images to choose from when downloading Debian; I generally take the net installer image because it is the smallest download and it gives me the most flexibility when installing.

Once the release is out and stable, there will probably be Live images available again, but Debian tends to be rather conservative in generating these, so it might be a while before they show up.

All of the Debian ISOs are "hybrid" images, so you can copy them to a USB flash drive with dd, or, of course, you can burn them to blank CD or DVD media as appropriate.

The first bit of good news about Debian 7.0 is that booting and installation works just fine with UEFI BIOS and GPT disk partitions. Secure Boot doesn't seem to work yet, with either the netinst ISO image or with the final installed system, but I suppose that might be because this is a pre-release daily build — I suspect that the final release will work with Secure Boot, and of course I will confirm that as soon as it is available.

On Legacy (DOS) BIOS systems, it boots and installs with no problem, of course.

The default Debian installation is a Gnome 3 desktop:

Debian Gnome 3
Debian GNU/Linux 7.0 Gnome 3 applications menu. (Image: Screenshot by Steve Ranger/ZDNet)

Unfortunately, I had a problem on the first couple of systems that I installed it on because they were both AMD/ATI laptop/netbook systems with Radeon graphic controllers — Acer Aspire One 522 and 725 systems.

On one of them, the X display server wouldn't even start, so I could only get a text console login, and on the other, it started, but Gnome complained that the graphic capability wasn't good enough, so it fell back to Gnome Classic.

In both cases, the problem was that the X server didn't recognize and associate the graphic controller with the FOSS Radeon controller. Rather than try to track that down, I decided to install the latest proprietary Radeon drivers from AMD, and that solved the problem quite nicely on both of them.

I still don't care much for Gnome 3, although I am slowly getting used to it (and using it bothers me a lot less than trying to use Unity). Debian includes a variety of other popular desktops in their repositories, I decided to add KDE and see how that went. To do this, you can use Synaptic if you prefer a GUI interface, or apt-get if you're a command-liner, and load the package kde-full, which is a meta-package that includes everything needed for a KDE installation.

Debian KDE
The Debian KDE Desktop

Finally, it is important to remember that Debian includes no proprietary software in the base distribution, and that includes firmware "blobs", which are necessary to operate some wi-fi cards.

That affected my old Fujitsu Lifebook S6510 with an Intel 5100 wi-fi controller, and my new Acer Aspire One 725 with a Broadcom 4313 wi-fi controller.

In summary, the upcoming Debian 7.0 release is looking very good. It is not a "one size fits all, install-and-go" release, in large part because of the omission of all proprietary software.

If you want to use it on systems that require such non-FOSS drivers or firmware, you will have to deal with that yourself — but there are lots and lots of descriptions available for how to do that for common devices, so a little bit of searching and reading will take care of that in most cases.

Topics: Linux, Open Source, Operating Systems

J.A. Watson

About J.A. Watson

I started working with what we called "analog computers" in aircraft maintenance with the United States Air Force in 1970. After finishing miliary service and returning to University, I was introduced to microprocessors and machine language programming on Intel 4040 processors. After that I also worked on, operated and programmed Digital Equipment Corportation PDP-8, PDP-11 (/45 and /70) and VAX minicomputers. I was involved with the first wave of Unix-based microcomputers, in the early '80s. I have been working in software development, operation, installation and support since then.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

9 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • why stick with gnome/gtk

    I am actually curious why so many people are insistent on still using Gnome/GTK based DE's. For me it was simply that I didn't like the original KDE 4.0, and never bothered to try again until a few months ago. Its just so superior now in every way, in my opinion.
    willyampz
    • Personal Preference?

      I tried KDE and for me it felt dated and full of old tired UI contructs. Gnome 3 is in my opinion a fresh new UI different for all the right reasons is it perfect? no, but its pretty close and usualbe without modification right out of the box in most cases. Right now I manage RPM based distros so i use FC 18. if i were to manage debian based distros i would use Debian over say Ubuntu everytime.
      ammohunt
    • Curiosity, Good Enough and Laziness

      Personally, I generally leave whatever the "default/standard" desktops are in a distribution alone, first because I am too lazy to change them, second because I am curious about what they are doing, how they work and what it is like to use them, and third because in most cases they are "good enough" for my use. In the specific case of Gnome 3 I have found that I have grown to like it more as time passes, both because the developers have improved it and also because I've gotten used to some of the underlying concepts.

      I have done the same with several of the other most common Linux desktops, and to be perfectly honest the only one that I still absolutely can't stand, which drives me crazy to try to use, is Unity. Oh well...

      Thanks for reading and commenting.

      jw
      j.a.watson@...
  • I'm guessing that Debian 8.0

    will be called "George"?
    William Farrel
    • Not quite...

      It will be called "Jessie".

      jw
      j.a.watson@...
  • Question

    How would you compare this, in every day use, to the more mainstream distros? Would this be a better option than Ubuntu, Fedora, or OpenSUSE for the average consumer? Also, any information on Wayland in Debian?
    Michael Alan Goff
  • My Opinion on Debian

    My opinion is that Debian is a mainstream distro. It is very usable as a desktop. I have been using it since Squeeze was released. I really liked Gnome 2 (and I am not trying to open a can of worms here), but I switched to XFCE. I am legally blind and also use Compiz and its enhanced desktop zoom. If you want Compiz in Wheezy, you will have to hook up the Sid repo as Compiz was removed from Wheezy due to a lack of a package manager from what I was told a few months back.

    Also, I installed with a software RAID 1 in my laptop and it is working flawlessly. I have been running Wheezy for a few months now and no issues here...
    danhartaz
    • One last thought

      I left out that I have used Mint and Ubuntu in the past. Each distro has their strengths and weaknesses. For me, I liked the stability of Debian as well as being a rolling release.I am using my machine primarily for web development and have Apache, MySQL, and PHP installed for testing. Mint and Ubunty are stable, but they are using more bleeding edge package versions than I like to use. If I want a newer version of a package, I can alsways go to Sid, and soon to be Jesse for a more up to date version of that package.
      danhartaz
      • hm

        is it rolling?
        aleksanderffs