EU shrugs off e-petition hijack fears

Summary: Lobbyists attempting to take advantage of European citizen e-petitions will be blocked by safeguards in the petitioning process, according to the European Commission.Public-relations firms including Bell Pottinger and Fleishman-Hillard have offered to use the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) — an e-petition programme — to lobby the European Commission on behalf of corporations, in breach of ECI rules, according to a report by the Independent on Tuesday.

Lobbyists attempting to take advantage of European citizen e-petitions will be blocked by safeguards in the petitioning process, according to the European Commission.

Public-relations firms including Bell Pottinger and Fleishman-Hillard have offered to use the European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) — an e-petition programme — to lobby the European Commission on behalf of corporations, in breach of ECI rules, according to a report by the Independent on Tuesday.

European Commission

The EU has said it is prepared for lobbyists who may try to take advantage of a new citizen e-petition scheme to push their own agenda.

However, the European Commission told ZDNet UK that it was prepared for lobbyists — including NGOs and environmental organisations — to try to use the ECI to influence policy. Safeguards such as rules on geographical distribution of petitioners would prevent undue influence on European legislation, Antony Gravili, spokesman for EC vice-president Maros Sefcovic, told ZDNet UK on Tuesday.

"We're not naive... We assumed in designing the initiative that this could be a problem," said Gravili. "We're not going to accept an invitation for a proposal from a private lobbying firm — or from the TUC, or from Greenpeace."

The ECI programme opened for signature collection on 1 April, according the ECI website. To be considered by the Commission, petitions must reach a threshold of signatories from different member states. For example, 54,000 signatures must be collected from the UK, and 74,250 must come from Germany.

Gravili said that individual citizens from at least seven different European Union member states had to form a committee to propose a petition, and that committee funding had to be transparent.

Gravili conceded that it was feasible that a lobbying firm or organisation could co-ordinate individuals in Europe to launch a petition, but said that a petition needed a million signatures to be considered by the Commission as a basis for legislation. Organisations would be unlikely to be able to mobilise a million affiliates — the sheer number of required signatories would stop niche influence of European policy, said Gravili.

"[The citizen committee] has to have full transparency about where its funding is coming from," said Gravili. "After one million signatures have been gathered, it's still for the Commission to decide whether to bring forward legislation."

The Commission will not check the affiliations of signatories, leaving organisations "somehow manag[ing] to wrangle" the launch of a petition as a feasible option, said Gravili. Nevertheless, if a petition gets a million signatures, this indicates a groundswell of support, said Gravili.

Individuals from NGOs and environmental organisations have been more active in lobbying the European Commission than PR companies, Gravili added.

"Greenpeace and NGOs are far more active than private lobbying firms," Gravili said.

Bell Pottinger and Fleishman-Hillard had not responded to a request for comment at the time of writing.

Topic: Security

About

Tom is a technology reporter for ZDNet.com. He covers the security beat, writing about everything from hacking and cybercrime to threats and mitigation. He also focuses on open source and emerging technologies, all the while trying to cut through greenwash.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Thanks for reporting on this. However, something you got wrong is the use of the term "petition" in the context of the European Citizens' Initiative. There is indeed a petition tool available to individuals or groups in the EU vis-a-vis the European Parliament. But the European Citizens' Initiative is a completly different process more in line with an electoral process just available to eligible voters. So please do not mix up these two very different participative processes as this makes it very difficult to most people to understand the various requirement and opportunities linked to those..
    brunokaufmann
  • Its sad to think that the 'so called' democratic process offered to the masses has now been hijacked and watered down with dubious legislation that effectively makes it totally ineffective. The entire EU demographic suggests that as a result of our historic differences in culture and attitudes towards other people and our toleranceof our European neighbours we will differ dramatically on numerous issues. So when we Brits object to GMO's it is totally unfair to dismiss our concerns as being too localised when we Brits are a totally different race to the rest of Europe. Besides we are an island so we are already marginalised here.
    So what you might think? Well if I was to try and raise the profile of an issue I would find it personally very difficult without recourse to some group like Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth to co-ordinate the collection of the signatures. I have neither the resources nor the money to fund such an endeavour and because of this I am being unfairly denied a voice.
    It is totally impossible to have several disparate groups acting separately collecting signatures for one issue when the next clever 'get out of jail card' the commissioners will pull out of the hat is 'Sorry but you are all different petitioners and your individual signature totals are less than 1 million so we are not going to even entertain the petition'.
    So much for 54,000 signatures from Britain and 74,250 from Germany actually counting together towards a meaningful democratic outcome or for anything else for that matter.

    Oh and lets not forget that the EU commissioners are unelected officials. I say until they are properly elected by the people of the individual member states of Europe they should stand down immediately without pay until they are officially elected by the people in a conclusive vote of not less than a 75% majority and not less than a 90% electorate turnout and 100% of those casting a vote. Now how about a petition on that idea anyone? :)
    Kev-C