Does Apple really have an identity crisis? Nope
Summary: Since nearly everyone is hosed on Apple shares, the handwringing and conspiracy theories are ramping over the company's prospects.
Apple's earnings season has quickly devolved into absurdity season as handwringing over everything from CEO Tim Cook's tenure to iPhone sales to whether the company is more hardware than software is in play.
Why? It's amazing what happens when Wall Street's hottest stock tumbles and drags mutual fund managers, retirement accounts, Apple fan boys, individual investors and a few others along with it. Oh the agony! Let's get real: Everyone owns Apple shares. Even if you hate the company, some index or mutual fund owns Apple so you do indirectly. The bell at Apple's peak was rung with all that $1 trillion market cap talk and then the company and its lack of product launches took over from there.

The worries about Apple are getting downright silly:
- The Wall Street Journal chronicles Apple's hardware vs. software identity crisis: Apple doesn't worry about hardware and software and how it's valued, but Wall Street does. In fact, Apple does both and frankly the company was always valued as a tweener even as the stock hit its peak. Apple isn't Dell. And Apple isn't Microsoft. It integrates hardware and software and controls a great ecosystem. Funny how this identity thing wasn't an issue just a few months ago.
- There's a campaign against Cook. First, the reports of this alleged campaign are mostly based on a whisper campaign by Doug Kass, an entertaining and insightful hedge fund manager. Spare me. If you think Cook is a poor choice, you try being the next act after Steve Jobs.
- Nefarious forces are driving Apple shares lower. This argument is based on the idea that Wall Street somehow has it out for Apple. Exhibit A in this diabolical plan is Kass and his tweets about Cook. If you think Kass could really move institutional investors, I have a bridge to sell you.
So here's the reality: Everybody and their mom bought into the Apple story. When you buy a stock at its peak, you convince yourself that the good times will always last. A company with $156.5 billion in revenue in fiscal 2012 was supposed to hit an estimated $179.16 billion in fiscal 2013 revenue and then march on to $200.9 billion in fiscal 2014 without any hiccups. Along the way, Apple would reinvent TV and get another revenue pillar.

It all sounds so plausible for Apple except for the supply and demand dynamics of the company's stock. Simply put, there is no one else to buy shares of Apple. Everyone is on board. No one can believe they bought a stock that's flailing. And now everyone is trapped assuming investors are still hanging on. Enter all the handwringing.
The scary part is that a lot of folks probably think today's dynamic with Apple shares is new. Cisco in the dot-com bubble had a similar issue. Financial history is littered with super star tech stocks that go pop — as Research in Motion/BlackBerry. From time to time, the market revalues a company's prospects and sometimes you're on the wrong side of the trade.
Here's Cisco's ride from the dot-com bust to now.

What has changed about Apple amid this revaluation of shares? Nothing. Apple is a bit slow with its product launches, but has time. Apple also knows it has high expectations to hit so can't enter the market with crap (see Apple Maps). Apple is doing the rational thing: milking its existing products as it plots out its product roadmap. Keep in mind that the iPod launched in 2001, iTunes in 2003, iPhone in 2007 and the iPad in 2010. In other words, Apple is due for a new product line, but not way overdue.
In the end, it's worth asking who really has the identity crisis and patience problem. Here's a hint: It ain't Apple.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Not so sure
I'd say not.
On some topics I love to be wrong ;-)
Even the iPad is just a giant iPod/iPhone ...
Disagree
APPL need innovative products ... and charisma.
Cook doesn't fit the bill, on present showing.
Hence the nervousness.
AAPL not APPL!
if you're trying to be sophisticated and throwing around stockcodes, at least get it right!
maybe the price crashed because all the iSheep couldn't find the AAPL stock to buy! haha
Apple Still Hiding Behind the Wizard's RDF Curtain!!!
Far from the truth and the only real genius left at Apple was recently fired. That being the other genius from NeXT Computing they got when Steve got hired back at Apple. None other than the genius behind OS X using NeXTStep OS as the GUI for it's user interface. The only thing these two Apple misfits didn't get when working on OS X and iOS was a new file system to replace (not just run on top of it) aging archaic old HFS+!
Like 'Tide' Detergent..... with it's perennial ""NEW Improved"" different color label on the box, Apple is just hoping you all won't notice that it's the same old legacy API's and Frameworks devoid of 'Pervasive Multi-Threading" system wide task management running on all Apple's devices today. It's their Archiles Heel coming back to haunt them over not ever doing what they should have done long ago; KILL BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY w/ IT'S LEGACY APPLE MAC SYSTEM API'S!!! ....and the gangrene is finally showing up as it's inability to run Pervasive Multi-threading, Multi-Tasking, Multi-Screen Features it's competitors have had for ages.
Instead..... Apple settled for their "Preemptive Task Management". Which is just a provocative term for suspending one task to run another. It's all they have for iOS, since they chose not to license ZFS from Sun, after the CEO announced Apple would be taking a license to it. Steve just couldn't stand the fact they couldn't just rename it the iFile System as their own creation! .......now that Old Legacy Archilles Heel is coming back to kick them in the arse, in the not too distant future. Along with the fact they kept the wrong guy in firing Scott Forestall and Sir Jony 'come lately' Ive - invented everything and Steve & Scott just took all the credit! ;-P ....nothing new under the sun, that Apple claim they Re-Invented or Invented it in the first place!!!
lipstick OS
ZFS would have brought it into the 21st century, but they killed that idea.
Hell, we don't need R&D, we have a massive PR department!
we still have Apple.com stating that OSX is the world's most advanced desktop OS and that iOS is the world's most advanced mobile OS.
That's enough to fool the isheep, but any developer will simply laugh at it.
Apple doesn't have an identity crisis, it has a systematic crisis where pride overrides common sense and Apple's aversion to license good technological standards and instead invent their own protocol and standards so they don't have to pay for it and allow them to patent their own half baked technologies and not share.
This results in their pig with lipstick technology.
Apple had no choice...
Of course, not entering that smaller market would have been worse because, Apple couldn't risk potential fans finding out that Android is a more capable Tablet OS.
Apple fans are loyal to a fault. They do not buy on price ...
Android fans, on the other hand, buy on price, as do many Windows fan.
The enterprise buys on price/performance, ROI, TCO, whatever you want to call it - which is why Apple cannot gain any traction in the enterprise.
Really?
The only thing you got right in your comment is that enterprise buys on price/performance, ROI, TCO. And Apple has been winning there for quite a while.
Winning TCO?
I would like evidence on your second and third points
That sounds like
Alternate reality?
Care to trump up some fiction to support your 3x froth?
Apple offers Good TCO and ROI - words from Idiots
I would have to disagree "cannot gain any traction in the enterprise."
Most people listen to HYPE, not look at true value
SAP shop
Apple IS Gaining In Enterprise
This coming from a person just stating the facts.
The myth of spending on style.
It reflects the fact that most people that buy Apple are technologically interested but technically backward.
They don't like being shamed by their inabilities or the failings of their equipment.
Rgiht