File-sharers' details can be handed over for smallest of infringements, Germany rules

File-sharers' details can be handed over for smallest of infringements, Germany rules

Summary: Germany's top court has ruled that ISPs must hand over the names and addresses of file sharers if rights holders ask for them – regardless of how much music has been shared.

TOPICS: Legal, Piracy, EU

Germany's Federal Court of Law, the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), has ruled that users of file-sharing sites have no right to remain anonymous, regardless of how much – or little – music they share.

The ruling comes in the case of Naidoo Records vs Deutsche Telekom. Naidoo Records had requested that the German ISP hand over the names and addresses of users of an IP address behind the illegal file-sharing of a piece of music, a new album by German song writer Xavier Naidoo.

The local courts in Cologne - first the Landgericht Köln then the superior court Oberlandesgericht Köln - refused Naidoo Records' request, saying that the breach of copyright would need to be on a commercial scale before the ISP could share the identity of the IP address owner.

The BGH has now overturned the local courts' decisions, ruling that Naidoo Records' request should be granted. The court decided that a breach of the law is sufficient for the details to be handed over, and the question of whether the breach was on a commercial scale or not is not relevant.

The rights holder is entitled to compensation and an injunction if their copyright is infringed, the court ruled, regardless of the magnitude of the infringement.

The BGH's decision has generated strong reactions: Lars Klingbeil, spokesman for the opposition Social Democratic Party (SPD), has called for a revision of German copyright law, saying the BGH's position is in conflict with that of the German parliament. Klingbeil claims the parliament wants to only punish copyright infringements that occur on a commercial scale.

The German Department of Justice (Bundesjustizministerium) is currently working on a revision of the copyright law, but this has been delayed for years.

On the other side, the German music industry association Bundesverband Musikindustrie has welcomed the ruling.

Thanks to the BGH's decision, the association said, it will be easier to protect older music records: in the past, most German judges only allowed top 100 or new albums to be protected by the 'commercial scale' legislation.

Topics: Legal, Piracy, EU

Jakob Jung

About Jakob Jung

Jakob Jung holds a PhD. in history and American Studies. He has been writing for German IT publications for over twelve years for publications including CRN, InformationWeek, ZDNet, Heise, ECMGuide, Database Developer, Mobile Developer and Network Computing. His experience of being historian has been surprisingly good preparation for an IT career as nothing becomes obsolete as fast as the latest gadgets.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I agree with the ruling

    It would be absurd to prosecute small file sharers, but they are still breaking the law, and IP owners have the right to know who is illegally distributing their IP. Identifying information could be used, for example, by IP owners to blacklist customers or discipline employees who steal their IP, etc. There are ways to circumvent such things, but they make piracy more difficult, and convenience is one of the reasons many people do it.
  • Just another reason

    not to trust the cloud. You think that this ruling can't (or won't) be abused?
  • Bad news for German file sharers

    This is bad news for the file sharing scene in Germany. On the other hand, I'm happy to know that the American judiciary and legislature isn't the only one in the pockets of powerful media conglomerates. (Is that schadenfreude on my part? Hmm.)

    If the media companies make music affordable, available, and usable, then I think most of their file-sharing problems go away.
  • Did anyone say....

    GEMA ???? Sounds just like them....trying to make money and not having to pass any of it on to the artists.....