X
Government

First Gershon year cost contractors $147.5m

Reforms stemming from Sir Peter Gershon's review into the Federal Government technology use has cost local IT contracting companies combined losses of $147.5 million in their first year, the authors of a new study into the review have claimed.
Written by Renai LeMay, Contributor and  Josh Taylor, Contributor

Reforms stemming from Sir Peter Gershon's review into the Federal Government technology use has cost local IT contracting companies combined losses of $147.5 million in their first year, the authors of a new study into the review have claimed.

Longhaus Report

Impact assessment of the implementation of the ICT Reform Program on the ICT-contingent labour market (Credit: Longhaus)

The Gershon Review was released in October 2008, which contained, among other recommendations, the British efficiency expert's finding that the Federal Government needed to drastically reduce its reliance on outside IT contractors and improve its use of internal staff.

However, a report commissioned by the Information Technology Contract & Recruitment Association (ITCRA) and carried out by analyst firm Longhaus has found that such moves might have backfired, with the 324 companies servicing Canberra's public sector suffering as a result of the reforms.

"Since the implementation of the Gershon Review commenced, these firms have experienced combined averaged losses of $147,500,000 in the first year," the report states. "Should this trend continue for the 2010/11 period, then up to 146 companies servicing the Australian Government will be exposed to extreme financial hardship."

The report found that overall, there was a total ICT workforce of over 10,244 persons in the Federal Government — with about a third of that being contractors.

The recommendations of the Gershon report have seen "over 5500 person-years" of experience and intellectual property redistributed within the Australian Government ICT labour eco-system, according to Longhaus. The analyst firm's data, though, showed that neither side has been able to claim any benefit.

"Outside of the cost-cutting measures that Longhaus believes will provide little more than short-term impacts for the Australian Government, little quantifiable progress has been made on the systemic recommendations of the Gershon Review relating to improved governance, skills training and career planning at a centralised or whole-of-government level," the report states.

The report also claims that due to "limited evidence of skills development, ICT strategy and career planning activities by the Australian Government", as well as continued outsourcing, neither the government nor the ICT industry can claim to have benefited from this "5500 person-years" redistribution.

"Over 400 respondents indicated a net 9 per cent decrease in personal productivity indicating that despite a reduction and transfer of contractor labour there has been little pressure to increase workloads on the permanent APS staff," the report said.

It also found that the Gershon Review under-reported the contracting labour force in the Australian Government. Apart from the 3100 ICT contractors working for the Australian Government accounted by Gershon, Longhaus identified an additional 1500 contractors employed through third-party channels — such as consulting or outsourcing suppliers — that were not accounted for.

"This 1500 (or 15 per cent of overall ICT employees) represents a significant extra cost to government of at least $64 million per year that will continue to undermine the $100 million savings target of the government," the report highlighted.

To put together the report, Longhaus surveyed both IT labour suppliers and individual contractors. It received some 91 responses from the companies, and 423 responses from a population of about 10,000 federal government ICT workers — both contractors and permanent public servants.

The office of Finance and Deregulation Minister Linday Tanner — whose department has overall responsibility for delivering the Gershon reforms — has not yet responded to a request for comment on Longhaus' report.

Editorial standards