Does your email address say you're a rube?
Summary: Opinions are often formed by many subtle factors. Can your email address sink you in the eyes of the tech glitteratti?
Let's say you're looking for a job as a social media manager. You've sent out query emails to a bunch of likely companies. Obviously, the subject line of the email is important. Byt what about your email address?
Opinions are often formed by many subtle factors. A social media manager has to be well-connected, and certainly seem current on all the new technologies and trends. You might have a good Klout rating, you might have a lot of Facebook friends, and you might even have four or five digits worth of Twitter followers.
But can your email address sink you in the eyes of the tech glitteratti?
Let's do a simple test. Here are six email addresses. Think fast. What are your first impressions?
- dloudon22@gmail.com
- dloudon22@cfl.rr.com
- dloudon22@aol.com
- dickloudon@facebook.com
- dloudon22@greenmtnbb.net
- dick@dickloudon.com
dloudon22@gmail.com
Let's take them one-by-one. The first email address, dloudon22@gmail.com, seems perfectly normal. The only red flag is the idea that there are 22 other dloudons, and perhaps you weren't creative enough to come up with a unique name. You lose a point, but you still seem reasonably current. On the other hand, if you'd used beerlover@gmail.com or marysdad@gmail.com, it would seem even more unprofessional.
The gmail address is safe enough.
dloudon22@cfl.rr.com and dloudon22@greenmtnbb.net
These are clearly ISP-provided email addresses. These definitely show you as a rube, because you'd have to change your email address if you move. It doesn't demonstrate that you care deeply about your email address. You just took what you were given.
ISP email addresses lose points.
dloudon22@aol.com
This email address says you're a bed and breakfast owner from the eighties, perhaps someone's grandfather, or at the very least an out-of-touch father-in-law. You're someone who's always calling for help with your computer, someone who is terribly excited by MagicJack, and someone who really enjoys posting pictures of your yard tools up on Facebook.
You're completely out of touch. No one will hire you.
dickloudon@facebook.com
You're clearly into this whole Facebook thing, and as a social media manager, that's not a bad idea. But you're probably too into Facebook. You've probably maxed out your Facebook friends, and you probably follow them all, reading every last update. Worse, you're on a first-name basis with every Zynga character, and you spend half your salary on in-game purchases of extra radishes so your farm will grow faster.
You're too risky.
dick@dickloudon.com
If your prospective hiring manager or client can't go to dickloudon.com and see a site that describes you, with examples of your work, and probably a pithy blog, you shouldn't have this email address. But if you've filled out your self-promotional space properly (and that probably also means you're @dickloudon on Twitter), then you're probably quite a good candidate for the gig.
You know how to register a domain, set up a site, promote yourself, and do it tastefully.
Does your email address say you're a rube?
So does your email address say you're a rube? What about dick22@hotmail.com or dickloudon@outlook.com? Or dickloudon23242@yahoo.com?
An email address alone isn't enough to kill your chances, but every little impression matters. Outlook.com is probably going to pick up quite nicely. Yahoo.com means you're just too cheap to get a real email address and not bright enough to get a gmail address. Hotmail.com means you're probably a spammer.
Don't make yourself crazy about your email address, but do keep in mind that it's part of your overall branding as a professional. If you have any questions, you can contact me at cookiemonster@hotasballs.com.
P.S. There really is at least one real-world Dick Loudon. The domain dickloudon.com redirects to a bio page for a real estate agent named Dick Loudon. Leave the nice man alone.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Hotmail.com is an interesting one
Hotmail has been able to compete with Gmail for several years now and Outlook.com largely exists to vanquish the poor Hotmail name (similar to Win7 did for Vista) and allow Microsoft to show off the features already part of Hotmail too.
Personally I think "Hotmail", you're either A: on the ball and know Hotmail is a first rate e-mail provider or B: Don't have a clue and flipped a coin over choosing Yahoo or Hotmail a decade ago.
People who still use ISP locked e-mail addresses, definitely give me a negative reaction. The same goes for Yahoo. At least AOL offers IMAP.
p.s - No one uses @facebook.com. I've never seen them used once, despite Facebook still trying to push them.
Re: Hotmail
I chose HoTMaiL...
That said, it is still a good service, if a little tainted by its middle years.
Oops
Yahoo! gets a bad rap
I have had my Yahoo! email address since about 1994, if memory serves. I did accidentally clean it all out using Eudora around 2002, but I have every email I've ever sent or received (just about), in [i]every[/i] account I have, consolidated in that Yahoo! mailbox. I generate about 500 MB of email every three months nowadays, and that number is going up; my mailbox is approximately 25 gigs at this point. That makes Yahoo! mail a fantastic archive. And it's free.
Neither gmail nor Hotmail can touch that. Besides, it does everything email should do (that is, send and receive messages). What more does anyone need?
spam
Spam vs. greymail
Totally manageable, though, and definitely not worth giving up an address I've had for almost two decades.
Yahoo mail
On the other hand, I despise Gmail's online interface. I do have a Gmail address because I was forced into using one for GooglePlay--and I only use it for GooglePlay.
Perhaps, the rube is the one who assumes that using something popular (Gmail) connotes technical savvy. The only person in my circle who bothers with Gmail for their main account is my (very non-technical) mother-in-law (who only got it because her best friend was using it).
Who sold me?
GMail makes this really easy
Give papajohn your roberthahn+papajohn@gmail.com address. No fiddling around creating new email addresses each time you want to do this.
Caveat: Very rarely, some systems don't accept '+' in an email address.
Says more about the commentator
Ultimately, all you're saying is people have found a new way to look down on people. My email is better than your email. Great, I'm so glad we've progressed this far!
Don't call me Shirley
But it doesn't matter if Hotmail or AOL or even Yahoo have the slickest interface ever. The point of the article is what sort of connotation it might have in the eyes of one who might have opinions of such things. Once upon a time, ISP email address probably got the most favored response since it indicated you were more savvy than customers of mass-market providers and had enough regard for your email than to trust it with a cheesy web provider. Google pretty much changed this, and early this year, I switch ISPs for the first time in a dozen years and experienced the pain of moving (but having a long-standing gmail account, it wasn't a terribly difficult transition).
I do own my own domain (mylastname.org) but I never developed it. If I was going for the kind of job the article suggests, I would probably do so. Otherwise, firstname@lastname.org is a mailbox I rarely check, and never give out...too much of a "vanity" address to be of practical use.
Filters work both ways
Reminds me of The Five Man Electrical Band
Email address
I have some bad news for you Dick...
So like it or not, your address WILL evoke a negative reaction to one sensitive to such details, even if it is subconscious. This does not mean they are someone you wouldn't want to work for, but it does mean you are potentially throwing away some credibility and offering your competitors (and the job market is very competitive) an advantage. If I were you, I'd strongly suggest using a gmail account for professional purposes if nothing else.
I must say...
So yes, I think it's entirely appropriate that you still use an AOL account.
That was my first thought
I agree!
AOL